Effect of genotype on chicken growth trait
Table 1 shows the effect of chicken genotypes on growth traits. There exist significant variations in genotype with chicken growth. Kuroiler birds sustain significantly higher mean body weight (p<0.05) at various critical growth stages than naked neck chicken reared under same conditions. At 10th week of growth, Kuroiler birds attain highest (959.72±0.07a) mean body weight compared to Nigerian indigenous naked neck chicken (623.69±12.32b) at same age. The influence of chicken genotype on breast girth remains insignificant during early growth stages. However, as birds approaches 10th week, Kuroiler showed significantly higher mean breast girth (26.80±0.23 a) than naked neck chicken (20.51±0.18 b).
Table1. Effect of chicken genotype on growth trait
abc Mean with different superscripts on the same column are significantly different (p<0.05).
Wk=week, KLR=Kuroiler, NKN=Nigerian indigenous Naked neck, BG=Breast girth, BWT=body weight, N=Number of observations, g=grams and Cm= Centimeter.
Effect of sex on chicken growth trait
Table 2 presents the effect of sex on chicken growth parameters. Sex did not have significant effect on chicken growth traits at 2nd and 4th week. However, at 6th, 8th and 10th week of age, the males were generally superior (p<0.05) to females of both Kuroiler and Nigerian indigenous naked neck chickens in mean body weight and average breast girth measures subjected to same management profile.
Table2. Effect of sex on chicken growth trait
abc Mean with different superscripts on the same column are significantly different (p<0.05).
Wk=week, ♂=male, ♀=female, BG=breast girth, BWT=body weight, N=Number of observations, g=grams and Cm= Centimeter.
Effect of Sex and Genotype interaction on chicken growth traits
Table 3 show the effect of genotype and sex interaction on chicken growth parameters. Sex and chicken genotype combination showed no significance on early birds growth traits. When compared with respect to genotype and sex interactions, Kuroiler sexes differ significantly in breast size and body weight from naked neck sexes only at 8th and 10th weeks. At 8th week, mean breast girth of Kuroiler sexes were statistically alike (23.76±0.23a and 23.54±0.37a), similar observation was recorded for their mean body weight (809.41±21.76 a and 791.74±39.75 a). Also, at 10th week, both Kuroiler sexes weighed similar values (982.60±14.22a and 936.85±16.57a) but significantly heavier than naked neck male and females.
Table 3. Effect of sex and genotype interaction on chicken growth traits
abc Mean with different superscripts on the same column are significantly different (p<0.05).
Wk=week, KLR=Kuroiler, NKN = Nigerian indigenous Naked neck, ♂=male, ♀=female, BG=Breast girth, BWT=body weight and N= number of observations, g=grams and Cm= Centimeter.
Growth in farm animals reflects a biological increase in an animal’s size or mass over its lifetime. Superior growth performance of Kuroiler chicken breeds compared to Nigerian indigenous naked neck fowls observed in this study might be attributed to better genetic potential that exotic breeds have acquired over series of selection and multiple cross breeding have genetically improved their growth rate and production potentials. This reveals that the genetic constitution of Nigerian indigenous naked neck chickens is still intact has not yet undergone full gene mixing with exotic lines (Islam, 2009). The significant sex effect to on body weight and linear measurements at 6th to 10th week is in agreement with literature (Ajayi and Ejiofor, 2009). Heavier weight of male to female birds in this study is consistent with Odah et al. (2019) who also reported differential growth rate among indigenous chicken population of Bekwarra, Southern Nigeria. This result also agree favorably with previous reports of variation in growth pattern within species (Deeb and Lamont, 2002) and comparable with the findings of Ajayi and Ejiofor, (2009) for Ross and Anak Broiler Strains reared in the high rainforest zone of Nigeria and Madilindi et al., (2018) for broiler chickens kept in subtropical South Africa environment. Superior male weights in this report might resulted from better feed consumption abilities and high level of testosterone secretions in males’ which influence growth dynamics of body parts not directly associated with muscles mass, reproduction and sexual development (Lawrence and Fowler, 2002).
Sexual dimorphism in favour of males observed in both genotypes in this report is consistent with Adeleke, (2005) and Isidahomen et al., (2012) who also revealed differential growth pattern in chickens. The difference observed in growth rate for Kuroiler and Nigerian indigenous naked neck chicken is an indication that there exist variation in their growth pattern, attributed to strain differences and birds genetics. High significant difference in genotype and sex interaction of Kuroiler breeds and Nigerian indigenous naked neck fowls agreed is inline with the reports of (Ajayi and Ejiofor, 2009; Razuki et al., 2011) who also observed significant genotype and sex interaction on body weight of Ross and Anak Broiler Strains. This however differ from the results of Ojedapo et al. (2008) who showed no significance in genotype and sex interaction on chicken body weight. The variations in mean body weight and breast girth measurements of chicken genotypes with age in this study can be attributed to genetic make-up, sexual dimorphism, age and bird physiology because organs and tissue functions determines general body development Adedeji et al. (2006).
In conclusion, the chickens exhibited differential growth patterns, attributable to genetic composition and strain differences. Kuroiler revealed superior growth rate and performance relative to Nigerian indigenous naked neck chickens. Introduction of Kuroiler strains and subsequent crossbreeding with Nigerian indigenous naked neck birds might improve their performance and adaptability.