Exploring the multi-dimensional influencing factors associated with sub-health status for residents: a cross-sectional study from China

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.19224/v1

Abstract

Background: The high incidence of sub-health and its impact on life and work have attracted wide attention. Sub-health status has been studied in China; however, there remains a lack of studies on multi-dimensional factors affecting sub-health status. This study aims to explore the sub-health status of residents, and its influencing factors in Zhuhai city of Guangdong Province of China.

Methods: Data were originated from the baseline survey of Zhuhai WHO Healthy Cities Index System in 2015, which was a cross-sectional study for the influencing factors associated with sub-health status. Finally, 3,313 participants aged 16-65 years were recruited. The study used the Sub-health Measurement Scale (SHMS V1.0), and the multivariate logistic regression model was to examine their possible associations with sub-health status. Data were analyzed using the SPSS version 22.0.

Results: Sub-health and non-sub-health groups accounted for 56.8% and 43.2% of the study population, respectively. There existed significant differences in terms of all items of SHMS V1.0 between the two groups. In the multivariate model, the place of residence was statistically significantly associated with sub-health, followed by having many close neighbors, relatives or friends, and happy feelings.

Conclusion: There are significant differences in many items of SHMS V1.0 between sub-health and non-sub-health groups. The leading determinants of sub-health included place of residence; having close neighbors, relatives or friends; having happy feelings; and negative emotions. To develop an effective sub-health intervention program, these factors should be taken into consideration. To develop an effective sub-health intervention program, the influencing factors should be taken into consideration.

Background

In recent years, the concept of human health has gradually been broadened on account of the changes in the disease spectrum and medical model. Apart from such health indicators as morbidity, mortality and life expectancy, attention has been paid to physical, psychological, and social health status [1, 2]. In other words, the concern has been transitioned from disease to health. In 1946, the World Health Organization (WHO) first defined health as a “state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.” Since the 1980s, many scholars have proposed that more individuals were in the intermediate state between health and illness, which is called the third state by WHO. In China, it is often called the sub-health state [3]. Sub-health is related to physical, psychological, and social imbalances, leading to lower physical health and energy, lower cognitive and emotional performance, as well as less social interaction and support [4]. According to a global survey carried out by the WHO, only 5% of the global citizens are truly healthy, whereas 75% of them are in the sub-health state. Moreover, it is estimated that six million people in America and 37 million people in Australia are in the sub-health state every year; In addition, 35% of 1,000 white-collar workers participating in a survey in Japan had sub-health conditions [5]. More studies in other countries have focused on exploring the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) - the main sign of sub-health. The diagnostic criteria of CFS has been established, and dynamic follow-up studies have been conducted in many regions [69]. However, studies on determinants of sub-health tend to pay more attention to causes of CFS, and most of them only examined a single factor. For instance, a study by He et al. pointed out a close physiological association between cerebral vascular control and skeletal muscle pH management, and neurological disorders may play a role in the development of CFS [10]. Wang et al. showed that the biosynthetic pathway of monoamine neurotransmitters may be related to the clinical features of CFS, and those genetic factors played an important role in the occurrence of CFS [11]. In recent years, there have been some improvements in the conduct of studies on determinants of sub-health in China; nevertheless, they have been mainly focused on mental health. This indicates a lack of studies on multi-dimensional sub-health. Based on the changes in the concept of human health, we conducted this study with the aim to explore sub-health status and its determinants of Zhuhai residents in Guangdong Province, thereby providing suggestions for an effective sub-health intervention program and the making of health policy by health administration departments.

Methods

Study Design and Data Source

The data were originated from the baseline survey of Zhuhai WHO Healthy Cities Index System in 2015. Zhuhai city is located in the south-central Guangdong Province with a population of approximately 1.89 million. In 2018, its gross domestic product per capita reached 2,914.74 billion Yuan, ranking ninth in the province [12]. Considering its geographic and jurisdictional diversity, a stratified cluster sampling method was adopted. All six districts in Zhuhai were involved in the study. Furthermore, we selected eight sampled towns from all the 15 towns using the probability proportional to size (PPS) method. After that, we randomly selected 109 communities in eight sampled towns. Finally, this study recruited 3,487 participants aged 16-65 years in Zhuhai city. All of them were asked to sign an informed consent document after being introduced about the purpose of the study. We sent out and then collected 3,487 questionnaires, of which only 3,323 were valid for analysis (the valid rate was 95.3%). The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Zhuhai Health and Family Planning Commission.

The Sub-health Measurement Scale (SHMS V1.0) (Table 1) that we used in this study was developed by the Southern Medical University using the Delphi method, item analysis and selection method [13]. This tool was proved by previous studies to be reliable and valid [14, 15]. It reflected the health of participants for the last four weeks. The questionnaire includes three sub-scales, namely physical sub-health (PS), mental sub-health (MS), and social sub-health (SS). These sub-scales cover nine dimensions, including physical symptom (P1), organic function (P2), physical mobility function (P3), vitality (P4), positive emotion (M1), psychosocial symptom (M2), cognitive function (M3), social adaptability (S1), as well as social resource and social support (S2). It consists of 39 items, all of which use a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). The positive items include questions 1-3, 13-19 and 26-39 whose scores remain the same as the score of the selected option (1-5 points). Meanwhile, the score of any negative item is equal to 6 minus the score of the selected option. Except for the four general sub-health items (15, 28, 38, and 39), the total score of certain dimensions is the score of the corresponding sub-scale.

The higher the score, the better the health status. The maximum scores of PS, MS and SS, and overall sub-health are 70, 60, 45, and 175, whereas the minimum scores are 14, 12, 9, and 35, respectively. For the sake of making comparisons, we converted the raw scores into percentage scores. The thresholds in the three sub-scales of PS, MS and SS are 68, 67 and 67, respectively. When the scores of any of the three sub-scales are lower than the thresholds, the participants could be judged as sub-health, other judged as healthy state [16]. Therefore, the participants were assigned to non-sub-health group vs sub-health group.

Statistical Analysis

The study participants could select only one option for each questionnaire item. Any item with multiple options was considered invalid and therefore listed as a missing value. Data were entered twice independently by two data entry operators using EpiData version 3.1 and checked for inconsistencies in order to enhance accuracy. We used descriptive statistics to summarize characteristics of the study participants and presented the scores of SHMS V1.0 as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Variables demonstrating statistical significance (p<0.05) in the univariate analysis were then included into the multivariate logistic regression model to examine their possible associations with sub-health status. The outcome variable was treated as a nominal measure: non-sub-health vs sub-health. All analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0 for Windows (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY).

Results

Characteristics of Study Participants

Of the 3,313 study participants, males accounted for 49.0%, while females formed 51.0%. Those aged 45 years or above accounted for 36.7%, and 39.8% lived in urban areas. Only 14.5% reported having an undergraduate or higher degree, and 75.2% were married. In addition, the majority (68.6%) of the study participants had a monthly income of less than 5,000 Yuan. More than two-thirds (74.0%) of the participants exercised fewer than five times per week. 70.0% of them followed vegetarian and carnivorous diets (15.2% only vegetarian diets and 10.2% only carnivorous diets, respectively). Only 40.3% of the participants listened to mental health lectures.

In our study, 56.8% of the study participants experienced sub-health status, while the non-sub-health group made up 43.2%. Two groups showed differences in factors other than gender, marital status, monthly income, eating habits and listening to mental health lectures. Sub-health status was more likely to be found among participants who were between 25 and 34 years old, had lower education level, lived in urban areas, were engaged in other occupations, and exercised fewer than three times per week (Table 2).

Comparison of mean SHMS V1.0 scores between sub-health group and non- sub-health group

The sub-health group had a mean total score of 65.72±13.14 lower than that of the non-sub-health group (74.21±7.98). Besides, in both groups, the mean score in the PS was lower than that of either MS or SS, and the mean scores of P2 and P3 were higher. In the sub-health group, M3 of the MS had the lowest mean score (56.32±13.55), followed by S2 of the SS (56.82±12.55), and P1 of the PS (59.06±15.20). These results were also seen in the non-sub-health group. The sub-health group and the non-sub-health group were different from each other in terms of all items (Table 3).

Influencing factors of sub-health

Univariate analysis showed that the frequency of physical exercise per week, the place of residence, and all the 35 items of the SHMS V1.0 (except for the general sub-health item) were significantly associated with sub-health status. Meanwhile, the multivariate logistic regression model identified the place of residence as the leading determinant of sub-health (OR=1.60, 95% CI: 1.45-1.76), followed by having many close neighbors, relatives or friends (OR=1.31, 95% CI: 1.15-1.49) and having happy feelings (OR=1.29, 95% CI: 1.15-1.44). The frequency of physical exercise per week, appetite, gastrointestinal upset, difficulty in walking 3-5 stairs, negative emotions, memory, and interpersonal relationship also had a significant impact on sub-health (Table 4).

Discussion

Our results showed that sub-health residents in Zhuhai accounted for 56.8%. This figure was slightly lower than that in a study conducted by Sun et al. on sub-health residents in Guangdong Province [17]. This may result from the differences in their samples and questionnaires [18-20]. Our study found that the proportion of participants with sub-health status varied across different age groups. Previous studies indicated that middle-aged people were more likely to experience sub-health status since they were at a critical stage of their career (e.g. personal promotion) and personal life. They had to face up with a lot of problems relating to their interpersonal relationships, children’s education, economic pressure, and responsibility for taking care of elderly family members. All these might increase their exposure to physical and mental problems [21, 22]. In our study, the 25-34-year-olds constituted the highest proportion of all participants having sub-health conditions (27.4%). This means that the sub-health population tends to be younger, and therefore, more attention should be paid to them. In addition, better-educated participants were less likely to be vulnerable to sub-health. A possible explanation is that they had better healthcare-related knowledge, more effective psychological adjustment methods, and healthier lifestyles [23].

Sub-health status assessed by the SHMS V1.0

The PS score of the sub-health group was the lowest of all the three sub-scales. This indicated that physical sub-health was the key factor leading to sub-health status. The symptoms of physical sub-health include lack of energy, insomnia, bitter taste, headache, as well as pain in body parts, like waist and legs. This causes an individual more susceptible to diseases. In view of this situation, boosting the immunity system is the best way to defend against harmful infections and diseases, and promote good health [24, 25]. To have a better immune system, a person needs to pursue a healthy lifestyle that balances different aspects of life, including work, rest and physical activity, have a balanced diet, and consume recommended dietary supplements.

Determinants of sub-health

The multivariate regression model showed that the pace of residence had the greatest impact (OR=1.60) on sub-health status. Urban residents were more likely to be in a sub-health status. Since the economic reform in 1978, Chinese economy has been growing at a rapid pace, leading to greater urbanization. Environmental pollution derived from urban development, pressure relating to resource allocation, and social competition have posed a lot of health threats to urban residents [26].

Social support is the external support, whether material or spiritual, that an individual receives when facing a stressful event. In our study, individuals having no close neighbors, relatives and friends in the SS were at a higher risk of sub-health status (Many vs. None, OR=1.31). As an intermediary factor between stress and physical health, social support plays an important role in protecting an individual’s physical and mental health. Most scholars believed that unlike negative social relations, positive social support is beneficial to physical and mental health [27, 28]. Therefore, lack of social support is considered to be an important contributor to long-term fatigue existence of sub-health and dysfunction. Lower social support puts a person at a higher risk of having sub-health conditions. Our results also showed that the score of social resource and support in the sub-health group was lower than that in the non-sub-health group.

Emotion plays a crucial part in the occurrence and development of sub-health status. Happy feelings (Always vs. None, OR=1.29) and negative emotions or depression (None vs. Always, OR=1.28) in the MS were deemed as two other important factors leading to sub-health status. With the acceleration of modern social life, negative emotions usually include depression and stress. They may further develop into anxiety disorders and non-communicable diseases, seriously threatening human health unless timely interventions are implemented [29]. Psychological adjustment is an irreplaceable approach to solving sub-health problems through improving self-cultivation, establishing a positive outlook on life, and taking courage to face reality [30].

Other contributors to sub-health status included the frequency of physical exercise per week (Daily vs. None), appetite (Very good vs. Very poor), gastrointestinal upset (None vs. Always), walking 3-5 stairs (None vs. Very difficult), memory (Very good vs. Very poor), and interpersonal relationship (Very satisfied vs. Very unsatisfied).

Limitations of the study

Our study encountered two potential limitations. Firstly, as a cross-sectional study, it can result in the information bias of measuring the study outcome. Secondly, we only surveyed the participants in Zhuhai city on account of time and resource restrictions; hence, these findings may not be generalizable to other regions in Guangdong province. Further studies, therefore, need to be conducted with more statistical methods while taking our limitations into consideration.

Limitations of the study

Our study encountered two potential limitations. Firstly, as a cross-sectional study, it can result in the information bias of measuring the study outcome. Secondly, we only surveyed the participants in Zhuhai city on account of time and resource restrictions; hence, these findings may not be generalizable to other regions in Guangdong province. Further studies, therefore, need to be conducted with more statistical methods while taking our limitations into consideration.

Conclusion

The high incidence of sub-health and its impact on life and work have attracted wide attention. In our study, the sub-health group outnumbered the non-sub-health group (56.8% vs 43.2%). There existed significant differences in terms of all items of SHMS V1.0 between the two groups. The leading determinants of sub-health included place of residence; having close neighbors, relatives or friends; having happy feelings; and negative emotions. To develop an effective sub-health intervention program, these factors should be taken into consideration.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the participants in this study.

Authors’contributions

JJR, and GYL contributed to the conception and design of the study. YHL was responsible for communicating with participants in the survey. LJZ, JR and NZ contributed to the data collection. XLY, and JL contributed to literature search and data quality control. XLY, and LJZ did the statistical analysis and drafted the original manuscript. JJR revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Doctoral Research Initiation Fund Project of Zunyi Medical University (Grant No. F-947); Key Research Bases of Humanities and Social Sciences of Education Department of Sichuan-“Sichuan Hospital Management and Development Research Center”of Southwest Medical University (Grant No. SCYG2019-31).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions. Respondents were informed during the consent process that the data they provide would be available only to the Zhuhai Health and Family Planning Commission and Zunyi Medical University.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Zhuhai Health and Family Planning Commission. Respondents’ consent to participate was given by agreeing to fill out the online questionnaire. The Research Ethics Committee of Zhuhai Health and Family Planning Commission approved the use of implied consent to participate upon returning of the completed survey.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations

CI: Confidence Interval; OR: Odds Ratio; WHO: World Health Organization; CFS: Chronic Fatigue Syndrome; SHMS V1.0: Sub-health Measurement Scale V1.0; PS: Physical Sub-health; MS: Mental Sub-health; SS: Social Sub-health; SD: Standard Deviation.

References

  1. Kindig DA. How do you define the health of populations? Physician Exec. 1997;23(7): 6-11.
  2. Mootz M. Health indicators. Soc Sci Med. 1986;22(2):255-63.
  3. Grad FP. The preamble of the constitution of the World Health Organization. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(12):981-4.
  4. Gui Z, Jun X. Measurement and evaluation of Sub-health. Chinese General Practice. 2007;10(11):923-5.
  5. Zhao R, Song Z, Hou X. Analysis and research on sub-health status of Chinese residents. Bull Med Res. 2001;30:55-7.
  6. Ke B, Liang Y. Anti-aging and complete sub-health checkup. Clin Funct Nutriology. 2011;3(3):137-40.
  7. Dunstan RH, Sparkes DL, Roberts TK, Crompton MJ, Gottfries J, Dascombe BJ. Development of a complex amino acid supplement, fatigue Reviva, for oral ingestion: initial evaluations of product concept and impact on symptoms of sub-health in a group of males. Nutr J. 2013;12:115.
  8. Davy CP, Patrickson M. Implementation of evidence-based healthcare in Papua New Guinea. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2012;10(4):361-8.
  9. Taylor RR. Quality of life and symptom severity for individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome: findings from a randomized clinical trial. Am J Occup Ther. 2004;58(1):35-43.
  10. He J, Hollingsworth KG, Newton JL, Blamire AM. Newton, Andrew M. Blamirea. Cerebral vascular control is associated with skeletal muscle pH in chronic fatigue syndrome patients both at rest and during dynamic stimulation. Neuroimage Clin. 2013;2:168-73.
  11. Wang T, Yin J, Miller AH, Xiao C. A systematic review of the association between fatigue and genetic polymorphisms. Brain Behav Immun. 2017;62:230-44.
  12. Bureau of Statistics in Guangdong. Guangdong municipal GDP and per capita GDP ranking 2018. Available from: http://www.sohu.com/a/295527271_720020. Accessed 15 Jun 2019.
  13. Xu J, Zhang J, Luo R, Zhao X, Feng L, Qiu J. The application of the Delphi method in screening indicator system of assessing sub-health. Chin J Behav Med & Brain. 2010;19(6):562-5.
  14. Feng L, Xu J, Luo R, Qiu J, Zhang J. Analysis and build-up for sub-health evaluating indicator system. Chin Gen Prac. 2011;14(1A):37-40.
  15. Cai Y, Lu Y, Xu J, Nie J. Reliability and validity research of Sub-health Measurement Scale Version 1.0 applied in Chaozhou Town community residents. The Journal of Practical Medicine. 2013;29(1):126-8.
  16. Bi J, Cheng J, Yu B, Xiao Y, Wang T, Li F, et al. Establishment of criteria for Sub-health Assessment Scale (SHMS V1.0) and distribution of TCM constitution among sub-health population in Guangdong. Journal of new Chinese medicine. 2014;46:65-68.
  17. Sun X, Wei M, Zhu C, Wang X, Zhao X, Luo R. A epidemiological study of sub-health in Guangdong. Shandong Med J. 2008;48(4):59-60.
  18. Yan Y, Liu Y, Li M Hu P, Guo A, Yang X, et al. Development and evaluation of a questionnaire for measuring suboptimal health status in urban Chinese. J Epidemiol. 2009;19(6):333-41.
  19. Cao H, Sun Y, Wan Y, Hao J, Tao F. Problematic Internet use in Chinese adolescents and its relation to psychosomatic symptoms and life satisfaction. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:802.
  20. Xu J, Feng L, Luo R, Qiu J, Zhang J, Zhao X, et al. Assessment of the reliability and validity of the Sub-health Measurement Scale Version 1.0. J South Med Univ. 2011;31(1):33-8.
  21. Liu L, Long Y, Zhang T, Niu X, Sun W, Shan G, et al. Sub-health status of the young and middle-aged populations and the relationships among sub-health, sleepness and personality in Hubei province, China. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2010;31(9):970-4.
  22. Tian Y, Zhai C, Gao H, Chen M, Wang J. Effect of moxibustion on the nailfold microcirculation of young and middle-aged people in sub-health status. WJAM. 2017;27(4):1-7.
  23. Yu K, Bi J, Huang Y, Li F, Cheng J, Wang T, et al. Relationship between health-promoting lifestyle and sub-health status in the employees of an enterprise. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2013;33(8):1203-6.
  24. Gonzalez BD, Grandner MA, Caminiti CB, Hui SA. Cancer survivors in the workplace: sleep disturbance mediates the impact of cancer on healthcare expenditures and work absenteeism. Support Care Cancer. 2018;26(12):4049-55.
  25. Kwekkeboom KL, Tostrud L, Costanzo E, Coe CL, Serlin RC, Ward SE, et al. The Role of Inflammation in the Pain, Fatigue, and Sleep Disturbance Symptom Cluster in Advanced Cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018;55(5):1286-95.
  26. Coker E, Kizito S. A narrative review on the human health effects of ambient air pollution in Sub-Saharan Africa: An urgent need for health effects studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(3):E427.
  27. Gu Y, Hu J, Hu Y, Wang J. Social supports and mental health: a cross-sectional study on the correlation of self-consistency and congruence in China. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:207.
  28. Park J, Kitayama S, Karasawa M, Curhan K, Markus HR, Kawakami N, et al. Clarifying the links between social support and health: culture, stress, and neuroticism matter. J Health Psychol. 2013;18(2):226-35.
  29. Liang Y, Chu X, Meng S, Zhang J, Wu L, Yan, Y. Relationship between stress-related psychosocial work factors and suboptimal health among Chinese medical staff: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(3):e018485.
  30. Xue Y, Xu J, Liu G, Feng Y, Xu M, Xie J, et al. Association analysis between personality and sub-health among urban residents aged over 14 years in 4 Chinese provinces. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2019;39(4):443-9.

Tables

Table 1 The structure of SHMS V1.0

Aspects

Dimensions

Item distributions

Sub-scale of Physical Sub-health (PS)

Physical symptom (P1)

1 ,2, 3

 

Organic function (P2)

4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

 

Physical mobility function (P3)

10, 11, 12

 

Vitality (P4)

13, 14

Sub-scale of Mental Sub-health (MS)

Positive emotion (M1)

16, 17, 18, 19

 

Psychosocial symptom (M2)

20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25

 

Cognitive function (M3)

26, 27

Sub-scale of Social Sub-health (SS)

Social adaptability (S1)

29, 30, 31, 32

 

Social resource and Social support (S2)

33, 34, 35, 36, 37

General item of Sub-health (GS)

Physical, Mental, Social and Overall Sub-health (G1, G2, G3, G4)

15, 28, 38, 39


Table 2 Association between sub-health status and characteristics of study participants

Variables

Total

N=3313 (%)

Sub-health group

N=1881 (%)

Non sub-health group

N=1432 (%)

P Value

Gender

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Male

1623

49.0

901

47.9

722

50.4

0.15

Female

1690

51.0

980

52.1

710

49.6

 

Age

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15-

467

14.1

248

13.2

219

15.3

0.02

25-

851

25.7

515

27.4

336

23.5

 

35-

779

23.5

445

23.7

334

23.3

 

45-

699

21.1

371

19.7

328

22.9

 

55-65

517

15.6

302

16.1

215

15.0

 

Place of residence

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Urban areas

1318

39.8

905

48.1

413

28.8

<0.001

Town

1062

32.1

535

28.4

527

36.8

 

Rural areas

933

28.2

441

23.4

492

34.4

 

Education level

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Junior college and less

424

12.8

262

13.9

162

11.3

<0.001

Junior middle school

832

25.1

414

22.0

418

29.2

 

Senior middle school

1578

47.6

894

47.5

684

47.8

 

Undergraduate and above

479

14.5

311

16.5

168

11.7

 

Marriage status

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unmarried

727

21.9

407

21.6

320

22.3

0.28

Married

2491

75.2

1411

75.0

1080

75.4

 

Divorced

59

1.8

40

2.1

19

1.3

 

Others

36

1.1

23

1.2

13

0.9

 

Occupation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Students

187

5.6

89

4.7

98

6.8

0.04

Staffs

421

12.7

252

13.4

169

11.8

 

Workers

488

14.7

261

13.9

227

15.9

 

Farmers

403

12.2

235

12.5

168

11.7

 

Individual occupation

458

13.8

258

13.7

200

14.0

 

Others

1356

40.9

786

41.8

570

39.8

 

Per capita monthly income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

<2500

1065

32.1

612

32.5

453

31.6

0.44

2500-

1210

36.5

692

36.8

518

36.2

 

5000-

646

19.5

347

18.4

299

20.9

 

7500-

211

6.4

127

6.8

84

5.9

 

10000-

181

5.5

103

5.5

78

5.4

 

The frequency of physical exercise per week

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

571

17.2

354

18.8

217

15.2

<0.001

<3

1263

38.1

773

41.1

490

34.2

 

3-5

621

18.7

343

18.2

278

19.4

 

Daily

858

25.9

411

21.9

447

31.2

 

Food habits

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vegetarian

154

4.6

95

5.1

59

4.1

0.053

Vegetarian-based

503

15.2

285

15.2

218

15.2

 

Vegetarian and carnivore

2318

70.0

1289

68.5

1029

71.9

 

Carnivore-based

338

10.2

212

11.3

126

8.8

 

Attending lectures on mental health

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes

1334

40.3

766

40.7

568

39.7

0.54

No

1979

59.7

1115

59.3

864

60.3

 


Table 3 Comparisons of mean SHMS V1.0 scores between sub-health group and non sub-health group

Aspects

Dimensions

Sub-health group

Mean (SD)

Non sub-health group

Mean (SD)

P-Value

PS

 

59.65 (9.87)

66.97 (10.95)

<0.001

 

P1

59.06 (15.20)

69.10 (16.24)

<0.001

 

P2

71.84 (14.42)

80.39 (12.95)

<0.001

 

P3

81.06 (15.71)

88.58 (13.41)

<0.001

 

P4

68.65 (18.97)

75.79 (20.50)

<0.001

MS

 

64.64 (9.90)

74.00 (9.37)

<0.001

 

M1

62.04 (13.14)

72.13 (13.49)

<0.001

 

M2

69.05 (13.08)

78.60 (11.44)

<0.001

 

M3

56.32 (13.55)

63.80 (15.10)

<0.001

SS

 

70.64 (10.63)

79.11 (9.83)

<0.001

 

S1

63.16 (10.95)

71.25 (12.04)

<0.001

 

S2

56.82 (12.55)

63.55 (14.18)

<0.001

Overall Sub-health

 

65.72 (8.28)

74.21 (7.98)

<0.001


Table 4 Results of multivariate logistic regression between sub-health and determinants

Variables

β

S.E.

Wald

Sig.

OR (95%CI)

The frequency of physical exercise per week (Daily vs. None)

0.18

0.04

20.65

<0.001

1.19 (1.11-1.29)

Place of residence (Rural vs. Urban areas)

0.47

0.05

88.51

<0.001

1.60 (1.45-1.76)

Appetite (Very good vs. Very poor)

0.23

0.07

12.77

<0.001

1.26 (1.11-1.43)

Gastrointestinal upset (None vs. Always)

0.19

0.05

15.52

<0.001

1.21 (1.10-1.34)

Walking 3-5 stairs (None vs. Very difficult)

0.23

0.06

17.41

<0.001

1.26 (1.13-1.40)

Having happy feelings (Always vs. None)

0.25

0.06

18.65

<0.001

1.29 (1.15-1.44)

Negative emotions (None vs. Always)

0.25

0.07

13.14

<0.001

1.28 (1.12-1.47)

Memory (Very good vs. Very poor)

0.16

0.06

7.61

<0.001

1.17 (1.05-1.30)

Interpersonal relationship (Very satisfied vs. Very unsatisfied)

0.20

0.06

10.26

<0.001

1.22 (1.08-1.38)

Having close neighbors, relatives or friends (Many vs. None)

0.27

0.07

16.49

<0.001

1.31 (1.15-1.49)

Constant

-5.03

0.75

45.40

<0.001

 

95% CI = 95% confidence interval