This prospective, randomized, triple-blind clinical trial was performed following the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Institution review board (IRB), King Saud University, Saudi Arabia approval was obtained (Ref. No. 21/0047/IRB), and written informed consent was acquired from all patients. the study protocol was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. (NCT04857450; principal investigator: Mostafa Mohammed Elsaid Elhamamsy; date of registration: April 23/04/ 2021). This study adheres to the applicable CONSORT guidelines.
The study included sixty cardiac patients admitted to the ICU at King Saud University and scheduled for EGD and Colonoscopy to diagnose and manage acute anemia aged 18 – 65 years, ASA III-IV, with ejection fraction (EF) > 30% were included. The Exclusion criteria were as follow: poor left ventricular function (ejection fraction < 30%), recent myocardial infarction (last seven days), known allergy to midazolam, fentanyl, etomidate, or ketamine, severe respiratory, hepatic, and renal failure, or history of neurological disorders or convulsions.
The study was performed in the ICU with the presence of all emergency equipment. Patients were randomly divided into two groups (E; etomidate and KE; ketamine/etomidate groups) using computer-generated random numbers placed into separate opaque envelopes opened by the study investigator just before performing the procedure. The gastroenterologist who performed the colonoscopies, all participants, and data collectors were blinded with group allocation till the end of the study. All patients received a standard colonic preparation protocol and were fasted eight hours before the procedures.
Anesthesia management:
Standard monitoring was performed after establishing IV access (noninvasive blood pressure, ECG, SpO2, and Bispectral Index (BIS)). First, a nasal cannula for oxygen (6 l/min) was connected to all patients. Then midazolam 0.03mg/kg IV and fentanyl one µg/kg IV were injected in all patients as a premedication.
For Group (E)
Patient Received etomidate 0.2 mg/kg IV over 30 seconds, followed by 0.05 mg/kg IV and repeated when needed.
For Group (KE)
Patient Received ketamine 0.5 mg/kg IV over 30 seconds, then etomidate 0.1 mg/kg IV over 30 seconds, followed by 0.05 mg/kg IV and repeated when needed.
The anesthesiologist determined the additional dose of etomidate to achieve a BIS above 60.
Any adverse effect was recorded, including; 1- Hypotension: decrease of baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) >30%, or decrease of baseline diastolic blood pressure (DBP) >30%, this was treated by phenylephrine 100-200 µg IV boluses. 2- Bradycardia: decrease of HR < 50/min; atropine 0.5 mg IV boluses managed this. 3- Apnea: spontaneous breathing > 30 sec, or SpO2 < 85% and this was treated by assisted manual ventilation using an AMBU bag and face mask.
At the end of the procedure, the total etomidate dose, the duration of the procedure, and the recovery time of the patients were recorded.
After full recovery and when the patients were alert enough to express their attitude regarding the intra-procedural events, they were asked to score their level of satisfaction during the procedure to recall any painful or other undesirable intra-procedural events.
Patient’s satisfaction level was assessed with a Likert five-item scoring system (12): (1 = Not satisfied at all, 2 = slightly satisfied, 3 = somewhat satisfied, 4 = very satisfied, and 5 = extremely satisfied). Finally, serum cortisol levels both before and 6 hours after the procedure were measured to calculate the percentage of suppression in both groups.
The primary outcome was; 6 hours postoperative serum cortisol level.
Secondary outcomes included
Estimated change in serum cortisol level (6-hours postoperative value compared to preoperative one), Incidence of perioperative complications; hypotension, bradycardia, apnea, nausea/vomiting, and psychological reactions. Patient satisfaction and Total dose of etomidate.
Statistical Analysis
For sample size calculation, there were no previous studies at the time of designing the study protocol, so we performed an external pilot study that included seven patients in each group, with its results not included in the full-scale study. This pilot showed 6 hours postoperative serum cortisol level (mean±SD, 356.28± 39.343 in the E group versus 389.71± 45.76 in the KE group). The minimal sample size of patients was 27 in each group needed to get power level 0.80 and alpha level 0.05. the calculated sample size was increased by 10% to reach 30 in each group to overcome the data dropout.
The collected data were organized, tabulated, and statistically analyzed using SPSS software statistical computer version 22 (SPSS Inc, USA).
We used a two-sample t-test to compare the two groups' mean values (age, weight, EF, Procedure Time, Recovery Time, and Serum cortisol level) and data presented as Mean, standard deviation (SD). And The Chi-square test was used to analyze independent qualitative data. Fischer's test was used when chi-square test conditions were not met. Data were presented as numbers and percentages (Sex, ASA, and the Side effects), and (95% CI ) were estimated. A two-sided P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.