Participants
Four participants dropped out on the first day, two on the second day and four on the third day because they were not able to complete the walking exercise; n = 9 participants suffered from sports injuries and n = 1 participant reported a serious adverse event unrelated to the study (hospitalization because of arrhythmia). Although the reasons for dropouts were unrelated to the supplement, n = 8 participants of the protein group dropped out compared to n = 2 participants of the placebo group (Fisher’s exact test: P = 0.094).
The remaining n = 104 participants consisted of n = 84 males (81%), aged 69 (IQR: 67-73) years with a BMI of 26.5 ± 2.5 kg/m2. N = 50 participants were allocated to the protein group and n = 54 to the placebo group. No differences were observed between both groups for demographics and body composition (Table 1).
The participants’ exercise duration was 7.5 ± 1.2 h on day 1 and 7.2 ± 1.3 h on day 3. The average exercise duration of the first day was longer for the protein group (7.7 ± 1.1 h) compared to the placebo group (7.2 ± 1.3 h), P = 0.022 (Figure 1A). The average heart rate during walking on the first day was 104 ± 18 bpm, which equals an exercise intensity of 67 ± 12% . No differences between the protein and placebo group were observed (Table 1 and Figure 1B). Moreover, the trained kilometers prior to the exercise event and walking distance during the event were not different between groups (Table 1).
Table 1 should be placed around here.
Dietary intake
Baseline habitual protein intake (disregarding supplements) was comparable between the protein and placebo group (0.92 ± 0.27 g/kg/d and 0.97 ± 0.23 g/kg/d, respectively, P = 0.31). In the protein group n = 17 participants (34%) were below the general protein recommendation of 0.8 g/kg/d and n = 14 participants (26%) of the placebo group were below 0.8 g/kg/d (P = 0.37). There were no differences between the protein and placebo group for energy intake, protein distribution, protein source and macronutrient intake (Table 1). Compliance of supplementation intake at breakfast and after finishing the walking exercise was 100%, resulting in a total protein intake of 1.28 ± 0.28 g/kg/d within the protein group.
Muscle soreness and fatigue
Muscle soreness in the calves, thighs and glutes and fatigue levels were similar between the protein and placebo group at baseline (all P > 0.05, Table 2). Significant increases over time from baseline until after the 3rd walking day, were found for the calves (P < 0.001) and the thighs (P < 0.001), but not for the glutes (P = 0.12). Between the protein and the placebo group, no differences were observed for muscle soreness in all muscle groups after day 1 and day 3 (all P > 0.05, Table 2). Similarly, categorical analysis revealed no differences between groups on all days (all P > 0.05, Table 3).
A significant time effect from baseline until after day 3 was found for fatigue levels (P < 0.001), but fatigue levels were similar across groups at baseline, after day 1 and day 3 (all P > 0.05, Table 2).
Table 2 and 3 should be placed around here.
Blood analyses
At baseline, no significant differences were found in the CK concentrations between the protein and the placebo group (110 (IQR: 84 – 160) U/L and 115 (IQR: 91 – 186) U/L, respectively, P = 0.84). Elevated CK levels were found in the protein group after day 1: 254 (175 – 445) U/L and day 3: 433 (IQR: 288 – 803) U/L), and in the placebo group (day 1: 301 (188 – 469) U/L and day 3: 622 (IQR: 321 – 1053) U/L after prolonged walking for three consecutive days, PTime < 0.001. No significant differences between groups were observed after day 1 and day 3 (Figure 2).
At baseline n = 11 participants (22%) of the protein group had CK concentrations above the reference value, which increased to n = 40 participants (80%) after day 1 and n = 49 participants (98%) after day 3. In the placebo group, n = 16 participants (30%), n = 47 participants (87%) and n = 52 (96%) had a CK concentrations above the reference value at baseline, after day 1 and after day 3, respectively. The number of participants that had CK concentrations above the reference value were not significantly different between both groups at baseline, after day 1 and after day 3 (P = 0.38, P = 0.60 and P = 0.53, respectively). Furthermore, the increase in CK between baseline and day 3 was not significantly different between the protein (∆283 (IQR: 182 – 662) U/L) and placebo group (∆456 (IQR: 209 – 885) U/L), P = 0.43.
The inflammatory markers CRP, IL6 and IL10 were similar between the protein and placebo group at baseline (all P > 0.05, Table 4). Significant changes over time were seen from baseline to day 3 for CRP, IL6 and IL10 (all P < 0.001). No group differences were observed after day 1 (all P > 0.05, Table 4), but a tendency towards lower values of IL6 and IL10 concentrations (both P = 0.06) was found for the protein group at Day 3 (Table 4).
Table 4 should be placed around here.