All diarylethenes have been purchased from Yamada Chemical Co. Ltd. (Kyoto). We have studied four DAE derivatives including 1,2-bis(2,4-dimethyl-5-phenyl-3-thienyl)perfluorocyclopentene (1), 1,2-bis(3,5-dimethylthiophen-2-yl)hexafluorocyclopentene (2), 1,2-bis(2-ethyl-5-phenyl-3-thienyl)perfluorocyclopentene (3), and 1,2-Bis(2-methyl-1-benzofuran-3-yl)perfluorocyclopentene (4). Their chemical structures and photochemical reactions are shown in Fig. 1. The purities of compounds are the following as declared by the distributing company: (1) - 99.8%, (2) – 99.9 %, (3) – 99.8%, (4) – 98%.
DAEs were dissolved in hexane to prepare the solutions of open-ring isomers. These solutions were irradiated for approximately two hours to perform the ring closure reaction using the output from femtosecond laser set-up (300 nm, ~1 µJ, ~150 fs) which is described elsewhere.22 After the irradiation, the solutions contained both open and closed ring isomers that were subsequently separated using thin layer chromatography (TLC). All separations were performed on the PTLC (preparative TLC) silica gel 60 glass plates with fluorescent indicator F254, 1 mm, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Solvents used for separation and extraction of the products were purchased from Avantor Performance Materials Poland SA and used as received. The details of the separation procedure on TLC are included in supplementary information (SI). After the TLC, the solvent was let to evaporate, and the remaining powder was re-dissolved in CCl4. The CCl4 has been selected because its IR spectrum contains only a small number of high-intensity bands that can overwhelm the bands of the solute. The infrared spectra of DAEs were recorded using a Fourier-Transform IR (FTIR) spectrometer (Avatar 330, ThermoFisher Scientific) and demountable liquid cell (DLC, Harrick). The sample was placed between 2 mm thick KBr windows separated by 250 µm spacer.
The density functional theory computations were performed using the Gaussian 09D software23 and def2-SVP basis set24. The employed exchange-correlation functionals were chosen based on their popularity, cost (no double hybrids were included), stability of performance with respect to the grid and basis set, and previous proven performance for diarylethene UV-vis spectra and they include global hybrids B3LYP25, PBE026, range-separated hybrids ωB97X-D27, LC-ωPBE28 and CAM-B3LYP29 and the local meta-GGA, M06L30. To assess the influence of the London dispersion interaction, functionals with and without the Grimme’s D3 dispersion correction31 were considered, except for ωB97X-D and M06L, which already account for dispersion without the correction. The open and closed structures of the studied molecules were optimized with the pertinent functionals and then the infrared spectra were calculated. To account for anharmonicity effects, the positions of IR peaks were adjusted by applying scaling factors.32
To compare the experimental (featuring broad vibrational bands) and the theoretical spectra (consisting of zero-width lines) with minimal bias, we have adopted one of the approaches introduced by Katari and coworkers who analyzed experimental and theoretical spectra of organometallic complexes.33 In this strategy (recommended by the authors, and denoted by them as protocol P2), the highest peak in the spectral range of consideration in computed spectrum determines the predicted frequency value to be compared with the maximum of a band in the experimental spectrum. When several vibrational frequencies having similar intensities (equal to at least a half of the intensity of the most intense peak) are present, the mean of all these frequencies is taken for analysis. In our analysis, approximately 30 of the most intense bands in the experimental spectrum in the range of 400-3500 cm−1 have been taken into account. After determination of maxima of these bands and corresponding predicted frequencies from theoretical spectrum using P2 protocol the mean absolute errors (MAE) have been calculated according to eq. (1) to estimate the accuracy of selected DFT functionals.\(MAE=\frac{\left|{\upsilon }_{predict}^{\upsilon }-{\upsilon }_{calc}^{\upsilon }\right|}{N}\)(1)
where N is a number of bands taken for analysis, \({\upsilon }_{predict}^{\upsilon }\) is a frequency calculated from computed spectrum using P2 protocol and \({\upsilon }_{calc}^{\upsilon }\) is a maximum of the experimental peak.