Clinical presentation
All MLL-SEPT6 positive cases (case 1-4) were male with ages ranging from 0 to 57 years and a median of 5.2 years, their detailed information was summarized in Table 1. All cases had manifestations of fever and pale complexion. The three pediatric cases (cases 2, 3, and 4) were accompanied by hepatosplenomegaly, and two cases (cases 3 and 4) had scattered petechiae and ecchymoses. The case 1 is an elderly male patient with perianal abscess and diabetes in addition to the above symptoms. The case 2 was accompanied by pain in both lower limbs, tenderness of the sternum and hypertrophy of tonsils. In the case 3, multiple lymph nodes were palpable on bilateral neck, he was positive of sternal tenderness, he also had hyperuricemia and acute bronchial pneumonia. The case 4 is a newborn delivered by cesarean section due to "decreased fetal heart rate". The birth weight was 3100g. The infant had no spontaneous breath at birth and was generally cyanotic, he restored spontaneous respiration under assisted ventilation, he developed persistent pulmonary arterial hypertension and neonatal pneumonia. His parents were healthy and with no history of genetic disease.
Table 1
Clinical features of 4 cases of AML patients with MLL-SEPT6 positive
Items
|
Case 1
|
Case 2
|
Case 3
|
Case 4
|
Sex
|
Male
|
Male
|
Male
|
Male
|
Age
|
57 years
|
9 years
|
16 months
|
0 months
|
Physical examination
|
Perianal abscess
|
Lower limbs pain, sternal tenderness and tonsil hypertrophy
|
Scattered petechiae on the neck, cervical lymphadenopathy and sternal tenderness (+)
|
Scattered petechiae and ecchymoses
|
Hepatomegaly/
Splenomegaly
|
No/No
|
Yes/Yes
|
Yes/Yes
|
Yes/Yes
|
CNS involvement
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
No
|
WBC/Hb/PLT
(×109/L/g/L/×109/L)
|
12.3/79.0/105.0
|
3.0/93.0/245.0
|
123.8/41.0/39.0
|
112.0/90.0/9.0
|
Serum LDH (U/l)
|
NA
|
966
|
2080
|
NA
|
D-Dimer (ug/L(DDU))
|
13117.0
|
3149.0
|
2469.0
|
620.0
|
Blood blasts (%)
|
69.0
|
2.0
|
52.0
|
17.0
|
Bone marrow blasts (%)
|
92.0
|
27.5
|
56.0
|
20.4
|
Morphological diagnosis
|
AML-M5
|
AML-M2
|
AML-M4
|
AML-M5
|
Immunophenotype
|
The leukemic cells expressed HLA-DR, CD117, CD33, CD13, CD38, CD15, CD64 and CD4
|
The leukemic cells expressed HLA-DR, CD33, CD38, CD15, CD64 and CD4
|
The leukemic cells expressed HLA-DR, CD33, CD13, CD38, CD15 and CD64
|
The leukemic cells expressed HLA-DR, CD33, CD38, CD15 and CD64
|
Karyotype
|
46, Y, t(X;11)(q24;q23)[4]/46,XY[6]
|
45,Y,del(X)(q21),der(11)t(X;11)(q24;q23),-20,add(22)(q13)[3]
|
46, Y, t(X;11)(q24;q23), del(7)(q21q31)[13]/46,XY[2]
|
46,Y,ins(X;11)(q23;q24q12)[10]
|
Gene mutations
|
NRAS: NM_002524:exon2:c.G35T:p.G12V rs121913237, VAF = 0.0369; ASXL1: NM_015338:exon12:c.2464dupA:p.D821fs, VAF =0. 3585
|
NRAS: NM_002524:exon2:c.G35T:p.G12V rs121913237, VAF = 0.0300
|
NRAS:NM_002524:exon4:c.G436A:p.A146T, VAF = 0.4411
|
Negative
|
Treatment protocol
|
IA regimen (resistance); then changed to decitabine combined with half-dose CAG regimen (once) + high dose cytarabine
|
MAE regimen + intrathecal chemotherapy + BMT
|
HA regimen
|
No chemotherapy
|
CR
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
NA
|
Follow-up (mo)
|
9
|
38
|
34
|
0.5
|
Outcome
|
Alive
|
Alive
|
Alive
|
Died
|
Footnotes: CNS, central nervous system; WBC, white blood cells; Hb, hemoglobin; PLT, platelets; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; VAF, variant allele frequencies; IA, idarubicin + cytosine arabinoside; CAG, cytarabine + aclacinomycin + granulocyte colony stimulating factor; MAE, Mitoxantrone + cytarabine + etoposide; BMT, bone marrow transplantation; HA, homoharringtonine + cytarabine; CR, complete remission; mo, month; NA, not available. |
Laboratory results showed that three cases (cases 1, 3, and 4) had high white blood cells (WBC) count, anemia, and low platelet count. One case (case 2) had low level of hemoglobin and WBC count but normal platelet count, and two cases (case 2 and 3) had increased level of serum lactate dehydrogenase. The D-dimer level of all four patients were increased.
Morphological evaluation
All cases exhibited morphological characteristics of AML (Figure 1). The French American British (FAB) morphological classification of each case was M5 (case 1 and 4), M2 (case 2) and M4 (case 3). Three cases (cases 1, 3, and 4) showed hypercellular bone marrow and the other case (case 2) had severe hypocellular bone marrow. The case 1 and case 4 were evaluated as M5 and revealed of 92.0% and 20.4% blasts in marrow aspirate, 69.0% and 17.0% in peripheral blood respectively (Table 1, Figure 1A and 1D). The case 2 was evaluated as M2, the marrow aspirate revealed 27.5% myeloblasts and the peripheral blood exhibited 2.0% blasts (Table 1, Figure 1B). The case 3 was evaluated as M4, the marrow aspirate showed 56.0% blasts and the peripheral blood exhibited 52.0% blasts (Table 1, Figure 1C).
Flow cytometric analysis
The flow cytometric analysis revealed the presence of myeloid blasts in bone marrow samples from all four patients (Table 1, Figure 2). The percentage of blasts was highest of 92% in the case 1 and lowest of 4.2% in the case 3. All cases were positive for CD33, CD15, CD64 indicating myeloid lineage, CD13 was positive only in the case 1 and case 2. All the cases were positive for CD38 and HLA-DR. CD117 was positive only in the case 3, CD34 was negative in all the four cases.
Cytogenetic analysis
The results showed that all four cases had clonal abnormalities of X chromosome and chromosome 11 or complex karyotype abnormalities (Table 1, Figure 3). In case 1, the metaphase cells exhibited abnormalities of t(X;11)(q24;q23) (Figure 3A). The metaphase cells collected in the case 2 showed 45, Y, del(X)(q21), der(11)t(X;11)(q24;q23), -20, add(22)(q13) (Figure 3B). In the case 3, in addition to the abnormal karyotype of t(X;11)(q24;q23), thirteen metaphase cells had del(7)(q21q31) (Figure 3C). The metaphase cells in case 4 showed abnormal karyotype of 46, Y, ins(X;11)(q23;q24q12) (Figure 3D).
Molecular analysis
We performed molecular biology tests including screening of fusion genes and next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis on all cases (Table 1). The MLL-SEPT6 fusion gene was detected in all four cases. The NGS panel included a total of 20 frequently mutated genes in AML which were ASXL1, CEBPA, DNMT3A, EZH2, FLT3, IDH1, IDH2, KIT, NPM1, PHF6, RUNX1, TET2, TP53, BCOR, GATA2, MLL, KRAS, NRAS, PDGFRA and WT1, the sequencing depth was 2000×. The results showed that three cases (cases 1-3) harbored NRAS (NM_002524) mutations, the mutation sites of the case 1 and 2 were both NRAS G12V, with variant allele frequencies (VAF) of 0.3585 and 0.0300 respectively. In addition, the case 1 was also accompanied by an insertion mutation of ASXL1 D821 with a VAF of 0.3585. The reexamination results on the third month showed that the MLL-SEPT6 gene remained positive but its expression level dropped from 100–24.4%. The ASXL1 D821 VAF dropped to 0.0068 and NRAS G12V gene mutation was not detected. Four month later, the patient achieved complete remission (CR), the ASXL1 D821 VAF dropped to 0.0032 and this time both the NRAS mutation and MLL-SEPT6 fusion gene were negative. The NRAS A146T mutation in the case 3 occurred in exon 4 with a VAF of 0.4411. MLL-SEPT6 gene and NRAS gene mutations both turned negative on the ninth month after diagnosis. The patient relapsed on the twenty-seventh month with positive MLL-SEPT6 and NRAS A146T mutation (VAF = 0.2662). In the case 4, no pathogenic gene mutations were detected.
Clinical Course
The treatment and follow-up information of all cases (case 1-4) was shown in Table 1. Three cases (case 1-3) received chemotherapy, the case 2 subsequently received a bone marrow transplantation (BMT), the case 4 was a newborn and did not receive any chemotherapy. The clinical follow-up period ranges from 0.5 to 38 months with a median of 21.5 months. The case 1 initially received IA (idarubicin + cytosine arabinoside) regimens, which didn’t make him reach CR. Then he began a new chemotherapy regime with decitabine combined with half dose CAG (cytarabine + aclacinomycin + granulocyte colony stimulating factor) and achieved CR. He also received an intrathecal injection (cytarabine + dexamethasone + methotrexate) for central nervous system infiltration prevention. After the chemotherapy, the bone marrow aspiration of the patient revealed a normal karyotype and negative molecular results of MLL-SEPT6 rearrangement and NRAS mutation. The case 2 received MAE (mitoxantrone + cytarabine + etoposide) regimens and reached CR one month later. In the following six months, the patient received BMT. Nineteen months after the transplantation he was re-admitted for headache. A flow cytometry analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid revealed 81.9% leukemia cells which indicated central nervous system leukemia, following five courses of intrathecal injection, the child’s headache relieved and no leukemia cells were detected in his cerebrospinal fluid. The case 3 received HA (homoharringtonine + cytarabine) regimens and intrathecal injection (cytarabine + dexamethasone + methotrexate), he reached CR four weeks after the diagnosis. This patient relapsed 27 months later, after receiving HAI (homoharringtonine + cytarabine + idarubicin) regimen he reached and remained CR status. The case 4 had dyspnea at birth, he was on assisted ventilation and given blood infusion to improve anemia and thrombocytopenia. The newborn’s condition did not improve during the treatment. His parents refused the follow-up treatment, and the child died a week later.
Literature review
A total of 22 MLL-SEPT6 positive cases were included in this literature review, including four cases in our report and eighteen cases from literatures [6–16]. Table 2 and Table 3 listed the detailed laboratory results and clinical information of all cases.
Table 3
Clinicopathologic features of evaluable patients
Characteristic
|
N (%)
|
Gender
|
N=22
|
Male
|
16 (72.7%)
|
Female
|
6 (27.3%)
|
Age (years)
|
N=22
|
≤1
|
12 (54.5%)
|
>1 and <18
|
8 (36.4%)
|
≥18
|
2 (9.1%)
|
WBC count (×109/L)
|
N=15
|
≥20.0
|
9 (60.0%)
|
<20.0
|
6 (40.0%)
|
Symptom at presentation
|
N=10
|
Hepatosplenomegaly
|
5 (50.0%)
|
CNS involvement
|
3 (30.0%)
|
Lymphadenopathy
|
3 (30.0%)
|
Skin involvement
|
2 (20.0%)
|
FAB classification
|
N=22
|
M1
|
1 (4.5%)
|
M2
|
8 (36.4%)
|
M4
|
5 (22.7%)
|
M5
|
5 (22.7%)
|
Unknown
|
3 (13.6%)
|
Chromosomal abnormalities
|
N=22
|
Translocations
|
11 (50.0%)
|
Insertions
|
9 (40.9%)
|
Complex abnormalities
|
3 (13.6%)
|
Treatment protocol
|
N=19
|
Chemotherapy alone
|
8 (42.1%)
|
BMT
|
9 (47.4%)
|
No chemotherapy
|
2 (10.5%)
|
Survival outcome
|
N=19
|
Alive
|
13 (68.4%)
|
Died
|
6 (31.6%)
|
Footnotes: WBC, white blood cells; CNS, central nervous system; BMT, bone marrow transplantation. |
The age of the patients ranged from 0 to 57 years (median = 1 year), with a male–female ratio of nearly 3:1 (16 males vs. 6 females). Twenty patients (90.9%) were children (≤ 9 years old), including twelve (54.5%) infants (≤1 year old). The majority of the patients manifested leukocytosis (range 1-608 × 109/L), anemia (range 41-109 g/L) and low platelet counts (range 9-254 × 109/L). According to the high WBC index [18], nine (60.0%) of the fifteen cases with WBC count information were defined as high WBC levels. Twelve cases were not provided with description of clinical features. Of the remaining ten cases, five children (50.0%) were observed of splenomegaly and hepatomegaly and three patients (30.0%) had lymphadenopathy. Central nervous system involvement was observed in three children (30.0%) and skin involvement was observed in two (20.0%).
All patients were diagnosed with AML (twenty children and two adults) according to the former FAB classification: five patients (three children and two adults, 22.7%) of M5, five children (22.7%) of M4, eight children (36.4%) of M2, one child (4.5%) of M1, and three children (13.6%) unknown.
All the cases had available cytogenetic information, chromosomal translocations (eleven cases) were the most common chromosomal rearrangements, followed by chromosomal insertions (nine cases). Among them, Xq24 (nine cases) and 11q23 (fourteen cases) were the most frequently involved chromosomal bands. Seven cases (31.8%) demonstrated complex abnormalities.
Of all 22 cases, 18 cases had clinical follow-up with median period of 27.7 months (0.5-101.5 months). Table 3 showed the clinicopathologic features of evaluable patients. Eight patients (42.1%) received chemotherapy alone. Nine patients (50%) received BMT. Six of eighteen patients died during the period of follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed on eighteen cases with complete follow-up information (Figure 4A). As of the final follow-up, median survival time has not been reached. In order to understand the impact of age and BMT on survival time, the patients were divided into infant group (≤1 year old, n=10), pediatric group (>1 and <18 years old, n=7), and adult group (≥18 years old, n=1). At the time of the last observation, there was no statistically significant differences in survival time between infant group and pediatric group (hazard ratio for infant-pediatric = 0.26, 95% confidence interval = 0.07 to 1.67, P = 0.1822, Figure 4B). The adult group was not included in the statistical analysis because there was only one case with complete follow-up information in this group. Meanwhile, the patients were also divided into receiving chemotherapy alone (n=6, one without survival information was excluded) and receiving BMT (n=9) treatment groups according to the treatment protocol. Survival time between the patients received chemotherapy alone and BMT did not show significant differences neither (hazard ratio for chemotherapy alone-BMT = 1.04, 95% confidence interval = 0.18 to 6.19, P = 0.9647, Figure 4C).