Ethics statement
All experiments on animals were approved by the Animal Care Committee of Shanghai General Hospital. Principles of animal research abided by the guidelines of ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Vision Research. The study was sanctioned by the Ethics Committee of the Shanghai General Hospital (Approval No.2020SQ120) and informed consents were acquired afore specimen collection.
Cell culture
Human skin fibroblasts (HSFs) and ARPE19 cells were all purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (USA). All above cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) and DMEM/Ham's F-12 medium (DMEM/F12, Gibco, USA) respectively. 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS)(Gibco, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin were supplemented with cells at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
Preparation of hucMSCs
Briefly, fresh umbilical cords were obtained and washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 1% penicillin and streptomycin. Then, the blood vessels were taken out and the remaining tissue was cut into 1- mm3 pieces on culture plates. The medium was replaced every 3 days. Nonadherent fragments were discarded, and the adherent cells were subcultured with 0.25% trypsin. The hucMSCs in passages 3–7 were used for further experiments.
The immune phenotype of hucMSCs was characterized by flow cytometry using a Human MSC Analysis Kit (562245; BD Biosciences, USA) which contained four positive markers (FITC-CD90, PerCP™Cy5.5-CD105, APC-CD73, and PE-CD44), five negative cocktails (PE-CD45, PE-CD34, PE-CD11b, PE-CD19, and PE-HLA-DR), and the respective isotype controls. The cells at a concentration of 5 106 cells/mL in PBS was stained following the BD’s protocol. The analysis was carried out in a flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, USA). Passage 3 hucMSCs were cultured in OriCell osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation media (Cyagen, Guangzhou, China) respectively as described by the manufacturer to identify the differentiation properties. After cultured for 23 days, hucMSCs were fixed and dyed with Alizarin red for osteogenic cells and Oil red for adipose cells. The cells cultured in a normal medium were served as controls.
Extraction and identification of hucMSC-derived exosomes
Exosome isolation was carried out following a previously published protocol(25) Briefly, hucMSCs were cultured and reached 50%–60% confluence. They were then placed in serum-free MSC medium (Nuwacell Biotechnology, RP02010-1 and RP02010-2, China). After 48 h of cultivation, the medium was obtained and centrifuged for 10 min at 300g and 30 min at 10000g. Next, the supernatant was filtered with a 0.22-μm filter (Millipore Corp, USA) and was further ultracentrifuged at 100,000g for 70min in a SW32Ti rotor (Beckman Coulter, USA). After removing the supernatant, the pellet was resuspended in PBS and then centrifuged at 100,000g for 70min again. Finally, the pellet was stored at -80℃ after being collected in 200-300uL of PBS .
The paiticle size distribution of hucMSC-Exo was analyzed using a nanoparticle tracking analysis system (ZetaView, Germany). Characteristic morphological observation of the exosomes was performed with a transmission electron microscope (FEI Tecnai Spirit G2). Western blotting was carried out to identify the expression of exosome-specific markers TSG101 (ab133586, Abcam, 1:1000 dilution), CD9 (A1703, Abclone, 1:1000 dilution), CD63 (25682-1-AP, Proteintech, 1:1000 dilution), and heat shock protein HSP70 (A12948, Abclone, 1:1000 dilution).
Exosome labeling
Purified exosomes were dyed with PKH67 (a green fluorescent dye; Sigma–Aldrich, Germany) following the instructions. Briefly, exosomes were stained with 4 µL of PKH67 in 200 μL of Diluent C fluid for 5 min. Next, an isovolumetric 1% BSA was appended to end the staining. PBS was used to wash the exosomes and re-purified via ultracentrifugation. Then, PKH67-labeled exosomes were incubated with ARPE19 cells for 12 h. Fluorescence microscopy (Leica Microsystems) was used to detect the green signals in cells.
Wound-healing assay
A total of 2 × 105 cells/well were plated and serum-starved overnight. Then, scratches on ARPE-19 cell monolayers were made with a sterilized 200-μL pipette tip. Images were recorded after 0, 24, and 48 h, and the wound recovery was analyzed using ImageJ. The migration capacity was determined by a percentage of wound closure.
Transwell assay
ARPE-19 cells (3 × 104) resuspended in 200 μL of serum-free medium were placed in the upper chamber with a polycarbonate membrane (8-μm pore size, Corning, USA). Then, 600 μL of DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS was added to the lower chamber. After incubation for 12 h, cells were stained with 0.1% crystal violet. For visualization, images of cultured cells were collected and counted in random different five fields.
Immunofluorescence staining
Birefly, cells after treatment were incubated with 1% BSA and 0.2% Triton X-100 for 2h. Then, the cells were co-cultivated with primary antibodies, namely, anti-alpha smooth muscle actin(anti-α-SMA) (#ab5694, Abcam, 1:100 dilution), anti-zonula occludens-1(anti-ZO-1) (#61-7300, Invitrogen, 1:50 dilution), and anti-Vimentin (#ARG66302, Arigo, 1:200 dilution, Shanghai) antibodies at 4°C. After that, cells was followed by incubation with the Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG and the FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, USA) for 1 h.The nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (Beyotime, Shanghai) and the images were taken sequentially with a fluorescent microscope.
Western blot analysis
RIPA (Beyotime, China) supplemented with SDS buffer and protease inhibitors (Thermo Scientific) were used to extract total proteins. The proteins were transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Millipore, MA, USA) and then blocked with 5% skim milk. Primary antibodies against Vimentin (ARG66302, Arigo), α-SMA (ab5694, Abcam), occludin (SAB4200593, Sigma–Aldrich), and N-cadherin (13116, CST) were incubated with the membrane at 4°C overnight, with all of them were diluted at 1:1000. Next, cells were followed by incubation with a corresponding secondary antibody (HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibodies, 1:5000, ab15007).
Cells transfection with miRNA
Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, USA) was used for transfection. The cells were cultivated in six-well plates upon cell fusion of 60%. The instructions from GenePharma (Shanghai) were followed for the agomir and antagomir (100 pmol) transfection. The cells were harvested for the following efficiency and function assay 48 h after transfection.
RNA isolation and quantitation
We extracted total RNA from hucMSC-Exo using TRIzol Reagent (Takara, Japan). Before isopropanol precipitation, Dr.GenTLE Precipitation Carrier (#9094, TaKaRa,Japan) was added as a co-precipitant to increase the yield of exosomes RNA, which was reverse transcribed into cDNA with a Mir-X miRNA First-Strand Synthesis Kit (Cat. No. 638313, TaKaRa). qRT-PCR was performed using the TB Green Premix Ex Taq II (Tli RNaseH Plus) (RR820A, TaKaRa) and then detected with an ABI 7500 qPCR instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The relative expression of miRNAs or mRNAs was analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCt method. U6 or GAPDH were deemed as an internal control. The primer sequences were acquired from GenePharma (Shanghai) (Table 1).
Table 1.Primer sequences for real-time PCR
Primers
|
Sequences (5’ to 3’)
|
has-miR-100-5p
|
F’ AACCCGTAGATCCGAACTTGTG
|
has-miR-21-5p
|
F’ GCAGTAGCTTATCAGACTGATG
|
has-miR-27b-3p
|
F’ TTCACAGTGGCTAAGTTCTGC
|
has-miR-145-5p
|
F’ GGTCCAGTTTTCCCAGGA
|
has-miR-23b-3p
|
F’ AGATCACATTGCCAGGGA
|
has-miR-221-3p
|
F’ CAGAGCTACATTGTCTGCTG
|
has-miR-204-5p
|
F’ CAGTTCCCTTTGTCATCCTATG
|
has-miR-211-5p
|
F’ GCAGTTCCCTTTGTCATCCT
|
The 3’ primer for above Forward qPCR is the mRQ 3’ Primer, along with U6 Forward Primer and U6 Reverse Primer are supplied in Mir-X miRNA First-Strand Synthesis Kit (Cat. No. 638313)
|
Dual-luciferase reporter assay
The cDNA of HOXC6 was loaded onto a psiCHECK2 vector (Promega, USA) (HOXC6- wild). Mutations are made in the potential miR-27b-3p-binding sites using a Fast Mutagenesis kit V2 (Vazyme, China) (HOXC6-mut). The luciferase activity was detected using a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega,USA).
Laser-induced CNV model and drug administration
C57BL/6J mice aged 6–8 weeks were used in this study. All animals were housed at the Laboratory Animal Center of Shanghai General Hospital. The laser-induced subretinal fibrosis model was established as previously described and observed for 35 days to generate subretinal fibrosis(1). In brief, four to six laser spots (532 nm, 180 mW, 100 ms; Novus Spectra, Japan) were selected at each fundus around the optic disc. The disruption of Bruch’s membrane was confirmed by subretinal bubble formation immediately after laser application. HucMSC-Exo or PBS in 2 µL was injected into the vitreous cavity immediately after laser injury. After injection, the mice were randomly sacrificed (n = 15) on day 7, day 21, and day 35 for further quantification of CNV and subretinal fibrosis.
Choroidal flat-mount and immunofluorescence staining
The areas of CNV and collagen fibers were determined on choroidal flat mounts on day 7, day 21, and day 35. Mouse eyecups were fixed in 4% PFA, and anterior segments were removed before cutting four to six radial incisions to be flattened. Then, the RPE–choroid complexes were washed, blocked with 5% goat serum albumin and 0.3% Triton X-100, and then incubated with FITC-labeled isolectin-B4 (IB4) (Vector Laboratories, 1:100) (for evaluation of CNV) and collagen type I antibody (ab34710, Abcam, dilution 1:100) (for evaluating subretinal fibrosis) at 4°C overnight. The secondary antibody against collagen type I was Cy3-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs, 1:200).
Hematoxylin and eosin and Masson staining
The eyes were removed after 7, 21, and 35 days and fixed for 2 h at 4°C in 4% PFA, then dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was conducted following specific protocols. Masson’s trichrome staining was carried out with a trichrome staining kit (ab150686, Abcam). The rate was automatically averaged using ImageJ (MD, USA).
Statistical analysis
GraphPad Prism Version 8.2 was used for statistical analysis. All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analysis between two sets of data was performed with the Student t test. Comparisons between multiple groups were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance. A P value less than 0.05 indicated a statistically significant difference.