1.World Health Organization. Depression and Other Common Mental Disorders: Global Health Estimates.; 2017.
2.Alonso J, Petukhova M, Vilagut G, Chatterji S, Heeringa S, Ustun TB, et al. Days out of role due to common physical and mental conditions: results from the WHO World Mental Health surveys. Molecular psychiatry. 2011;16(12):1234–46.
3.Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological medicine. 2002;32(6):959–76.
4.Williams JW, Jr., Noel PH, Cordes JA, Ramirez G, Pignone M. Is this patient clinically depressed? Jama. 2002;287(9):1160–70.
5.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM–5. Washington, DC American Psychiatric Publ.; 2013.
6.Kessler RC, Ustun TB. The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative Version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). International journal of methods in psychiatric research. 2004;13(2):93–121.
7.Radloff LS. The CES-D Scale:A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1(3):385–401.
8.Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ–9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of general internal medicine. 2001;16(9):606–13.
9.Levis B, Benedetti A, Thombs BD. Accuracy of Patient Health Questionnaire–9 (PHQ–9) for screening to detect major depression: individual participant data meta-analysis. Bmj. 2019;365:l1476.
10.Amtmann D, Kim J, Chung H, Bamer AM, Askew RL, Wu S, et al. Comparing CESD–10, PHQ–9, and PROMIS depression instruments in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Rehabilitation psychology. 2014;59(2):220–9.
11.Khamseh ME, Baradaran HR, Javanbakht A, Mirghorbani M, Yadollahi Z, Malek M. Comparison of the CES-D and PHQ–9 depression scales in people with type 2 diabetes in Tehran, Iran. BMC psychiatry. 2011;11:61.
12.Milette K, Hudson M, Baron M, Thombs BD. Comparison of the PHQ–9 and CES-D depression scales in systemic sclerosis: internal consistency reliability, convergent validity and clinical correlates. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2010;49(4):789–96.
13.Zhang Y, Ting RZ, Lam MH, Lam SP, Yeung RO, Nan H, et al. Measuring depression with CES-D in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: the validity and its comparison to PHQ–9. BMC psychiatry. 2015;15:198.
14.Gilbody S, Richards D, Brealey S, Hewitt C. Screening for depression in medical settings with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): a diagnostic meta-analysis. Journal of general internal medicine. 2007;22(11):1596–602.
15.Vilagut G, Forero CG, Barbaglia G, Alonso J. Screening for Depression in the General Population with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D): A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0155431.
16.Grigoriadis S, Robinson GE. Gender issues in depression. Annals of clinical psychiatry: official journal of the American Academy of Clinical Psychiatrists. 2007;19(4):247–55.
17.Parker G, Fletcher K, Paterson A, Anderson J, Hong M. Gender differences in depression severity and symptoms across depressive sub-types. J Affect Disord. 2014;167:351–7.
18.Salk RH, Hyde JS, Abramson LY. Gender differences in depression in representative national samples: Meta-analyses of diagnoses and symptoms. Psychological bulletin. 2017;143(8):783–822.
19.Kessler RC. Epidemiology of women and depression. J Affect Disord. 2003;74(1):5–13.
20.Schmermund A, Mohlenkamp S, Stang A, Gronemeyer D, Seibel R, Hirche H, et al. Assessment of clinically silent atherosclerotic disease and established and novel risk factors for predicting myocardial infarction and cardiac death in healthy middle-aged subjects: rationale and design of the Heinz Nixdorf RECALL Study. Risk Factors, Evaluation of Coronary Calcium and Lifestyle. American heart journal. 2002;144(2):212–8.
21.Stang A, Moebus S, Dragano N, Beck EM, Mohlenkamp S, Schmermund A, et al. Baseline recruitment and analyses of nonresponse of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study: identifiability of phone numbers as the major determinant of response. European journal of epidemiology. 2005;20(6):489–96.
22.Clark VA, Aneshensel CS, Frerichs RR, Morgan TM. Analysis of effects of sex and age in response to items on the CES-D scale. Psychiatry research. 1981;5(2):171–81.
23.Fountoulakis KN, Bech P, Panagiotidis P, Siamouli M, Kantartzis S, Papadopoulou A, et al. Comparison of depressive indices: Reliability, validity, relationship to anxiety and personality and the role of age and life events. J Affect Disord. 2007;97(1):187–95.
24.Lewinsohn PM, Seeley JR, Roberts RE, Allen NB. Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as a screening instrument for depression among community-residing older adults. Psychology and aging. 1997;12(2):277–87.
25.Icks A, Albers B, Haastert B, Pechlivanis S, Pundt N, Slomiany U, et al. Risk for high depressive symptoms in diagnosed and previously undetected diabetes: 5-year follow-up results of the Heinz Nixdorf Recall study. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56300.
26.Hautzinger M, Bailer M. Allgemeine Depressions Skala. Manual. Göttingen: Beltz-Test-GmbH; 1993.
27.Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. Jama. 1999;282(18):1737–44.
28.Manea L, Gilbody S, McMillan D. Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ–9): a meta-analysis. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l’Association medicale canadienne. 2012;184(3):E191–6.
29.McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia medica. 2012;22(3):276–82.
30.Landis JR, Koch GG. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–74.
31.Beekman AT, Deeg DJ, Van Limbeek J, Braam AW, De Vries MZ, Van Tilburg W. Criterion validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D): results from a community-based sample of older subjects in The Netherlands. Psychological medicine. 1997;27(1):231–5.