1 Luger M, Lafontan M, Bes-Rastrollo M, Winzer E, Yumuk V, Farpour-Lambert N. Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Weight Gain in Children and Adults: A Systematic Review from 2013 to 2015 and a Comparison with Previous Studies. Obes Facts 2018;10:674-93.
2 Imamura F, O’Connor L, Ye Z, et al. Consumption of sugar sweetened beverages, artificially sweetened beverages, and fruit juice and incidence of type 2 diabetes: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimation of population attributable fraction. Br J Sports Med 2016;50:496-504.
3 De Koning L, Malik VS, Kellogg MD, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sweetened beverage consumption, incident coronary heart disease, and biomarkers of risk in men. Circulation 2012;125:1735-41.
4 Chazelas E, Srour B, Desmetz E, et al. Sugary drink consumption and risk of cancer: Results from NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort. BMJ 2019;366.
5 Collin LJ, Judd S, Safford M, Vaccarino V, Welsh JA. Association of Sugary Beverage Consumption With Mortality Risk in US Adults: A Secondary Analysis of Data From the REGARDS Study. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e193121-e193121.
6 Teng AM, Jones AC, Mizdrak A, Signal L, Genç M, Wilson N. Impact of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on purchases and dietary intake: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2019;1187-1204.
7 Ferreira-Pego C, Babio N, Fenandez-Alvira JM, Iglesia I, Moreno LA, Salas-Salvado J. Fluid intake from beverages in Spanish adults; cross-sectional study. Nutr Hosp 2014;29:1171-78.
8 Guelinckx I, Iglesia I, Bottin JH, et al. Intake of water and beverages of children and adolescents in 13 countries. Eur J Nutr 2015;54:69-79.
9 Ruiz E, Ávila JM, Valero T, et al. Macronutrient distribution and dietary sources in the Spanish population: Findings from the ANIBES study. Nutrients 2016;8.
10 Ramiro-González MD, Sanz-Barbero B, Royo-Bordonada MÁ. Childhood Excess Weight in Spain From 2006 to 2012. Determinants and Parental Misperception. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2017;70:656-63.
11 El lobby del azúcar consigue su objetivo al frenar el impuesto sobre los refrescos [The sugar lobby achieves its goal by curbing the soft drink tax]: https://www.eldiario.es/economia/consigue-objetivo-impuesto-bebidas-azucaradas_0_628187485.html. Accessed 2 July 2019.
12 Boletín Oficial del Estado. Ley 5/2017, de 28 de marzo, de medidas fiscales e impuestos [Fiscal Measures & Taxation Act 5/2017, March 28]. 2017;53471-682.
13 Diepeveen S, Ling T, Suhrcke M, Roland M, Marteau TM. Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Public Health 2013;13:756.
14 Hernández-Quevedo C, Rechel B. The role of public health organizations in addressing obesity in Europe. Eur J Public Health 2018;28.
15 Beeken RJ, Wardle J. Public beliefs about the causes of obesity and attitudes towards policy initiatives in Great Britain. Public Health Nutr 2013;16:2132-37.
16 Mazzocchi M, Cagnone S, Bech-Larsen T, et al. What is the public appetite for healthy eating policies? Evidence from a cross-European survey. Heal Econ Policy Law 2015;10:267-92.
17 Gollust SE, Barry CL, Niederdeppe J. Americans’ opinions about policies to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. Prev Med (Baltim) 2014;63:52-57.
18 Schulte EM, Tuttle HM, Gearhardt AN. Belief in Food Addiction and Obesity-Related Policy Support. PLoS One 2016;11:e0147557.
19 Rivard C, Smith D, Mccann SE, Hyland A. Taxing sugar-sweetened beverages: a survey of knowledge, attitudes and behaviours. Public Health Nutr. 2012;15:1355-61.
20 Farley TA, Halper HS, Carlin AM, Emmerson KM, Foster KN, Fertig AR. Mass media campaign to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in a rural area of the United States. Am J Public Health 2017;107:989-95.
21 Donaldson EA, Cohen JE, Rutkow L, Villanti AC, Kanarek F, Barry CL. messages in a Mid-Atlantic US state. 2015;18:2263-73.
22 Krukowski CN, Conley KM, Sterling M, Rainville AJ. A Qualitative Study of Adolescent Views of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes, Michigan, 2014. Prev Chronic Dis 2016;13:1-10.
23 Farrell LC, Warin MJ, Moore VM, Street JM. Socio-economic divergence in public opinions about preventive obesity regulations: Is the purpose to «make some things cheaper, more affordable» or to «help them get over their own ignorance»? Soc Sci Med 2016;154:1-8.
24 Jou J, Niederdeppe J, Barry CL, Gollust SE. Strategic messaging to promote taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages: Lessons from recent political campaigns. Am J Public Health 2014;104:847-53.
25 Hilbert A, Rief W, Braehler E. What determines public support of obesity prevention? J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61:585-90.
26 Curry LE, Rogers T, Williams P, Homsi G, Willett J, Schmitt CL. Public Attitudes and Support for a Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in America’s Heartland. Health Promot Pract 2018;19:418-26.
27 Royo-Bordonada MÁ, Rodriguez-Artalejo F, Bes-Rastrollo M, et al. Politicas alimentarias para prevenir la obesidad y las principales enfermedades no transmisibles en España: querer es poder (Food policies to prevent obesity and the main non-transmissible diseases in Spain: where there’s a will there’s a way). Gac. Sanit., in press.
28 Encuesta sobre Equipamiento y Uso de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación en los Hogares 2018 [2018 Survey of Home-based Equipment and Use of Information and Communication Technologies]. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. https://www.ine.es/prensa/tich_2018.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2019.
29 Julia C, Méjean C, Vicari F, Péneau S, Hercberg S. Public perception and characteristics related to acceptance of the sugar-sweetened beverage taxation launched in France in 2012. Public Health Nutr 2015;18:2679-88.
30 Richardson TE, Yanada BA, Watters D, Stupart D, Lamichhane P, Bell C. What young Australians think about a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages. Aust N Z J Public Health 2019;43:63-67.
31 Pell D, Penney T, Hammond D, Vanderlee L, White M, Adams J. Support for, and perceived effectiveness of, the UK soft drinks industry levy among UK adults: Cross-sectional analysis of the International Food Policy Study. BMJ Open 2019;9:1-9.
32 Brinsden H, Neveux M. Implementing sugar-sweetened beverage taxes : Considerations for European policymakers. 2018.
33 Branson C. Acceptable Behavior. Ipsos MORI SRI. .
34 Niebylski ML, Redburn KA, Duhaney T, Campbell NR. Healthy food subsidies and unhealthy food taxation: A systematic review of the evidence. Nutrition 2015;31:787-95.
35 Afshin A, Peñalvo JL, Del Gobbo L, et al. The prospective impact of food price on improving dietary consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2017;12:e0172277.
36 Sassi F, Belloni A, Mirelman AJ, et al. Equity impacts of price policies to promote healthy behaviours. Lancet 2018;391:2059-70.
37 Olstad DL, Teychenne M, Minaker LM, et al. Can policy ameliorate socioeconomic inequities in obesity and obesity-related behaviours? A systematic review of the impact of universal policies on adults and children. Obes Rev 2016;17:1198-1217.
38 Ralston J, Brinsden H, Buse K, et al. Time for a new obesity narrative. Lancet (London, England) 2018;392:1384-86.
39 Royo-Bordonada MÁ. Setting up childhood obesity policies in Europe. Lancet (London, England) 2016;388:2475.
40 Elwell-Sutton T, Marshall L, Bibby J, Volmert A. Briefing: Reframing the conversation on the social determinants of health: https://www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/upload/publications/2019/Reframing-the-conversation-on-social-determinants.pdf Accessed 2 July 2019.
41 World Health Organization. Fiscal policies for diet and the prevention of noncommunicable diseases. Tech Meet Rep 5–6 May 2015, Geneva, Switz 2016;36.
42 Barry CL, Niederdeppe J, Gollust SE. Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages: Results from a 2011 national public opinion survey. Am J Prev Med 2013;44:158-63.
43 Vives A, Ferreccio C, Marshall G. Comparación de dos métodos para corregir el sesgo de no respuesta a una encuesta: sustitución muestral y ajuste según propensión a responder [Comparison of two methods to correct survey non-response bias: sample substitution and adjustment according to tendency to respond]. Gac Sanit 2009;23:266–271.