See the published version of this preprint at Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Ann-Sophie Lindqvist Bagge
University of Gothenburg
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7932-8233
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background: Many studies have used disease-specific instruments, such as the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT), when studying health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients. Few studies however, have described normative HRQOL values in the general population using FACT - General Population (FACT-GP) . The general aim of the present study is thus to describe the normative HRQOL values in the general Swedish population by using the FACT-GP instrument and to investigate to what degree sociodemographic factors and status of self-rated health (SRH) correlate with HRQOL.
Methods: The participants consisted of a pre-stratified (gender, age and education) sample of Swedish citizens that previously had enrolled to be a part of a web panel hosted by a research institute (SOM Institute) at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden. The HRQOL was assessed by using the FACT-GP and SRH.
Results: A higher FACT-GP score was mainly associated with males, higher age, higher income and better SRH. The results showed that the Swedish sample scored lower on FACT-GP than previous studies.
Conclusions: Since HRQOL is frequently used as an important endpoint in healthcare research, there is an increasing need for normative data. The results from this study serve as a general population standard against which other studied HRQOL-data could be evaluated.
Keywords
Health-related quality of life, HRQOL, the functional assessment of cancer therapy - general population, FACT-GP, self-rated health, SRH, normative data
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.
Version 3
Posted 27 May, 2020
No community comments so far
Editor assigned
On 19 May, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 18 May, 2020
Editor invited
On 18 May, 2020
No comments provided
Review #2 received
Received 30 Apr, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 30 Apr, 2020
Editorial decision: Minor Revision
On 30 Apr, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 17 Apr, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 17 Apr, 2020
Editor assigned
On 15 Apr, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 15 Apr, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 14 Apr, 2020
Editor invited
On 14 Apr, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major Revision
On 12 Feb, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 11 Feb, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 03 Feb, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 28 Jan, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 22 Dec, 2019
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 21 Dec, 2019
Editor assigned
On 19 Dec, 2019
Submission checks complete
On 18 Dec, 2019
Editor invited
On 18 Dec, 2019
First submitted
On 17 Dec, 2019
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
See the published version of this preprint at Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Ann-Sophie Lindqvist Bagge
University of Gothenburg
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7932-8233
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.
Version 3
Posted 27 May, 2020
No community comments so far
Editor assigned
On 19 May, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 18 May, 2020
Editor invited
On 18 May, 2020
No comments provided
Review #2 received
Received 30 Apr, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 30 Apr, 2020
Editorial decision: Minor Revision
On 30 Apr, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 17 Apr, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 17 Apr, 2020
Editor assigned
On 15 Apr, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 15 Apr, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 14 Apr, 2020
Editor invited
On 14 Apr, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Major Revision
On 12 Feb, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 11 Feb, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 03 Feb, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 28 Jan, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 22 Dec, 2019
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 21 Dec, 2019
Editor assigned
On 19 Dec, 2019
Submission checks complete
On 18 Dec, 2019
Editor invited
On 18 Dec, 2019
First submitted
On 17 Dec, 2019
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article at Health and Quality of Life Outcomes.
Background: Many studies have used disease-specific instruments, such as the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT), when studying health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients. Few studies however, have described normative HRQOL values in the general population using FACT - General Population (FACT-GP) . The general aim of the present study is thus to describe the normative HRQOL values in the general Swedish population by using the FACT-GP instrument and to investigate to what degree sociodemographic factors and status of self-rated health (SRH) correlate with HRQOL.
Methods: The participants consisted of a pre-stratified (gender, age and education) sample of Swedish citizens that previously had enrolled to be a part of a web panel hosted by a research institute (SOM Institute) at the University of Gothenburg in Sweden. The HRQOL was assessed by using the FACT-GP and SRH.
Results: A higher FACT-GP score was mainly associated with males, higher age, higher income and better SRH. The results showed that the Swedish sample scored lower on FACT-GP than previous studies.
Conclusions: Since HRQOL is frequently used as an important endpoint in healthcare research, there is an increasing need for normative data. The results from this study serve as a general population standard against which other studied HRQOL-data could be evaluated.
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...