Fabrication and characterization of keratin-starch bio-composite film from chicken feather waste and ginger starch

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-103182/v1

Download PDF

Research article

Fabrication and characterization of keratin-starch bio-composite film from chicken feather waste and ginger starch

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-103182/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: The disposal of chicken feather through burning or burying is not environmentally compliant due to the accompanying release of greenhouse gas and underground water contamination. Thus, the transformation of this bio-waste into a bio-composite film is considered not only sustainable strategy for disposal of these solid wastes but also an attractive alternative to developing an efficient nanostructure biomaterial from renewable bio resource.

Methods: In the present study keratin extracted from chicken feather waste in combination with ginger starch were fabricated into a bio-composite film. The fabricated bio-composite films were characterized, using different analytical techniques.

Results: The physicochemical characteristics of ginger starch showed a moisture content of 33.8%, pH of 6.21, amylose and amylopectin contents of 39.1% and 60.9%, respectively. The hydration capacity of the starch was 132.2% while its gelatinization temperature was 65.7 ^oC. Physical attributes of the bio-composite film, such as surface smoothness and tensile stress increased significantly (p < 0.05) with increasing keratin content, while transparency, solubility significantly (p < 0.05) decreased with increasing keratin level. The various blends of the bio-composite films decayed by over 50% of the original mass after 12 days of complete burial in soil.

Conclusion: Based on the results obtained in this study, the addition of keratin to starch bio-composite showed improvement in mechanical properties, such as tensile stress and surface smoothness. The bio-composite film exhibited appropriate stability in water, although future study showed be carried out to evaluate its thermal stability. Nonetheless, the fabricated keratin-starch bio-composite showed desirable characteristics that could be optimized for industrial applications.

Biomaterials

Toxicology

Chicken feather waste

keratin

starch

bio-material

bio-composites

The lack of adequate regulatory framework guiding human activities especially in developing nations like Nigeria has inevitably led to increasing buildup of greenhouse gases leading to global warming and ultimately climate change. No doubt, the impacts of climate change is becoming more devastating with each passing year. Natural disasters, such as flooding, fire outbreaks, drought, extreme heat etc. are unforeseen consequences of climate change with devastating consequences. Global efforts aimed at reducing climate change though promising are insufficient at the moment. Thus, research efforts focusing on promoting low-cost ecofriendly approaches to meeting human needs should be encouraged [1].

Consequent upon the growing environmental concerns on disposing packaging materials after use [2], there is a renewed efforts aimed at promoting the use of bio-composite from renewable raw materials as alternative to single use, non-biogradable plastics. Bio-Composites are evolving as a sustainable substitute to petroleum-based composites especially in food packaging applications. Hence, there is renewed research attention focusing on the fabrication of composite materials from biopolymers. Natural polymers such as proteins and polysaccharides have been reported to exhibit film-forming properties [3, 4]. Unlike synthetic or hydrocarbon-based polymers, bio-based polymers are edible, ecofriendly, easily affordable and available. The development of bio-based films or coatings from renewable sources, such as polysaccharides (starch, cellulose), proteins (gelatin, keratin), lipids have attracted considerable research efforts in recent times [5–8]. Protein-based biopolymer are characterized by their safety, biodegradability and biocompatibility. Recently, Tesfaye et al. [3] demonstrated the production of keratin-based biofilm from waste feather and starch extracted from avocado seeds.

Protein processing industries including slaughter house, meat packing, leather processing plant etc. generate a huge amount of keratin containing wastes. Of these industries, the poultry slaughter industries take the lead in that approximately 78 million tons of chicken feather waste is added to the global solid waste biomass yearly [9–11]. That is, the contribution of chicken feather waste to the total solid waste is substantial. Thus, management strategies aimed at mitigating the environmental consequences of chicken feather waste is urgently required. By focusing on the physical and chemical structures and properties of feather keratin, researchers might be able to develop some economically feasible applications for the increasingly large amount of chicken feather waste generated daily [12, 13]. The presence of cell-binding motifs in keratin such as arginine-glycine-aspartic acid and leucine-aspartic acid-valine, which are complementary to those found on extracellular matrix proteins such as collagen or fibronectin, enable it to interact with integrins to support cellular attachment, proliferation and migration [14]. Thus, keratin remains an attractive bio-material for controlled drug delivery and release, as well as the production of edible film coating for food packages and post-harvest preservation of fruits.

Ginger (Zingiber officinale) is a member of the Zingiberaceae. It is an herbaceous perennial root crop cultivated extensively worldwide. The underground stem or rhizome with its characteristic pungent aromatic smell is consumed as a delicacy, medicine or spice. However, with its high starch content (40–59% dry weight), it has been identified as a promising biomass for the production of starch [15, 16]. The present study therefore is focused on the transformation of waste keratin extracted from chicken feather waste and ginger root starch into a novel nanocomposite biofilm.

Chicken feather: Chicken feather was obtained from the animal processing unit at Landmark University Commercial Farm, Omu-Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria.

Ginger: Ginger roots was purchased from Omu-Aran market and transported fresh in polythene bag to Biochemistry Laboratory.

Chicken feather and keratin extraction: Chicken feather was obtained from the animal processing unit at Landmark University Commercial Farms. The white coloured feather wastes were free of blood and grease by washing severally with detergent and then rinsed several times with tap water to remove every trace of the detergent. The washed feathers were spread on a clean dry white board to remove any extraneous tissues such as skin, intestine, beak, etc. Thereafter, the feathers were disinfected by soaking in 0.5% hypochlorite solution, sodium thiosulphate was added to neutralize the hypochlorite before being rinsed severally with distilled water before being dried to constant weight at 60 ^oC in a forced-air oven. The dried feathers were cut into small pieces and milled into powder, using a mechanical grinder. One thousand gram (1000 g) of the powdered feather was soaked in acetone (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) overnight, filtered and allowed to air-dry at 27 ^oC. Keratin was extracted from the powdered feather following a combine methods of Akpor et al. [17] and Tesfaye et al. [3]. Fifty gram (50 g) feather powder was dissolved in 150 mL of 0.1 M sodium hydroxide solution, mixed thoroughly and then placed in an orbital shaker at 27 ^oC for 8 h. The resulting solution was filtered through a muslin cloth. The pH of the dissolved feather solution was adjusted to neutral, using 10% trichloroacetic acid and the precipitated keratin filtered through a muslin cloth, washed severally in distilled water and then freeze-dried. The dried keratin was pulverized using a mechanical grinder, sieved through a 50 µm sieve and then stored at 4 ^oC until required for further analysis.

Starch extraction

Starch was extracted from ginger rhizome according to the method of Afolayan et al. [16]. Freshly purchased ginger roots were neatly peeled, washed with copious water, sliced into small pieces and soaked in 1% sodium metabisulphite solution to prevent oxidative browning. Afterward, the chopped ginger roots were milled into a slurry using an electric blender. The starch slurry was then dispersed in a large volume of 1% sodium metabisulphite solution before been filtered using muslin cloth. The obtained filtrate was centrifuged for 15 min at 3000 rpm after which the supernatant was carefully decanted and the mucilage scraped off. The process was repeated trice until the starch was obtained in a pure form. The extracted starch was oven-dried to constant weight at 30 ^oC, weighed and then stored at 4 ^oC, until required for further analysis.

Preparation of the keratin-starch bio-composite film

In the preparation of the keratin-starch bio-composite film, the method described by Tesfaye et al. [3] was followed with little modifications. Briefly, a 5% starch solution was prepared and gelatinized by heating on an electric heater at 70 ^oC under constant stirring. Keratin solution was made by adding 5 g keratin powder in 100 mL of 0.1 M NaOH and heated in an electric heater at 70°C for 20 minutes with constant stirring. Different blends of starch and keratin solutions were then prepared as follow: 20:0, 20:1, 20:3 and 20:5 (starch:keratin ^v/_v). To each starch-keratin blend 1 mL of glycerol was added as plasticizer, after which the mixture was heated at 70 ^oC on an electric heater for 10 min, with vigorous stirring before being poured into a glass petri dish and oven-dried at 50 ^oC for 24 h. The resulting film was carefully peeled and kept in a cool dried carton at 25 ^oC before further analysis.

Physicochemical characterization of ginger starch

Swelling power determination

The swelling power of the starch sample was determined using the method of Afolayan et al. [16]. Ginger starch (0.1 g) was added to 10 ml of distilled water and heated at 50 ^oC for 30 min in a water bath with continuous shaking. The resulting slurry was centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 15 min after which the supernatant was carefully decanted and the resulting starch paste weighed. Thereafter, the swelling power was estimated using the formula:

The swelling power of the starch sample was estimated over a temperature range of 50 – 100 ^oC.

Solubility index determination

The swelling power of the starch sample was determined using the method of Afolayan et al. [16]. A starch solution comprising of 0.5 g dry starch sample dissolved in 10 mL distilled water and heated at 50 ^oC over a water bath for 30 min with vigorous shaking was prepared. The starch solution was then centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 10 min and the supernatant carefully decanted. The resulting starch paste was weighed and the solubility index was estimated, using the formula:

The solubility index of the starch sample was evaluated over a temperature range of 50 – 100 ^oC.

pH determination

The pH was determined using a British Standard Institution (BSI 757) as described by Taheri et al. [18]. A10% (^w/_v) starch dispersion was prepared with continuous shaking in a water bath at 50 ^oC for 5 minutes. Having allowed the starch gel to cool to about 25 ^oC, the pH determined using a pH meter with a glass electrode after standardizing with 4 and 7 pH buffers.

Gelatinization temperature determination

The gelatinization temperature was determined following the method described by Nwokocha et al. [19]. One gram (1 g) starch sample was dispersed in 10 mL distilled water and stirred vigorously. The starch solution was placed on a hot plate and heated with continuous stirring. With the aid of a suspended thermometer, the gelatinization temperature was then estimated.

Physicochemical characterization of the keratin-starch bio-composite film

Thickness measurement

The bio-composite film thickness was estimated with the aid of a digital MDC-MX 923 micrometer (Mitutoyo, Japan). For each bio-composite film, 10 random points were sampled and measurements were taken and the mean values calculated.

Transparency test

The degree of transparency or opaqueness of the bio-composite film with the aid of a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Jenway 7305, UK) at 560 nm. The measurement was done following Santacruz et al. [20] method.

Moisture content determination

The moisture content of the bio-composite fil was determined by drying the bio-composite film to constant weight in a forced air oven at 100 °C. The moisture content was then calculated using the equation:

Where W1, Initial weight of the biocomposte film, W2, weight of the bio-composite film after drying.

Tensile strength analysis

The tensile strength of the bio-composite film was determined according to the method of Rahman and Jamalulail [21], with the aid of a Universal Testing Machine (Hounsfield Series S, UK) according to ASTM standard D882. In measuring the tensile strength, a 1.0 kN load was applied at 10 mm/mim constant at 27 ^oC. From the data obtained, tensile strength and elongation at break were calculated.

Solubility test

The solubility of the keratin-starch bio-composite film in water was determined according to the method of Pavin et al. [22]. A weighed amount of the keratin-starch bio-composite films was completely immersed in water for a period of 12 da and at every three-day interval, the bio-composite film was exhumed and weighed.

Degradability test

The degradability test of the keratin-starch bio-composite films in soil was studied, following the method of Pavin et al. [22]. In this study, a weighed amount of the keratin-starch bio-composite films was vertically buried at 3 – 5 cm depth inside the soil to ensure aerobic degradation conditions at 25 ± 2 ^oC and 35 – 50% relative humidity for a period of 12 days and at every three-day interval, the bio-composite film was exhumed, washed with water, dried to constant weight and weighed.

Morphological analysis of the bio-composite films

The morphological analysis of keratin, ginger starch, and keratin-starch bio-composite film was carried out with a field emission gun scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Zeiss, Germany). The sample was placed on a gold coated stub with the aid of a diode sputter coater. The crystalline phase evaluation was carried out with the aid of a benchtop XRD analyzer (ARL EQUINOX 1000, Thermo Fischer, UK), equipped with a diffracted beam monochromator and a copper target X-ray tube operated at 40 kV and 30 mA.

Statistical analysis

The experimental set up was carried out in triplicate and the results expressed as mean ± SD. The results were statistically analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Turkey multiple range test. Charts were drawn using GraphPad prism 8.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, California). Significant level was set at P < 0.05.

Physicochemical characteristics of ginger starch

The physicochemical characteristics of ginger starch showed a moisture content of 33.8%, pH of 6.2, amylose and amylopectin contents of 39.1% and 60.9%, respectively. The hydration capacity of the starch was 132.2% while its gelatinization temperature was 65.7 ^oC (Table 1). Ginger starch showed a progress increase in swelling capacity (Fig. 2a) and solubility index (Fig. 2b) with increasing temperature.

Table 1

Physicochemical characteristics of ginger starch
Moisture (%)	pH	Amylose (%)	Hydration capacity (%)	Gelatinization temperature (^oC)
33.8 ± 0.44	6.2 ± 0.1	39.1 ± 1.6	132.2 ± 18.1	65.7 ± 3.2

Results are means ± SD of triplicate determinations.

Physical attributes of keratin-starch bio-composite film

The fabricated bio-composite films obtained from starch, and a combination of starch and different volumes of keratin with glycerol as plasticizer is shown in Fig. 1. Keratin containing bio-composites (20:1, 20:3, and 20:5) had significantly lower moisture content, when compared to the starch only (20:0) bio-composite. The moisture content of the keratin-based bio-composite (20:1, 20:3, and 20:5) decreased with increasing keratin content. Bio-composites containing 1 and 3 volume of keratin had similar moisture level which was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than 20:5 bio-composite (Table 2). On the contrary, the thickness of the bio-composites increased proportionately with increasing keratin content. The 20:3 and 20:5 keratin-containing bio-composites were significantly thicker compared to 20:1 and 20:0 bio-composite films. Film transparency follows a similar trend with moisture content. Opaqueness increases with increase in keratin-level in the bio-composites (Table 2). The tensile strength and elongation at break of the bio-composite films increased significantly (p < 0.05) with increasing keratin concentration in the film.

Table 2

Characteristics of the keratin-starch biocomposite films
Characteristics	20:0	20:1	20:3	20:5
Moisture (%)	19.0 ± 0.1^c	13.0 ± 0.2^b	11.7 ± 0.2^b	5.5 ± 0.2^a
Thickness (mm)	0.18 ± 0.02^a	0.23 ± 0.03^b	0.35 ± 0.03^c	0.35 ± 0.04^c
Transparency (%T)	76.83 ± 0.3^d	52.60 ± 0.2^c	33.20 ± 0.1^b	18.03 ± 0.2^a
Tensile strength (MPa)	8.3 ± 0.2^a	9.2 ± 0.1^a	11.5 ± 0.3^b	13.8 ± 0.2^c
Elongation at break (%)	19.7 ± 0.1^a	20.5 ± 0.3^a	28.1 ± 0.3^b	33.3 ± 0^c

Results are means ± SD of triplicate determinations. Values in the same row carrying different alphabets are significant (p < 0.05). Note: 20:0, 20:1, 20:3, and 20:5 = starch/keratin (^v/_v)

Solubility test

Keratin containing bio-composites (20:1, 20:3, and 20:5) had significantly lower solubility in water, when compared to the starch only (20:0) bio-composite. The solubility of the keratin-based bio-composite (20:1, 20:3, and 20:5) decreased with increasing keratin content though the observed decreases were insignificant (p > 0.05) (Fig. 3).

Degradability test

The various blends of the bio-composite films decayed by over 50% of the original mass after 12 d of complete burial in the soil. No appreciable difference was however observed in the degree of degradability between the various blends on day 12 (Fig. 4).

Structural analysis

Scanning electron micrographs of keratin, ginger starch, and bio-composite films obtained from graded addition of keratin to starch solution are presented in Fig. 5. The SEM images showed distinct variation characteristic of their respective composition. The roughness of the bio-composite surface was observed to decreases with increasing keratin concentration. X-ray diffractogram of ginger starch showed distinct characteristic crystalline peaks, which was observed to disappear with increasing keratin content in the keratin-starch bio-composite films (Fig. 6.)

The percentage moisture content of ginger starch as demonstrated in this study is considerably high and poses a great threat in terms of its shelf life [23]. The stability and storage of food products depend greatly on their moisture content. A moisture content of 10–12% is recommended for commercial starches and starch with a below 10% moisture level is specified for the production of low-density bio-composite film [24, 25]. A pH of 6.2 obtained for ginger starch in this study agrees closely to the value (6.2) reported by Praveen et al. [26]. The amylose content (39.1%) of ginger starch as revealed in this study is high compared to values obtained for wheat (25.6%) [27]; potato (29.3%), cassava (23.7%), and Dioscorea (26.3%) [28]. However, our result agrees closely with that obtained for ginger (34.0%) by Braga et al. [29]. Turmeric had been demonstrated to contain amylose content as high as 48% [29]. The amylose content of starch contributes significantly to its physicochemical and functional characteristics. Studies have shown that the amount of amylose present within a particular crop could vary even within the same botanical species due geographical and cultural variations [30]. Amylose unlike amylopectin is anhydrous hence impede the swelling and solubility of starch granules. The anhydrous nature of amylose offers excellent advantage in industrial application of starch in the fabrication of very strong, colourless bio-composite films [31]. Starches with amylose content above 30% are known to show a slight deformation in their granule appearance. The interactions within the polymeric linkages of starch determine its solubility and swelling capacity [32]. These interactions in turn is a function of the ratio of amylose to amylopectin [33]. The lower the amylose to amylopectin ratio, the greater is the swelling capacity of starch [34]. Starches such as ginger starch with high amylose content as demonstrated in this study usually exhibit low swelling and solubility capacity. The high amylose of ginger starch (> 30%) contributes significantly to the mechanical properties of bio-composite films. The considerably high amylose content of ginger starch in this study also contributes to its relatively high gelatinization temperature. Studies have shown that potato starch, wheat starch, and cassava starch with low amylose level exhibit a relatively low gelatinization temperatures of 57–58 °C [35]. It is often argued that the longer branch chains in high-amylose starches is responsible for their characteristically high gelatinization temperatures. Gelatinization is a requisite process which disrupts the crystalline structure of starch as a means of facilitating good cross-linking reactions in bio-composite formation.

The present study demonstrated the successful fabrication of thin, homogenous, yellow flexible films from varying combinations of ginger starch and chicken feather keratin. The colour variation from white to yellow as a function of increasing keratin content led to reduction in the degree of transparency of the bio-composite films. This observation concurs with the report of Tesfaye et al. [3] on the production of bio-composite film from avocado pear kernel and keratin. The inclusion of keratin in the biofilms was also observed to enhance the toughness, in terms of tensile strength, of the films in addition to glycerol. This could be due to the formation of intermolecular bonds/interactions between the hydroxyl groups present in starch and the functional groups (carboxyl and amino groups) present in keratin amino acids. Thus, the keratin-based biofilms had higher tensile strength and exhibited higher elongation at break than the one containing ginger starch and glycerol only.

The moisture level in the various blends of keratin-starch bio-composite films ranged between 5.5 and 19.0%. The moisture absorption capacity of bio-composites is of great significance with regard to their processing, packaging, transportation, and shelve life. During processing, moisture content of products could affect the intra and intermolecular associations within and/or between molecules present in such products thereby contributing its final mass or volume as well impact on its durability. Products with high moisture content most often tend to be heavier hence high transportation cost and are also highly susceptible to rapid deterioration [36, 37].The inclusion of keratin in the fabricated bio-composites in this study led to remarkable reduction in moisture content. This suggests enhanced shelf life, as a result of low microbial activity, of the bio-composite film and reduced cost implication with regard to transportation. The interaction affinity of a biofilm with an aqueous environment such as obtainable within a cellular milieu is determined by its solubility. Though the utilization of a bio-composite film in food packaging only requires partial solubility in water in order to not to compromise the integrity of packed products, the solubility of certain products before consumption is beneficial. From the present study, it was observed that keratin inclusion resulted in remarkable decrease in solubility. The reduction in solubility as a consequence of keratin could be attributed to the presence of hydrophobic amino acids within the keratin matrix [38]. It is our submission that the potential reduction in solubility of bio-composite film as a result of keratin could be beneficial in contributing to their stability.

The results of the SEM images evidently showed that the morphological appearance of keratin-starch bio-composites greatly depends on their chemical composition. Film attributes, such as surface morphology and texture are influenced by the ratio of the keratin and starch solutions. Contrary to reports by some authors, we observed that the degree of smoothness of the keratin-starch bio-composite film depends on the keratin content and not starch. From the data obtained from the X-ray difractograms, it could be observed that the XRD patterns of ginger starch showing different crystallinity peaks, completely disappeared, especially from the 20:3 keratin-starch bio-composite film. This is indicative of a perfect dispersion of the starch granules with the keratin fibres showing the extent of intercalation or cross linking in the bio-composite film.

Data obtained from the degradation of the bio-composite fil in soil was impressive. The loss of over 50% mass observed in the keratin-starch bio-composite film after 12 ds is significant, given the challenge in chicken feather waste disposal. The soil contain a myriad of microflora consisting of bacteria and fungi. This microbial population produce different types of keratinases that act synergistically together in the degradation process [39].

These study demonstrated the successful fabrication of a keratin-starch bio-composite film from chicken feather wastes and ginger starch. The bio-composite film exhibited remarkable dissolution in water, thus showcasing its suitability in drug delivery. It also showed desirable mechanical properties such as reduced moisture content due to increased keratin content thus exhibiting high tensile strength and elongation at break, thus contributing to its stability. The remarkable degradability of the biocomposite film is a testament of its environmental friendliness. Overall, the keratin-starch bio-composite showed comparable qualities to the non- degradable polymers. Therefore, it could offer a viable, eco-friendly and sustainable solution to solid waste accumulation in the environment.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the Director, Landmark Commercial Farm for the gift of chicken feather waste.

Authors’ contribution

O.M.O. designed and supervised the experiment, drafted the manuscript, C.F.O. and F.D.A. performed the experiment, A.A.A. and M.O. carried out the SEM and XRD analysis and analyzed the data, O.B.A. and S.I.O. took part in experimental analysis, statistical analysis and manuscript editing. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated and analyzed during the current study are available with the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study does not require any formal consent as it does not include any human participation or animal experimentation.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declare that there is no competing interest.

Kunamaneni S, Jassi S, Hoang D. Promoting reuse behaviour: Challenges and strategies for repeat purchase, low-involvement products. Sustain Prod Consum. 2019;20:253-72.
Sevigné-Itoiz E, Gasol CM, Rieradevall J, Gabarrell X. Contribution of plastic waste recovery to greenhouse gas (GHG) savings in Spain. Waste manag. 2015;46:557-67.
Tesfaye T, Sithole BB, Ramjugernath D. Preparation, characterization and application of keratin based green biofilms from waste chicken feathers. Int J Chem Sci 2018; 16(3):1-16.
Malhotra BH, Keshwani A, Kharkwal HA. Natural polymer based cling films for food packaging. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015;7(4):10-18.
Mathiot C, Ponge P, Gallard B, Sassi JF, Delrue F, Le Moigne N. Microalgae starch-based bioplastics: Screening of ten strains and plasticization of unfractionated microalgae by extrusion. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;208:142-151.
Yusmaniar Y, Syafei DI, Arum M, Handoko E, Kurniawan C, Asali MR. Preparation and characterization of Seaweed based Bioplastic Blended with Polysaccharides derived from various seeds of Avocado, Jackfruit and Durian. InJournal of Physics: Conference Series 2019; 1402(5): 055097. IOP Publishing.
Susilawati S, Rostini I, Pratama RI, Rochima E. Characterization of Bioplastic Packaging from Tapioca Flour Modified with the Addition of Chitosan and Fish Bone Gelatin. World Sci News. 2019;135:85-98.
Omrani Fard H, Abbaspour-Fard MH, Khojastehpour M, Dashti A. Gelatin/Whey Protein-Potato Flour Bioplastics: Fabrication and Evaluation. J Polym Environ. 2020.
Booth S, Long AJ, Addy VI. Converting tannery waste to energy in: Visual Display Presentation, V-21, IILTCS II. Eurocongress, Istanbul. 2006.
Thanikaivelan P. Transformation of leather industry biowaste into high value multifunctional materials. En: International and Interuniversity Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (IIUCNN). Third International Conference on Recycling and Reuse of Materials. Kerala, India.2014.
Rao JR, Thanikaivelan P, Sreeram KJ, Nair BU. Green route for the utilization of chrome shavings (chromium-containing solid waste) in tanning industry. Environ Sci Technol. 2002; 36: 1372–1376.
Akpor OB, Odesola DE, Thomas RE, Oluba OM. Chicken feather hydrolysate as alternative peptone source for microbial cultivation. F1000Research. 2018;7.
Akintola SA, Oki M, Aleem AA, Adediran AA, Akpor OB, Oluba OM, Ogunsemi BT, Ikubanni PP. Valorized chicken feather as corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in drilling mud. Results Eng. 2019;4:100026.
Varanko A, Saha S, Chilkoti A. Recent trends in protein and peptide-based biomaterials for advanced drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2020.
Jacob J, Haponiuk JT, Thomas S, Peter G, Gopi S. Use of ginger nanofibers for the preparation of cellulose nanocomposites and their antimicrobial activities. Fibers. 2018;6(4):79.
Afolayan MO, Adama KK, Oberafo A, Omojola M, Thomas S. Isolation and characterization studies of ginger (Zingiber officinale) root starch as a potential industrial biomaterial. Am J Mater Sci. 2014;4(2):97-102.
Akpor OB, Deborah JE, Oluba OM. Comparative Decolouration of Crystal Violet Dye using ChickenFeather Fibre, Chemical Oxidation and Bacterial Cells. J Environ Sci Technol. 2018;11(5):246-53.
Taheri A, Abedian Kenari AM, Gildberg A, Behnam S. Extraction and physicochemical characterization of greater lizardfish (Saurida tumbil) skin and bone gelatin. J Food Sci. 2009;74(3):E160-5.
Nwokocha LM, Senan C, Williams PA. Structural, physicochemical and rheological characterization of Tacca involucrata starch. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;86(2):789-96.
Santacruz S, Rivadeneira C, Castro M. Edible films based on starch and chitosan. Effect of 29starch source andconcentration, plasticizer, surfactant's hydrophobic tail and mechanical treatment. Food Hydrocoll. 2015; 49: 89-94.
Rahman MN, Jamalulail SA. Extraction, physicochemical characterizations and sensory quality of chicken feet gelatin. Borneo Sci. 2012;30:1-3.
Parvin F, Rahman M, Islam JM, Khan MA, Saadat AH. Preparation and characterization of starch/PVA blend for biodegradable packaging material. In: Adv Mater Res 2010; 123: 351-354.
Abdullah N, Nawawi A, Othman I (2000) Fungal spoilage of starch-based foods in relation to its water activity (aw). J Stored Prod Res. 2000;36:47–54..
Kormin S, Kormin F, Beg MDH, et al. Physical and mechanical properties of LDPE incorporated with different starch sources. IOP Conference Series: Mater Sci Eng. 2017;226, 012157.
Chisenga SM, Workneh TS, Bultosa G, Laing M. Characterization of physicochemical properties of starches from improved cassava varieties grown in Zambia. AIMS Agric Food. 2019;4(4):939-66.
Praveen NM, Manasa S, Kiran BM, Sathish Kumar BY. Isolation, Characterization and Physicochemical Properties of Starch from Ginger (Zingiber Officinale). J Pharm Adv Res. 2019; 2(2): 475-478.
Hung PV, Maeda T, Morita N. Study on physicochemical characteristics of waxy and high‐amylose wheat starches in comparison with normal wheat starch. Starch‐Stärke. 2007;59(3‐4):125-31.
Yuan Y, Zhang L, Dai Y, Yu J. Physicochemical properties of starch obtained from Dioscorea nipponica Makino comparison with other tuber starches. J Food eng. 2007;82(4):436-42.
Braga ME, Moreschi SR, Meireles MA. Effects of supercritical fluid extraction on Curcuma longa L. and Zingiber officinale R. starches. Carbohydr polym. 2006;63(3):340-6.
Liu P, Kang X, Cui B, Gao W, Wu Z, Yu B. Effects of amylose content and enzymatic debranching on the properties of maize starch-glycerol monolaurate complexes. Carbohydr polym. 2019;222:115000.
Cano A, Jiménez A, Cháfer M, Gónzalez C, Chiralt A. Effect of amylose: amylopectin ratio and rice bran addition on starch films properties. Carbohydr polym. 2014;111:543-55.
Zhang J, Li A, Wang A. Study on superabsorbent composite. VI. Preparation, characterization and swelling behaviors of starch phosphate-graft-acrylamide/attapulgite superabsorbent composite. Carbohydr Polym. 2006 Jul 25;65(2):150-8.
Hoover R, Ratnayake WS. Starch characteristics of black bean, chick pea, lentil, navy bean and pinto bean cultivars grown in Canada. Food Chem. 2002;78(4):489-98.
Srichuwong S, Sunarti TC, Mishima T, Isono N, Hisamatsu M. Starches from different botanical sources II: Contribution of starch structure to swelling and pasting properties. Carbohydr Polym. 2005;62(1):25-34.
Kong X, Zhu P, Sui Z, Bao J. Physicochemical properties of starches from diverse rice cultivars varying in apparent amylose content and gelatinisation temperature combinations. Food Chem. 2015;172:433-40.
Munawar SS, Subiyanto B. Characterization of biomass pellet made from solid waste oil palm industry. Procedia Environ Sci. 2014;20:336-41.
Kausar A, Iqbal M, Javed A, Aftab K, Bhatti HN, Nouren S. Dyes adsorption using clay and modified clay: A review. J Mol Liq. 2018;256:395-407.
Barone JR, Gregoire NT. Characterization of fibre-polymer interactions and transcrystallity in short keratin fiber-polypropylene composites. Plast Rubber Compos.2006; 35: 287–293.
Wattie B. Synthesis of keratin-based hydrogels and cryogels destined for environmental applications. Department of Bioresource Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Macdonald Campus of McGill University Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada, Bryan Wattie. 2016.

Download PDF

Version 1

posted

You are reading this latest preprint version

Fabrication and characterization of keratin-starch bio-composite film from chicken feather waste and ginger starch

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Materials And Methods

Morphological analysis of the bio-composite films

Results

Physicochemical characteristics of ginger starch

Physical attributes of keratin-starch bio-composite film

Solubility test

Degradability test

Structural analysis

Discussion

Conclusion

Declarations

References

Status:

Version 1