Study participant characteristics at baseline are summarized in Table 1. Since ELITE and WISH enrolled only women, most (79%) study participants were women. The majority were non-Hispanic White (66%) and married (59%). Study participants had an average age of 61 years, were highly educated (mean 16 years of education), had an average annual income of $66,700, and were overweight (mean BMI 27 kg/m2). Over a quarter of participants (27%) carried the ApoE4 genotype. The average CES-D score at baseline was low, and only 13% scored above the cut-off score of 16 indicating concern for clinical depression(18). The average CIMT at baseline was highest in the WISH trial but was otherwise comparable across all three clinical trials (overall mean=0.77±0.12 mm).
Table 1
Baseline characteristics for study participants by clinical trial (n = 1,495).
Variable | BVAIT (n = 504)a | WISH (n = 349)a | ELITE (n = 642)a | Combined |
| Mean ± SD or Number (%) |
Age (years) | 61.5 ± 9.9 | 61.4 ± 7.1 | 60.6 ± 6.9 | 61.1 ± 8.1 |
Sex | | | | |
Male | 308 (61.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 308 (20.6%) |
Female | 196 (38.9%) | 349 (100%) | 642 (100%) | 1,187 (79.4%) |
Race | | | | |
Non-Hispanic White | 326 (64.7%) | 222 (63.6%) | 439 (68.4%) | 987 (66.0%) |
Non-Hispanic Black | 75 (14.9%) | 21 (6.0%) | 60 (9.3%) | 156 (10.4%) |
Hispanic | 55 (10.9%) | 55 (15.8%) | 90 (14.0%) | 200 (13.4%) |
Asian or Pacific Islander | 45 (8.9%) | 38 (10.9%) | 53 (8.3%) | 136 (9.1%) |
Other | 3 (0.6%) | 13 (3.7%) | 0 (0%) | 16 (1.1%) |
Education (# of years) | 15.7 ± 2.0b | 15.8 ± 2.0 | 16.0 ± 1.9 | 15.9 ± 2.0 |
Income | $64.6k ± $29.7kb | $65.3k ± $31.3kb | $69.0k ± $31.0kb | $66.7k ± $30.7k |
Marital status | | | | |
Single, never married | 45 (8.9%)b | 33 (9.5%) | 50 (7.8%) | 128 (8.6%) |
Married | 323 (64.1%)b | 197 (56.4%) | 368 (57.3%) | 888 (59.4%) |
Separated | 5 (1.0%)b | 7 (2.0%) | 12 (1.9%) | 24 (1.6%) |
Divorced | 89 (17.7%)b | 80 (22.9%) | 171 (26.6%) | 340 (22.8%) |
Widowed | 41 (8.1%)b | 32 (9.2%) | 41 (6.4%) | 114 (7.6%) |
Current smoker | 17 (3.4%)b | 8 (2.3%) | 22 (3.4%) | 47 (3.2%) |
Alcohol | 221 (43.8%) | 152 (43.6%) | 313 (48.8%) | 686 (45.9%) |
Use of anti-hypertensives at baseline | 190 (37.7%) | 117 (33.5%) | 220 (34.3%) | 527 (35.3%) |
Use of cholesterol lowering medication at baseline | 81 (16.1%) | 72 (20.6%) | 126 (19.6%) | 279 (18.7%) |
BMI (kg/m2) | 28.1 ± 4.9 | 26.6 ± 5.2 | 27.2 ± 5.4b | 27.4 ± 5.2 |
Blood pressure (mmHg) | | | | |
Systolic | 127.0 ±15.6 | 117.9 ± 13.9 | 116.5 ± 13.7b | 120.4 ± 15.2 |
Diastolic | 78.7 ± 8.9 | 75.0 ± 8.6 | 74.5 ± 8.4b | 76.0 ± 8.8 |
ApoE4+ | 103 (22.2%)b | 86 (25.7%)b | 197 (30.9%)b | 386 (26.9%) |
CES-D score | 6.2 ± 6.6 | 7.3 ± 6.82 | 8.3 ± 8.6 | 7.4 ± 7.6 |
CES-D score ≥ 16c | 44 (8.7%) | 40 (11.5%) | 113 (17.6%) | 197 (13.2%) |
Average CIMT (mm, over 1 cm segment) | 0.75 ± 0.15 | 0.81 ± 0.10 | 0.77± 0.11 | 0.77± 0.12 |
Executive function composite score | -0.012 ± 1.369 | -0.005 ± 1.323 | -0.002 ± 1.360 | -0.006 ± 1.353 |
Verbal memory composite score | -0.005 ± 1.317 | -0.006 ± 1.357 | 0.001 ± 1.348 | -0.003 ± 1.339 |
Visual memory composite score | 0.001 ± 1.108 | 0.001 ±1.107 | 0 ± 1.103 | 0.001 ± 1.105 |
Global cognition composite score | 0.014 ± 1.745 | 0.002 ± 1.715 | -0.001 ± 1.827 | 0.05 ± 1.773 |
a. 2 participants in BVAIT and 1 participant in both WISH and ELITE each did not complete the baseline cognitive exam. |
b. Differing sample sizes: Education, BVAIT: n = 503. Income, BVAIT: n = 472, WISH: n = 319, ELITE: n = 597. Marital status, BVAIT: n = 503. Current smoker, BVAIT: n = 503. BMI, ELITE: n = 641. Blood pressure, ELITE: n = 640. ApoE4 genotype, BVAIT: n = 463, WISH: n = 334, ELITE: n = 637. CES-D score, WISH: n = 348. |
c. A score of 16 or higher on the CES-D indicates concern for clinical depression. |
Baseline and 2.5 Year Cross-Sectional Associations between CIMT and Cognition
CIMT was not associated with any of the cognitive function composite scores after adjustment for various confounders either at baseline or at 2.5 years (Table 2).
Table 2
Cross-sectional associations between CIMT and cognitive function at baseline and at 2.5 years from multivariable linear regression models.
| Baseline | 2.5 years | |
Cognitive Domain | β (95% CI)a | p-value | β (95% CI)a | p-value | Model covariates |
Executive function | 0.0227 (-0.0325, 0.0778) | 0.42 | -0.0302 (-0.1022, 0.0419) | 0.41 | Age, sex, race, education, income, marital status, ApoE genotype, BMI, SBP, HDL, study |
Verbal memory | 0.0088 (0.0507, 0.0684) | 0.77 | -0.0620 (-0.1389, 0.0149) | 0.11 | Age, sex, race, education, income, ApoE genotype, current smoking status, CES-D score, BMI, study |
Visual memory | 0.0489 (-0.0031, 0.1001) | 0.07 | 0.0220 (-0.0413, 0.0854) | 0.50 | Age, sex, race, education, income, marital status, SBP, HDL, study |
Global cognition | 0.0445 (-0.0297, 0.1187) | 0.24 | -0.0347 (-0.1299, 0.0605) | 0.47 | Age, sex, race, education, CES-D score, BMI, SBP, HDL, study |
a. Beta estimates are reported in units per 0.1 mm of CIMT. |
In models without BMI, SBP or HDL, CIMT was also not associated with any of the cognitive function composite scores. No significant interaction by ApoE4 genotype was found between CIMT associations with cognition (all interaction p-values ≥ 0.19). Similarly, no significant interaction by age group was found (all interaction p-values ≥ 0.32). There was a significant interaction by sex for the association between CIMT and verbal memory composite score (p=0.019). When the analysis was stratified by sex, the CIMT association was in opposite directions, but was not significantly associated with verbal memory composite score among men (β=-0.071 units per 0.1 mm CIMT, 95% CI: -0.156, 0.013, p=0.10) or among women (β = 0.059 units per 0.1 mm CIMT, 95% CI: -0.021, 0.139, p=0.15).
Longitudinal Associations between CIMT and Cognition
Higher CIMT at baseline was weakly associated with a decrease in global cognition composite score assessed over 2.5 years (β=-0.056 units per 0.1 mm CIMT, 95% CI: -0.110, -0.001, p=0.045) after adjusting for baseline global cognition composite score, age, sex, race, education, baseline CES-D, baseline BMI, baseline SBP, baseline HDL-cholesterol and the three clinical trials. There were no significant associations between CIMT at baseline and other cognitive domains over 2.5 years (Table 3). There were no significant interactions by ApoE4 genotype, sex, or age group in the longitudinal models (all p-values ≥ 0.21).
Table 3
Associations between baseline CIMT and change in cognitive function assessed over 2.5 years from multivariable linear regression models.
Cognitive Domain | β (95% CI)a | p-value | Model Covariates |
Executive function | -0.0173 (-0.0542, 0.0196) | 0.36 | Baseline executive function composite score, age, sex, race, education, income, marital status, ApoE4 genotype, baseline BMI, baseline SBP, baseline HDL, study |
<65 years old | -0.0193 (-0.0631, 0.0246) | 0.39 |
≥65 years old | -0.0131 (-0.0844, 0.0581) | 0.72 |
Verbal memory | -0.0245 (-0.0795, 0.0304) | 0.38 | Baseline verbal memory composite score, age, sex, race, education, income, ApoE4 genotype, current smoking status, baseline CES-D score, baseline BMI, study |
<65 years old | -0.0208 (-0.0853, 0.0438) | 0.53 |
≥65 years old | -0.0387 (-0.1461, 0.0688) | 0.48 |
Visual memory | -0.0209 (-0.0617, 0.0199) | 0.32 | Baseline visual memory composite score, age, sex, race, education, income, marital status, baseline SBP, baseline HDL, study |
<65 years old | -0.0324 (-0.0798, 0.0150) | 0.18 |
≥65 years old | -0.0148 (-0.0962, 0.0667) | 0.72 |
Global cognition | -0.0558 (-0.1104, -0.0012) | 0.045 | Baseline global cognition composite score, age, sex, race, education, baseline CES-D score, baseline BMI, baseline SBP, baseline HDL, study |
<65 years old | -0.0354 (-0.1006, 0.0297) | 0.29 |
≥65 years old | -0.1061 (-0.2080, -0.0043) | 0.0412 |
a. Beta estimates are reported in units per 0.1 mm of CIMT. |
In analysis stratified by age group, the weak inverse association between baseline CIMT and change in global cognition composite score assessed over 2.5 years remained significant only for participants aged 65 years and older (Table 3). The interaction by age group for the association between baseline CIMT and change in global cognition composite score was not significant (p=0.21). No other associations between baseline CIMT and change in cognitive domain composite scores assessed over 2.5 years were observed for either age category.
The average CIMT at 2.5 years across all three clinical trials (0.79±0.12 mm) increased by 0.01 mm from average CIMT at baseline. There were no significant associations between change in CIMT and change in cognition in models adjusting only for baseline cognitive function scores.