Soil properties, MBC, grain yield, and Rubisco activity
One-way analysis of variance showed that the N treatments have significant effects on soil properties (P < 0.05, Table S1). TN and NO3−N were significantly (P < 0.05) increased with the increasing rates of N application, while soil pH and SWC exhibited an opposite tread (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found in SOC (P > 0.05), NH4−N (P > 0.05), and AP (P > 0.05) among three N treatments (N1, N2, and N3). DOC and MBC were enhanced by the N application (Fig. S1), with the significantly (P < 0.05) higher values under the N3 treatment than under the N1 and N0 treatments. The N2 and N3 treatments were characterized by significantly (P < 0.05) higher grain yield and aboveground biomass than the N1 and N0 treatments (Fig. S1), as well as RubisCO activity (P < 0.05, Fig. 1).
Abundance and structure of soil autotrophic bacterial community
The abundance of autotrophic bacteria indicated by the copy number of cbbL gene ranged from 0.82 × 106 to 2.78 × 106 copies g−1 soil. The clear differences were observed among treatments (P < 0.05), with the highest abundance of cbbL gene under the N3 treatment (Fig. 1). A total of 289, 656 sequences of soil autotrophic bacterial community were obtained using Illumina sequencing after quality control. The diversity of autotrophic bacteria indicated by Chao 1 richness was significantly higher under the N0 and N1 treatments than under the N2 treatment, with intermediary value under the N3 treatment (P < 0.05, Fig. 1). However, there was no significant difference in Shannon index among the four treatments (P = 0.10, Fig. 1).
Across all samples, the autotrophic bacterial community was dominated by Alphaproteobacteria (32.4%), Betaproteobacteria (10.7%), and Actinobacteria (10.4%) (Fig. 2). The dominant communities were mainly affiliated with facultative autotrophic bacteria within the genera Xanthobacter (10.8%), Bradyrhizobium (10.1%), Aminobacter (5.2%), Nitrosospira (6.1%) and, Mycobacterium (2.9%), followed by the rare genera Nocardia (1.9%), Oscillochloris (1.8%), Sphingomonas (1.5%), and Saccharomonospora (1.3%), (Fig. 2). Principal coordinates analysis indicated that the composition of autotrophic bacterial community under the N2 and N3 treatments exhibited a significant (P < 0.05) separation from that under the N1 and N0 treatments (Fig. S2). The relative abundance of Xanthobacter under the N3 treatment was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those under the N0, N1, and N2 treatments, while Nocardia and Saccharomonospora under the N1, N2, and N3 treatments were significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that under the N0 treatment (Fig. 2).
The abundance and community composition of autotrophic bacteria were positively correlated with NO3−N (r = 0.57, P < 0.05 and r = 0.79, P < 0.01), but negatively correlated with pH (r = −0.57, P < 0.05 and r = −0.75, P < 0.01) and SWC (r = −0.62, P < 0.05 and r = −0.83, P < 0.001) (Fig. 5). The abundance and community composition of autotrophic bacteria had positive correlations with RubisCO activity (r = 0.58, P < 0.05 and r = 0.91, P < 0.001), SOC (r = 0.63, P < 0.05 and r = 0.75, P < 0.01), DOC (r = 0.90, P < 0.001 and r = 0.73, P < 0.01), as well as maize yield (r = 0.65, P < 0.05 and r = 0.94, P < 0.001), and aboveground biomass (r = 0.61, P < 0.05 and r = 0.91, P < 0.001) (Fig. 5). In contrast, the autotrophic bacterial diversity showed negative correlations with TN (r = −0.74, P < 0.01), NO3−N (r = −0.70, P < 0.05), RubisCO activity (r = −0.57, P < 0.05), DOC (r = −0.69, P < 0.05), maize yield (r = −0.71, P < 0.05), and aboveground biomass (r = −0.73, P < 0.01).
The autotrophic bacterial co-occurrence networks
Co-occurrence networks were constructed to examine the different co-occurrence patterns of the soil autotrophic bacterial community under the four treatments (Fig. 3). In total, there were 367 nodes, 1956 links, and four distinct modules (modules I, II, III, and VI) in the autotrophic bacterial network. In the autotrophic bacterial network, the number of positive correlations (1953 edges) were greater than that of the negative correlations (3 edges). The modules I, II, III, and VI in the bacterial networks consisted of 117, 72, 99, and 79 nodes, respectively. At the phylum level, the relative abundance of Alphaproteobacteria was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in modules II and VI than in modules I and III, while those of Betaproteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Chloroflexi followed the opposite trend (Fig. 4). At the genus level, modules I and II showed the significantly (P < 0.05) greater abundances of Aminobacter and Bradyrhizobium, but lower abundances of Mycobacterium, Nitrosospira, and Saccharomonospora than module III. In contrast, Xanthobacter was significantly greater in module VI than in modules I, II, and III. Module VI was positively correlated with TN (r = 0.77, P < 0.01) and NO3−N (r = 0.89, P < 0.001), but negatively correlated with pH (r = −0.71, P < 0.01) (Fig. 5). Furthermore, module VI had positive correlations with RubisCO activity (r = 0.77, P < 0.01), SOC (r = 0.63, P < 0.05), DOC (r = 0.59, P < 0.05), MBC (r = 0.85, P < 0.001), grain yield (r = 0.72, P < 0.01), and aboveground biomass (r = 0.71, P < 0.05) (Fig. 5).
Soil properties and autotrophic bacterial community affected RubisCO activity and maize yield
Random forest modeling revealed that pH (7.0% and 6.3%, P < 0.05), NO3−N (5.8% and 5.8%, P < 0.05), and SWC (10.2%and 9.8%, P < 0.01) were the primary predictors among soil properties for RubisCO activity and maize yield (Fig. 6). As for the autotrophic bacteria, RubisCO activity and maize yield were significantly affected by the composition (11.5% and 11.7%, P < 0.01), diversity (6.5% and 7.6%, P < 0.05), and module VI in the network (5.4% and 6.0%, P < 0.05) of the autotrophic bacterial community. Structural equation modeling (SEM) further suggested that soil properties were significantly (P < 0.01) correlated with the autotrophic bacterial community (Fig. 6). Importantly, soil autotrophic bacterial community might significantly (P < 0.05) affect RubisCO activity through composition, diversity, and module VI, and profoundly impact SOC storage and maize yield.