See the published version of this preprint at Malaria Journal.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Nourou Barry
Université Nazi BONI, Bobo-Dioulasso
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8921-4341
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
Background Most field entomology research projects require active participation by local community members. Since 2012, Target Malaria, a not-for-profit research consortium, has been working with residents in the village of Bana, in Western Burkina Faso, in various studies involving mosquito collections, releases and recaptures. The long-term goal of this work is to develop innovative solutions to combat malaria in Africa with the help of mosquito modification technologies. Since the start of the project, members of local communities have played an important role in research activities, yet the motivations and expectations that drive their participation remain under-investigated. This study aims to examine the factors that motivate some members of the local community to contribute to the implementation of Target Malaria’s activities in the village of Bana, and, more broadly, to explore the motivations animating citizen participation in entomological research work.
Methods A qualitative approach was used to examine the factors motivating the local community to assist in the implementation of Target Malaria’s entomological research activities in Bana. 85 individual in-depth and semi-structured interviews were conducted, followed by three focus groups, one with youths who had participated in mosquito collections, and two with adult men and women from the village. All data collected were fully transcribed, processed, and submitted for thematic content analysis.
Results Data showed that the willingness of local community members to participate in entomological research activities was informed by a wide range of motivational factors. Although interviewees expressed their motivations under different semantic registers, the data showed a degree of consistency around five categories of motivation: (a) enhance protection from mosquitoes and malaria, (b) contribute to a future world free of the disease, (c) acquire knowledge and skills, (d) earn financial compensation, and (e) gain social prestige for the village.
Conclusion These varying motivations reflected fundamentally different personal and collective perceptions about the participation process. Beyond the specific circumstances of this case, our study highlights the importance of understanding the varied, context-specific reasons driving collective participation in entomological research and vector control activities.
Keywords
public engagement, entomological research activities, malaria, Target Malaria, Burkina Faso
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at Malaria Journal.
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 29 May, 2020
Editor assigned
On 27 May, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 26 May, 2020
Editor invited
On 26 May, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor Revision
On 23 May, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 21 May, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 21 May, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 12 May, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 12 May, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 11 May, 2020
Editor assigned
On 09 May, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 08 May, 2020
Editor invited
On 08 May, 2020
Version 2
Posted 02 Apr, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor Revision
On 26 Apr, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 09 Apr, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 09 Apr, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 07 Apr, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 07 Apr, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 05 Apr, 2020
Editor assigned
On 30 Mar, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 29 Mar, 2020
Editor invited
On 29 Mar, 2020
No comments provided
Review #2 received
Received 18 Feb, 2020
Editorial decision: Major Revision
On 18 Feb, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 07 Feb, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 27 Jan, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 16 Jan, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 15 Jan, 2020
Editor assigned
On 25 Dec, 2019
First submitted
On 24 Dec, 2019
Submission checks complete
On 24 Dec, 2019
Editor invited
On 24 Dec, 2019
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Learn more about our company.
See the published version of this preprint at Malaria Journal.
This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Learn more about In Review
Research
Nourou Barry
Université Nazi BONI, Bobo-Dioulasso
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8921-4341
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
Peer Review Timeline
CURRENT STATUS: Published
View the published article at Malaria Journal.
No community comments so far
Editorial decision: Accept
On 29 May, 2020
Editor assigned
On 27 May, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 26 May, 2020
Editor invited
On 26 May, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor Revision
On 23 May, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 21 May, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 21 May, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 12 May, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 12 May, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 11 May, 2020
Editor assigned
On 09 May, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 08 May, 2020
Editor invited
On 08 May, 2020
Version 2
Posted 02 Apr, 2020
No comments provided
Editorial decision: Minor Revision
On 26 Apr, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 09 Apr, 2020
Review #2 received
Received 09 Apr, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 07 Apr, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 07 Apr, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 05 Apr, 2020
Editor assigned
On 30 Mar, 2020
Submission checks complete
On 29 Mar, 2020
Editor invited
On 29 Mar, 2020
No comments provided
Review #2 received
Received 18 Feb, 2020
Editorial decision: Major Revision
On 18 Feb, 2020
Review #1 received
Received 07 Feb, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed
On 27 Jan, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed
On 16 Jan, 2020
Reviewers invited
Invitations sent on 15 Jan, 2020
Editor assigned
On 25 Dec, 2019
First submitted
On 24 Dec, 2019
Submission checks complete
On 24 Dec, 2019
Editor invited
On 24 Dec, 2019
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article at Malaria Journal.
Background Most field entomology research projects require active participation by local community members. Since 2012, Target Malaria, a not-for-profit research consortium, has been working with residents in the village of Bana, in Western Burkina Faso, in various studies involving mosquito collections, releases and recaptures. The long-term goal of this work is to develop innovative solutions to combat malaria in Africa with the help of mosquito modification technologies. Since the start of the project, members of local communities have played an important role in research activities, yet the motivations and expectations that drive their participation remain under-investigated. This study aims to examine the factors that motivate some members of the local community to contribute to the implementation of Target Malaria’s activities in the village of Bana, and, more broadly, to explore the motivations animating citizen participation in entomological research work.
Methods A qualitative approach was used to examine the factors motivating the local community to assist in the implementation of Target Malaria’s entomological research activities in Bana. 85 individual in-depth and semi-structured interviews were conducted, followed by three focus groups, one with youths who had participated in mosquito collections, and two with adult men and women from the village. All data collected were fully transcribed, processed, and submitted for thematic content analysis.
Results Data showed that the willingness of local community members to participate in entomological research activities was informed by a wide range of motivational factors. Although interviewees expressed their motivations under different semantic registers, the data showed a degree of consistency around five categories of motivation: (a) enhance protection from mosquitoes and malaria, (b) contribute to a future world free of the disease, (c) acquire knowledge and skills, (d) earn financial compensation, and (e) gain social prestige for the village.
Conclusion These varying motivations reflected fundamentally different personal and collective perceptions about the participation process. Beyond the specific circumstances of this case, our study highlights the importance of understanding the varied, context-specific reasons driving collective participation in entomological research and vector control activities.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Loading...