1. Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2020;54(24):1451.
2. Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1·6 million participants. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. 2020;4(1):23-35.
3. Biddle SJH, Ciaccioni S, Thomas G, Vergeer I. Physical activity and mental health in children and adolescents: An updated review of reviews and an analysis of causality. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2019;42:146-55.
4. Cristi-Montero C, Chillón P, Labayen I, Casajus JA, Gonzalez-Gross M, Vanhelst J, et al. Cardiometabolic risk through an integrative classification combining physical activity and sedentary behavior in European adolescents: HELENA study. Journal of sport and health science. 2019;8(1):55-62.
5. Eime RM, Young JA, Harvey JT, Charity MJ, Payne WR. A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2013;10(1):98.
6. Hayes G, Dowd KP, MacDonncha C, Donnelly AE. Tracking of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior From Adolescence to Young Adulthood: A Systematic Literature Review. J Adolesc Health. 2019;65(4):446-54.
7. Dobbins M, Husson H, DeCorby K, LaRocca RL. School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(2):Cd007651.
8. Kriemler S, Meyer U, Martin E, van Sluijs EM, Andersen LB, Martin BW. Effect of school-based interventions on physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents: a review of reviews and systematic update. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(11):923-30.
9. Borde R, Smith JJ, Sutherland R, Nathan N, Lubans DR. Methodological considerations and impact of school-based interventions on objectively measured physical activity in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity. 2017;18(4):476-90.
10. Love R, Adams J, van Sluijs EMF. Are school-based physical activity interventions effective and equitable? A meta-analysis of cluster randomized controlled trials with accelerometer-assessed activity. Obes Rev. 2019;20(6):859-70.
11. Daly-Smith A, Quarmby T, Archbold VSJ, Corrigan N, Wilson D, Resaland GK, et al. Using a multi-stakeholder experience-based design process to co-develop the Creating Active Schools Framework. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):13.
12. Naylor P-J, Nettlefold L, Race D, Hoy C, Ashe MC, Wharf Higgins J, et al. Implementation of school based physical activity interventions: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine: An International Journal Devoted to Practice and Theory. 2015;72:95-115.
13. ISPAH. International Society for Physical Activity and Health: Eight Best Investments that work for Physical Activity International Society for Physical Activity and Health; 2020 November 2020.
14. WHO. Global Action plan on physical activity 2018-2030: more active people for a healthier world. World Health Organisation. 2018;Geneva.
15. Woods CB, Volf K, Kelly L, Casey B, Gelius P, Messing S, et al. The evidence for the impact of policy on physical activity outcomes within the school setting: A systematic review. J Sport Health Sci. 2021;10(3):263-76.
16. The Active School Flag. https://activeschoolflag.ie 2021 [cited 2021 25/7/221].
17. Ng KW, McHale F, Cotter K, O’Shea D, Woods C. Feasibility study of the secondary level Active School Flag programme: Study Protocol. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2019;4(1):16.
18. Belton S, Britton Ú, Murtagh E, Meegan S, Duff C, McGann J. Ten Years of ‘Flying the Flag’: An Overview and Retrospective Consideration of the Active School Flag Physical Activity Initiative for Children—Design, Development & Evaluation. Children. 2020;7(12).
19. Clerkin A. Personal development in secondary education: the Irish Transition Year. education policy analysis archives. 2012;20:38.
20. Baranowski T, Stables G. Process evaluations of the 5-a-day projects. Health Education & Behavior. 2000;27(2):157-66.
21. Mitra D. Student voice in secondary schools: the possibility for deeper change. Journal of Educational Administration. 2018;56(5):473-87.
22. van Sluijs EM, McMinn AM, Griffin SJ. Effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity in children and adolescents: systematic review of controlled trials. BMJ. 2007;335(7622):703.
23. Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(3-4):327-50.
24. Birken SA, Powell BJ, Presseau J, Kirk MA, Lorencatto F, Gould NJ, et al. Combined use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF): a systematic review. Implementation Science. 2017;12(1):2.
25. Shortell SM, Marsteller JA, Lin M, Pearson ML, Wu SY, Mendel P, et al. The role of perceived team effectiveness in improving chronic illness care. Med Care. 2004;42(11):1040-8.
26. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.
27. Birken SA, Powell BJ, Shea CM, Haines ER, Alexis Kirk M, Leeman J, et al. Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey. Implementation Science. 2017;12(1):124.
28. Kirk MA, Kelley C, Yankey N, Birken SA, Abadie B, Damschroder L. A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implementation Science. 2016;11(1):72.
29. French SD, Green SE, O’Connor DA, McKenzie JE, Francis JJ, Michie S, et al. Developing theory-informed behaviour change interventions to implement evidence into practice: a systematic approach using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Implementation Science. 2012;7(1):38.
30. Powell BJ, McMillen JC, Proctor EK, Carpenter CR, Griffey RT, Bunger AC, et al. A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health. Med Care Res Rev. 2012;69(2):123-57.
31. Wolfenden L, Foy R, Presseau J, Grimshaw JM, Ivers NM, Powell BJ, et al. Designing and undertaking randomised implementation trials: guide for researchers. BMJ. 2021;372:m3721.
32. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implementation Science. 2013;8(1):139.
33. Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Chinman MJ, Damschroder LJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implementation Science. 2015;10(1):1-14.
34. Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science. 2015;10(1):53.
35. Sparkes AC, Smith B. Qualitative research methods in sport, exercise and health: From process to product. New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; 2014. vii, 279-vii, p.
36. Hamilton AB, Finley EP. Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Research. 2019;280:112516.
37. Carey MA, Smith MW. Capturing the group effect in focus groups: A special concern in analysis. Qualitative health research. 1994;4(1):123-7.
38. Gibson F. Conducting focus groups with children and young people: strategies for success. Journal of research in nursing. 2007;12(5):473-83.
39. Wolfenden L, Nathan NK, Sutherland R, Yoong SL, Hodder RK, Wyse RJ, et al. Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting risk factors for chronic disease. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017;11(11):CD011677-CD.
40. Creswell JW, Clark VLP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research: Sage publications; 2017.
41. O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine. 2014;89(9):1245-51.
42. Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. 2019;11(4):589-97.
43. Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, Moules NJ. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International journal of qualitative methods. 2017;16(1):1609406917733847.
44. Braun V, Clarke V. To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health. 2021;13(2):201-16.
45. Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International journal of qualitative methods. 2006;5(1):80-92.
46. Perry C, Thurston M, Green K. Involvement and Detachment in Researching Sexuality: Reflections on the Process of Semistructured Interviewing. Qualitative health research. 2004;14(1):135-48.
47. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Establishing trustworthiness. Naturalistic inquiry. 1985;289(331):289-327.
48. DeCuir-Gunby JT, Marshall PL, McCulloch AW. Developing and Using a Codebook for the Analysis of Interview Data: An Example from a Professional Development Research Project. Field Methods. 2010;23(2):136-55.
49. MacPhail A, Tannehill D, Ataman R. The role of the critical friend in supporting and enhancing professional learning and development. Professional Development in Education. 2021:1-14.
50. Powell BJ, Beidas RS, Lewis CC, Aarons GA, McMillen JC, Proctor EK, et al. Methods to Improve the Selection and Tailoring of Implementation Strategies. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2017;44(2):177-94.
51. Sutherland RL, Campbell EM, Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Nathan NK, Wolfenden L, et al. The Physical Activity 4 Everyone Cluster Randomized Trial: 2-Year Outcomes of a School Physical Activity Intervention Among Adolescents. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(2):195-205.
52. Haapala HL, Hirvensalo MH, Laine K, Laakso L, Hakonen H, Lintunen T, et al. Adolescents' physical activity at recess and actions to promote a physically active school day in four Finnish schools. Health Educ Res. 2014;29(5):840-52.
53. Chalkley AE, Routen AC, Harris JP, Cale LA, Gorely T, Sherar LB. A retrospective qualitative evaluation of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a school-based running programme. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):N.PAG-N.PAG.
54. Sebire SJ, Banfield K, Jago R, Edwards MJ, Campbell R, Kipping R, et al. A process evaluation of the PLAN-A intervention (Peer-Led physical Activity iNtervention for Adolescent girls). BMC public health. 2019;19(1):1-13.
55. Hartwig TB, Sanders T, Vaconcellos D, Noetel M, Parker PD, Lubans DR, et al. School-based interventions modestly increase physical activity and cardiorespiratory fitness but are least effective for youth who need them most: an individual participant pooled analysis of 20 controlled trials. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2021:bjsports-2020-102740.
56. McLoughlin GM, Candal P, Vazou S, Lee JA, Dzewaltowski DA, Rosenkranz RR, et al. Evaluating the implementation of the SWITCH® school wellness intervention and capacity-building process through multiple methods. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2020;17(1):1-18.
57. Bice MR, Brown SL, Parry T. Retrospective evaluation of factors that influence the implementation of CATCH in southern Illinois schools. Health Promot Pract. 2014;15(5):706-13.
58. McMullen JM, Ní Chróinín D, Iannucci C. What happened next? Exploring the sustainability of a whole-of-school physical activity initiative. International Journal of Health Promotion and Education. 2020:1-10.
59. Sutherland R, Campbell E, Nathan N, Wolfenden L, Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, et al. A cluster randomised trial of an intervention to increase the implementation of physical activity practices in secondary schools: study protocol for scaling up the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) program. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):883.
60. Shoesmith A, Hall A, Wolfenden L, Shelton RC, Powell BJ, Brown H, et al. Barriers and facilitators influencing the sustainment of health behaviour interventions in schools and childcare services: a systematic review. Implementation Science. 2021;16(1):62.
61. Weiner BJ. A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science. 2009;4(1):67.
62. Finegood DT, Johnston LM, Steinberg M, Matteson CL, Deck P. Complexity, systems thinking, and health behavior change. Health Behavior Change in Populations. 2014:435-58.
63. Norman A, Nyberg G, Elinder LS, Berlin A. One size does not fit all-qualitative process evaluation of the Healthy School Start parental support programme to prevent overweight and obesity among children in disadvantaged areas in Sweden. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:37.
64. van Sluijs EM, Ekelund U, Crochemore-Silva I, Guthold R, Ha A, Lubans D, et al. Physical activity behaviours in adolescence: current evidence and opportunities for intervention. The Lancet. 2021.
65. Blom A, Tammelin T, Laine K, Tolonen H. Bright spots, physical activity investments that work: the Finnish Schools on the Move programme. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Association of Sport and Exercise Medicine; 2018.
66. Hart RA. Children's participation: From tokenism to citizenship. 1992.
67. Scanlon D, Connolly C. Teacher agency and learner agency in teaching and learning a new school subject, Leaving Certificate Computer Science, in Ireland: Considerations for teacher education. Computers & Education. 2021;174:104291.
68. Treseder P, Smith P. Empowering Children & Young People: Training Manual Save the Children London. 1997.
69. Fransen K, Delvaux E, Mesquita B, Van Puyenbroeck S. The Emergence of Shared Leadership in Newly Formed Teams With an Initial Structure of Vertical Leadership: A Longitudinal Analysis. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 2018;54(2):140-70.