1 Donnelly, C. A. et al. Positive and negative effects of widespread badger culling on tuberculosis in cattle. Nature439, 843-846, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04454 (2006).
2 Krebs, J. et al. Bovine tuberculosis in cattle and badgers - report by the Independent Scientific Review Group. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (MAFF). (London, UK, 1997).
3 Waters, W. R., Palmer, M. V., Buddle, B. M. & Vordermeier, H. M. Bovine tuberculosis vaccine research: Historical perspectives and recent advances. Vaccine, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.018 (2012).
4 Godfray, C., Donnelly, C., Hewinson, G., Winter, M. & Wood, J. Bovine TB Strategy Review. Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA). (London, UK, 2018).
5 Roadmap For Zoonotic Tuberculosis. World Health Organisation (WHO). (Geneva, Switzerland, 2017).
6 More, S. J., Radunz, B. & Glanville, R. J. Lessons learned during the successful eradication of bovine tuberculosis from Australia. Vet. Rec.177, 224-232, https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.103163 (2015).
7 Reviriego Gordejo, F. J. & Vermeersch, J. P. Towards eradication of bovine tuberculosis in the European Union. Vet. Microbiol.112, 101-109, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.11.034 (2006).
8 Griffin, J. M. et al. The impact of badger removal on the control of tuberculosis in cattle herds in Ireland. Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine. Proceedings of a meeting held at Nairn, Inverness, Scotland, 30th March-1st April 2005, 42-54, (2005).
9 Naranjo, V., Gortazar, C., Vicente, J. & de la Fuente, J. Evidence of the role of European wild boar as a reservoir of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Vet. Microbiol.127, 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.10.002 (2008).
10 de la Rua-Domenech, R. et al. Ante mortem diagnosis of tuberculosis in cattle: a review of the tuberculin tests, gamma-interferon assay and other ancillary diagnostic techniques. Res. Vet. Sci.81, 190-210, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2005.11.005 (2006).
11 Srinivasan, S. et al. A defined antigen skin test for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. Sci. Adv.5, eaax4899, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax4899 (2019).
12 Whelan, A. O. et al. Development of a Skin Test for Bovine Tuberculosis for Differentiating Infected from Vaccinated Animals. J. Clin. Microbiol.48, https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00420-10 (2010).
13 Jones, G. J., Gordon, S. V., Hewinson, R. G. & Vordermeier, H. M. Screening of predicted secreted antigens from Mycobacterium bovis reveals the immunodominance of the ESAT-6 protein family. Infect. Immun.78, 1326-1332, https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.01246-09 (2010).
14 Jones, G. J., Whelan, A., Clifford, D., Coad, M. & Vordermeier, H. M. Improved skin test for differential diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis by the addition of Rv3020c-derived peptides. Clin. Vaccine. Immunol.19, 620-622, https://doi.org/10.1128/cvi.00024-12 (2012).
15 Schiller, I. et al. Comparison of tuberculin activity using the interferon-gamma assay for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. Vet. Rec.167, 322-326, https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.c3403 (2010).
16 Coad, M. et al. Repeat tuberculin skin testing leads to desensitisation in naturally infected tuberculous cattle which is associated with elevated interleukin-10 and decreased interleukin-1 beta responses. Vet. Res.41, 14, https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres/2009062 (2010).
17 Cockle, P. J., Gordon, S. V., Hewinson, R. G. & Vordermeier, H. M. Field evaluation of a novel differential diagnostic reagent for detection of Mycobacterium bovis in cattle. Clin. Vaccine. Immunol.13, 1119-1124, https://doi.org/10.1128/cvi.00209-06 (2006).
18 Vordermeier, H. M. et al. Conserved immune recognition hierarchy of mycobacterial PE/PPE proteins during infection in natural hosts. PLoS One7, e40890, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040890 (2012).
19 Cockle, P. J. et al. Identification of novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens with potential as diagnostic reagents or subunit vaccine candidates by comparative genomics. Infect. Immun.70, 6996-7003, https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.70.12.6996-7003.2002 (2002).
20 Mustafa, A. S. et al. Immunogenicity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens in Mycobacterium bovis BCG-vaccinated and M. bovis-infected cattle. Infect. Immun.74, 4566-4572, https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.01660-05 (2006).
21 van Pinxteren, L. A., Ravn, P., Agger, E. M., Pollock, J. & Andersen, P. Diagnosis of tuberculosis based on the two specific antigens ESAT-6 and CFP10. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.7, 155-160, https://doi.org/10.1128/cdli.7.2.155-160.2000 (2000).
22 Pollock, J. M. & Andersen, P. The potential of the ESAT-6 antigen secreted by virulent mycobacteria for specific diagnosis of tuberculosis. J. Infect. Dis.175, 1251-1254, https://doi.org/10.1086/593686 (1997).
23 Sidders, B. et al. Screening of highly expressed mycobacterial genes identifies Rv3615c as a useful differential diagnostic antigen for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Infect. Immun.76, 3932-3939, https://doi.org/10.1128/iai.00150-08 (2008).