Cell culture
Human glioblastoma cell lines (U87MG and U251) were purchased from GeneChem (Shanghai, China) and were cultured in DMEM (HyClone, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Sigma, USA) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (Beyotime). All cells were cultured in a humidified incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
Lentiviral transduction
Cells were seeded in 6-well plates at 5×104 cells/well and incubated at 37 °C until 30% confluence was reached. According to the multiplicity of infection, an appropriate amount of lentivirus was added to the culture medium of glioma cells for transduction, and the cells were cultured for another 14 h. The medium containing the lentivirus was then removed, and the cells were cultured in normal medium for 58 h. The expression of GFP was observed under a fluorescence microscope 3 days after infection, and glioma cells with infection efficiency >80% were selected for subsequent analysis.
All lentiviruses were purchased from GeneChem (Shanghai, China). The forward sequences of the shRNAs targeting OLFML2A in U251 and U87MG cells were as follows: sh-OLFML2A-1: TCTATGTCACCAACTACTA and sh-OLFML2A-2: GCCAAACAAACATTCACTA. The forward sequence of the shRNA targeting OLFML2A in C6 cells was as follows: AGGCCGGTGGAGTAATATGTA. To increase the efficiency of RNA interference, four shRNAs targeting amyloid precursor protein (APP) were designed, and the four plasmids carrying the different shRNAs were mixed in equal proportion for lentivirus packaging. The forward sequences of the shRNAs targeting APP in U87MG cells were as follows: psc10391: ccCTGTTCATTGTAAGCACTT; psc10392: gcAGACACAGACTATGCAGAT; psc11434: ccCAAAGTTTACTCAAGACTA; and psc11435: gcCATCTTTGACCGAAACGAA.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
All glioma specimens were routinely sectioned in paraffin, and immunohistochemical staining was performed. Specimens were cut into 5-μm sections. The slides were subjected to antigen retrieval. Sections were incubated with primary antibodies (anti-OLFML2A antibody, Abcam, ab75882, 1:200; anti-Ki-67 antibody, Abcam, ab15580, 1:200; anti-APP antibody, Abcam, ab32136, 1:300; anti-β-catenin antibody, CST, CST#8480, 1:50; anti-P-β-catenin (Ser33/37/Thr41) antibody, CST, CST#9561, 1:200; anti-GSK-3β antibody, CST, CST#12456, 1:800; and anti-P-GSK-3β antibody, CST, CST#9323, 1:50) overnight at 4 °C and then visualized using a DAB detection kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin and observed under a BX-53 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The degree of immunostaining in the sections was reviewed and scored independently by 2 observers based on both the percentage of positively stained tumor cells and the staining intensity. The staining intensity was graded into four categories on a scale from 0 to 3 (intensity score): no staining (0), light-brown staining (1), brown staining (2) and dark-brown staining (3). Protein staining was evaluated using the following formula: overall staining score = intensity score × percentage score.
Cell proliferation analysis by Celigo assay
Cell proliferation was analyzed using a Celigo assay as described in a previous work[13]. Briefly, cells were cultured in 96-well plates at a density of 1000 cells/well and treated with the indicated shRNAs or control shRNA (shCtrl). The medium was changed every other day. The cells were imaged with a Celigo Imaging Cytometer for 5 consecutive days. For each experimental well of a 96-well plate, Celigo scans of four visual fields at each time point (40 × magnification) were performed, and the images were analyzed with the corresponding software. Each assay was conducted in triplicate. After 5 days of consecutive measurements, a cell growth curve was plotted to reflect cell proliferation.
3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay
MTT and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solutions (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were used to determine the cell proliferative ability. Specific cells (2×104) were seeded into 96-well plates. Sterile MTT solution (10 μL) was added to the 96-well plate after cell culturing for 24 h, 48 h and 72 h. After incubation for 4 h at 37 °C, the medium was removed, and 150 μL DMSO was added to each well. The absorbance at 490 nm was measured on a microplate reader (SpectraMax i3X, MOLECULAR, California, USA).
Quantitation of apoptosis by flow cytometry
An Annexin-V-APC apoptosis detection kit (eBioscience, Cat. No. 88-8007) was used for cell apoptosis analysis according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First, glioma cells were infected with a lentivirus expressing OLFML2A or a scrambled shRNA sequence (Scr-shRNA). After incubation for another 4 days, the cells were harvested, washed with PBS buffer, and resuspended in staining buffer at a final density of 1×106-1×107/ml. Then, 5 μL Annexin-V-APC was added to 100 μL cell suspensions and incubated at room temperature for 10-15 min. Signals were detected with a FACSCalibur (Becton-Dickinson, USA).
Animal studies
All animals were purchased from the Animal Experiment Center of Gansu College of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Lanzhou, China) and housed in a standardized specific pathogen‑free animal facility. All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Lanzhou University Second Hospital.
For the tumor xenograft implantation model, 4-week-old mice were randomly divided into two groups (n=10 per group) and implanted with 1×106 U87MG cells previously transfected with OLFML2A shRNA lentivirus or negative control. Cells were mixed with Matrigel (50% volume) and implanted subcutaneously into the right flank areas of the nude mice (BALB/c). Tumor volume was determined using an external caliper every 3-4 days and calculated using the formula (Length×Width2)/2. Mice were sacrificed 50 days after transplantation, at which time tumors were excised and subjected to subsequent analyses.
For the orthotropic model, 1×106 C6-OLFML2A-shRNA cells and control cells were injected into the right corpus striatum of the brains of 6-week-old Wistar rats using a stereotactic frame. Spectral computed tomography (HD750 CT scanner; GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) was performed to record tumor growth at 14 days and 19 days after injection. The scanning parameters were consistent with those reported in previous work[14]. Rats were monitored and sacrificed when neurological signs appeared or after 35 days.
Gene chip microarray analysis
Total RNA was extracted using an RNAiso Plus kit (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) and examined using a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA) and an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 (Palo Alto, CA, USA)[15]. Only samples of sufficient quality were used in subsequent gene chip experiments. The RNA quality control standards were as follows: 1.7<A260/A280<2.2 on the NanoDrop 2000 and an RNA integrity number (RIN)> =7.0 and a 28 S/18 S ratio > 0.7 on the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. The microarray was processed as described in previous work[16]. Briefly, amplified RNA ( aRNA) was prepared from total RNA using a GeneChip 3' IVT Express Kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). DNA was synthesized, after which double-stranded template DNA was synthesized. Biotin-labeled aRNA was obtained by transcription in vitro. Then, aRNA was purified, fragmented, labeled and hybridized with an Affymetrix GeneChip® Human Transcriptome Array 2.0 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). After hybridization, the chips were washed and stained. Finally, raw intensity data were analyzed using Affymetrix Expression Console software after the images and raw data were scanned. Genes that were up- or downregulated with fold changes > 2.0 or < 2.0 were analyzed using Affymetrix Transcriptome Analysis Console Software.
Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA)
IPA of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) was conducted with Qiagen's Ingenuity Pathway Analysis algorithm (www.qiagen.com/ingenuity, Qiagen, Redwood City, CA, USA). Canonical pathway analysis, functional analysis, regulatory effect analysis, and interaction network analysis were performed. The activation z-score and overlapping p-value were calculated as described in a previous work[17].
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
Cells in the exponential growth phase were collected, and an RNAiso Plus kit (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) was used for cell lysis to extract total RNA. A NanoDrop-2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA) was used to measure the purity and concentration of RNA. According to the manufacturer's protocol, total RNA was reverse transcribed using the Prime Script RT kit (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) for 15 min at 37 °C and 20 seconds at 85 °C. Subsequently, PCR amplification was performed using SYBR® Premix Ex Taq ™ Master Mix (TaKaRa Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) and the Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-time PCR system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The primers used are illustrated in Table 1. PCR was performed with a final volume of 10 μL and the following cycles: initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 10 seconds, 60 °C for 30 seconds, and 72 °C for 30 seconds. As the reaction progressed, a fluorescence signal was obtained. After amplification, a melting curve analysis was performed, which was used to determine the dissociation characteristics of the PCR products. The 2-ΔΔCq method was used to calculate the mRNA expression level relative to the expression level of the internal reference gene GAPDH. Each sample was run in triplicate.
Table 1. Primer sequences used in this study.
Gene
|
forward primer 5'-3'
|
reverse primer 5'-3'
|
GAPDH
|
TGACTTCAACAGCGACACCCA
|
CACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCAAA
|
OLFML2A
|
AACAGGCAGTAGAGTCAA
|
TTACAAGATTCCTACCAACAG
|
APP
|
CTGATGCGGAGGAGGATGAC
|
TCTCTGTGGCTTCTTCGTAGG
|
Wnt3
|
GGACGGAGAAGCGGAAGGA
|
GCGAGTTGGGTCTGGGTCAT
|
Wnt5a
|
TCGACTATGGCTACCGCTTTG
|
CACTCTCGTAGGAGCCCTTG
|
Wnt5b
|
CTGGTGGTCATTAGCTTTG
|
ATGTGCTCCTGGTACAATT
|
MYC
|
TGTCCGTCCAAGCAGAGG
|
CGCACAAGAGTTCCGTAGC
|
CD44
|
AGGCTGAGACAGGAGGTTA
|
CCTCCCTTATTTCTATCGTG
|
CSNK2A2
|
TGGAGTTTGGGCTGTATGTT
|
TCGTATCGCAGAAGTTTGTC
|
LEF1
|
AGAGCGAATGTCGTTGCTGA
|
TCGTTTTCCACCTGATGCAGA
|
FZD3
|
CAAATCTGGGTGTTGGGTT
|
TGAGAAAGGCTGGGCATC
|
LRP6
|
TGGGGAAACTATGACTAATG
|
CTGACAAAGAACTTGGGTG
|
LRP1
|
AGGGCGTAGGTTCCTTTCTC
|
CATTGGTCACCACGTCTTCA
|
DVL3
|
TACTGCGGGAGATTGTGC
|
GAACTGGTGATGGAGGAGC
|
SOX4
|
ACTTCGAGTTCCCGGACTACT
|
TGAAAACCAGGTTGGAGATGC
|
MAP3K7
|
CCGGTGAGATGATCGAAGCC
|
GCCGAAGCTCTACAATAAACGC
|
AKT3
|
AATGGACAGAAGCTATCCAGGC
|
TGATGGGTTGTAGAGGCATCC
|
MDM2
|
GAATCATCGGACTCAGGTACATC
|
TCTGTCTCACTAATTGCTCTCCT
|
RARG
|
ATGCTGCGTATCTGCACAAG
|
AGGCAAAGACAAGGTCTGTGA
|
BTRC
|
AGTTCTGCACTTGCGTTTC
|
ACTCACTACCAGCCTGTCC
|
TGFBR2
|
GTGCCAACAACATCAACC
|
GACTGCCACTGTCTCAAACT
|
ACVR1C
|
GCACCTTCCAACAGCATCAC
|
ATCCAGAGGCGGTCACATC
|
ACVR2B
|
AGACACGGGAGTGCATCTACT
|
GCCTATCGTAGCAGTTGAAGTC
|
PPP2R2B
|
ACCAGGGACTACTTGACCG
|
TCACGCTTGGTGTTTCTGT
|
Western blot analysis
Cells were lysed using RIPA (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology) buffer on ice for 30 min and were centrifuged at 12,000×g for 45 min at 4 °C. The protein concentrations were analyzed by the BCA protein assay kit (Solarbio, China). The samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked with TBST containing 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Solarbio, China) for 2 h at room temperature and then incubated with primary antibodies against the following antigens: OLFML2A (1:500, Abcam, ab85458, UK); GAPDH (1:1000, Abcam, ab8245, UK); APP (1:500, Abcam, ab32136, UK); β-catenin (1:500, CST, CST#8480, USA); P-β-catenin (Ser33/37/Thr41) (1:500, CST, CST#9561, USA); GSK-3β (1:500, CST, CST#12456, USA); and P-GSK-3β (1:500, CST, CST#9323, USA) overnight at 4 °C. The membranes were then washed three times with TBST and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 2 h at room temperature. The blots were visualized with an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) kit (Solarbio, China) and scanned by ChemImager 5500 V2.03 software. The relative integrated density values (IDVs) were calculated using Fluor Chen 2.0 software based on GAPDH as an internal control.
Statistics and data analysis
All data are presented as the means ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical analyses were performed using Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Two-tailed Student’s t-test was used to assess the significance of the differences between two groups. One-way ANOVA was used to assess the significance of the differences among multiple groups. Survival curves were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and assessed by the log-rank test. P-values<0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.