1. Eliminating female genital mutilation: An Interagency Statement: OHCHR, UNAIDS, UNPD, UNECA, UNFPA, UNHCHR, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIFEM, WHO. 2008. www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/fgm Accessed 15 Jan 2015.
2. Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A global concern. [Internet]. UNICEF. 2016. http://data.unicef.org/topic/child-protection/female-genital-mutilation-and-cutting/ Accessed 10 Apr 2017.
3. Leye E, Sabbe A. Responding to female genital mutilation in Europe: striking the right balance between prosecution and prevention. Gent; 2009.
4. Kimani S, Karibu CW, Muteshi J, Guyo J. Exploring barriers to seeking health care among Kenyan Somali women with female genital mutilation: a qualitative study. BMC International Health and Human Rights. 2020;20(3):1-12.
5. Vloeberghs E, Van der Kwaak A, Knipscheer J, Van den Muijsenbergh M. Coping and chronic psychosocial consequences of female genital mutilation in the Netherlands. Ethnicity and Health. 2012;17:677-95.
6. Whitehorn J, Ayonride O, Maingay S. Female Genital Mutilations: Cultural and Psychological Implications. Sexual and Relationships Therapy. 2002;17(2):161-70.
7. Cook RJ. Ethical concern in female genital cutting. African Journal of Reproductive Health. 2008;12(1):7-16.
8. Ahmed HM, Shabu SA, Shabila NP. A qualitative assessment of women’s perspectives and experience of female genital mutilation in Iraqi Kurdistan Region. BMC Women’s Health. 2019;19:1-12.
9. Farage MA, Miller KW, Tseghai GE, Azuka CE, Sobel JD, Ledger WJ. Female genital cutting: confronting cultural challenges and health complications across the lifespan. Women’s Health 2015;11(1):70-94.
10. Monagan SL. Patriarchy: perpetuating the practice of female genital mutilation. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in Social Sciences. 2010;2(1):160-81.
11. Alavi R. Female genital mutilation: a capability approach. Auslegung. 2003;26(2):1-25.
12. Heise L, Manji K. Social norms. UK: University of Birmingham; 2016.
13. Brown K, Beecham D, Barrett H. The applicability of behaviour change in intervention programmes targeted at ending female genital mutilation in the EU: integrating social cognitive and community level approaches. Obstetrics and Gynecology International. 2013;2013:1-12.
14. Shell-Duncan B, Hernlund Y, Wander K, Moreau A. Legislating change? Response to criminalizing female genital cutting in Senegal. Law & Society Review. 2013;47(4):803-35.
15. Johnsdotter S. Meaning well while doing harm: compulsory genital examinations in Swedish African girls. Sexual and Reproductive Health Matters. 2019;17(2):1586817.
16. Fund UNCs. Female genital mutilations/cutting: a statistical overview and exploration of the dynamics of change. New York; 2013.
17. Shell-Duncan B, Wander K, Hernlund Y, Moreau A. Dynamics of change in the practice of female genital cutting in Senegambia: Testing predictions of social convention theory. Social Science & Medicine. 2011;73(8):1275-83.
18. Mackie G, LeJeune J. Social dynamics of abandonment of harmful practices: a new look at the theory. Florence, Italy: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre; 2009.
19. Leye E, Bauwens S, Bjakander O. Behaviour change towards female genital mutilation:lessons learned from Africa and Europe. Ghent, Belgium: International Centre for Reproductive Health; 2005.
20. Hernlund Y, Shell-Duncan B. Transcultural positions: negotiating rights and culture. In: Hernlund Y, Shell-Duncan B, editors. Transcultural bodies: female genital cutting in global context. London, UK: Rutgers University Press; 2007. p. 1-43.
21. Dustin M. Female genital mutilation/cutiing in the UK: challenging the inconsistencies. European Journal of Women's Studies. 2010;17(1):7-23.
22. Boyle EH, Preves SE. National politics as international process: the case of anti-female genital cutting laws. Law and Society Review. 2000;34(3):703-37.
23. O'Neill S, Dubourg D, Florquin S, Bos M, Zewolde S, Richard F. Men have a role to play but they don't play it: a mixed methods study exploring men's involvement in female genital mutilation in Belgium, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom: Summary. Men Speak Out Project. Brussels; 2017.
24. Diop N, Askew A. Strategies for encouraging the abandonment of female genital cutting: experiences from Senegal, Burkina Faso, and Mali In: Abusharaf RM, editor. Female circumcision: Multicultural perspectives. Philadelphia, USA: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2006. p. 125-41.
25. Toubia NF, Sharief, EF. Female genital mutilation: have we made progress? International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 2003;82:251-61.
26. Prochaska JO, Diclemente CO. Satges and processes of sel-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1983;51(3):390-5.
27. Shell-Duncan B, Hernlund Y, Wander K, Moreau A. Contingency and change in the practice of female genital cutting: dynamics of decision-making in Senegambia. Seattle, USA: University of Washington; 2010.
28. Murray CE., Crowe, A., Flasch, P. Turning points: critical incidents prompting survivors to begin the process of terminating abusive relationships. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families. 2015;23(3):228-38.
29. Chang JC, Dado, D, Ashton S, Hawker L, Cluss, PA, et al. Understanding behavior change for women experiencing intimate partner violence: mapping the ups and downs using the stages of change. Patient Education and Counseling. 2006;62(3):330-9.
30. Walker K, Bowen E, Brown S, Sleath E. Subjective accounts of the turning points that facilitate desistance from intimate partner violence. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 2017;61(4):371-96.
31. Teruya C, Hser Y-I. Turning points in the life course: current findings and future directions in drug use research. Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 2010;3(3):189-95.
32. Carlsson C. Using turning points to understand processes of change offending: notes from a Swedish study on life courses and crime. British Journal of Criminology. 2012;52:1-16.
33. Wheaton B, Gotlib IH. Trajectories and turning points over the life course: concepts of themes. In: Gotlib IH Wheaton B, editor. Stress and adversity over the life course: trajectories and turning points. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.; 1997.
34. Enz KF, Talarico JM. Forks in the road: memories of turning points and transitions. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2015.
35. Hareven TK, Masaoka K. Turning points and transitions: Perceptions of the life course. Journal of Family History. 1988;13:271-89.
36. Reimer D. Subjective and objective dimensions of turning points. Social Work and Society International Online Journal. 2014;12(1):1-10.
37. Clausen JA. Gender, contexts and turning points in adult's lives. In: Moen P, Elder Jr GH, Luscher K, editors. Examining lives in context: perspectives on the ecology of human development. Washington, DC: APA; 1995. p. 365-89.
38. Wengraf T. Short guide to biographical narrative interviewing and analysis by the SQUIN-BNIM method. London: Middlesex and East London Universities; 2008.
39. Bertaux D. Le récit de vie. 4th ed. Paris: Armand Colin; 2016.
40. Adriansen HK. Time line interviews: a tool for conducting life history research. Qualitative Studies. 2012;3(1):40-55.
41. Chang JC, Dado D, Hawher L, Cluss PA, Buranosky R, Slagel L, et al. Understanding turning points in intimate partner violence: factors and circumstances leading women victims toward change. Journal of Women’s Health. 2010;19(2):251-9.
42. King G, Cathers T, Brown E, Specht JA, Willoughby C, Polgar JM, et al. Turning points and protective processes in the lives of people with chronic disabilities. Qualitative Health Research. 2003;13(2):184-206.
43. Patzel B. Women's use of resources in leaving abusive relationships: a naturalistic inquiry. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 2001;22(8):729-47.
44. Lawrence JA, Valsiner J. Making personal sense: an account of basic internalisation and externalisation processes. Theory and Psychology. 2003;13(6):723-52.
45. Lien I-L, Shultz J-H. Internalizing knowledge and changing attitudes to female genital cutting/mutilation. Obstetrics and Gynecology International. 2013;2013:1-10.
46. Mackie G. Ending footbinding and infibulation: a convention account. American Sociological Review. 1996;61(6):999-1017.