1. Gender differences in cerebral ischemic injury and NDRG2 expression
First, we assessed infarct volume and neurological scores to verify gendered differences in cerebral ischemic injury. As shown in Fig. 1 A(a) and (b), the mean infarct volume in male mice was 50.2 ± 1.7%, whereas female mice exhibited a smaller mean infarct volume of 32.2 ± 1.9% (*p < 0.05). Neurological scores were also significantly lower in male than in female mice, demonstrating more severe neurological damage (*p < 0.05).
We next detected NDRG2 expression in the cortex and striatum of male and female mice. As shown in Fig. 1 B(a) and (b), NDRG2 expression was significantly higher in female mice than in male mice in both the cortex (*p < 0.05) and striatum (##p < 0.01).
2. Ndrg2 deficiency significantly aggravates cerebral ischemic injury in female mice
To investigate whether Ndrg2 is necessary for neuroprotective effects against cerebral ischemic injury in female mice, we used Ndrg2 systemic knockout female mice to examine infarct volume and neurological scores after MCAO-R injury. First, immunoblotting was performed to detect NDRG2 expression and PCR was used to confirm the genotypes in the brain of Ndrg2+/+ and Ndrg2-/- mice. As shown in Fig. 2 A(a) and (b), Ndrg2+/+ mice did and Ndrg2-/- mice did not express NDRG2. Moreover, following cerebral ischemic injury, the infarct volume in the Ndrg2+/+ mice was 32.3% ± 1.8%, whereas Ndrg2 knockouts significantly increased the infarct volume to 48.0% ± 1.6% (Fig. 2 B(a) and (b), *p < 0.05). Compared with the Ndrg2+/+ mice, the Ndrg2-/- mice exhibited markedly worse neurological deficit scores (Fig. 2 B(c), *p < 0.05).
To further explore the role of Ndrg2 in cerebral ischemic injury, we constructed Ndrg2flox/flox mice and adeno-associated virus (AAV), pAAV-CAG-Cre-3flag, to conditionally down-regulate the expression of NDRG2. The adeno-associated virus was injected into the right lateral cerebral ventricle of Ndrg2flox/flox mice to generate the AAV-Ndrg2 group. Three weeks later, NDRG2 expression was detected in different brain regions by immunoblotting. As shown in Fig. 2 C(a) and (b), NDRG2 was significantly down-regulated in the AAV-Ndrg2 group compared with the control (AAV-Con) group in both the cortex and striatum (*p < 0.05, #p < 0.05). After MCAO-R injury, the infarct volume was 31.5% ± 1.5% in the AAV-Con group and significantly higher (40.0% ± 1.4%) in the AAV-Ndrg2 group (Fig. 2 D(a) and (b), *p < 0.05). Furthermore, the mice in the AAV-Ndrg2 group exhibited worse neurological outcomes (Fig. 2 D(c), *p < 0.05).
3. Estrogen and ERβ agonist DPN treatment upregulate the expression of NDRG2 in cortex and striatum in the OVX mice
As shown in Fig. 3 A(a) and (b), the female mice were divided into five groups: Con (Control), OVX (mice that had undergone ovariectomy for 1 week), E2 (mice treated with estrogen for three weeks, beginning one week after ovariectomy), PPT (mice treated with the estrogen receptor α agonist PPT for three weeks, beginning one week after ovariectomy), and DPN (mice treated with the estrogen receptor β agonist DPN for three weeks, beginning one week after ovariectomy). We found that ovariectomy significantly decreased NDRG2 expression in both the cortex and striatum (*p < 0.05 vs. Con-Cortex group, &p < 0.05 vs. Con-Striatum group). Furthermore, E2 and DPN treatment increased NDRG2 expression in both the cortex and striatum (#p < 0.05 vs. OVX-Cortex group, ^p < 0.05 vs. OVX-Striatum group). However, PPT treatment did not increase NDRG2 protein expression.
4. E2 and DPN did not activate astrocytes in Ndrg2 knockouts
Next, we detected the expression of GFAP, which indicates activation of astrocytes, in the corresponding ischemic penumbra region of non-ischemic female mice. As shown in Fig. 3 B (a) and (b), GFAP expression in the Ndrg2+/+-OVX group was significantly lower than in the Ndrg2+/+-Con group (*p < 0.05), and both E2 and DPN treatment significantly increased GFAP expression compared with the Ndrg2+/+-OVX group (#p < 0.05). GFAP expression was decreased in the Ndrg2-/--Con group compared to the Ndrg2+/+-Con group (*p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in GFAP expression among the Ndrg2-/--Con, Ndrg2-/--OVX, Ndrg2-/--E2, and Ndrg2-/--DPN groups. GFAP expression was significantly down-regulated in Ndrg2-/--E2 group compared with that of the Ndrg2+/+-E2 group (^p < 0.05), and DPN treatment in the Ndrg2-/--DPN group exhibited lower GFAP expression compared with that of the Ndrg2+/+-DPN group (&p < 0.05).
As shown in Fig. 3 C (a) and (b), the primary cultured astrocytes from the cortex of Ndrg2-/- pups and Ndrg2+/+ pups were divided into six groups: Ndrg2+/+-Ast-Con, Ndrg2+/+-Ast-E2 (Ndrg2+/+-astrocytes treated with 10 nM E2 for 24 h), Ndrg2+/+-Ast-DPN (Ndrg2+/+-astrocytes treated with 10 nM DPN for 72 h), Ndrg2-/--Ast-Con, Ndrg2-/--Ast-E2 (Ndrg2-/--astrocytes treated with 10 nM E2 for 24 h), and Ndrg2-/--Ast-DPN (Ndrg2-/--astrocytes treated with 10 nM DPN for 72 h). We found that both E2 and DPN treatment significantly increased astrocyte activation compared to the Ndrg2+/+-Ast-Con group (*p < 0.05). Ndrg2 knockouts induced a significant decrease in GFAP expression compared to the Ndrg2+/+-Ast-Con group (*p < 0.05). However, neither E2 nor DPN treatment induced astrocyte activation in vitro. Moreover, the Ndrg2-/--Ast-E2 group showed a markedly reduce in the expression of GFAP compared with the Ndrg2+/+-Ast-E2 group (#p < 0.05), and the expression of GFAP was significantly down-regulated in Ndrg2-/--Ast-DPN group compared with that of the Ndrg2+/+-Ast-DPN group (^p < 0.05).
We next examined whether down-regulation of Ndrg2 could preserve the effect of DPN on astrocyte activation. As shown in Fig. 3 D (a) and (b), consistent with the results above, GFAP expression was significantly lower in the AAV-Con-OVX group than the AAV-Con-Con group (*p < 0.05); both E2 treatment and DPN treatment induced more robust astrocyte activation than the AAV-Con-OVX group (#p < 0.05). The conditional knockdown Ndrg2 significantly decreased GFAP expression compared to the AAV-Con-Con group (*p < 0.05). Interestingly, GFAP expression in the AAV-Ndrg2-OVX group was lower than in the AAV-Ndrg2-Con group (&p < 0.05), and E2 or DPN treatment significantly increased GFAP expression compared to the AAV-Ndrg2-OVX group (^p < 0.05).
We then quantified astrocyte activation in the corresponding ischemic penumbra region of non-ischemic female mice by observing astrocyte morphology. As shown in Fig. 3 E, the astrocyte (GFAP-positive) in the Ndrg2+/+-Con group displayed a normal activated morphology, which is characterized by a large soma and cytoplasmic processes. However, the astrocyte in the Ndrg2+/+-OVX group showed much smaller soma and thinner, shorter processes than those in Ndrg2+/+-Con group. Following ovariectomy, E2 or DPN treatment significantly increased astrocyte activation. Interestingly, the astrocytes in the Ndrg2-/--Con, Ndrg2-/--OVX, Ndrg2-/--E2, and Ndrg2-/--DPN groups demonstrated small soma and short processes, demonstrating a lack of normal activation. These results provide strong support for the importance of Ndrg2 in activating astrocytes.
5. Neuroprotective effect of E2 and DPN treatment was lost in Ndrg2 knockouts but not knockdowns
To further investigate whether Ndrg2 is a critical mediator in the neuroprotective effects of E2 and DPN, we used Ndrg2+/+ and Ndrg2-/- female mice and divided them into eight groups: Ndrg2+/+-Con (Ndrg2+/+-Control), Ndrg2+/+-OVX (Ndrg2+/+ mice had undergone ovariectomy one week prior), Ndrg2+/+-E2 (Ndrg2+/+ mice treated with E2 for three weeks, beginning one week after ovariectomy), Ndrg2+/+-DPN (Ndrg2+/+ mice treated with the estrogen receptor β agonist DPN for three weeks, beginning one week after ovariectomy), Ndrg2-/--Con (Ndrg2-/--Control), Ndrg2-/--OVX (Ndrg2-/- had undergone ovariectomy one week prior), Ndrg2-/--E2 (Ndrg2-/- mice treated with E2 for three weeks, beginning one week after ovariectomy), Ndrg2-/--DPN (Ndrg2-/- mice treated with the estrogen receptor β agonist DPN for three weeks, beginning one week after ovariectomy). The mice in all groups received MCAO-R injury. As shown in Fig. 4 A(a) and (b), the infarct volume was 32.0% ± 1.5% in the Ndrg2+/+-Con group, and larger in the Ndrg2+/+-OVX group (44.6% ± 1.9%, *p < 0.05). However, compared to the Ndrg2+/+-OVX group, E2 and DPN treatment significantly decreased the infarct volume to 35.2% ± 1.5% and 36.0% ± 1.6%, respectively (#p < 0.05). Ndrg2 knockouts significantly increased the infarct volume to 45.4% ± 2.1% compared to the Ndrg2+/+-Con group (*p < 0.05). The infarct volume was 44.2% ± 2.2% in the Ndrg2-/--OVX group, 45.0% ± 1.6% in the Ndrg2-/--E2 group, and 45.4% ± 1.5% in the Ndrg2-/--DPN group, although none of these differences were significant. However, the infarct volume was larger in the Ndrg2-/--E2 and Ndrg2-/--DPN groups than in the Ndrg2+/+-E2 and Ndrg2+/+-DPN groups, respectively (^p < 0.05). Notably, we observed precisely the same trends for each of the groups when we assessed neurological scores. As shown in Fig. 4 A(c), compared with the Ndrg2+/+-Con group, the Ndrg2+/+-OVX group had significantly lower neurological scores (*p < 0.05). Interestingly, the neurological scores of the mice in the Ndrg2+/+-E2 and Ndrg2+/+-DPN groups were dramatically improved compared with those in the Ndrg2+/+-OVX group (#p < 0.05). Additionally, the neurological scores of the mice in the Ndrg2-/--Con group were dramatically reduced compared with the Ndrg2+/+-Con group (*p < 0.05). Furthermore, the neurological scores of mice in the Ndrg2-/--E2 and Ndrg2-/--DPN groups were much lower compared with the Ndrg2+/+-E2 and Ndrg2+/+-DPN groups, respectively (^p < 0.05), the mice in the Ndrg2-/--DPN group had lower neurological scores than that of Ndrg2+/+-DPN group (&p < 0.05), which indicating that systemic deletion of Ndrg2 significantly decreased the neuroprotective effects of E2 and DPN.
Next, we used Ndrg2flox/flox female mice and related viruses to construct AAV-Con and AAV-Ndrg2 mice as described above, then divided them into eight groups: AAV-Con-Con (AAV-Con-Control), AAV-Con-OVX (the AAV-Con mice had undergone ovariectomy one week prior), AAV-Con-E2 (the AAV-Con mice treated with E2 for three weeks, beginning one week after ovariectomy), AAV-Con-DPN (the AAV-Con mice treated with the estrogen receptor β agonist DPN for three weeks, beginning one week after ovariectomy), AAV-Ndrg2-Con (AAV-Ndrg2-Control), AAV-Ndrg2-OVX (the AAV-Ndrg2 mice had undergone ovariectomy one week prior), AAV-Ndrg2-E2 (the AAV-Ndrg2 mice treated with E2 for three weeks, beginning one week after ovariectomy), AAV-Ndrg2-DPN (the AAV-Ndrg2 mice treated with the estrogen receptor β agonist DPN for three weeks, beginning one week after ovariectomy). After receiving OVX, E2, or DPN treatment, the mice were all subjected to cerebral ischemic injury. As shown in Fig. 4 B(a) and (b), the mean infarct volume was 32.2% ± 1.9% in the AAV-Con-Con group, and was significantly larger in AAV-Con-OVX group, at 41.8% ± 1.3% (*p < 0.05). However, E2 and DPN replacement treatment both markedly attenuated the infarct volume compared to the AAV-Con-OVX group (33.0% ± 1.2% and 33.4% ± 1.1%, respectively; #p < 0.05). Additionally, conditional knockdown of Ndrg2 significantly increased cerebral infarction volume to 38.0% ± 1.6% compared to the AAV-Con-Con group (*p < 0.05). Similarly, ovariectomy significantly increased the infarct volume to 47.0% ± 2.0% compared to the AAV-Ndrg2-Con group (&p < 0.05), but E2 treatment and DPN replacement treatment both significantly decreased the infarct volume compared to the AAV-Ndrg2-OVX group (40.0% ± 1.6% and 40.8% ± 1.9%, respectively; ^p < 0.05). As shown in Fig. 4 B(c), the AAV-Con-OVX group had much lower neurological scores than the AAV-Con-Con group (*p < 0.05), but treatment with either E2 or DPN significantly enhanced the neurological scores compared to the AAV-Con-OVX group (#p < 0.05). Compared with the AAV-Con-Con group, conditional knockdown of Ndrg2 significantly decreased the neurological scores in the AAV-Ndrg2-Con group (*p < 0.05), and the AAV-Ndrg2-OVX group had much lower neurological scores compared to the AAV-Ndrg2-Con group (&p < 0.05). Again, both E2 and DPN treatment dramatically improved the neurological scores compared to the AAV-Ndrg2-OVX group (^p < 0.05). Thus, neurological scores and infarct volumes showed similar trends between the different genotypes and treatment groups.