1. Raina A, Guledgud M, Patil K. Infraorbital ethmoid (Haller's) cells: a panoramic radiographic study. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2012;41(4):305-8.
2. Ahmad M, Khurana N, Jaberi J, Sampair C, Kuba RK. Prevalence of infraorbital ethmoid (Haller's) cells on panoramic radiographs. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2006;101(5):658-61.
3. Mathew R, Omami G, Hand A, Fellows D, Lurie A. Cone beam CT analysis of Haller cells: prevalence and clinical significance. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2013;42(9):20130055.
4. Khayam E, Mahabadi AM, Ezoddini F, Golestani MA, Hamzeheil Z, Moeini M, et al. The prevalence of ethmoidal infraorbital cells in panoramic radiography. Am J Res Commun. 2013;1:109-18.
5. Kantarci M, Karasen RM, Alper F, Onbas O, Okur A, Karaman A. Remarkable anatomic variations in paranasal sinus region and their clinical importance. European journal of radiology. 2004;50(3):296-302.
6. Lerdlum S, Vachiranubhap B. Prevalence of anatomic variation demonstrated on screening sinus computed tomography and clinical correlation. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand= Chotmaihet thangphaet. 2005;88:S110-5.
7. Leunig A, Betz C, Sommer B, Sommer F. Anatomic variations of the sinuses; multiplanar CT-analysis in 641 patients. Laryngo-rhino-otologie. 2008;87(7):482-9.
8. Kayalioglu G, Oyar O, Govsa F. Nasal cavity and paranasal sinus bony variations: a computed tomographic study. Rhinology. 2000;38(3):108-13.
9. Valizadeh S, Mostafavi M, Ehsani S, Goorang S. Visibility of infraorbital ethmoid air cell on panoramic radiographs. Shahid Beheshti University Dental Journal. 2010;28(1):7-11.
10. Fadda G, Rosso S, Aversa S, Petrelli A, Ondolo C, Succo G. Multiparametric statistical correlations between paranasal sinus anatomic variations and chronic rhinosinusitis. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica. 2012;32(4):244.
11. Mamatha H, Shamasundar N, Bharathi M, Prasanna L. Variations of ostiomeatal complex and its applied anatomy: a CT scan study. Indian J Sci Technol. 2010;3(8):904-7.
12. Alkire BC, Bhattacharyya N. An assessment of sinonasal anatomic variants potentially associated with recurrent acute rhinosinusitis. The Laryngoscope. 2010;120(3):631-4.
13. Miranda CMNRd, Maranhão CPdM, Arraes FMNR, Padilha IG, Farias LdPGd, Jatobá MSdA, et al. Anatomical variations of paranasal sinuses at multislice computed tomography: what to look for. Radiologia Brasileira. 2011;44(4):256-62.
14. Lloyd G. CT of the paranasal sinuses: study of a control series in relation to endoscopic sinus surgery. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 1990;104(6):477-81.
15. Lloyd G, Lund V, Scadding G. CT of the paranasal sinuses and functional endoscopic surgery: a critical analysis of 100 symptomatic patients. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 1991;105(3):181-5.
16. Scribano E, Ascenti G, Cascio F, Racchiusa S, Salamone I. Computerized tomography in the evaluation of anatomic variations of the ostiomeatal complex. La Radiologia medica. 1993;86(3):195-9.
17. Yousem DM. Imaging of sinonasal inflammatory disease. Radiology. 1993;188(2):303-14.
18. Wanamaker HH. Role of Haller's cell in headache and sinus disease: a case report. Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery. 1996;114(2):324-7.
19. Tonai A, Baba S. Anatomic variations of the bone in sinonasal CT. Acta oto-laryngologica Supplementum. 1996;525:9-13.
20. Stackpole SA, Edelstein DR. The anatomic relevance of the Haller cell in sinusitis. American journal of rhinology. 1997;11(3):219-24.
21. Perez-Pinas I, Sabate J, Carmona A, Catalina-Herrera C, Jimenez-Castellanos J. Anatomical variations in the human paranasal sinus region studied by CT. The Journal of Anatomy. 2000;197(2):221-7.
22. Zinreich S, Albayram S, Benson M, Oliverio P. The ostiomeatal complex and functional endoscopic surgery. Head and neck imaging 4th ed St Louis: Mosby. 2003:149-73.
23. Wani AA, Kanotra S, Lateef M, Ahmad R, Qazi SM, Ahmad S. CT scan evaluation of the anatomical variations of the ostiomeatal complex. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery. 2009;61(3):163-8.
24. Khojastepour L, Mirhadi S, Mesbahi SA. Anatomical variations of ostiomeatal complex in CBCT of patients seeking rhinoplasty. Journal of Dentistry. 2015;16(1):42.
25. Mazza D, Bontempi E, Guerrisi A, Del SM, Cipolla G, Perrone A, et al. Paranasal sinuses anatomic variants: 64-slice CT evaluation. Minerva stomatologica. 2007;56(6):311-8.
26. Jaju PP, Jaju SP. Clinical utility of dental cone-beam computed tomography: current perspectives. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry. 2014;6:29.
27. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology-E-Book: Principles and interpretation: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.
28. Schwarz MS, Rothman SL, Rhodes ML, Chafetz N. Computed tomography: Part I. Preoperative assessment of the mandible for endosseous implant surgery. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 1987;2(3).
29. Timock AM, Cook V, McDonald T, Leo MC, Crowe J, Benninger BL, et al. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging. American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics. 2011;140(5):734-44.
30. Dhillon JK, Kalra G. Cone beam computed tomography: An innovative tool in pediatric dentistry. Journal of Pediatric Dentistry. 2013;1(2):27.
31. Damstra J, Fourie Z, Slater JJH, Ren Y. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2010;137(1):16. e1-. e6.
32. Özen T, Kamburoğlu K, Cebeci ARI, Yüksel SP, Paksoy CS. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using 2 different dental cone-beam computerized tomography units, an intraoral digital sensor, and conventional film. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2009;107(3):426-32.
33. Oz U, Orhan K, Abe N. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2011;40(8):492-500.
34. Kamburoğlu K, Kolsuz E, Kurt H, Kılıç C, Özen T, Paksoy CS. Accuracy of CBCT measurements of a human skull. Journal of digital imaging. 2011;24(5):787-93.
35. Tomasi C, Bressan E, Corazza B, Mazzoleni S, Stellini E, Lith A. Reliability and reproducibility of linear mandible measurements with the use of a cone-beam computed tomography and two object inclinations. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2011;40(4):244-50.
36. Sheikhi M, Ghorbanizadeh S, Abdinian M, Goroohi H, Badrian H. Accuracy of linear measurements of galileos cone beam computed tomography in normal and different head positions. International journal of dentistry. 2012;2012.
37. Earwaker J. Anatomic variants in sinonasal CT. Radiographics. 1993;13(2):381-415.
38. Bašić N, Bašić V, Jukić T, Bašić M, Jelić M, Hat J. Computed tomographic imaging to determine the frequency of anatomical variations in pneumatization of the ethmoid bone. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology. 1999;256(2):69-71.
39. Sebrechts H, Vlaminck S, Casselman J. Orbital edema resulting from Haller's cell pathology: 3 case reports and review of literature. Acta oto-rhino-laryngologica belgica. 2000;54(1):39-43.