The RE-AIM framework19 has become widely recognized across a range of disciplines as a valuable tool to guide development and evaluation of public health interventions intended for wider dissemination. The acronym stands for Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance which together are used here to help determine the impact of the first responder training intervention for the traffic police in Makwanpur District.
Reach
The bespoke first responder trauma training programme reached three-quarters of the targeted population; operational traffic police officers in the district. Co-operation from the district police inspector ensured a high take-up of course places, but reach was naturally affected by the need to maintain a police presence on the roads. The enthusiasm for the training was a reflection of how so many of the participants felt that applying first aid skills was a part of their responsibilities. Indeed, first aid is made explicit in the NTP mission objectives which state that the police should “Render assistance to public in various stressful conditions such as prompt first aid to accident victims”16.
Efficacy
Within the RE-AIM framework19, effectiveness is defined as the success rate of the intervention to achieve its intended goal(s). In our study, we sought to develop, design and evaluate the feasibility of a bespoke first-responder trauma training programme for the traffic police in Nepal.
We have shown that we were able to develop and design a first-responder course focussed on managing traumatic injuries at RTCs. Studies examining first-aid training curricula in LMICs have shown significant heterogeneity11. Our study was designed using subject expertise and local expert knowledge and adaptation of pre-existing curricula 17,18, and took into account the prior knowledge and experience of the course participants. The course combined theory with ‘hands-on’ simulation. Simulation is a key training modality in learning trauma care11.
The pre-intervention data showed that Nepal traffic police were attending road traffic crashes and transporting casualties with limited or no first aid training and limited emergency resources. The range of injuries include wounds and bleeding, fractures and head and internal injuries. This is not uncommon in LMICs20,21,22,23,24. Previous studies have shown that where casualties are treated and/or rushed to hospital by untrained police or bystanders, they have much poorer outcomes and are more likely to die than if looked after by emergency medical personnel or trained first responders24,25,26,27.
Three-quarters of the participants had received no previous first aid training. Therefore, unsurprisingly, pre-intervention levels of first aid knowledge and confidence were low and for those participants that had received first aid training, there was no common course length or fixed refresher period. Experts have identified that there is little evidence addressing the best length of time for a first aid course28. Instead advising that the individual needs of the learner or learner group will dictate the course content and hence the course duration. Many of the course participants said they would have liked it to be longer. Our 3-day training was based on the balance of achieving the course learning outcomes, against the need to maintain traffic police operations.
The knowledge of first aid and confidence in applying those skills in practice improved significantly post-intervention. This dropped a little at 6-months, but not to pre-intervention levels. At follow-up, some of the participants in our study identified the need for refresher training and indeed, this is an important part of retaining knowledge and confidence. Research conducted with lay first-aiders in Nepal has found that retention of first aid skills reduces significantly over time and concluded that first aid skills should be refreshed annually29. Other studies have shown increased retention of knowledge and self-assessed confidence in refresher training at 6-months30,31. Frequency of retraining must be based on a balance between the need to maintain skills and the practicalities, including financial, involved in mandating refresher courses at frequent intervals.
Adoption
The training programme was delivered at the Police headquarters in Hetauda. The training was conducted by local and national trainers from the Nepal Red Cross Society, using the curriculum developed by NIRC. Participants were commended for their high level of enthusiasm and motivation32. The local police commander also participated on most of the training days. National support for the research was also gained and permission given by the National Traffic Police Headquarters (Traffic Directorate) in Kathmandu.
Training the traffic police is not only feasible, but has the capacity to have a long term impact on clinical outcomes. When applied correctly, first aid treatment for trauma victims has been reported to show significantly reduced mortality and morbidity26,33,34,35,36.
Knowledge and confidence improved as a result of the training and this was carried through in to the field, with participants using their new skills frequently during the study period. It was found that police officers were not only applying first aid skills in practice, but were often the rescuer, extricating the RTI victim from the wreckage. Moving and handling patients were areas where they maintained self-confidence through the post intervention phase.
Implementation
At the program level, training was delivered as intended by the trainers from the NRCS in strict adherence to the training curriculum, to ensure intervention fidelity. Having the trainers from NRCS was advantageous as the trainers were confident and had many years of experience providing first aid training across Nepal.
The training was conducted with oversight by the NIRC team and it was evaluated by the trainee at its conclusion. Feedback on the training experience showed the majority of the participants rated the training’s overall value as either ‘excellent’ or ‘good’. The training was flexible whilst maintaining fidelity to the original planned timings and duration so as to meet with the other competing duties of the traffic police.
The cost of three-day first responder training course (including the trauma pack) was £3,682.87 (£127 per trainee). A summary of the first responder training course costs and associated trauma pack components are listed in Table 9.
Table 9:
First responder training programme costs
Activity items
|
Quantity
|
Total (£)
|
Trainee travel allowances
|
29
|
328.41
|
Trainers wages
|
5
|
314.44
|
Transportation
|
2
|
87.15
|
Food and accommodation costs for trainees and trainers
|
34
|
1,110.70
|
Training materials
|
|
|
Stationery and certificate
|
29
|
95.66
|
Gloves and mask
|
29
|
33.39
|
Pocket resuscitation face mask
|
4
|
9.36
|
Vinyl disposable bag valve mask (adult)
|
4
|
42.96
|
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation manikins
|
4
|
775.20
|
Trauma pack
|
3
|
885.60
|
Total
|
|
3682.87
|
The training was implemented at a reasonable cost, indicating that it would be feasible and sustainable to roll out in other districts. All items in the trauma pack were low-cost and can be easily obtainable locally (Additional File 6).. There is limited reporting on implementation and resourcing costs associated with first responder training making it difficult to compare our findings with those of similar studies23,37,38,39 . A study in Uganda in 2008 reported the cost of a 1-day, basic first-aid course for lay people including the police was approximately US$27 per participant23. Although higher than the costs in Uganda, the estimated cost of extending the training to cover other districts/all of Nepal compares favourably with the significant direct costs of road traffic injuries in Nepal 40.
Maintenance
There were a number of barriers and facilitators to maintaining the application of first-responder skills to RTI victims. At an organisational level, the support both locally and nationally was essential for this type of intervention to succeed. There was a change of local police leadership part-way into the research that may have impacted on the level of support locally. Participants identified that they hadn’t always felt supported or encouraged to apply their new first responder skills in practice.
Although the traffic police are frequently the first official presence at the scene of the RTC, delays in being activated and arriving on scene were identified by participants as factors resulting in the RTI victim being removed from the scene prior to their arrival. The lack of an identifiable, national, 3-digit phone number to summon the emergency services promptly may be a contributory factor to these delays. Walker et al7 have reported some success with the introduction of the ‘102’ number in Kathmandu and other regions. As the general public are frequently on scene before the police, having trained community first responders also makes intuitive sense. Research in other LMICs has shown this is feasible and can make a difference 11,21,26,27.
Having arrived on scene, although participants were able to frequently apply their skills for patient care, they sometimes felt pressured by the public to prioritise transferring the patient to hospital. There was a lack of public recognition that they were trained first responders, and that providing first aid may be more beneficial than immediate transportation. Possible solutions to this problem would be wearing an identifiable first responder badge on their uniform and, if expanded nationally, a publicity campaign to inform the general public of their additional role.
Post-incident, there was a limited return of incident report forms. As time pressures and forgetting were identified as reasons, this would require greater reinforcement in training, and for the process to be built in to the systematic reporting of RTCs and enforced by senior staff, were the training to be rolled out nationally.
Strengths and Limitations
Strengths of this study include that the course was designed after the training needs assessment, and that it was based on published guidance. It was delivered by experienced and recognised first aid trainers. There was good interest and co-operation from the district police and the participants which resulted in three-quarters of officers being trained, and we were able to follow up 27/29 (93%).
Asking participants to recall the frequency of using first aid skills is at risk of under-reporting or over-reporting due to recall bias. The limited number of contemporaneous incident report forms has meant a reliance on data from the self-reported use of first responder skills across the 6-month follow up period. Although it is clear that participants have been applying their first-aid skills; without the forms, it is not possible to determine the validity of their responses.