Fabrication of PIM-1 and AOPIM-1 polymers. Polymer of intrinsic microporosity (PIM-1) was obtained following a previously reported method. Under a nitrogen atmosphere, 3.001 g (15 mmol) tetra-fluoroterephthalonitrile (TFTPN), 5.106 g (15 mmol) 5,5’,6,6’-tetrahydroxy-3,3,3’,3’- tetramethylspirobisindane (TTSBI) and 30 mL anhydrous DMAc were added into a 100 mL three-necked flask. After the chemicals were completely dissolved, 6.21 g (45 mmol) anhydrous milled K2CO3 was added and the flask was placed into an 160°C oil bath under mechanical stirring. After approximately 3 min, a viscous yellow solution formed, and 20 mL of toluene was added. Several minutes later, a further 20 mL of toluene was added to dilute the solution. Then, the mixture was poured into 300 mL methanol, and an elastic, threadlike, light yellow polymer was observed. The polymer product was dissolved in chloroform and reprecipitated in methanol, and then refluxed in Milli-Q water for 4-5 h and dried at 80°C under vacuum for 48 h.
Hydrophilic amidoxime modified PIM-1 (AOPIM-1) was synthesized by dissolving 0.5 g PIM-1 in 30 mL THF and heating to reflux under N2. Then, 5.0 mL hydroxyl amine was added dropwise, and the solution was further refluxed for 20 hours. The resulting polymer was precipitated by the addition of ethanol, filtered, washed thoroughly with ethanol and water, and then dried at 110°C for 24 h.
Fabrication of AOPIM-1 membranes. The polymer dope was obtained by dissolving AOPIM-1 in DMF or DMF/1,4-dioxane mixed solvent, and stirred continuously at room temperature overnight to ensure that the polymer dissolves evenly in the solvent. Then the mixture was left at room temperature for 24 h to remove air bubbles. After that, the polymer solution was used to cast films on a clean glass plate at 25 ºC and 40% relative humidity. For the casting solution with co-solvent, the solvent was allowed to evaporate from the surface of the film in 20 s to produce a denser selective skin. Next, the glass plate was immersed into a coagulation bath. After 1 h, membranes were transferred to a fresh water bath and kept for 24 h to finish phase separation. Finally, the membranes were immersed in methanol for future use.
Membrane material characterization. The morphology of the as-prepared membranes was observed using a field emission scanning electron microscope (Hitachi S4800, Japan). Before capturing SEM image, a thin Au layer was sputtered onto the membrane under 10 mA for 2 min (Emitech K550X sputtering). 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on a Bruker 400 MHz spectrometer using dimethyl sulfoxide-d6 as a solvent. FTIR spectra of membranes were obtained using a Nicolet 6700 FTIR spectrometer (USA). Nitrogen absorption/desorption measurements were performed on a Quantachrome Autosorb IQ-MP-MP at 77 K. All samples were degassed at 120°C for 12 h before nitrogen absorption measurements were performed. The surface charge of the membrane was determined by streaming potential measurement using a SurPASS 3 electrokinetic analyzer with a flat-plate measuring cell (10 mm × 20 mm).
Static adsorption behavior of AOPIM-1 polymer. The static adsorption behavior of AOPIM-1 was investigated using dyes with different chargeability (negative, MO; positive, MB) as model solutes. A dry AOPIM-1 membrane coupon (~10 mg) was placed in dye solution with certain concentration (10-500 mg L−1) and pH value. The mixture was stirred continuously at room temperature at least 24 h or a certain time. The concentration of dyes was analyzed by a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Inc.). The amount of dye adsorbed by the AOPIM-1, q (mg g−1), was determined from the Eq. (1)49–50,
\(q=\frac{\left({C}_{0}-{C}_{\text{*}}\right)\text{V}}{\text{w}}\) (1)
where q represents the adsorption amount at equilibrium (qe) or the adsorption amount at time t (qt). C0 (mg L−1), C∗ (mg L−1), V (L), and W (g) represent initial concentration of dye, concentration of dye at equilibrium or time t, volume of solution and amount of AOPIM-1, respectively.
The effect of pH on the adsorption was studied by adjusting pH of the dye solutions to 3-10 with the help of 0.1 M NaOH and 0.1 M HCl.
The adsorption kinetics of dyes by AOPIM-1 was studied using a second-order equation in nonlinear form by Ep. (2)54–55,
\({q}_{t}=\frac{{k}_{2}{q}_{e}^{2}t}{1+{k}_{2}{q}_{e}t}\) (2)
where k2 (g mg−1 min−1) is the second-order rate constant. The adsorption capacity of dyes by AOPIM-1 was studied using a Langmuir isotherm model by Ep. (3)54−55,
\({q}_{e}=\frac{{K}_{L}{q}_{m}{C}_{e}}{1+{K}_{L}{C}_{e}}\) (3)
where KL (L mg−1) represents the affinity constant and qm (mg g−1) is the maximum adsorption capacity of the adsorbate.
Dynamic adsorptive separation properties of AOPIM-1 membranes The dynamic adsorption properties of AOPIM-1 membranes were investigated using six types of dyes with different chargeability (negative: MO, CR, BB; positive: MB, RHB, CV). Filtration experiments were performed in a dead-end filtration cell with an effective membrane area of 3.14 cm2 (Figure S16). Each tested membrane was compacted by the filtration of deionized water under 0.2 MPa for 2 h in order to achieve a steady flux. Then, the permeate flux (J (L m−2 h−1 bar−1)) used different dyes as feed solution (20 mg L−1, PH=3/10) was measured under 0.2 MPa at room temperature and calculated using the following Eq. (4),
\(J=\frac{V}{\varDelta PAt}\) (4)
where ΔP (bar), V (L), A (m2), and t (h) represent permeate flux, transmembrane pressure, permeate volume, membrane area and filtration time, respectively. The rejection rate (R (%)) of dyes was calculated from Eq. (5),
\(R=1-\frac{{C}_{P}}{{C}_{F}}\) (5)
where CP and CF correspond to the dye concentrations in the permeate and feed solutions, respectively. The dye concentrations in the permeate and feed solutions were determined using a UV/Vis spectrometer (Biochrom Libra S32). The processing capacity used RHB as feed solution (20 mg L−1, PH=10) was measured under 0.2 MPa at room temperature and determined by permeation volume when rejection is higher than 99%.
The multi-cycle adsorptive separation performance stability of the AOPIM-1 adsorptive membrane was performed in a dead-end filtration cell with an effective membrane area of 3.14 cm2 for 8 cycles. For a typical cycle, the RHB solution (20 mg L−1, pH = 10) was filtrated through the membrane for 500 L m−2 at 0.2 MPa, and the permeate flux (J) was calculated by Eq. (4). Afterwards, the membrane is subjected to a short time (five minutes) desorption process by switching the feed solution of the membrane to about 20 ml methanol for cleaning, and the eluent can be obtained at the outlet. After that, fresh feed dye solution was applied for the next cycle.
Adsorptive separation of APIs by AOPIM-1 membranes Separation of a synthetic 3-conponent mixture feed representing inorganic salt, polysaccharides and active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) chemicals in the water extract of natural plants was performed in a lab-scale cross-flow cell (Figure S13) at room temperature. The feed solution included NaCl, dextran T-200 and berberine with detailed composition listed in Table S5. The concentrations of each substance in the feed and permeate solution were measured by conductometer (FE30K, Mettler Toledo), total organic carbon (TOC) analyzer (Aurora 1030W) and UV-Vis spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Inc.), respectively.