1. Levin MF. What is the potential of virtual reality for post-stroke sensorimotor rehabilitation? Expert Rev Neurother. 2020;20:195–7.
2. Zimmerli L, Jacky M, Lünenburger L, Riener R, Bolliger M. Increasing patient engagement during virtual reality-based motor rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1737–46.
3. Levin MF, Demers M. Motor learning in neurological rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;1–9.
4. Laver KE, Lange B, George S, Deutsch JE, Saposnik G, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2017.
5. Nemani A, Ahn W, Cooper C, Schwaitzberg S, De S. Convergent validation and transfer of learning studies of a virtual reality-based pattern cutting simulator. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:1265–72.
6. Devos H, Akinwuntan AE, Nieuwboer A, Tant M, Truijen S, De Wit L, et al. Comparison of the effect of two driving retraining programs on on-road performance after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:699–705.
7. Howard MC. A meta-analysis and systematic literature review of virtual reality rehabilitation programs. Comput Human Behav. 2017;70:317–27.
8. Müssgens DM, Ullén F. Transfer in motor sequence learning: Effects of practice schedule and sequence context. Front Hum Neurosci. Frontiers Media S. A; 2015;9:642.
9. Levac DE, Jovanovic BB. Is children’s motor learning of a postural reaching task enhanced by practice in a virtual environment? 2017 Int Conf Virtual Rehabil. IEEE; 2017. p. 1–7.
10. Massetti T, Fávero FM, de Menezes LDC, Alvarez MPB, Crocetta TB, Guarnieri R, et al. Achievement of virtual and real objects using a short-term motor learning protocol in people with duchenne muscular dystrophy: a crossover randomized controlled trial. Games Health J. 2018;7:107–15.
11. Levac DE, Huber ME, Sternad D. Learning and transfer of complex motor skills in virtual reality: a perspective review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2019;16:121.
12. Juliano JM, Liew SL. Transfer of motor skill between virtual reality viewed using a head-mounted display and conventional screen environments. J Neuroeng Rehabil. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation; 2020;17:1–13.
13. Levin MF, Magdalon EC, Michaelsen SM, Quevedo AAF. Quality of Grasping and the Role of Haptics in a 3-D Immersive Virtual Reality Environment in Individuals With Stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2015;23:1047–55.
14. Magdalon EC, Michaelsen SM, Quevedo AA, Levin MF. Comparison of grasping movements made by healthy subjects in a 3-dimensional immersive virtual versus physical environment. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011;138:126–34.
15. Anglin JM, Sugiyama T, Liew SL. Visuomotor adaptation in head-mounted virtual reality versus conventional training. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45469.
16. Frederiksen JG, Sørensen SMD, Konge L, Svendsen MBS, Nobel-Jørgensen M, Bjerrum F, et al. Cognitive load and performance in immersive virtual reality versus conventional virtual reality simulation training of laparoscopic surgery: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:1244–52.
17. Baumeister J, Ssin SY, Elsayed NAM, Dorrian J, Webb DP, Walsh JA, et al. Cognitive Cost of Using Augmented Reality Displays. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. IEEE; 2017;23:2378–88.
18. Funk M, Kosch T, Schmidt A. Interactive worker assistance: Comparing the effects of in-situ projection, head-mounted displays, tablet, and paper instructions. UbiComp 2016 - Proc 2016 ACM Int Jt Conf Pervasive Ubiquitous Comput. 2016;934–9.
19. Orru G, Longo L. The Evolution of Cognitive Load Theory and the Measurement of Its Intrinsic, Extraneous and Germane Loads: A Review. Longo L, Leva MC, editors. Commun Comput Inf Sci. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019;1012:23–48.
20. Tseng YW, Diedrichsen J, Krakauer JW, Shadmehr R, Bastian AJ. Sensory prediction errors drive cerebellum-dependent adaptation of reaching. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98:54–62.
21. Krakauer JW, Hadjiosif AM, Xu J, Wong AL, Haith AM. Motor learning. Compr Physiol. 2019;9:613–63.
22. Miall RC, Wolpert DM. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Networks. Pergamon; 1996;9:1265–79.
23. Taylor JA, Ivry RB. Implicit and Explicit Processes in Motor Learning. Action Sci. 2013;63–87.
24. Redding GM, Rader SD, Lucas DR. Cognitive load and prism adaptation. J Mot Behav. 1992;24:238–46.
25. Taylor JA, Krakauer JW, Ivry RB. Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task. J Neurosci. 2014;34:3023–32.
26. Goh HT, Gordon J, Sullivan KJ, Winstein CJ. Evaluation of attentional demands during motor learning: Validity of a dual-task probe paradigm. J Mot Behav. 2014;46:95–105.
27. Bouchard JM, Cressman EK. Intermanual transfer and retention of visuomotor adaptation to a large visuomotor distortion are driven by explicit processes. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0245184.
28. Werner S, Strüder HK, Donchin O. Intermanual transfer of visuomotor adaptation is related to awareness. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2019;14.
29. Vaswani PA, Shmuelof L, Haith AM, Delnicki RJ, Huang VS, Mazzoni P, et al. Persistent residual errors in motor adaptation tasks: Reversion to baseline and exploratory escape. J Neurosci. 2015;35:6969–77.
30. Butcher PA, Taylor JA. Decomposition of a sensory prediction error signal for visuomotor adaptation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018;44:176–94.
31. McDougle SD, Taylor JA. Dissociable cognitive strategies for sensorimotor learning. Nat Commun. 2019;10.
32. Lo S, Andrews S. To transform or not to transform: using generalized linear mixed models to analyse reaction time data. Front Psychol. Frontiers; 2015;6:1171.
33. French MA, Morton SM, Reisman DS. Use of explicit processes during a visually guided locomotor learning task predicts 24-h retention after stroke. J Neurophysiol. 2021;125:211–22.
34. Kim S, Ogawa K, Lv J, Schweighofer N, Imamizu H. Neural Substrates Related to Motor Memory with Multiple Timescales in Sensorimotor Adaptation. PLoS Biol. 2015;13:e1002312.
35. Seidler RD, Noll DC. Neuroanatomical correlates of motor acquisition and motor transfer. J Neurophysiol. 2008;99:1836–45.
36. Anguera JA, Reuter-Lorenz PA, Willingham DT, Seidler RD. Contributions of spatial working memory to visuomotor adaptation. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008;22:172.
37. Liew SL, Thompson T, Ramirez J, Butcher PA, Taylor JA, Celnik PA. Variable neural contributions to explicit and implicit learning during visuomotor adaptation. Front Neurosci. Frontiers Media SA; 2018;12:610.
38. Takeo Y, Hara M, Shirakawa Y, Ikeda T, Sugata H. Sequential motor learning transfers from real to virtual environment. J Neuroeng Rehabil. BioMed Central; 2021;18:1–8.
39. Leow LA, Marinovic W, de Rugy A, Carroll TJ. Task errors drive memories that improve sensorimotor adaptation. J Neurosci. 2020;40:3075–88.
40. Huberdeau DM, Krakauer JW, Haith AM. Dual-process decomposition in human sensorimotor adaptation. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015;33:71–7.
41. Harris DJ, Buckingham G, Wilson MR, Vine SJ. Virtually the same? How impaired sensory information in virtual reality may disrupt vision for action. Exp Brain Res. 2019;237:2761–6.
42. Ganel T, Goodale MA. Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape. Nature. 2003;426:664–7.
43. Goodale MA, Króliczak G, Westwood DA. Dual routes to action: Contributions of the dorsal and ventral streams to adaptive behavior. Prog Brain Res. 2005;149:269–83.
44. Campagnoli C, Domini F, Taylor JA. Taking aim at the perceptual side of motor learning: Exploring how explicit and implicit learning encode perceptual error information through depth vision. J Neurophysiol. 2021;20:413–26.
45. McDougle SD, Bond KM, Taylor JA. Explicit and implicit processes constitute the fast and slow processes of sensorimotor learning. J Neurosci. 2015;35:9568–79.
46. Joiner WM, Smith MA. Long-term retention explained by a model of short-term learning in the adaptive control of reaching. J Neurophysiol. 2008;100:2948–55.
47. Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R. Interacting Adaptive Processes with Different Timescales Underlie Short-Term Motor Learning. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:e179.