The data provided can be used as input data to develop an energy system model for the included countries in Africa, South America, and Asia. These countries are selected based on geography and data availability. This paper presents selected country-specific data and related aggregated data by region, with an example energy system model in the appendix; however, additional more comprehensive country-specific datasets are available externally for each country (see Appendix B for links to each available country-specific dataset, which should be consulted by those wishing to use these data for their own country analyses). As an illustration, these data were used to develop an example energy system model for Kenya using the cost-optimization tool OSeMOSYS (6) for 2015-2050. For reference, that model is described in Appendix A, and its data files are available as supplementary materials. The data provided were collected from publicly available sources, including the reports of international organizations, journal articles and existing model databases. The data sources used are listed in Table 1; each data source is assigned a letter code which is then referred to in the text. The dataset includes the techno-economic parameters of supply-side technologies, installed capacities, emissions factors and final electricity demands.
U4RIA are practical goals designed to improve energy modelling for policy support through guidelines and best practices (2). They are short for Ubuntu (meaning community focused), Retrievability, Reusability, Repeatability, Interoperability and Auditability. The datasets and example model move to meet U4RIA goals in that partially:
- We develop examples of results that can be used by other research communities, including energy and transport, and to aid mitigation strategies.
- The illustrative analyses are retrievable, reusable, repeatable.
- As data are defined, elements of interoperability are feasible.
- Moreover, the investigation could be audited or verified (not to say that it is ‘accurate’ but simply reproducible).
Item
|
Description of Content
|
Table 1
|
A table showing the raw data sources that data were collected from
|
Table 2
|
A table showing the estimated installed capacity of different on-grid power plant types in selected countries in Africa in 2018
|
Table 3
|
A table showing the estimated installed capacity of different on-grid power plant types in selected countries in East Asia in 2018
|
Table 4
|
A table showing the estimated installed capacity of different on-grid power plant types in selected countries in South America in 2018
|
Table 5
|
A table showing the estimated installed capacity of off-grid solar PV and hydropower in selected countries in Africa in 2018
|
Table 6
|
A table showing the estimated installed capacity of off-grid solar PV and hydropower in selected countries in East Asia in 2018
|
Table 7
|
A table showing the estimated installed capacity of off-grid solar PV and hydropower in selected countries in East South America in 2018
|
Table 8
|
A table showing techno-economic parameters for electricity generation technologies in Africa
|
Table 9
|
A table showing techno-economic parameters for electricity generation technologies in South East Asia
|
Table 10
|
A table showing techno-economic parameters for electricity generation technologies in South America
|
Table 11
|
A table showing capital cost projections for renewable energy technologies in Africa up to 2050
|
Table 12
|
A table showing capital cost projections for renewable energy technologies in South East Asia up to 2050
|
Table 13
|
A table showing capital cost projections for renewable energy technologies in South America up to 2050
|
Table 14
|
A table showing estimated average capacity factors for solar PV, hydropower and wind in selected countries in Africa
|
Table 15
|
A table showing estimated average capacity factors for solar PV, hydropower and wind in selected countries in East Asia
|
Table 16
|
A table showing estimated average capacity factors for solar PV, hydropower and wind in selected countries in South America
|
Table 17
|
A table showing estimated combined efficiency of transmission and distribution in selected countries in Africa in 2020, 2030 & 2050
|
Table 18
|
A table showing estimated combined efficiency of transmission and distribution in selected countries in East Asia in 2020, 2030 & 2050
|
Table 19
|
A table showing estimated combined efficiency of transmission and distribution in selected countries in South America in 2020, 2030 & 2050
|
Table 20
|
A table showing estimated domestic refinery capacity for selected countries in Africa
|
Table 21
|
A table showing estimated domestic refinery capacity for selected countries in East Asia
|
Table 22
|
A table showing estimated domestic refinery capacity for selected countries in South America
|
Table 23
|
A table showing cost and performance data for refinery technologies
|
Table 24
|
A table showing fuel price projections in Africa up to 2050
|
Table 25
|
A table showing fuel price projections in East Asia up to 2050
|
Table 26
|
A table showing fuel price projections in South America up to 2050
|
Table 27
|
A table showing carbon dioxide emissions factors by fuel
|
Table 28
|
A table showing estimated renewable energy potentials for selected countries in Africa
|
Table 29
|
A table showing estimated renewable energy potentials for selected countries East in Asia
|
Table 30
|
A table showing estimated renewable energy potentials for selected countries in South America
|
Table 31
|
A table showing estimated fossil fuel reserves for selected countries in Africa
|
Table 32
|
A table showing estimated fossil fuel reserves for selected countries in Asia
|
Table 33
|
A table showing estimated fossil fuel reserves for selected countries in South Africa
|
Figure 1
|
A graph showing a final electricity demand projection for selected countries in the North Africa Power Pool from 2015-2050
|
Figure 2
|
A graph showing a final electricity demand projection for selected countries in the Central Africa Power Pool from 2015-2050
|
Figure 3
|
A graph showing a final electricity demand projection for selected countries in the East Africa Power Pool from 2015-2050
|
Figure 4
|
A graph showing a final electricity demand projection for selected countries in the West Africa Power Pool from 2015-2050
|
Figure 5
|
A graph showing a final electricity demand projection for selected countries in the South Africa Power Pool from 2015-2050
|
Figure 6
|
A graph showing a final electricity demand projection for selected countries in East Asia from 2015-2050
|
Figure 7
|
A graph showing a final electricity demand projection for selected countries in South America from 2015-2050
|
Table 1: Data sources used in this article. In the text, lettered data sources corresponding to those in Table 1 are included in brackets
Source ID
|
Reference
|
A
|
C. Cannone, Towards evidence-based policymaking: energy modelling tools for sustainable development, UPC Barcelona (2020). http://hdl.handle.net/2117/333306
|
B
|
M. Brinkerink, P. Deane, PLEXOS-World 2015. (2020). https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CBYXBY
|
C
|
M. Brinkerink, B. Gallachóir, P. Deane, Building and Calibrating a Country-Level Detailed Global Electricity Model Based on Public Data, Energy Strateg Rev. 33 (2021) 100592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100592
|
D
|
L. Byers, J. Friedrich, R. Hennig, A. Kressig, X. Li, C. McCormick, et al., A Global Database of Power Plants, Washington, DC (2018). https://www.wri.org/publication/global-power-plant-database
|
E
|
IRENA, Renewable Energy Statistics 2020, Abu Dhabi (2020). https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Jul/Renewable-energy-statistics-2020
|
F
|
IRENA, Planning and Prospects for Renewable Power in Eastern and Southern Africa, Abu Dhabi (2021). https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2021/Apr/IRENA_Planning_Prospects_Africa_2021.pdf
|
G
|
IRENA, Planning and prospects for renewable power: West Africa, Abu Dhabi (2018). https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2018/Nov/IRENA_Planning_West_Africa_2018.pdf
|
H
|
IRENA, Future of Wind, Abu Dhabi (2019). https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2019/Oct/IRENA_Future_of_wind_2019.pdf
|
I
|
IRENA, ASEAN Centre for Energy, Renewable Energy Outlook for ASEAN, Abu Dhabi (2016). https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2016/IRENA_REmap_ASEAN_2016_report.pdf
|
J
|
IRENA, Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2019, Abu Dhabi (2020). https://irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2020/Jun/IRENA_Power_Generation_Costs_2019.pdf
|
K
|
G. N. P. de Moura, L.F.L. Legey, M. Howells, A Brazilian perspective of power systems integration using OSeMOSYS SAMBA – South America Model Base – and the bargaining power of neighbouring countries: A cooperative games approach, Energy Policy. 115 (2018) 470–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.01.045
|
L
|
I. Staffell, S. Pfenninger, Using bias-corrected reanalysis to simulate current and future wind power output, Energy. 114 (2016) 1224–1239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.068
|
M
|
I. Staffell, S. Pfenninger, Long-term patterns of European PV output using 30 years of validated hourly reanalysis and satellite data. Energy. 114 (2016). 1251–1265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.060
|
N
|
I. Pappis, V. Sridharan, W. Usher, M. Howells, KTH-dESA/jrc_temba: TEMBA 2.0 (Version v2.0.3). (2021). https://github.com/KTH-dESA/jrc_temba/releases/tag/v2.0.3
|
O
|
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Global CFDDA-based Onshore and Offshore Wind Potential Supply Curves by Country, Class, and Depth (quantities in GW and PWh). (2014). https://openei.org/doe-opendata/dataset/c186913f-6684-4455-a2f2-f26e152a9b35/resource/4dc4a6fd-3a63-47df-bcbe-e9c83b83b38e/download/nrelcfddawindsc20130603.xlsx
|
P
|
IRENA, Future of wind: Deployment, investment, technology, grid integration and socio-economic aspects (A Global Energy Transformation paper), Abu Dhabi.(2019).https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2019/Oct/IRENA_Future_of_wind_2019.pdf
|
Q
|
I. Pappis, M. Howells, V. Sridharan, F. Gardumi, E. Ramos, W. Usher, et al., Energy projections for African countries. (2019). https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC118432
|
R
|
International Energy Agency, IndexMundi, Electric Power Transmission and Distribution Losses (% of output) - Country Ranking – Asia. (2018). https://www.indexmundi.com/facts/indicators/EG.ELC.LOSS.ZS/rankings/asia
|
S
|
Y. Li, Y. Chang Y, Infrastructure Investments for Power Trade and Transmission in ASEAN+2: Costs, Benefits, Long-Term Contracts, and Prioritised Development. (2014). https://www.eria.org/ERIA-DP-2014-21.pdf
|
T
|
McKinsey, McKinsey Refinery Reference Desk. (2020). [Accessed 13/03/2021]. https://www.mckinseyenergyinsights.com/resources/refinery-reference-desk/
|
U
|
IEA ETSAP, Oil Refineries. (2014). https://iea-etsap.org/E-TechDS/PDF/P04_Oil Ref_KV_Apr2014_GSOK.pdf
|
V
|
U.S. EIA, Assumptions to the Annual Energy Outlook 2020: International Energy Module.(2020). https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/assumptions/pdf/international.pdf
|
W
|
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, APEC Energy Demand and Supply Outlook 7th Edition. (2019). https://aperc.or.jp/publications/reports/outlook.php
|
X
|
ERIA, Cost Analysis of Biomass Power Generation. (2019). https://www.eria.org/uploads/media/12_RPR_FY2018_09_Chapter_5.pdf
|
Y
|
Argus, Argus Biomass Markets Weekly Biomass Market News and Analysis Issue 20-47. (2020). https://www.argusmedia.com/-/media/Files/sample-reports/argus-biomassmarkets.ashx?la=en&hash=872E2C03A0A78FE3F236BBF00E7729E3114326E0
|
Z
|
P. Howes, J. Bates, A. Brown, R. Diaz-Chavez, S. Christie, A. Bayley, Global Biomass Markets Final Report. (2018). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/795029/Global_Biomass_Markets_Final_report.pdf
|
AA
|
IPCC, Emission Factor Database. [accessed 03/02/2021]. https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/EFDB/main.php
|
AB
|
S. Hermann, A. Miketa, N. Fichaux, Estimating the Renewable Energy Potential in Africa, Abu Dhabi. (2014). https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2014/IRENA_Africa_Resource_Potential_Aug2014.pdf
|
AC
|
IRENA, Analysis of Infrastructure for Renewable Power in Eastern and Southern Africa, Abu Dhabi. (2015). https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2015/IRENA_Africa_CEC_infrastructure_2015.pdf
|
AD
|
United Nations, World Small Hydropower Development Report 2019. (2019). https://www.unido.org/our-focus-safeguarding-environment-clean-energy-access-productive-use-renewable-energy-focus-areas-small-hydro-power/world-small-hydropower-development-report
|
AE
|
V. Veng, B. Suryadi, A. Damar Pranadi, A review of renewable energy development and its policy under nationally determined contributions in ASEAN, Int J Smart Grids Clean Energy. (2019). https://accept.aseanenergy.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/A-Review-of-RE-and-NDCs-in-ASEAN.pdf
|
AF
|
NREL, Exploring Renewable Energy Opportunities in Select Southeast Asian Countries. (2019). https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1527336-exploring-renewable-energy-opportunities-select-southeast-asian-countries-geospatial-analysis-levelized-cost-energy-utility-scale-wind-solar-photovoltaics
|
AG
|
NREL, Solar Resources by Class and Country. (2014). https://openei.org/datasets/dataset/solar-resources-by-class-and-country
|
AH
|
The World Bank, energydata.info. (2019) [accessed 03/02/2021]. https://energydata.info/en
|
AI
|
US EIA, US Energy Information Administration. (2019). [accessed 13/3/2021]. https://www.eia.gov/
|
AJ
|
Worldometer, Worldometer. (2020). [accessed 13/03/2021]. https://www.worldometers.info/
|
AK
|
BP, Full report – BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2019. (2019). https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2019-full-report.pdf
|
AL
|
International Energy Agency, IEA Sankey Diagram. (2019). [accessed 13/03/2021]. https://www.iea.org/sankey/
|
AM
|
OLADE, Energy Outlook of Latin America and the Caribbean 2019. (2019). http://biblioteca.olade.org/opac-tmpl/Documentos/old0446b.pdf
|
AN
|
A. Shivakumar, M. Brinkerink, T. Niet, W. Usher, OSeMOSYS/osemosys_global: Development release for CCG (Version v0.2.b0). (2021). https://zenodo.org/record/4624417#.Yd2pQmjP02w
|
AO
|
IRENA, Southern African Power Pool: Planning and Prospects for Renewable Power, Abu Dhabi. (2013). https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2013/SAPP.pdf
|
AP
|
United Nations Development Programme Asia-Pacific Regional Centre, Achieving Sustainable Energy For All in the Asia-Pacific. (2013). https://www.asia-pacific.undp.org/content/rbap/en/home/library/climate-and-disaster-resilience/APRC-EE-2013-SE4ALL.html
|
AQ
|
Global Electrification Platform, Explore — Global Electrification Platform. (2019) [accessed 13/03/2021]. https://electrifynow.energydata.info/explore/ng-1?year=2030&scenario=0_0_0_0_0_0&filters=r8_2766837%7Cr0_190%7C1_3_5_6_7%7Cr0_131%7Cr0_68%7Cr15_2105
|
AR
|
NREL, Annual Technology Baseline 2020 Data. (2020). https://atb.nrel.gov/electricity/2020/data.php
|
AS
|
E. Terpilowski-Gill, Decarbonising the Laotian Energy System, Imperial College London. (2020). http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/86671
|
AT
|
O. Okolo, H. Teng, Analysing Nigeria’s Energy system in light of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. (2017)h ttps://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1131269/FULLTEXT01.pdf
|
1.1 Existing Electricity Supply System
The estimated existing power generation capacity in each selected country in 2018 is detailed in Tables 1-6 below (sources B-E). The methods used to calculate these estimates are described in more detail in Section 2.1. Data on the installation year of each power plant can be found in the country datasets published on Zenodo (see Appendix B).
Table 2: Estimated Installed On-Grid Capacity by Technology Type in Selected Countries in Africa in 2018 (sources B-D). ‘-’ denotes 0 estimated capacity.
Country
|
Estimated Installed Capacity (MW)
|
Biomass
|
Oil
|
Coal
|
Gas CCGT
|
Gas SCGT
|
Geothermal
|
Utility PV
|
CSP
|
Large Hydro (>100MW)
|
Medium Hydro (10-100MW)
|
Small Hydro (<10MW)
|
Onshore Wind
|
Nuclear
|
Algeria
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
35738
|
143
|
-
|
54
|
25
|
251
|
24
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Angola
|
-
|
351
|
-
|
-
|
420
|
-
|
14
|
-
|
849
|
71
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Benin
|
-
|
20
|
-
|
139.1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Botswana
|
-
|
-
|
746
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Burkina Faso
|
-
|
267
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Burundi
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
49
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Cameroon
|
-
|
168
|
-
|
450
|
200
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
550
|
171
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Central African Republic
|
-
|
14
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
19
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Chad
|
-
|
217
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Republic of Congo
|
-
|
71.1
|
-
|
336
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
120
|
99
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Côte D'Ivoire
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
716
|
504
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
549
|
50
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Djibouti
|
-
|
107
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Democratic Republic of Congo
|
-
|
13
|
-
|
-
|
25
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2533
|
418
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Egypt
|
-
|
1146
|
-
|
16546
|
294
|
-
|
25
|
20
|
2700
|
150
|
-
|
810
|
-
|
Equatorial Guinea
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
185
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
150
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Eritrea
|
-
|
133
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Eswatini
|
120
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
51
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Ethiopia
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
8.5
|
23
|
-
|
3621
|
191
|
-
|
171
|
-
|
Gabon
|
-
|
16
|
-
|
306.9
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
160
|
170
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Gambia
|
-
|
70
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Ghana
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1251
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1598
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Guinea
|
-
|
371
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
240
|
178
|
-
|
-
|
--
|
Guinea Bissau
|
-
|
18
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Kenya
|
90
|
735
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
419
|
24
|
-
|
499
|
249
|
-
|
310
|
-
|
Lesotho
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
72
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Liberia
|
-
|
121
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
60
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Libya
|
-
|
191
|
-
|
6762
|
2120
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Malawi
|
10
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
16
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
252
|
92
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Mali
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
200
|
106
|
5
|
-
|
-
|
Mauritania
|
-
|
133
|
-
|
-
|
120
|
-
|
33
|
-
|
-
|
97
|
-
|
30
|
-
|
Morocco
|
-
|
338
|
2621
|
1666
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
690
|
1207
|
453
|
8
|
1266
|
-
|
Mozambique
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2242
|
44
|
-
|
-
|
--
|
Namibia
|
-
|
60
|
120
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
27.4
|
-
|
240
|
92
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Niger
|
-
|
124
|
38
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Nigeria
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
5158
|
3261
|
-
|
17
|
-
|
2040
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Rwanda
|
-
|
28
|
-
|
-
|
26
|
-
|
9
|
-
|
-
|
126
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
Senegal
|
25
|
856
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
11
|
-
|
120
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Sierra Leone
|
-
|
76
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
50
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Somalia
|
-
|
15.6
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2
|
-
|
South Africa
|
224
|
2832
|
38295
|
|
376
|
|
1765
|
450
|
601
|
42
|
7
|
2032
|
1830
|
South Sudan
|
-
|
64.9
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Sudan
|
191
|
926
|
-
|
319
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2196
|
56
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Tanzania
|
70
|
100
|
-
|
208
|
213
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
384
|
169
|
8
|
-
|
-
|
Togo
|
-
|
101
|
-
|
28
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
66
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Tunisia
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3559
|
145
|
-
|
22
|
-
|
-
|
57.8
|
8
|
245
|
-
|
Uganda
|
60
|
136
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
20
|
-
|
635
|
71.5
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Zambia
|
39.8
|
170
|
300
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2308
|
12
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Zimbabwe
|
97
|
9.83
|
1117.5
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
680
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Table 3: Estimated Installed On-Grid Capacity by Technology Type in Selected Countries in East Asia in 2018 (sources B-D) ‘-’ denotes 0 estimated capacity.
Country
|
Estimated Installed Capacity (MW)
|
Biomass
|
Oil
|
Coal
|
Gas CCGT
|
Gas SCGT
|
Geothermal
|
Utility PV
|
Large Hydro (>100MW)
|
Medium Hydro (10-100MW)
|
Small Hydro (<10MW)
|
Onshore Wind
|
Nuclear
|
Cambodia
|
2
|
54
|
506
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
12
|
897
|
33
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Indonesia
|
1740
|
751.7
|
34397
|
13799
|
1170
|
1404
|
-
|
4539.41
|
505
|
42
|
-
|
-
|
Laos
|
30
|
-
|
1876
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
4221.14
|
222
|
19
|
-
|
-
|
Malaysia
|
1040
|
178
|
14334
|
14324
|
626
|
-
|
262
|
4500
|
168
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Myanmar
|
-
|
0
|
252.49
|
1448.6
|
35
|
-
|
12
|
2568.8
|
647
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Papua New Guinea
|
-
|
361.9
|
-
|
-
|
186.2
|
56
|
-
|
-
|
271
|
4
|
-
|
-
|
Philippines
|
190
|
2709
|
10699
|
4237.5
|
100
|
1918.8
|
818
|
3393.9
|
208
|
1
|
220.1
|
-
|
South Korea
|
858
|
3255
|
38260
|
33583
|
118
|
-
|
3533
|
4827
|
374
|
62
|
768.9
|
23080
|
Taiwan
|
740
|
2632
|
18650
|
13561
|
-
|
-
|
842
|
3778
|
41
|
3
|
646.64
|
5216
|
Thailand
|
3230
|
|
5259
|
27132
|
-
|
-
|
1415
|
3639
|
148
|
-
|
210
|
-
|
Vietnam
|
255
|
970.7
|
14935
|
8201.5
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
13534
|
2957
|
266
|
287
|
-
|
Table 4: Estimated Installed On-Grid Capacity by Technology Type in Selected Countries in South America in 2018 (sources B-D) ‘-’ denotes 0 estimated capacity.
Country
|
Estimated Installed Capacity (MW)
|
Biomass
|
Oil
|
Coal
|
Gas CCGT
|
Gas SCGT
|
Utility PV
|
Large Hydro (>100MW)
|
Medium Hydro (10-100MW)
|
Small Hydro (<10MW)
|
Onshore Wind
|
Nuclear
|
Argentina
|
660
|
1755.55
|
2634.54
|
13775.38
|
1362
|
3
|
9204
|
589
|
52
|
279.32
|
1764
|
Bolivia
|
150
|
-
|
-
|
1315.58
|
383
|
13
|
-
|
496.9
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Brazil
|
12271.5
|
13403.2
|
4145.5
|
19287.36
|
718.6
|
6
|
88787
|
6917
|
1062
|
11378.2
|
1990
|
Chile
|
466.1
|
3365.18
|
4835
|
4878.89
|
72
|
618.15
|
5698
|
1460
|
165
|
909.18
|
-
|
Colombia
|
240
|
188
|
775.9
|
3151.06
|
-
|
-
|
11434
|
66
|
-
|
20
|
-
|
Ecuador
|
140
|
1693.3
|
-
|
146
|
1420.54
|
30
|
3089
|
167
|
-
|
20
|
-
|
Paraguay
|
40
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
8764
|
50
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Peru
|
180
|
-
|
230.67
|
7373.13
|
75
|
96
|
4105.6
|
46
|
-
|
150
|
-
|
Uruguay
|
425.3
|
905.2
|
-
|
570.34
|
54
|
227
|
1538
|
-
|
-
|
1384
|
-
|
Venezuela
|
-
|
3570
|
-
|
10857
|
680
|
-
|
17560
|
105
|
-
|
30
|
-
|
Table 5: Estimated Installed Off-Grid PV and Hydropower in Selected Countries in Africa in 2018 (source E) ‘-’ denotes 0 estimated capacity.
Country
|
Estimated Installed Capacity (MW)
|
Off-Grid PV
|
Off-Grid Hydropower
|
Algeria
|
423
|
-
|
Angola
|
13.38
|
6.86
|
Benin
|
-
|
-
|
Botswana
|
1.61
|
-
|
Burkina Faso
|
27
|
-
|
Burundi
|
4.7
|
1.6
|
Cameroon
|
14.19
|
0.3
|
Central African Republic
|
0.3
|
0.2
|
Chad
|
0.17
|
-
|
Republic of Congo
|
0.57
|
-
|
Côte D'Ivoire
|
8.28
|
-
|
Djibouti
|
0.36
|
-
|
Democratic Republic of Congo
|
18.9
|
131.7
|
Egypt
|
50
|
-
|
Equatorial Guinea
|
-
|
-
|
Eritrea
|
10.16
|
-
|
Eswatini
|
0.8
|
1.7
|
Ethiopia
|
13.94
|
1.28
|
Gabon
|
1.4
|
0.29
|
Gambia
|
2
|
-
|
Ghana
|
7.59
|
-
|
Guinea
|
13.28
|
2.22
|
Guinea Bissau
|
1.17
|
-
|
Kenya
|
37.84
|
6.44
|
Lesotho
|
0.16
|
0.18
|
Liberia
|
2.58
|
4
|
Libya
|
5.11
|
0
|
Malawi
|
21.88
|
1.7
|
Mali
|
19.58
|
-
|
Mauritania
|
21.07
|
-
|
Morocco
|
22.9
|
-
|
Mozambique
|
15
|
1.06
|
Namibia
|
21.93
|
-
|
Niger
|
20.04
|
-
|
Nigeria
|
17.57
|
0.4
|
Rwanda
|
25.4
|
-
|
Senegal
|
12
|
-
|
Sierra Leone
|
4.25
|
4.89
|
Somalia
|
7.07
|
-
|
South Africa
|
-
|
7.19
|
South Sudan
|
0.55
|
-
|
Sudan
|
12.58
|
-
|
Tanzania
|
25.34
|
15.42
|
Togo
|
3
|
-
|
Tunisia
|
2.08
|
-
|
Uganda
|
28
|
5.4
|
Zambia
|
0.22
|
2.61
|
Zimbabwe
|
7.91
|
1.6
|
Table 6: Estimated Installed Off-Grid PV and Hydropower in Selected Countries in East Asia in 2018 (source E). ‘-’ denotes 0 estimated capacity.
Country
|
Estimated Installed Capacity (MW)
|
Off-Grid PV
|
Off-Grid Hydropower
|
Cambodia
|
1.94
|
-
|
Indonesia
|
45.08
|
14.85
|
Laos
|
1.63
|
2.01
|
Malaysia
|
7.44
|
0.45
|
Myanmar
|
47.54
|
6.89
|
Papua New Guinea
|
1.23
|
76.4
|
Philippines
|
1.16
|
20.59
|
South Korea
|
-
|
-
|
Taiwan
|
-
|
-
|
Thailand
|
-
|
-
|
Vietnam
|
5.26
|
43
|
Table 7: Estimated Installed Off-Grid PV and Hydropower in Selected Countries in South America in 2018 (source E). ‘-’ denotes 0 estimated capacity.
Country
|
Estimated Installed Capacity (MW)
|
Off-Grid PV
|
Off-Grid Hydropower
|
Argentina
|
0.62
|
19.58
|
Bolivia
|
5.54
|
9.2
|
Brazil
|
7.23
|
0.02
|
Chile
|
-
|
-
|
Colombia
|
1.53
|
5.32
|
Ecuador
|
2.02
|
26
|
Paraguay
|
0.06
|
-
|
Peru
|
53.58
|
177.65
|
Uruguay
|
2.27
|
-
|
Venezuela
|
3.4
|
0.81
|
1.2 Techno-economic Data for Electricity Generation Technologies
The techno-economic parameters of electricity generation technologies by region are presented in Tables 7-9, including costs, operational lives, efficiencies and average capacity factors. For countries in Africa, cost (capital and fixed), operational life and efficiency data were collected from reports by the International Renewable Energy Agency (sources F-H) and applied to all of Africa. These cost data include projected cost reductions for renewable energy technologies, which are presented in Table 11. Cost (capital and fixed), operational life and efficiency data for countries in East Asia are based on reports by the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) and the ASEAN Centre for Clean Energy (ACE) (sources I-J). Cost (capital and fixed), operational life and efficiency data for countries in South America are based on the data used in the South America Model Base (SAMBA) (source K). Where technologies were not included in SAMBA, namely diesel generation technologies, medium hydropower plants and decentralised solar PV with storage, costs were estimated based on costs in other regions. For countries in Asia and South America, projected cost reductions for renewable energy technologies were estimated by applying the cost reduction trends of IRENA for Africa (source F), published in 2021, to current Asia- and South America-specific cost estimates. The cost and performance of parameters of fossil electricity generation technologies are assumed constant over the modelling period. Only fixed power plant costs are considered in this analysis, which captures variable operation and maintenance costs. Country-specific capacity factors for solar PV, onshore wind and hydropower technologies for every country were sourced from Renewables Ninja and the PLEXOS-World 2015 Model Dataset (sources B, L, M). Country-specific capacity factors for offshore wind were sourced from the TEMBA dataset (source N) for countries in Africa and an NREL dataset for countries in East Asia and South America (source O). Regional capacity factor estimates for other technologies were sourced from the IRENA (sources G, J) for Africa, SAMBA for South America (source K), and IRENA and ACE for Asia (source I). Average capacity factors were calculated for each technology and presented below, with daytime (6 am - 6 pm) averages presented for solar PV technologies. For more information on the capacity factor data, refer to Section 2.1.
Table 8: Techno-economic parameters of electricity generation technologies in Africa (sources F, G, P)
Technology
|
Capital Cost ($/kW in 2020)
|
Fixed Cost ($/kW/yr in 2020)
|
Operational Life (years)
|
Efficiency
|
Average Capacity Factor
|
Biomass Power Plant
|
2500
|
75
|
30
|
35%
|
50%
|
Coal Power Plant
|
2500
|
78
|
35
|
37%
|
85%
|
Geothermal Power Plant
|
4000
|
120
|
25
|
80%
|
79%
|
Light Fuel Oil Power Plant
|
1200
|
35
|
25
|
35%
|
80%
|
Oil Fired Gas Turbine (SCGT)
|
1450
|
45
|
25
|
35%
|
80%
|
Gas Power Plant (CCGT)
|
1200
|
35
|
30
|
48%
|
85%
|
Gas Power Plant (SCGT)
|
700
|
20
|
25
|
30%
|
85%
|
Solar PV (Utility)
|
1378
|
18
|
24
|
100%
|
Varies by country
|
CSP without Storage
|
4058
|
41
|
30
|
100%
|
23%
|
CSP with Storage
|
5797
|
58
|
30
|
100%
|
26%
|
Large Hydropower Plant (Dam) (>100MW)
|
3000
|
90
|
50
|
100%
|
Varies by country
|
Medium Hydropower Plant (10-100MW)
|
2500
|
75
|
50
|
100%
|
Varies by country
|
Small Hydropower Plant (<10MW)
|
3000
|
90
|
50
|
100%
|
Varies by country
|
Onshore Wind
|
1489
|
60
|
25
|
100%
|
Varies by country
|
Offshore Wind
|
3972
|
159
|
25
|
100%
|
Varies by country
|
Nuclear Power Plant
|
6137
|
184
|
50
|
33%
|
85%
|
Light Fuel Oil Standalone Generator (1kW)
|
750
|
23
|
10
|
16%
|
30%
|
Solar PV (Distributed with Storage)
|
4320
|
86
|
24
|
100%
|
Varies by country
|
Table 9: Techno-economic parameters of electricity generation technologies in East Asia (sources I-J)
Technology
|
Capital Cost ($/kW in 2020)
|
Fixed Cost ($/kW/yr in 2020)
|
Operational Life (years)
|
Efficiency
|
Average Capacity Factor
|
Biomass Power Plant
|
2750.0
|
69.0
|
25
|
0.38
|
0.7
|
Coal Power Plant
|
1300.0
|
52.0
|
60
|
0.3
|
0.75
|
Geothermal Power Plant
|
2500.0
|
100.0
|
50
|
0.1
|
0.7
|
Light Fuel Oil Power Plant
|
1200.0
|
18.0
|
50
|
0.4
|
0.25
|
Oil Fired Gas Turbine (SCGT)
|
1344.0
|
18.0
|
50
|
0.4
|
0.25
|
Gas Power Plant (CCGT)
|
1000.0
|
40.0
|
30
|
0.55
|
0.55
|
Gas Power Plant (SCGT)
|
784.0
|
23.0
|
30
|
0.35
|
0.55
|
Solar PV (Utility)
|
1160.0
|
15.08
|
30
|
1.0
|
Varies by country
|
CSP with Storage
|
4965.31
|
120.0
|
35
|
0.33
|
0.3
|
Large Hydropower Plant (Dam) (>100MW)
|
1539.0
|
46.17
|
40
|
1.0
|
Varies by country
|
Medium Hydropower Plant (10-100MW)
|
1592.86
|
47.79
|
40
|
1.0
|
Varies by country
|
Small Hydropower Plant (<10MW)
|
2162.0
|
64.86
|
40
|
1.0
|
Varies by country
|
Onshore Wind
|
2220.09
|
88.8
|
30
|
1.0
|
Varies by country
|
Offshore Wind
|
2876.21
|
115.05
|
30
|
1.0
|
Varies by country
|
Nuclear Power Plant
|
5500.0
|
138.0
|
60
|
0.33
|
0.83
|
Light Fuel Oil Standalone Generator (1kW)
|
1500.0
|
38.0
|
20
|
0.42
|
0.4
|
Solar PV (Distributed with Storage)
|
2130.8
|
42.62
|
24
|
1.0
|
Varies by country
|
Table 10: Techno-economic parameters of electricity generation technologies in South America (sources J-K)
Technology
|
Capital Cost ($/kW in 2020)
|
Fixed Cost ($/kW/yr in 2020)
|
Operational Life (years)
|
Efficiency
|
Average Capacity Factor
|
Biomass Power Plant
|
1905.0
|
13.0
|
25
|
0.35
|
0.7
|
Coal Power Plant
|
2500.0
|
40.0
|
40
|
0.43
|
0.75
|
Geothermal Power Plant
|
3796.47
|
100.0
|
20
|
0.11
|
0.7
|
Light Fuel Oil Power Plant
|
1200.0
|
15.0
|
25
|
0.35
|
0.25
|
Oil Fired Gas Turbine (SCGT)
|
1400.0
|
25.0
|
25
|
0.35
|
0.25
|
Gas Power Plant (CCGT)
|
1260.0
|
20.0
|
30
|
0.57
|
0.55
|
Gas Power Plant (SCGT)
|
583.0
|
10.0
|
30
|
0.38
|
0.55
|
Solar PV (Utility)
|
1524.5
|
19.8
|
25
|
1.0
|
Varies by country
|
CSP with Storage
|
5797.0
|
57.97
|
40
|
0.35
|
0.3
|
Large Hydropower Plant (Dam) (>100MW)
|
2939.0
|
88.17
|
60
|
1.0
|
Varies by country
|
Medium Hydropower Plant (10-100MW)
|
2500.0
|
75.0
|
60
|
1.0
|
Varies by country
|
Small Hydropower Plant (<10MW)
|
3499.0
|
104.9
|
60
|
1.0
|
Varies by country
|
Onshore Wind
|
1375.6
|
55.0
|
30
|
1.0
|
Varies by country
|
Offshore Wind
|
3406.3
|
136.2
|
25
|
1.0
|
Varies by country
|
Nuclear Power Plant
|
6318.0
|
189.54
|
40
|
0.35
|
0.83
|
Light Fuel Oil Standalone Generator (1kW)
|
750.0
|
23.0
|
20
|
0.42
|
0.4
|
Solar PV (Distributed with Storage)
|
4320.0
|
86.4
|
24
|
1.0
|
Varies by country
|
Table 11: Projected costs of renewable energy technologies for selected years to 2050 in Africa. (sources F, P)
Renewable Energy Technology
|
Capital Cost ($/kW)
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
2040
|
2050
|
Biomass Power Plant
|
2500
|
2500
|
2500
|
2500
|
2500
|
2500
|
Geothermal Power Plant
|
4000
|
4000
|
4000
|
4000
|
4000
|
4000
|
Solar PV (Utility)
|
2165
|
1378
|
984
|
886
|
723
|
723
|
CSP without Storage
|
6051
|
4058
|
3269
|
2634
|
2562
|
2562
|
CSP with Storage
|
8645
|
5797
|
4670
|
3763
|
3660
|
3660
|
Large Hydropower Plant (Dam) (>100MW)
|
3000
|
3000
|
3000
|
3000
|
3000
|
3000
|
Medium Hydropower Plant (10-100MW)
|
2500
|
2500
|
2500
|
2500
|
2500
|
2500
|
Small Hydropower Plant (<10MW)
|
3000
|
3000
|
3000
|
3000
|
3000
|
3000
|
Onshore Wind
|
1985
|
1489
|
1191
|
1087
|
933
|
933
|
Offshore Wind
|
5000
|
3972
|
3021
|
2450
|
2275
|
2100
|
Solar PV (Distributed with Storage)
|
6840
|
4320
|
3415
|
2700
|
2091
|
2091
|
Table 12: Projected costs of renewable energy technologies in East Asia for selected years to 2050. (sources F, I, J, P)
Renewable Energy Technology
|
Capital Cost ($/kW)
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
2040
|
2050
|
Biomass Power Plant
|
2750.0
|
2750.0
|
2750.0
|
2750.0
|
2750.0
|
2750.0
|
Solar PV (Utility)
|
1822.5
|
1160.0
|
828.33
|
745.83
|
608.62
|
608.62
|
CSP with Storage
|
7404.71
|
4965.31
|
4000.0
|
3223.13
|
3134.9
|
3134.9
|
Large Hydropower Plant (Dam) (>100MW)
|
1539.0
|
1539.0
|
1539.0
|
1539.0
|
1539.0
|
1539.0
|
Medium Hydropower Plant (10-100MW)
|
1592.86
|
1592.86
|
1592.86
|
1592.86
|
1592.86
|
1592.86
|
Small Hydropower Plant (<10MW)
|
2162.0
|
2162.0
|
2162.0
|
2162.0
|
2162.0
|
2162.0
|
Onshore Wind
|
2959.63
|
2220.09
|
1775.78
|
1620.71
|
1391.1
|
1391.1
|
Offshore Wind
|
3620.25
|
2876.21
|
2187.28
|
1773.92
|
1647.21
|
1520.5
|
Solar PV (Distributed with Storage)
|
3502.0
|
2130.8
|
1880.8
|
1755.8
|
1690.8
|
1625.8
|
Table 13: Projected costs of renewable energy technologies in South America for selected years to 2050. (sources F, K, P)
Renewable Energy Technology
|
Capital Cost ($/kW)
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
2040
|
2050
|
Biomass Power Plant
|
1905.0
|
1905.0
|
1905.0
|
1905.0
|
1905.0
|
1905.0
|
Solar PV (Utility)
|
1898.79
|
1791.02
|
1683.26
|
1575.49
|
1359.96
|
1144.43
|
CSP with Storage
|
8652.93
|
5797.0
|
4670.0
|
3763.0
|
3660.0
|
3660.0
|
Large Hydropower Plant (Dam) (>100MW)
|
2939.0
|
2939.0
|
2939.0
|
2939.0
|
2939.0
|
2939.0
|
Medium Hydropower Plant (10-100MW)
|
2500.0
|
2500.0
|
2500.0
|
2500.0
|
2500.0
|
2500.0
|
Small Hydropower Plant (<10MW)
|
3499.0
|
3499.0
|
3499.0
|
3499.0
|
3499.0
|
3499.0
|
Onshore Wind
|
1620.0
|
1582.33
|
1544.65
|
1506.98
|
1431.63
|
1356.28
|
Offshore Wind
|
4104.0
|
3928.19
|
3752.37
|
3576.56
|
3224.93
|
2873.3
|
Solar PV (Distributed with Storage)
|
6840.0
|
4320.0
|
3415.0
|
2700.0
|
2091.0
|
2091.0
|
Table 14: Estimated Average Capacity Factors in Selected Countries in Africa (sources B, C, L, M, Q)
Country
|
Hydropower
|
Solar PV
|
Onshore Wind
|
Offshore Wind
|
Algeria
|
0.11
|
0.35
|
0.21
|
0.37
|
Angola
|
0.52
|
0.32
|
0.11
|
0.12
|
Benin
|
0.36
|
0.27
|
0.13
|
0.13
|
Botswana
|
0.23
|
0.35
|
0.21
|
n/a
|
Burkina Faso
|
0.35
|
0.37
|
0.17
|
n/a
|
Burundi
|
0.42
|
0.28
|
0.06
|
n/a
|
Cameroon
|
0.6
|
0.31
|
0.07
|
0.1
|
Central African Republic
|
0.7
|
0.28
|
0.08
|
n/a
|
Chad
|
0.43
|
0.33
|
0.26
|
n/a
|
Republic of Congo
|
0.47
|
0.25
|
0.03
|
0.09
|
Côte D'Ivoire
|
0.33
|
0.17
|
0.09
|
0.1
|
Djibouti
|
0.41
|
0.29
|
0.21
|
0.36
|
Democratic Republic of Congo
|
0.34
|
0.26
|
0.06
|
n/a
|
Egypt
|
0.54
|
0.36
|
0.22
|
0.4
|
Equatorial Guinea
|
0.19
|
0.23
|
0.03
|
0.08
|
Eritrea
|
0.41
|
0.3
|
0.16
|
0.46
|
Eswatini
|
0.42
|
0.32
|
0.14
|
n/a
|
Ethiopia
|
0.41
|
0.37
|
0.18
|
0.48
|
Gabon
|
0.55
|
0.25
|
0.04
|
0.1
|
Gambia
|
0.41
|
0.28
|
0.14
|
0.14
|
Ghana
|
0.58
|
0.27
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
Guinea
|
0.43
|
0.35
|
0.08
|
0.11
|
Guinea Bissau
|
0.41
|
0.26
|
0.11
|
0.15
|
Kenya
|
0.48
|
0.32
|
0.21
|
0.45
|
Lesotho
|
0.69
|
0.36
|
0.15
|
n/a
|
Liberia
|
0.6
|
0.27
|
0.07
|
0.37
|
Libya
|
0.41
|
0.35
|
0.29
|
0.4
|
Malawi
|
0.54
|
0.44
|
0.16
|
n/a
|
Mali
|
0.54
|
0.37
|
0.22
|
n/a
|
Mauritania
|
0.41
|
0.37
|
0.35
|
0.41
|
Morocco
|
0.13
|
0.37
|
0.36
|
0.33
|
Mozambique
|
0.68
|
0.3
|
0.18
|
0.3
|
Namibia
|
0.59
|
0.41
|
0.15
|
n/a
|
Niger
|
0.36
|
0.37
|
0.27
|
n/a
|
Nigeria
|
0.36
|
0.34
|
0.15
|
0.37
|
Rwanda
|
0.38
|
0.33
|
0.06
|
n/a
|
Senegal
|
0.41
|
0.41
|
0.17
|
0.37
|
Sierra Leone
|
0.36
|
0.26
|
0.08
|
0.37
|
Somalia
|
0.41
|
0.29
|
0.52
|
0.58
|
South Africa
|
0.23
|
0.38
|
0.25
|
0.36
|
South Sudan
|
0.5
|
0.19
|
0.15
|
n/a
|
Sudan
|
0.43
|
0.26
|
0.22
|
0.28
|
Tanzania
|
0.47
|
0.38
|
0.14
|
0.3
|
Togo
|
0.23
|
0.26
|
0.12
|
0.37
|
Tunisia
|
0.13
|
0.33
|
0.21
|
0.41
|
Uganda
|
0.54
|
0.31
|
0.08
|
n/a
|
Zambia
|
0.63
|
0.32
|
0.21
|
n/a
|
Zimbabwe
|
0.68
|
0.34
|
0.2
|
n/a
|
Table 15: Estimated Average Capacity Factors in Selected Countries in East Asia (sources B, C, L, M, O)
Country
|
Hydropower
|
Solar PV
|
Onshore Wind
|
Offshore Wind
|
Cambodia
|
0.31
|
0.33
|
0.09
|
0.19
|
Indonesia
|
0.32
|
0.4
|
0.03
|
0.2
|
Laos
|
0.55
|
0.28
|
0.08
|
n/a
|
Malaysia
|
0.35
|
0.27
|
0.04
|
0.18
|
Myanmar
|
0.45
|
0.34
|
0.09
|
0.21
|
Papua New Guinea
|
0.38
|
0.27
|
0.11
|
0.24
|
Philippines
|
0.26
|
0.19
|
0.2
|
0.23
|
South Korea
|
0.2
|
0.25
|
0.19
|
0.24
|
Taiwan
|
0.19
|
0.24
|
0.27
|
0.34
|
Thailand
|
0.25
|
0.38
|
0.16
|
0.19
|
Vietnam
|
0.49
|
0.23
|
0.15
|
0.27
|
Table 16: Estimated Average Capacity Factors in Selected Countries in South America (sources B, C, L, M, O)
Country
|
Hydropower
|
Solar PV
|
Onshore Wind
|
Offshore Wind
|
Argentina
|
0.42
|
0.38
|
0.32
|
0.45
|
Bolivia
|
0.54
|
0.2
|
0.13
|
n/a
|
Brazil
|
0.62
|
0.29
|
0.33
|
0.24
|
Chile
|
0.49
|
0.5
|
0.28
|
0.4
|
Colombia
|
0.5
|
0.24
|
0.41
|
0.27
|
Ecuador
|
0.52
|
0.3
|
0.07
|
0.18
|
Paraguay
|
0.72
|
0.29
|
0.2
|
n/a
|
Peru
|
0.66
|
0.44
|
0.29
|
n/a
|
Uruguay
|
0.52
|
0.17
|
0.27
|
0.31
|
Venezuela
|
0.63
|
0.28
|
0.2
|
0.3
|
1.3 Techno-economic Data for Power Transmission and Distribution
The techno-economic parameters of transmission and distribution technologies are taken from The Reference Case scenario of The Electricity Model Base for Africa (TEMBA) (source Q) for countries in Africa. This gives estimated transmission and distribution efficiencies projected to 2050 and estimated costs and operational lives. For countries in Asia, combined losses in electricity transmission and distribution are estimated based on an International Energy Agency (IEA) dataset presented by Index Mundi (source R), which gives estimated combined losses in 2014. It was then assumed that combined losses would be reduced to 5% by 2050, falling linearly. The combined costs of power transmission and distribution are estimated based on a report by the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA) (source S), which gives cost estimates for several real-life projects in ASEAN. For countries in South America, the efficiencies and costs of power transmission and distribution were taken from the SAMBA dataset (source K), which gives estimated efficiencies by country, including projections to 2063. The estimated combined efficiencies of transmission and distribution in each included country are presented in the following tables.
Table 17: Estimated combined efficiency of transmission and distribution in selected countries in Africa in 2020, 2030 & 2050 (source Q)
Country
|
Estimated combined efficiency of transmission & distribution
|
2020
|
2030
|
2050
|
Algeria
|
71.3%
|
74.1%
|
77.9%
|
Angola
|
89.3%
|
90.3%
|
90.3%
|
Benin
|
77.9%
|
78.9%
|
80.8%
|
Botswana
|
81.6%
|
82.6%
|
85.4%
|
Burkina Faso
|
49.4%
|
51.3%
|
55.1%
|
Burundi
|
86.5%
|
87.4%
|
89.3%
|
Cameroon
|
77.0%
|
77.9%
|
79.8%
|
Central African Republic
|
77.0%
|
77.9%
|
79.8%
|
Chad
|
77.0%
|
77.9%
|
79.8%
|
Republic of Congo
|
52.3%
|
54.2%
|
58.0%
|
Côte D'Ivoire
|
80.8%
|
81.7%
|
81.7%
|
Djibouti
|
77.9%
|
78.9%
|
80.8%
|
Democratic Republic of Congo
|
87.5%
|
87.4%
|
89.3%
|
Egypt
|
87.4%
|
88.3%
|
90.2%
|
Equatorial Guinea
|
74.1%
|
76.0%
|
79.8%
|
Eritrea
|
80.8%
|
81.7%
|
83.6%
|
Eswatini
|
90.3%
|
90.3%
|
90.3%
|
Ethiopia
|
87.4%
|
88.3%
|
90.2%
|
Gabon
|
58.9%
|
60.8%
|
64.6%
|
Gambia
|
77.9%
|
79.8%
|
81.7%
|
Ghana
|
77.0%
|
77.9%
|
79.8%
|
Guinea
|
90.3%
|
90.3%
|
92.2%
|
Guinea Bissau
|
43.7%
|
45.6%
|
50.4%
|
Kenya
|
81.7%
|
83.6%
|
88.4%
|
Lesotho
|
83.6%
|
88.4%
|
89.3%
|
Liberia
|
71.3%
|
74.1%
|
77.9%
|
Libya
|
67.5%
|
69.4%
|
73.2%
|
Malawi
|
78.9%
|
79.8%
|
81.7%
|
Mali
|
79.8%
|
79.8%
|
81.7%
|
Mauritania
|
59.9%
|
61.8%
|
65.6%
|
Morocco
|
86.5%
|
87.4%
|
89.3%
|
Mozambique
|
82.7%
|
84.6%
|
89.3%
|
Namibia
|
90.2%
|
91.2%
|
93.1%
|
Niger
|
74.1%
|
76.0%
|
79.8%
|
Nigeria
|
86.5%
|
87.4%
|
89.3%
|
Rwanda
|
66.5%
|
75.1%
|
78.9%
|
Senegal
|
86.5%
|
87.4%
|
89.3%
|
Sierra Leone
|
54.2%
|
56.1%
|
63.7%
|
Somalia
|
53.2%
|
55.1%
|
62.7%
|
South Africa
|
91.2%
|
92.2%
|
92.2%
|
South Sudan
|
90.3%
|
90.3%
|
92.2%
|
Sudan
|
90.3%
|
90.3%
|
91.2%
|
Tanzania
|
83.6%
|
84.6%
|
87.4%
|
Togo
|
86.5%
|
87.4%
|
89.3%
|
Tunisia
|
83.6%
|
84.6%
|
87.4%
|
Uganda
|
82.7%
|
83.6%
|
86.5%
|
Zambia
|
86.4%
|
87.4%
|
89.3%
|
Table 18: Estimated combined efficiency of transmission and distribution in selected countries in Asia in 2020, 2030 & 2050 (source R)
Country
|
Estimated combined efficiency of transmission & distribution
|
2020
|
2030
|
2050
|
Cambodia
|
80.0%
|
85.0%
|
95.0%
|
Indonesia
|
91.0%
|
93.0%
|
95.0%
|
Laos
|
91.0%
|
92.0%
|
95.0%
|
Malaysia
|
94.0%
|
95.0%
|
95.0%
|
Myanmar
|
82.0%
|
86.0%
|
95.0%
|
Papua New Guinea
|
90.0%
|
92.0%
|
95.0%
|
Philippines
|
91.0%
|
93.0%
|
95.0%
|
South Korea
|
86.0%
|
89.0%
|
95.0%
|
Taiwan
|
92.0%
|
93.0%
|
95.0%
|
Thailand
|
94.0%
|
94.3%
|
95.0%
|
Vietnam
|
91.0%
|
93.0%
|
95.0%
|
Table 19: Estimated combined efficiency of transmission and distribution in selected countries in South America in 2020, 2030 & 2050 (source K)
Country
|
The estimated combined efficiency of transmission & distribution
|
2020
|
2030
|
2050
|
Argentina
|
87.4%
|
89.3%
|
90.2%
|
|