1. international roadmap committee (IRC), International Focus Teams (IFTs). Homepage IEEE IRDS. International Roadmap for Devices and Systems (IRDS™). [Online] IEEE. [Cited: ] https://irds.ieee.org/home/process.
2. Nanomanufacturing: A Perspective. Liddle, James Alexander and Gallatin, Gregg M. . 2016, ACS Nano, Vol. 10, p. 2995−3014.
3. The transfer of photoresist LER through etch. Pawloski, Adam, et al. sl : SPIE Press, 2006, Proc. SPIE, Vol. 6153, pp. 615318 1-11.
4. High NA EUV: A challenge for metrology, an opportunity for atomic force microscopy. Moussa, A., et al. s.l. : SPIE, 2021. Proc. SPIE. Vol. 11854, p. 1185410.
5. The application of a Rapid Probe Microscope (RPM) for investigating 1D and 2D structures from EUV lithography. Humphris, A.D.L., et al. 2020. Proc. SPIE Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIV . Vol. 11325, p. 113251M. ISBN 978-151063417-6.
6. CD metrology for EUV lithography and etch. Johanesen, Hayley, et al. sl : IEEE, 2015, ASMC, pp. 329-335.
7. FinFEt scaling to 10 nm Gate Lenght. Yu, Bin, et al. sl : IEEE, 2002, Digest. International Electron Devices Meeting, pp. 251-254.
8. Levinson, Harry. Principles of Lithography: Third Edition. 3. Bellingham : SPIE press, 2011. pp. 1-505.
9. Bakshi, Vivek. EUV Lithography. 2nd. Bellingham : SPIE Press Books, 2018. Vol. PM283. ISBN 9781510616783.
10. Okoroanyanwu, Uzodinma. Chemistry and Lithography, Second Edition, Vol. 1: The Chemical History of Lithography. Bellingham : SPIE Press, 2020. Vol. 1.
11. Impact of local variability on defect-aware process windows. Maslow, Mark John, et al. s.l. : Proc. SPIE, 2019. Vol. 10957, pp. 109570H 1-15.
12. Stochastic printing failures in extreme ultraviolet lithography. de Bisschop, Peter. 4, s.l. : SPIE, 2018, J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS, Vol. 17, pp. 041011-1-23.
13. Chemical amplification resists: History and development within IBM. Ito, Hiroshi. 1/2, sl : IBM, 1997, IBM J. Res. Develop., Vol. 41.
14. Chemical Amplification Resists: Inception, Implementation in Device Manufacture, and New Developments. Ito, Hiroshi. s.l. : Wiley Periodicals, 2003, Journal of Polymer Science: Part A: Polymer Chemistry, Vol. 41, pp. 3863-3970.
15. Materials challenges for sub-20-nm lithography. Thackeray, James. 2011, Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS, p. 033009.
16. Pursuit of lower Critical Dimensional Uniformity in EUV resists. Thackeray, James, et al. 5, 2013, Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, Vol. 26, pp. 605 - 610.
17. Thackeray, James. Chemically amplified resists and acid amplifiers. [boekaut.] Alex Robinson en Richard Lawson. Materials and Processes for Next Generation Lithography. sl : Elsevier, 2016, 7, pp. 211-222.
18. Extreme ultraviolet resist materials for sub-7 nm patterning. Li, Li, et al. 16, 2017, Chemical Society Reviews, Vol. 46, pp. 4855-4866.
19. Resist blur and line edge roughness. Gallatin, Gregg M. 2005, Proc. SPIE, Vol. 5754, pp. 38-50.
20. Evaluation of EUV resist materials for use at the 32 nm half-pitch node. Wallow, T., et al. 2008. Proc. SPIE. Vol. 6921, p. 69211F.
21. Bunday, Benjamin, et al. Unified Advanced Critical Dimension Scanning Electron Microscope (CD–SEM) Specification for sub-90 nm Technology (2007 Version). Austin : International SEMATECH Manufacturing Initiative, 2008. Technology Transfer . #04114595D-ENG.
22. Resist Materials and Processes for Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography. Itani, Toshiro and Kozawa, Takahiro. s.l. : IOP Science, 2012, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 52, p. 010002.
23. Sensitivity enhancement of chemically amplified EUV resists by adding acid-generating promoters. Shinya , Fujii, et al. 2017, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 56, pp. 06GD01-1-6.
24. Fundamental study of polymer dynamic behavior in resist processing. Yaegashi, Hidetami. Bellingham : SPIE Proc., 2021. Vol. 11612, pp. 116120D-1-11.
25. Systematic errors in the measurement of the power spectral density. Mack, Chris A. 3, s.l. : SPIE, 2013, J. Micro/Nanolith. MEMS MOEMS, Vol. 12, pp. 033016-1-10.
26. Metrology capabilities and needs for 7nm and 5nm logic nodes. Bunday, Benjamin, et al. 2017. Proc. SPIE Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXI. Vol. 10145, p. 101450G.
27. Determination of line edge roughness in low dose top-down scanning electron microscopy images. Verduin, Thomas, Kruit, Pieter and Hagen, Cornelis W. s.l. : SPIE, 2014. SPIE Proc. Vol. 90500, pp. 90500L-1-17.
28. Sub-50 nm metrology on extreme ultra violet chemically amplified resist—A systematic assessment. Maas, Diederik Jan, et al. October 2015, Rev. Sci. Instr., Vol. 86, p. 103702.
29. What is prevalent CD-SEM's role in EUV era? Wang, Zhigang, et al. sl : SPIE, 2019. Proc. SPIE. Vol. 10959, pp. 1095914-1-10.
30. Fast resist-activation dosimetry for extreme ultra-violet lithography. Heo, Jinsoek, Man, Xu en Maas, Diederik. 5, 2017, Optics Express, Vol. 25, pp. 4621-4631.
31. Influence of shot noise on CDU with DUV, EUV, and e-beam. Pan, Zhih-Yu , et al. 2008. Proc. SPIE. Vol. 6924, pp. 69241K 1-8.
32. Roughness and variability in EUV lithography: Who is to blame? (Part 1). Vaglio Pret, A., et al. 2013. Proc. SPIE. Vol. 8679, pp. 86792O-1-10. ISBN 978-081949461-0.
33. Impact of pixel-dose optimization on pattern fidelity for helium ion beam lithography on EUV resist. Kalhor, Nima, et al. 2015. Proc. SPIE. Vol. 9425, pp. 942513-1-9.
34. Improvements in resist performance towards EUV HVM. Yildirim, A., et al. 2017. Proc. SPIE 10143. p. 101430Q.
35. Multiscale simulation of extreme ultraviolet nanolithography: impact of acid–base reaction on pattern roughness. Lee, Hyungwoo, et al. sl : The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2021, J. Mater. Chem. C, Vol. 9, pp. 1183-1195.
36. Stochastic simulation and calibration of organometallic photoresists for extreme ultraviolet lithography. Belete, Zelalem, et al. 1, Bellingham : SPIE, 2021, J. Micro/Nanolithogr. MEMS MOEMS, Vol. 20, pp. 014801-1-22.
37. Photoresist and stochastic modeling. Hansen, S.G. 1, 2018, J. Micro/ Nanolithogr. MEMS MOEMS, Vol. 17, p. 013506.
38. One metric to rule them all: new k4 definition for photoresist characterization. Santaclara, J.G., et al. 2020. Proc. SPIE. Vol. 11323, pp. 113231A-1-10.
39. Pattern roughness analysis using power spectral density: application and impact in photoresist formulation. Cutler, Charlotte, et al. 2021, J. Micro/Nanopattern. Mater. Metrol., Vol. 20, pp. 010901 (1-18).
40. Maas, Diederik Jan, et al. LITHOGRAPHIC PATTERNING METHOD AND SYSTEM THEREFORE. WO2020/122724 WO, 14 12 2018.
41. Nanoscale chemical imaging by photoinduced force microscopy. Nowak, Derek, et al. 3, 2016, Sci. Adv., Vol. 2, p. e1501571.
42. Photoinduced force microscopy: A technique for hyperspectral nanochemical mapping. Murdick, Ryan A., et al. 2017, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 56, pp. 08LA04-1-14.
43. Near-field nanoprobing using Si tip-Au nanoparticle photoinduced force microscopy with 120:1 signal-to-noise ratio, sub-6-nm resolution. Rajaei, Mohsen M., et al. 20, Oct. 2018, Optics Express, Vol. 26, pp. 26365 - 26376.
44. New development of nanoscale spectroscopy using scanning probe microscope. Minn, Khant, Birmingham, Blake en Zhang, Zhenrong. 3, sl : AVS, 2020, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, Vol. 38, pp. 30801-1-17.
45. Nanoscale Chemical Imaging by Photo-Induced Force Microscopy: Technical Aspects and Application to the Geosciences. Otter, Laura M., et al. 1, March 2021, Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, Vol. 45, pp. 5-27.
46. Novel high sensitivity EUV photoresist for sub-7 nm node. Nagai, Tomoki, et al. 3, 2016, Journal of Photopolymer Science and Technology, Vol. 29, pp. 475-478.
47. Tip-Enhanced Infrared Imaging with Sub-10 nm Resolution and Hypersensitivity. Li, Jian, et al. 5, 2020, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., Vol. 11, pp. 1697–1701.
48. Relative importance of various stochastic terms and EUV patterning. Naulleau, Patrick and Gallatin, Gregg. 4, s.l. : SPIE, 2018, J. Micro/Nanolithogr., MEMS, MOEMS, Vol. 17, p. 041015.
49. Theory of infrared nanospectroscopy by photothermal induced resonance. Dazzi, Alexandre, Glotin, Francois and Carminati, Rémi. 12, 2010, Vol. 107, pp. 124519-1-7. ISSN 00218979.
50. SEMI. Standard P47-0307, “Test method for evaluation of line-edge roughness and linewidth roughness. San Jose, CA : SEMI, 2006. Standard.
51. Negative chemically amplified resist characterization for direct write and SCALPEL nanolithography. Ocola, L.E., et al. 6, s.l. : Am. Vac. Soc., 1998, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., Vol. 16, pp. 3705-3708.
52. Griffiths, Peter R. and de Hasseth, James A. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry. 2nd. New Jersey : Wiley-Blackwell, 2007. ISBN 978-0-471-19404-0.
53. Bruker. Invenio R. Bruker. [Online] 18 4 2018. https://www.bruker.com/en/products-and-solutions/infrared-and-raman/ft-ir-research-spectrometers/invenio-ft-ir-spectrometer.html.
54. In situ direct visualization of irradiated electron-beam patterns on unprocessed resists using atomic force microscopy. Koop, H., et al. s.l. : AVS, 2010. J.Vac. Sci. Techn. Vol. 28, pp. 802 - 805. ISSN 21662746.