1. General Information
Up to the deadline, 703 completed questionnaires have been received. Finally, 703 valid research questionnaires have been determined, with an effective rate of 100%. From the questionnaire data collected, there were 521 male participants (71.1%) and 182 female participants (25.8%); Age distribution: 39 people under the age of 19 (5.5%), 359 people aged 20 ~ 29 (51.0%), 266 people aged 30 ~ 39 (37.8%), 36 people aged 40 ~ 49 (5.1%), and 3 people over 50 (0.4%); Education distribution: 169 college students (24.0%), 439 undergraduate students (62.6%); 95 people (13.5%) with master's degree or above; Hospital grade distribution: 175 (24.8%) in class III A, 232 (33%) in class III B, 226 (32.1%) in class II A, 51 (7.2%) in class II B and 19 (2.7%) in others; Professional distribution of clinical work: 146 (20.7%) in gastroenterology, 276 (39.2%) in general surgery, 213 (30.3%) in endoscopy center, 51 (7.2%) in nursing and 17 (2.4%) in others; Title Distribution: 108 medical students (15.3%), 180 residents (25.6%), 226 attending doctors (32.1%), 118 deputy chief doctors (16.7%), 42 chief doctors (5.9%), and 29 other titles / identities not listed (4.1%); The distribution of endoscopic operation types (multiple choices): ERCP accounted for 48.6% (342 / 703), EUS 52.9% (372 / 703), gastroscope and colonoscopy 57.0% (401 / 703), ESD 31.2% (220 / 703) and others 5.6% (40 / 703).
2. Statistics on the Cumulative Number of ERCP Cases Completed by Individual Registered Doctors (Fig. 1) and Affiliated Hospitals (Fig. 2)
3. Application Effect of Hebei Biliary and Pancreatic Endoscopy Diagnosis and Treatment Alliance Platform on Continuing Medical Education for Registered Doctors
3.1 Learning of registered doctors on the platform of Hebei Alliance for diagnosis and treatment of biliary and pancreatic endoscopy (hereinafter referred to as "the platform")
The frequency distribution of registered doctors landing on the platform is as follows: 105 (14.9%) once a week or less, 286 (40.6%) twice to three times a week, 228 (32.43%) four to five times a week, 63 (8.9%) six to seven times a week and 21 (2.9%) more than seven times a week; The length of time for registered doctors to join the platform: 136 (19.3%) less than 6 months, 328 (46.6%) 6–12 months, 169 (24.0%) 1–2 years and 70 (9.9%) more than 2 years; Distribution of main activities of registered doctors on the platform (multiple choices): 38.8% (273 / 703) search for information or services needed on the platform, 47.5% (334 / 703) simply browse posts or dive, 52.0% (366 / 703) find new posts and provide help, 45.3% (319 / 703) post and seek information or services, 33.2% (234 / 703) interact with friends and exchange information, 17.0% (120 / 703) of them interacted with teaching experts and solved problems online; the time distribution of registered doctors participating in platform activities each time: 77 (10.9%) less than half an hour, 380 (54.0%) from half an hour to one hour, 214 (30.4%) from one to two hours and 32 (4.5%) more than two hours; After the live broadcast of the course on the platform, watch the playback of the course: 341 people (48.5%) often watch it, 276 people (39.2%) occasionally watch it, and 86 people (12.2%) don't need to watch the playback; After the registered doctors joined the platform, the impact on their own endoscopic operation level: 469 (66.7%) had a significant effect, 209 (29.7%) had a general effect, and 25 (3.5%) had no effect; After joining the platform, the specific improvement of endoscopic operation (multiple choices): skillfully entering the endoscope into the designated position accounted for 51.4% (362 / 703), intubation of bile duct or pancreatic duct accounted for 50.9% (358 / 703), removal of bile duct stones and pancreatic duct stones accounted for 53.0% (373 / 703), treatment of complications after endoscopic operation accounted for 44.8% (315 / 703), and diagnosis under endoscopic ultrasound accounted for 22.3% (157 / 703), others accounted for 1.7% (12 / 703); The impact on the diagnostic level of biliary and pancreatic related diseases: the feeling was significantly improved in 354 (50.3%), not significantly improved in 162 (23.0%), not improved in 130 (18.4%), decreased in 49 (6.9%) and unclear in 8 (1.1%).
3.2 Since joining this platform, comparison of the influence of the endoscopic operation level of registered doctors on this platform under different conditions
Since joining this platform, there is no statistically significant difference in the impact of different gender, age, educational background, hospital grade and professional title of registered doctors on their own endoscopy level (P > 0.05). There is statistically significant difference in the impact of the specialty of registered doctors engaged in clinical work on their own endoscopy level (P < 0.05) (see Table 1).After further analysis, it is concluded that the effect of improving the endoscopic level of registered doctors in the endoscopic center is the most significant. The reason is that the platform is mainly a platform for professional communication of digestive endoscopy dominated by ERCP and ultrasonic endoscopy. Compared with the departments of gastroenterology and general surgery, the endoscopic center is more engaged in such operations.
Table 1 After joining the platform, the effect of different situations of registered physicians on their own endoscopic operation level was compared(n,%)
Project
|
Influence of registered doctors' endoscopic operation level after joining the platform
|
χ2
|
P
|
Significant effect
|
Average effect
|
No effect
|
Gender
|
|
|
|
5.387
|
0.068
|
Male
|
337(64.6)
|
167(32.0)
|
17(3.2)
|
|
|
Female
|
132(72.5)
|
42(23.0)
|
8(4.3)
|
|
|
Age
|
|
|
|
11.872
|
0.131
|
Under 19
|
22(56.4)
|
15(38.4)
|
2(5.1)
|
|
|
20 ~ 29 years old
|
229(63.7)
|
116(32.3)
|
14(3.8)
|
|
|
30 ~ 39 years old
|
189(71.0)
|
71(26.6)
|
6(2.2)
|
|
|
40 ~ 49 years old
|
26(72.2)
|
7(19.4)
|
3(8.3)
|
|
|
Over 50
|
3(100)
|
0(0)
|
0(0)
|
|
|
Education
|
|
|
|
1.163
|
0.884
|
College
|
110(65.0)
|
54(1.9)
|
5(2.9)
|
|
|
Undergraduate college
|
298(67.8)
|
125(28.4)
|
16(3.6)
|
|
|
Master degree or above
|
61(64.2)
|
30(31.5)
|
4(4.2)
|
|
|
Hospital grade
|
|
|
|
14.639
|
0.055
|
Class III class A
|
127(72.5)
|
43(24.5)
|
5(2.8)
|
|
|
Class III B
|
147(63.3)
|
80(3.4)
|
5(2.1)
|
|
|
Class II class A
|
154(68.1)
|
62(27.4)
|
10(4.4)
|
|
|
Second class B
|
32(62.7)
|
17(33.3)
|
2(3.9)
|
|
|
Other
|
9(47.3)
|
7(36.8)
|
3(15.7)
|
|
|
Specialty of clinical work
|
|
|
|
20.224
|
0.007
|
GI Medicine
|
115(78.7)
|
30(20.5)
|
1(0.6)
|
|
|
General surgery
|
183(66.3)
|
84(30.4)
|
9(3.2)
|
|
|
Endoscopic Center
|
128(60.0)
|
75(35.2)
|
10(4.6)
|
|
|
Nursing specialty
|
33(64.7)
|
15(29.4)
|
3(5.8)
|
|
|
Other
|
10(58.8)
|
5(29.4)
|
2(11.7)
|
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
16.472
|
0.07
|
Medical students
|
80(74.0)
|
25(23.1)
|
3(2.7)
|
|
|
Resident
|
125(69.4)
|
48(26.6)
|
7(3.8)
|
|
|
Attending doctor
|
155(68.5)
|
67(29.6)
|
4(1.7)
|
|
|
Deputy chief physician
|
66(55.9)
|
46(38.9)
|
6(5.0)
|
|
|
Chief physician
|
26(61.9)
|
14(33.3)
|
2(4.7)
|
|
|
Other titles / identities not listed
|
17(58.6)
|
9(31.0)
|
3(10.3)
|
|
|
3.3 Since joining this platform, the influence of registered doctors on the diagnosis level of biliary and pancreatic related diseases in different situations is compared
Since joining this platform, there was no significant difference in the influence of different ages of registered doctors on the diagnosis level of biliary and pancreatic related diseases (P > 0.05). There was significant difference in the influence of different gender, educational background, hospital grade, specialty and professional title engaged in clinical work on the diagnosis level of biliary and pancreatic related diseases (P < 0.05) (see Table 2).Further statistical analysis shows that male clinicians working in class III class A hospitals and engaged in general surgery have significantly improved their diagnostic level of biliary and pancreatic related diseases, which is closely related to the fact that most clinical doctors engaged in general surgery are men. In addition, clinical medical students, including professional postgraduates and social training personnel, have been struggling in their jobs for a certain time, but there is still a big gap in disease diagnosis, treatment and clinical experience compared with other senior doctors. After the "charging" of continuous medical education, the learning effect has been significantly improved.
Table 2
Comparison of the influence of different registered doctors on the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic diseases after joining the platform (n ,%)
Project
|
Influence of registered doctors on the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic diseases after joining the platform
|
χ2
|
P
|
Significantly improve
|
The improvement is not obvious
|
Not improved
|
Lower than before
|
Not too clear
|
Gender
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.195
|
0.000
|
Male
|
238(45.6)
|
131(25.1)
|
109(20.9)
|
39(7.4)
|
4(0.7)
|
|
|
Female
|
116(63.7)
|
31(17.0)
|
21(11.5)
|
10(5.4)
|
4(2.1)
|
|
|
Age
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.821
|
0.904
|
Under 19
|
16(41.0)
|
10(25.6)
|
11(28.2)
|
2(5.1)
|
0(0.0)
|
|
|
20 ~ 29 years old
|
177(49.3)
|
82(22.8)
|
69(19.2)
|
26(7.2)
|
5(1.3)
|
|
|
30 ~ 39 years old
|
137(51.5)
|
63(23.6)
|
45(16.9)
|
19(7.1)
|
2(0.7)
|
|
|
40 ~ 49 years old
|
21(58.3)
|
7(19.4)
|
5(13.8)
|
2(5.5)
|
1(2.7)
|
|
|
Over 50
|
3(100.0)
|
0(0.0)
|
0(0.0)
|
0(0.0)
|
0(0.0)
|
|
|
Education
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.341
|
0.027
|
College
|
92(54.4)
|
33(19.5)
|
29(17.1)
|
9(5.3)
|
6(3.5)
|
|
|
Undergraduate college
|
211(48.0)
|
105(23.9)
|
88(20.0)
|
34(7.7)
|
1(0.2)
|
|
|
Master degree or above
|
51(53.6)
|
24(25.2)
|
13(13.6)
|
6(6.3)
|
1(1.0)
|
|
|
Hospital grade
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.302
|
0.002
|
Class III class A
|
112(64.0)
|
36(20.5)
|
18(10.2)
|
7(4.0)
|
2(1.1)
|
|
|
Class III B
|
102(43.9)
|
61(26.2)
|
55(23.7)
|
13(5.6)
|
1(0.4)
|
|
|
Class II class A
|
107(47.3)
|
49(21.6)
|
44(19.4)
|
23(10.1)
|
3(1.3)
|
|
|
Second class B
|
23(45.0)
|
11(21.5)
|
12(23.5)
|
4(7.8)
|
1(1.9)
|
|
|
Other
|
10(52.6)
|
5(26.3)
|
1(5.2)
|
2(10.5)
|
1(5.2)
|
|
|
Specialty of clinical work
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.3
|
0.002
|
GI Medicine
|
98(67.1)
|
24(16.4)
|
17(11.6)
|
7(4.7)
|
0(0.0)
|
|
|
General surgery
|
123(44.5)
|
77(27.8)
|
56(20.2)
|
18(6.5)
|
2(0.7)
|
|
|
Endoscopic Center
|
99(46.4)
|
47(22.0)
|
45(21.1)
|
19(8.9)
|
3(1.4)
|
|
|
Nursing specialty
|
27(52.9)
|
10(19.6)
|
10(19.6)
|
2(3.9)
|
2(3.9)
|
|
|
Other
|
7(41.1)
|
4(23.5)
|
2(11.7)
|
3(17.6)
|
1(5.8)
|
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.321
|
0.001
|
Medical students
|
66(61.1)
|
22(20.3)
|
14(12.9)
|
6(5.5)
|
0(0.0)
|
|
|
Resident
|
97(53.8)
|
38(21.1)
|
37(20.5)
|
7(3.8)
|
1(0.5)
|
|
|
Attending doctor
|
106(46.9)
|
56(24.7)
|
48(21.2)
|
14(6.1)
|
2(0.8)
|
|
|
Deputy chief physician
|
47(39.8)
|
32(27.1)
|
23(19.4)
|
16(13.5)
|
0(0.0)
|
|
|
Chief physician
|
24(57.1)
|
8(19.0)
|
6(14.2)
|
3(7.1)
|
1(2.3)
|
|
|
Other titles / identities not listed
|
14(48.2)
|
6(20.6)
|
2(6.8)
|
3(10.3)
|
4(13.7)
|
|
|
3.4 Comparison of the impact of different registered doctors' learning on their endoscopic operation level after joining this platform
Since joining the platform, there was no significant difference in the impact of the frequency of registered doctors logging on the platform on their own endoscopic operation level (P > 0.05). However, there was significant difference in the impact of the length of time registered doctors joined the platform, the time they participated in the platform activities each time, and whether they watched the playback of the course after the live broadcast of the platform on their own endoscopic operation level (P < 0.05), (see Table 3).
Table 3 After joining the platform, the comparison of the influence of different registered doctors' learning situation on their own endoscopic operation level (n,%)
Project
|
After joining this platform, registered doctors' own endoscopic operation level will be affected
|
χ2
|
P
|
Significant effect
|
Average effect
|
No effect
|
Landing platform frequency
|
|
|
|
6.448
|
0.570
|
Once a week or less
|
71(67.6)
|
31(29.5)
|
3(2.8)
|
|
|
2 ~ 3 times a week
|
196(68.5)
|
80(27.9)
|
10(3.4)
|
|
|
4 ~ 5 times a week
|
151(66.2)
|
70(30.7)
|
7(3.0)
|
|
|
6 ~ 7 times a week
|
35(55.5)
|
24(38.0)
|
4(6.3)
|
|
|
More than 7 times
|
16(76.1)
|
4(19.0)
|
1(4.7)
|
|
|
Length of time to join this platform
|
|
|
|
19.855
|
0.003
|
Less than 6 months
|
97(71.3)
|
35(25.7)
|
4(2.9)
|
|
|
6 ~ 12 months
|
224(68.2)
|
94(28.6)
|
10(3.0)
|
|
|
1 ~ 2 years
|
92(56.8)
|
69(40.8)
|
8(4.7)
|
|
|
More than 2 years
|
56(80.0)
|
11(15.7)
|
3(4.2)
|
|
|
Time for each platform activity
|
|
|
|
16.101
|
0.013
|
Less than half an hour
|
59(76.6)
|
13(16.8)
|
5(6.4)
|
|
|
Half an hour to an hour
|
259(68.1)
|
111(29.2)
|
10(2.6)
|
|
|
One to two hours
|
127(59.3)
|
79(36.9)
|
8(3.7)
|
|
|
More than two hours
|
24(75.0)
|
6(18.7)
|
2(6.2)
|
|
|
Watch the playback of the course
|
|
|
|
123.368
|
0
|
Often watch
|
296(86.8)
|
39(11.4)
|
6(1.7)
|
|
|
Occasionally
|
134(48.5)
|
130(47.1)
|
12(4.3)
|
|
|
Don't need to watch playback
|
39(45.3)
|
40(46.5)
|
7(8.1)
|
|
|
3.5 Comparison of the impact of different registered doctors' learning on the diagnosis level of biliary and pancreatic related diseases after joining this platform
Since joining the platform, the frequency of registered doctors logging on the platform, the duration of joining the platform, the time of participating in platform activities each time, and whether to watch the playback of the course after the live broadcast of the platform have a statistically significant difference on the diagnostic level of biliary and pancreatic related diseases (P < 0.05) (see Table 4).
Table 4 After joining the platform, the comparison of the influence of different registered doctors' learning on the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic diseases (n,%)
Project
|
Influence of registered doctors on the diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic diseases after joining the platform
|
χ2
|
P
|
Significantly improve
|
The improvement is not obvious
|
Not improved
|
Lower than before
|
Not too clear
|
Landing platform frequency
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.678
|
0.038
|
Once a week or less
|
66(62.8)
|
17(16.1)
|
13(12.3)
|
7(6.6)
|
2(1.9)
|
|
|
2 ~ 3 times a week
|
148(51.7)
|
64(22.3)
|
50(17.4)
|
20(6.9)
|
4(1.3)
|
|
|
4 ~ 5 times a week
|
101(44.2)
|
63(27.6)
|
50(21.9)
|
14(6.1)
|
0(0.0)
|
|
|
6 ~ 7 times a week
|
26(41.2)
|
16(25.3)
|
14(22.2)
|
6(9.5)
|
1(1.5)
|
|
|
More than 7 times
|
13(61.9)
|
2(9.5)
|
3(14.2)
|
2(9.5)
|
1(4.7)
|
|
|
Length of time to join this platform
|
|
|
|
|
|
53.191
|
0.000
|
Less than 6 months
|
75(55.1)
|
28(20.5)
|
22(16.1)
|
7(5.1)
|
4(2.9)
|
|
|
6 ~ 12 months
|
161(49.0)
|
85(25.9)
|
59(17.9)
|
21(6.4)
|
2(0.6)
|
|
|
1 ~ 2 years
|
62(36.6)
|
41(24.2)
|
47(27.8)
|
18(10.6)
|
1(0.5)
|
|
|
More than 2 years
|
56(80.0)
|
8(11.4)
|
2(2.8)
|
3(4.2)
|
1(1.4)
|
|
|
Time for each platform activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.133
|
0.011
|
Less than half an hour
|
44(57.1)
|
19(24.6)
|
7(9.0)
|
3(3.8)
|
4(5.1)
|
|
|
Half an hour to an hour
|
192(50.5)
|
91(23.9)
|
74(19.4)
|
21(5.5)
|
2(0.5)
|
|
|
One to two hours
|
100(46.7)
|
43(20.0)
|
47(21.9)
|
22(10.2)
|
2(0.9)
|
|
|
More than two hours
|
18(56.2)
|
9(28.1)
|
2(6.2)
|
3(9.3)
|
0(0.0)
|
|
|
Watch the playback of the course
|
|
|
|
|
|
199.519
|
0.000
|
Often watch
|
260(76.2)
|
33(9.6)
|
35(10.2)
|
13(3.8)
|
0(0.0)
|
|
|
Occasionally
|
73(26.4)
|
100(36.2)
|
74(26.8)
|
27(9.7)
|
2(0.7)
|
|
|
Don't need to watch playback
|
21(24.4)
|
29(33.7)
|
21(24.4)
|
9(10.4)
|
6(6.9)
|
|
|
Statistical analysis on the learning situation of registered doctors landing on the platform: there was no significant difference in the impact of the frequency of registered doctors landing on the platform on their own endoscopic operation level (P > 0.05), but the length of time registered doctors joined the platform, the time of participating in platform activities each time and after the platform live broadcast course, the influence of watching the playback of the course on their own endoscopic operation level is statistically significant (P < 0.05). Further statistical analysis shows that whether the length of time registered doctors join the platform or each time they participate in platform activities does not mean that the longer the time, the better the impact on the registered doctors' own endoscopic operation level. In contrast, the registered doctors who have joined the platform for 6–12 months and the registered doctors who have participated in the platform activities for one to two hours each time benefit significantly; In addition, the frequency of registered doctors logging on the platform, the length of time they joined the platform, the time they participated in the platform activities each time, and whether they watched the playback of the course after the live broadcast of the platform had a statistically significant difference on the diagnostic level of biliary and pancreatic related diseases (P < 0.05). It is worth mentioning that the latter (the impact on the diagnostic level of biliary and pancreatic related diseases) was compared with the former (impact on self endoscopic operation level), there are differences in the frequency of registered doctors landing on the platform, and the students who log on to the platform 4–5 times a week for learning have significantly improved their level of disease diagnosis. The reason is that for theoretical knowledge, medical workers can review the platform many times to memorize and master the knowledge points. However, they want to thoroughly master the actual clinical operation skills, this alone is far from enough. Practice makes perfect through repeated practical practice, which is also the limitation of continuing medical education based on the Internet platform.
4.Evaluation of Registered Doctors of the Platform on the Platform of Hebei Alliance for Diagnosis and Treatment of Biliary and Pancreatic Endoscopy
59.3% (417 / 703) think that the platform has a large number of knowledge resources, wide coverage and high reliability. 69.8% (491 / 703) think that the platform has a strong and friendly academic atmosphere and that everyone is willing to share knowledge in order to exchange knowledge, share experience and increase knowledge. 45.3% (319 / 703) think that the platform has reasonable design, humanization and perfect functions, It is believed that the platform relies on a strong medical team, which is very friendly and has a close relationship with users. 48.0% (338 / 703) of the team members trust it very much. The registered doctors themselves have a certain authority or reputation in the platform, and many people pay attention to it, accounting for 13.5% (95 / 703); 94.0% (661 / 703) of registered doctors were very willing to recommend this platform to others, and 5.9% (42 / 703) were unwilling to recommend this platform to others,it can be seen that the application effect of the platform on students' continuing medical education has been affirmed by the vast majority of registered doctors.