Salt used in restaurants
A total of 125 restaurants were evaluated. Regarding the origin of the salt used during food preparation in the restaurants, 79% of restaurants used salt of national origin, 13.7% used salt of international origin, 4% used salt of both origins, and 3.2% used salt of an unknown origin.
Of the restaurants in which the salt used in food preparation was of national origin, 62.6% used salt from the island of Sal, and 25.3% used salt from the island of Maio; for 12.1%, the island of origin was unknown. Notably, the island of Santiago does not produce salt.
Of the restaurants in which the salt used in food preparation was of international origin, 95% used salt from Portugal, and 5% used salt from France.
Regarding the means used to transport salt, 61.1% of restaurants used a car, 18.2% used a car and boat, 7.1% used a car and plane, and 13.5% did not use any means of transport.
Most restaurants (58.4%) did not have a specific location for salt storage. The salt was stored in its original packaging (91.9%), protected from light (38.7%), exposed to heat in a nonventilated area (19.4%), stored in the presence of chemicals (9.7%), and exposed to moisture (6.5%).
Other forms of salt storage indicated by the respondents were in plastic buckets (30%), together with other nonperishable foods (25%), in flasks (15%), in stainless steel containers (10%), in plastic bowls (10%), inside a kitchen cabinet (5%) and in a bag inside a box (5%).
Among the restaurants that did not have a specific location for salt storage, in 79.6%, the salt was stored in the kitchen; in 12.2%, the salt was stored in the pantry; in 4.1%, the salt was stored on a kitchen shelf; and in 2%, the salt was stored on a shelf or near the stove.
Regarding the lighting where the salt was stored, the location was well lit in 30.6% and lit in 26.5% of restaurants, received natural light in 22.4%, low light in 12.2%, and no light in 4.1% of restaurants, and was exposed to light and heat in 2% of restaurants.
The salt storage location was ventilated in 44.7% of the restaurants, well ventilated in 23.4%, poorly ventilated in 12.8%, ventilated and exposed to heat in 6.4%, not ventilated in 4.3%, exposed to heat in 4.3% and exposed to natural ventilation in 2.1%.
In 29.2% of the restaurants, the salt was stored in its own packaging; in 37.5%, the salt was stored in plastic jars; in 12.5%, the salt was stored in a container with a lid; in 6.3%, the salt was stored in plastic bags; in 6.3%, the salt was stored in jars; in 4.2%, the salt was stored in a random container; and in 4.2%, the salt was stored in glass jars. In 82.1% of the restaurants, the salt was stored together with other products.
Most restaurants (83.3%) used a utensil for handling salt: spoon (69.8%), cup (4%), ladle (4%), stainless steel scoop (1.6%), spoon and jar (1.6%), milk pitcher (0.8%), jar (0.8%) and wooden spoon (0.8%).
Salt used in bakeries
A total of 30 bakeries were evaluated. Most of the salt used in the preparation of bread was of national origin, with 55.6% of bakeries using salt from the island of Sal and 37% using salt from the island of Maio; 7.4% reported not knowing the provenance.
The car was the most commonly used means for transporting salt (76.7%), followed by boat and car (20.0%) and plane and car (3.3%). Most bakeries purchased salt locally (76.7%) and stored it in a specific location (80%). Of these, 78.3% stored the salt in its original container, 47.8% stored the salt protected from light, 30.4% stored the salt in a location exposed to heat, 4.3% stored the salt in a nonventilated area, and 4.3% stored the salt in the presence of chemicals.
Of the 6 bakeries that did not have a specific location for salt storage, 50% stored it in the pantry, 33.3% stored it in the production area, and 16.7% stored it in a location with other products. In 66.7% of the bakeries, the salt was stored away from light; in 50%, the salt was stored in its own container; in 33.3%; the salt was exposed to heat; and in 16.7%; the salt was stored in an unventilated location.
A total of 96.4% of the bakeries used a utensil to handle the salt: cup (25.9%), ladle (25.9%), stainless steel scoop (14.8%), bowl (7.4%), shaker (7.4%), and either a spoon, scale plate, spatula, cake pan or jar (3.7% each).
Profile of the salt used in restaurants
Only 12% of the restaurant managers stated that they followed standard guidelines for the amount of salt to be used in food preparation.
Most (67.2%) restaurant managers believe that there are differences between different types of salt, whereas 30.4% think there are no differences and 2.4% do not know. Of those who reported the existence of differences between the types of salt, 59.5% referred to the quality, with emphasis on the presence of iodine (30%).
Table 1 shows the proportion of salt per meal used by restaurants in Praia and Mindelo. In both the soup and the main dish, most establishments used less than 1 g of salt.
Table 1
Amount of salt/meal used in restaurants
Salt | Restaurants |
Soup | Main dish |
n | % | n | % |
< 1 g | 75 | 59.5 | 65 | 51.6 |
1 to 2 g | 25 | 19.8 | 40 | 31.7 |
2 to 4 g | 7 | 5.6 | 14 | 11.1 |
4 to 6 g | 1 | 0.8 | 2 | 1.6 |
> 6 g | - | - | 5 | 4 |
Does not cook | 17 | 13.5 | - | - |
Does not know | 1 | 0.8 | - | - |
Total | 126 | 100 | 126 | 100 |
Regarding the daily dose of salt recommended by the WHO, 48% of respondents were unaware of the existence of a WHO recommendation on the amount of salt that should be consumed daily per person; 18.4% were aware of such a recommendation.
Only 37.3% of the respondents knew the relationship between salt and sodium.
Profile of the salt used in bakeries
Regarding the existence of a standard that regulates the amount of salt to be used in the preparation of bread, 83.3% of the bakeries reported that they followed a standard; for the remaining 16.7%, there was no compliance with any standard.
Iodized salt was the most used salt type (90%), followed by sea salt, fleur de sel and others, with 3.3% each.
Most respondents (69%) stated that there were differences between types of salt; the remaining 31% responded that no differences exist between different types. The most reported differences between the types of salt were quality (41.2%), followed by texture (17.6%). Among the respondents, 11.8% considered iodized salt the best, and differences were reported in terms of appearance, taste/aroma, presence of iodine, importance for health and salt content in the recipe (5.9% each).
The amount of salt per kg of dough was greater than 14 g/kg in 3 bakeries, and in 2 bakeries, the amount of salt was greater than 6 g per loaf (Table 2).
Table 2
Amount of salt per kg of dough and per loaf
Salt | kg of dough | Loaf |
n | % | n | % |
< 1 g | 4 | 14.3 | 21 | 75 |
1 to 2 g | 1 | 3.6 | 5 | 17.9 |
2 to 4 g | 1 | 3.6 | - | - |
4 to 6 g | 1 | 3.6 | - | - |
> 6 g | 21 | 75 | 2 | 7.1 |
The majority of the bakery managers (96.7%) believe that salt has an impact on the health of all individuals. Only 3.3% considered that it has an impact only on the health of individuals with some disease.
Most respondents (66.7%) were unaware of the daily dose of salt recommended by the WHO (5 g/day); 6.7% were aware of such a recommendation.
Regarding the relationship between salt and sodium, 36.7% of the respondents answered that salt contains sodium; 53.3% did not know the relationship between the 2.
Laboratory results
A total of 155 food samples were collected, and 152 were analyzed, 30 of which were bread (Portuguese/wheat bread) and 122 of which were meals ready for consumption. Of these, 75 were collected in the city of Praia (16 bread samples and 59 meal samples), and 77 were collected in the city of Mindelo (14 bread samples and 63 meal samples).
Of the bread samples analyzed, 63.3% had salt contents above the limit recommended by the Portuguese standard (Decree Law no. 75/2009, of 12 August). This standard defines a maximum permitted salt content, i.e., 1.4 g per 100 g of baked bread (or 0.55 g of sodium per 100 g of bread). Of the samples with salt contents equal to or greater than 1.4 g/100 g, 57.8% (n = 11) were collected in the city of Mindelo, and 42.2% (n = 8) were collected in the city of Praia.
Approximately 41% of the meal samples collected in Praia and 55% in Mindelo had a NaCl content higher than the maximum daily intake recommended by the WHO (5 g/day of NaCl). All of these samples had a common component (meat) that underwent some traditional preserving process (use of salt as a preservative).
In the present study, the amount of Na varied between 0.78 g and 4.33 g per meal, with a median of 1.9 g, indicating a high Na content based on the recommended daily intake of less than 2 g of Na established by WHO (8).
Bakeries and restaurants in Mindelo used a mean of 1.5 ± 0.3 g of salt/100 g of bread and 1.4 ± 0.5 g of salt/100 g of meal. In Praia, the mean salt content in bread was 1.35 ± 0.3 g/100 g, and that in meals was 1.3 ± 0.5 g/100 g. There were no significant differences between Praia and Mindelo regarding the salt content used in the bakeries (p = 0.419) or in the restaurants (p = 0.631).
Most of the salt samples collected (97%) contained iodine.