The Force Effects of Two Types of Polyethylene Terephthalate Glyc-olmodified Clear Aligners Immersed in Artificial Saliva

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-124785/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

The Force Effects of Two Types of Polyethylene Terephthalate Glyc-olmodified Clear Aligners Immersed in Artificial Saliva

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-124785/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Numerous factors can influence the force exerted by clear aligners teeth. This study aimed to investigate the stability of the force delivered by two different material appliances. 90 clear aligners with 2 materials and three different activations were designed and fabricated. Then, a device was employed to measure the force generated by the two types of PET-G material appliances immersed in artificial saliva for 0, 3, 7, 10, 14 days. Scanning electron microscopy was applied to observe the morphologic alterations on the aligner surfaces, respectively. The forces generated by different activation appliance exhibited differently, 0.0 mm < 0.1 mm < 0.2 mm. In addition, increasing the immersion times and the orthodontic force also decreased , but the forces decreased differently. Compared with the forces of conventional PETG appliances with 0.20 mm activation, the modified PETG appliances with the same activation exhibited significantly higher mean force. When comparing the mean force for modified PETG appliances after 10 and 14 days with conventional PETG appliances, the delivery forces exhibited significant differences (P<0.05). The force delivered by both materials decreased obviously following artificial saliva immersion, and the force generated by modified aligners exhibited better stability than conventional aligners.

Dentistry

Clear aligner

PETG

a thin-film pressure sensor

orthodontic force

mechanical properties

Clear Aligner Therapy (CAT), first emerging in 1997, was introduced at the American Association of Orthodontist Annual Session (AAO) in 1998. It was the first technology that incorporated the use of Computer Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) with transparent thermoplastic materials to align the teeth. Development over the last two decades has realized much progress in terms of key materials, digital technology, and clinical application of CAT[1-2]. The earliest clear aligner company was built in China in 2001, and Smartee Denti-Technology established in 2004 has become one of the largest CAT companies in China. CAT, which was initially aimed at treating patients with mild-moderate dentition crowding, has nowadays also applied in the treatment of severe crowding and complex malocclusions with improvements in aligner materials, CAT systems, intraoral scanned digital models technology and resin attachments bonded on tooth[3-4]. More and more orthodontists and patients were attracted towards this technology because of comfort, good oral hygiene facilitation and less root resorption rates. Currently, over 6 million patients have been treated with clear aligner technology.

Clear aligners have been utilized extensively in clinical orthodontic treatment; however, it remained problematic to complete treatment of some complex malocclusion patients using CAT. Moreover, CAT still required more improvements when compared to fixed appliances therapy. Fixed appliances exerted relatively constant light forces depending on the deflection of the wire to align teeth until the teeth moved and changed the deflection. Thermoplastic material behaviors exhibited creep and stress relaxation properties over time because of its viscoelastic property, and can commonly led to either high force application on the teeth, causing pain, or too little force, achieving scarce teeth movement for less experienced orthodontics[5-7]. Moreover, most orthodontists, who lacked clinical experience with CAT, were much more familiar with fixed appliances technology. Limited studies have been conducted to investigate the detail orthodontic mechanism of CAT.

The capability of CAT effectiveness was primarily dependent on material property of the aligner. Currently, polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified (PET-G), polycarbonate (PC), thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPU) and polypropylene materials were widely applied in the manufacturing of aligners. Previous studies have reported that numerous factors can change the material orthodontic force, including material thickness, removal frequency, wearing time and activation. Clear aligners came with variable thickness, ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 mm, which also affected the force value. CAT also used different activation, ranging from 0.0 mm to 0.33 mm, and mount of activation can also influenced the overall orthodontic force exerted on teeth. Under constant light force, behavior and mechanical properties of clear aligners also underwent changes over time because of its viscoelastic nature property. Studies have further demonstrated that orthodontic forces behaved differently with removal frequency changing [7-8]. The orthodontic force mainly was explored by three-dimensional finite element analysis (FEA) [9]. However, its actual force was rarely measured, and a force change detection device were used to explored the force.

Numerous studies have investigated the force properties of thermoplastic materials during teeth alignment. Adham Skaik [7] reported that conventional PETG and modified PETG exhibited a decrease in overall force in two days. Compared with conventional PETG, the force exerted by the modified PETG decreased differently when the clear aligners were removed more frequently, and the modified PETG showed higher stability compared to conventional PETG. This study, however, didn't consider that appliances ware placed on teeth of patients for two weeks when moving and aligning tooth. Few researches have been conducted to tackle this problem, which requires further investigation. We hypothesized that immersion in artificial saliva at 37℃ could be used to simulate the oral environment for experimentation.

In our study, we established a model of simulation artificial environments. Our aim was to investigate and compare the force stability of conventional PETG and modified PETG immersed in artificial saliva for two weeks with different activations and different immersion time periods. Finally, the constant light force was measured by a force change detection device. A workflow of the systems material experiment was summarized as shown in Fig. 1.

2.1 Resin model

The experiment was approved by the local ethics committee of the Smartee Denti-Technology, and all methods were performend in accordance with the approved guidelines and regulations. written informed consent was obtained from all the participants before they entered this experiment. A consecutive patient with complete dentition was obtained. Three-dimensional digital models of the upper dentition were obtained from the same subject using intraoral scanner CS3600 Access (Carestream Health, Shang Hai, China), and saved as STL files. Using the STL files, experimental resin cast was designed and fabricated with the help of clear aligner Co.,Ltd. According to varying teeth movement, the resin model was made using three different activations, including 0.0 mm, 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm.

2.2 Clear aligner

A series of clear aligners with three activations, 0.0 mm, 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm at the maxillary central incisor, canine, second premolar and first permanent molar were designed and constructed by clear aligner Co.,Ltd. The clear aligners were structured with two different materials, the first material being conventional PETG with lower modulus elasticity and abrasion resistance; while a modified material with higher modulus elasticity and greater abrasion resistance was chosen as the second material. Both the materials were 0.75 mm thick layer, and primarily composed of modified-polyethylene terephthalate glycol, and the two different material aligners were shown in Fig. 2.

2.3 Artificial oral environment

Clear aligners (n=90) were immersed in Artificial Saliva (AS) at 37℃ to simulate oral environment, as depicted in Fig 3, and were subsequently divided into the five following groups: control group (AS immersion for 0 day), 3 days group (AS immersion for 3 days), 7 days group (AS immersion for 7 days), 10 days group (AS immersion for 10 days), 14 days group (AS immersion for 14 days). AS was refreshed every day in each group. After the respective time periods were met, the clear aligners were taken out and washed with distilled water.

2.4A thin-film pressure sensor detection

A thin-film pressure sensor detection system was established in order to measure the force stability, which comprised of a thin-film pressure sensor, a signal acquisition circuit board, a software visually measuring the pressure date, a computer, and the sensor’ structure was shown in Fig 4. Regarding the sensor thickness as the primary factor when measuring orthodontic force, the sensor thickness was specifically designed to provide space according to the feature of resin model; subsequently, 0.2 mm thick sensors, the thinnest sensors of their kind were designed and constructed by Yu Bo Intelligent Technology Co.,Ltd (Hangzhou, China). The positions of measuring force points were at the maxillary central incisor, canine, second premolar and first permanent molar.

2.5 Scanning electron microscopy detection

The clear aligners, which were immersed in AS, were prone to material surface aging, peeling and pore formation, and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) detection was employed to explore the differences in aligners surface morphology. Specific area specimens of the maxillary central incisor, canine, second premolar and first permanent molar were cut and measured by SEM at×1000,5000 magnification.

2.6 Fourier transformation infrared detection

Based on the transmittance measurements, FT-IR spectroscopy was applied to examine the chemical group of the surface morphology of the aligners immersed in AS in attenuated total reflectance mode. Before and after 14 days of AS immersion, maxillary first molar part of the aligners was cut and extracted (n=3). The specimens were washed in distilled water for 5 minutes and dried with tissue paper. Spectra of the two type of material aligners were measured over the range of 600-4000 cm^-1with an FT-IR spectrometer, and FT-IR spectra were analyzed by software.

3.1 Effects of AS on force generated by two types of material aligners

Orthodontic force value was measured to evaluate the stability of two different material aligners immersed in AS. As shown in Fig. 5, the force values were lower in all clear aligners groups immersed in AS (immersion for 3 days, 7 days, 10 days and 14 days) compared to those in the control group (immersion for 0 day). In addition, when compared to the conventional PETG aligner group, the force values of modified PETG group were higher, while the force values were significantly elevated following AS immersion for extended periods (10 days, 14 days). These findings demonstrated that the force generated by modified PETG decreased relatively slower than that in conventional PETG induced by AS.

3.2 Effects of different activation on force generated by two types of material aligners

Force values of two material properties aligners with three different activation (0.0 mm, 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm) were measured to investigate the force patterns exerted by varying activation aligners on teeth. As depicted in Fig 6, the force values in 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm groups were higher compared to the 0.0 mm group, with the orthodontic force being the highest in the 0.2 mm group. In addition, force values were found to be much higher in the modified PETG group relative to the conventional PETG aligner group.

3.3 Effects of AS on aligner material surface morphology

Additionally, SEM was applied to study the aligner material surface morphology and the results were shown in Fig 7 A, B, C and D. Compared with control group (immersion for 0 day), AS immersion for 14 days group tended to be rougher and exhibited more severe peeling and increased pore formation. Moreover, compared with the modified aligner material, the surface morphology in the conventional aligner material group presented with significantly more peeling following AS immersion for 14 days. These findings demonstrated that AS immersion caused damage to the surface morphology of both the material aligners, whereas the modified aligner material conferred better protection on the material surface.

3.4 Effects of AS on aligner material spectroscopy

The chemical groups were measured in the aligner surfaces using ATR-FTIR, and the spectra of the aligners surface materials with 0 day and 14 days immersion time were shown in Fig 8. the bands at (a, b, c and d) 724 and 873 cm^-1exhibited a characteristic peak of the two material aligners according to the C-H bending of the single substituted phenyl ring. The band at (a, b, c and d) 1713 cm^-1was the characteristic peak of aligners surface material with C=O stretching of ester groups, and the bands at (a, b, c and d) 1241 cm^-1and 1094 cm^-1were identified as the characteristic peak of O=C-O stretching. The characteristic peak at 1408 cm^-1was identified as the aromatic ring; considering the bands at 2922 cm^-1and 2851 cm^-1, the characteristic peak was identified as C-H bond stretching vibration. Compared with the bands of (a, c) at 2922 cm^-1and 2851 cm^-1, the bands of (b, d) were higher and sharper.

The clear aligner, which could exert constant light force to move the teeth, completed treatment based on wearing a series of aligners made of transparent thermoplastic materials. Manufacturers had the choice of three thermoplastic materials in the production of clear aligners, namely TPU, TPC, and PETG. Recent studies have indicated that material thickness, time and activation were among the various factors capable of affecting the orthodontic force value exerted on teeth. Barbagallo et al. documented a mean force magnitude of 5.12 N with 0.5 mm activation utilizing a 0.8 mm thick material, whereas, Kohda et al. obtained a mean force magnitude of 1.65 N with 0.5 mm activation using a 0.8 mm thick material. Therefore, the thickness and the activation had visible influence on the orthodontic force value [10-12]. More intriguingly, Adham Skaik et al. [7] investigated the effects of wearing time and activation amounts on the force of two PETG material aligners, and uncovered that the force value of both materials decreased with time and increased with increasing activation, however failed to simulate the intraoral environment for pragmatic results. In the current study, we established an intraoral environment to investigate the effects of immersion time and activation on orthodontic force value.

Several difficulties were faced in the measurement of orthodontic force on the contacts surface between the aligners and models, which can easily lead to measurement error owing to the fact that the contact surfaces were curved instead of flat [7,13]. In the current study, a thin-film pressure sensor, which was simplistic, high-precision and low-cost, was specifically designed and utilized to examine the force values. The accuracy of thin-film pressure sensors has been recognized in the measurement of force of the contact surface between model and aligner, and the force measurement errors between the simulation and experimental models were less than or equal to 0.2 N, of which measurements value was accepted. In addition, complicated contact surface between aligners and resin models can also frequently lead to sensor weight imbalance, causing measurement error. To tackle this, we designed and manufactured an adequate thin and flexible sensor, which was 0.2-mm in thickness, to adjust to the measurement area, and employed a pressure-film approach to measure the force exerted by thermoplastic appliance on the first maxillary molars in vivo which has been applied by some researchers papers [14-15]. Therefore, in this study, a film-pressure sensor was utilized to measure the orthodontic force.

Currently, clear aligners were available with different activation, ranging from 0.0 mm to 0.33 mm. Numerous studies have highlighted that the amount of activation can modulate the orthodontic force; however, such values remained to be investigated, and the continuous light orthodontic force was delivered to the target tooth for effective tooth movement [16-17]. Interestingly, different activation-based approaches have also been discovered to affect the clear orthodontic force value, but, the detail mechanism of different-activation affecting the orthodontic force value required more research [18]. The amount of tooth movement with fixed orthodontic therapy was primarily dependent on orthodontic clinical experience; however, it proved to be difficult to control effective tooth movement. The orthodontic force was either too much, causing root resorption, or too small, which led to prolonged treatment period. One particular study explored the value of clear aligner therapy using the force value of 0.0 mm, 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm three different tooth movements, and found that the orthodontic force value changed with the amount of activation as follows: the force of 0.0 mm activation < the force of 0.1 mm activation< the force of 0.2 mm activation, and provided the foundation for different activation aligners therapy [7,19]. In the current study, we examined the effect of three different activations, 0.0 mm, 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm on the orthodontic force properties using AS immersion, and our findings were in line with those reported in Adham Skaikpr’s papers.

Aligners being inside oral cavity were vulnerable to water adsorption, which can commonly lead to unstable mechanical properties and degradation of aligner material, consequently failing to provide adequate force to control tooth movement. The mechanical properties of aligners have also been associated with wearing time, and studies have suggested further that PETG, TPC and TPU, all different aligner materials exhibited different water adsorption rates in simulated intraoral environment. Attachment and penetration of water molecules into the material surface has also been shown to cause adverse effects on the functioning of the aligner [8,20]. Furthermore, studies have also identified that the duration of wearing time can significantly alter the surface morphology and mechanical properties of aligners, causing evident changes in overall functioning. Based on previous papers and the aligners wearing in the oral cavity time (7 days or 14 days), in the current study, we utilized different immersion times (3 days, 7 days, 10 days and 14 days) to investigate the detailed change mechanism of aligner material surface morphology and mechanical properties, and the result revealed that intraoral environment simulation caused visible variations in material surface morphology and mechanical properties in both the aligner materials.

Furthermore, the change in the orthodontic force among different aligners have been reported by some previous papers, Adham Skaik found that the orthodontic force with 2 material properties and (0.0 mm, 0.1 mm and 0.2 mm) three different activations at the maxillary permanent first molar, maxillary second premolar and maxillary central incisor exhibited similar decreases over time. In the current study, a 3D digital model of maxillary the first premolar extraction case was utilized to investigate the orthodontic force. To explain the detail mechanism of clear aligner closing tooth extraction gap, the force value of the maxillary canine also was measured; therefore, we calculated the orthodontic force of the maxillary canine, incisor, second premolar and first permanent molar[21-22]. Both the aligner materials exhibited decreases in orthodontic force after in vitro simulation ( 3 days, 7 days, 10 days and 14 days). However, it was notable that the orthodontic force generated by the modified clear aligners was more stable compared to those in conventional aligners. Similarly, the modified aligners exhibited significantly higher orthodontic force values following AS immersion for 10 and 14 days compared to the conventional aligners. The clear aligner, which was viscous, elastic and even intermediate properties material, exerted constant orthodontic light force depending on the deflection of the thermoplastic material. The aligners properties also changed over time even though the tooth has not moved. Under orthodontic force, the deflection of thermoplastic material increases over time, while aligner material load decreases with the constant deflection because of its creep and stress relaxation; therefore, the thermoplastic material, the wearing time and amount of activation affected the force value [7,23].

After the discovery that mean force generated by modified aligners was higher than that generated by conventional aligners, the clear aligners were immersed in AS to study variations in aligner surface morphology. Furthermore, the thermoplastic material surface morphology usually has been associated with deflection of the clear aligners, and the continuous orthodontic light force was exerted by deflection of the aligners. Some studies have investigated the surface morphology variations caused by immersion in coffee, black tea, red wine, and 75% ethanol solution, and aligners did exhibit surface morphology changes, but these solutions were unable of truly simulating the oral environment, which might not reflect the realistic conditions of aligners placed on tooth [8,24,25]. Hence, we chose to immerse the clear aligners in AS at 37℃, and measured the forces exerted on teeth and surface changes. SEM resulted from our study illustrated that the conventional-based material presented with rougher surface morphology and more peeling. Moreover, modified aligners generated higher orthodontic force values after AS immersion for 14 days compared to the conventional aligners. Both the materials investigated in the current study were composed of PETG polymers, and the aligners surface group contained a hydrophobic group; however, the modified PETG aligners displayed better stability, which might be associated with the material surface group and penetration rate. Some previous papers have reported that three types of polymers-based materials exhibited different water adsorption rates, and water penetration into material surface led to aligner surface morphology change. Water adsorption rates which usually depended on hydrophilic or hydrophobic polarity of the thermoplastic material surface, might influence the mechanical properties of aligner.

Moreover, water adsorption rates have been associated with surface groups, and the aligner groups were analyzed using ATR-FTIR. Within the aligners surface material spectra, the hydrophilic groups were prone to hydrogen bond formation, which interacted with water penetration [26-27]. The peak shape changed less before and after immersion of clear aligners in AS. Both conventional aligners and modified aligners contained C=O stretching at 1713 cm^-1, O=C-O stretching at 1241 cm^-1and 1094 cm^-1. Compared with conventional aligners spectra wavenumbers, the strongest bands showed no shifts. However, the bands of (a, c) at 2922 cm^-1and 2851 cm^-1of modified aligners were higher and sharper, and the C-H bond stretching vibration was the hydrophobic group, which could decrease the water adsorption rates and increase the material stability. These results showed that C-H at 2922 cm^-1and 2851 cm^-1may increase the material aligner surface stability.

The force delivered by both PETG thermoplastic materials decreased obviously following artificial saliva immersion, and the mechanical force generated by modified aligners, surface morphology and structure exhibited better stability than conventional aligners. Therefore, the modified material could be a promising material for orthodontist and patients owing to its ability of appropriate delivery force stability.

PETG:Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol-modified; SEM:Scanning Electron Microscopy; CAT: Clear Aligner Therapy; CAD/CAM: Computer Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacturing; PC:Polycarbonate; TPU:Thermoplastic Polyurethanes; FEA: Finite Element Analysis; AS: Artificial Saliva

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Authors information

Affiliations

Department of medicine, Shanghai Smartee Denti-Technology, at. No. 2305 Zuchongzhi Rd, Pudong New District, Shanghai 200120, China

Biao Xiang, Xingxing Wang, Gang Wu, Menghan Wang

Shanghai Stomatological Hospital, Fudan University, at. No.356 Beijing East Rd, Huangpu District, Shanghai200001, China.

Yichen Xu, Yanjing Yang

Shanghai Brismile Dental Clinic , at. No. 285 Jianguo West Rd, Xuhui District, Shanghai200031, China

Qingyu Wang

Contributions

BX involved in the design of the experiment and drafted this manuscript. XXW involved in the design of the experiment and conducted the statistical analysis. GW carried out thin-film pressure sensor measurement. MHW, YCX and YJY helped to conducted scanning electron microscopy detection. QYW conceived of the study and involved in its design and coordination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Shanghai-level hospitals joint research project of emerging frontier technology(SHDC12019126).

Competing interests

The authors XB and WQY declare a financial interest in the Company “Smartee Denti-Technology” mentioned in the manuscript. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Data availability

The datasets in this manuscript are available from the corresponding author according to appropriate request.

Ethics declarations

The experiment was approved by the local ethics committee of the Smartee Denti-Technology and written informed consent were obtained from all the participants.

Approval for human experiments

The experiment was approved by the patient.

[1]Lombardo L , Marafioti M , Stefanoni F , et al. Load deflection characteristics and force level of nickel titanium initial archwires[J]. Angle Orthod, 2012, 82(3):507-521.

[2]Jindal P, Juneja M, Siena F L, et al. Mechanical and geometric properties of thermoformed and 3D printed clear dental aligners[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2019, 156(5): 694-701.

[3]Ko H C, Liu W, Hou D, et al. Recommendations for clear aligner therapy using digital or plaster study casts[J]. Prog Orthod, 2018, 19(1): 22.

[4]Garnett B S, Mahood K, Nguyen M, et al. Cephalometric comparison of adult anterior open bite treatment using clear aligners and fixed appliances[J]. Angle Orthod, 2018, 89(1): 3-9.

[5]Lombardo L , Toni G , Stefanoni F , et al. The effect of temperature on the mechanical behavior of nickel-titanium orthodontic initial archwires[J]. Angle Orthod, 2013, 83(2):298-305.

[6]Lombardo L , Marafioti M , Stefanoni F , et al. Load deflection characteristics and force level of nickel titanium initial archwires[J]. Angle Orthod, 2012, 82(3):507-521.

[7]Skaik A , Wei X L , Abusamak I , et al. Effects of time and clear aligner removal frequency on the force delivered by different polyethylene terephthalate glycol-modified materials determined with thin-film pressure sensors[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2019, 155(1):98-107.

[8]Liu C L, Sun W T, Liao W, et al. Colour stabilities of three types of orthodontic clear aligners exposed to staining agents[J]. Int J Oral Sci, 2016, 8(4): 246-253.

[9]Gomez J P , Pe?A F M , Martínez, Valentina, et al. Initial force systems during bodily tooth movement with plastic aligners and composite attachments:\r, A three-dimensional finite element analysis[J]. Angle Orthod, 2015, 85(3):454-460.

[10]Liu L, He B, Zhuang J, et al. Force measurement system for invisalign based on thin film single force sensor[J]. Measurement, 2017, 97: 1-7.

[11]Barbagallo L J , Shen G , Jones A S , et al. A Novel Pressure Film Approach for Determining the Force Imparted by Clear Removable Thermoplastic Appliances[J]. Ann Biomed Eng, 2008, 36(2):335-341.

[12]Hahn W , Dathe H , Fialka-Fricke J , et al. Influence of thermoplastic appliance thickness on the magnitude of force delivered to a maxillary central incisor during tipping[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2009, 136(1):120-127.

[13]Hahn W, Engelke B, Jung K, et al. Initial forces and moments delivered by removable thermoplastic appliances during rotation of an upper central incisor[J]. Angle Orthod, 2010, 80(2): 239-246.

[14]Kohda N, Iijima M, Muguruma T, et al. Effects of mechanical properties of thermoplastic materials on the initial force of thermoplastic appliances[J]. Angle Orthod, 2012, 83(3): 476-483.

[15]Ryu J H, Kwon J S, Jiang H B, et al. Effects of thermoforming on the physical and mechanical properties of thermoplastic materials for transparent orthodontic aligners[J]. Korean J Orthod, 2018, 48(5): 316-325.

[16]Li X, Ren C, Wang Z, et al. Changes in force associated with the amount of aligner activation and lingual bodily movement of the maxillary central incisor[J]. Korean J Orthod, 2016, 46(2): 65-72.

[17]Alansari S, Atique M I, Gomez J P, et al. The effects of brief daily vibration on clear aligner orthodontic treatment[J]. Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists, 2018, 7(4): 134-140.

[18]Garlet T P, Coelho U, Silva J S, et al. Cytokine expression pattern in compression and tension sides of the periodontal ligament during orthodontic tooth movement in humans[J]. Eur J oral Sci, 2007, 115(5): 355-362.

[19]Ihssen B A, Willmann J H, Nimer A, et al. Effect of in vitro aging by water immersion and thermocycling on the mechanical properties of PETG aligner material[J]. J Orofac Orthop, 2019, 80(6): 292-303.

[20]Liu Y, Hu W. Force changes associated with different intrusion strategies for deep-bite correction by clear aligners[J]. Angle Orthod, 2018, 88(6): 771-778.

[21]Manuelli M , Ghislanzoni L H , Farronato M , et al. Comparison of linear transverse measures between plaster and resin printed digital models[J]. Journal of Biological Regulators & Homeostatic Agents, 2018, 32(2 Suppl. 2):81-85.

[22]Giudice A L , Ronsivalle V , Grippaudo C , et al. One Step before 3D Printing—Evaluation of Imaging Software Accuracy for 3-Dimensional Analysis of the Mandible: A Comparative Study Using a Surface-to-Surface Matching Technique[J]. Materials, 2020, 13(12):2798-2804.

[23]Dongyu F , Ning Z , Hui C , et al. Dynamic stress relaxation of orthodontic thermoplastic materials in a simulated oral environment[J]. Dent Mater J, 2013, 32(6):946-951.

[24]Papadopoulou A K, Cantele A, Polychronis G, et al. Changes in Roughness and Mechanical Properties of Invisalign® Appliances after One-and Two-Weeks Use[J]. Mater, 2019, 12(15): 2406-2414.

[25]Lombardo L, Martini M, Cervinara F, et al. Comparative SEM analysis of nine F22 aligner cleaning strategies[J]. Prog Orthod, 2017, 18(1): 26-31.

[26]Chen T, Zhang J. Surface hydrophilic modification of acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene terpolymer by poly (ethylene glycol-co-1, 4-cyclohexanedimethanol terephthalate): Preparation, characterization, and properties studies[J]. Appl Surf Sci, 2016, 388: 133-140.

[27]LAGRAVèRE, MANUEL O, FLORES-MIR, CARLOS. The treatment effects of Invisalign orthodontic aligners[J]. J Am Dent Assoc, 136(12):1724-1729.

Download PDF

Editorial decision: Major revision
16 Mar, 2021
Reviews received at journal
03 Mar, 2021
Reviewers agreed at journal
18 Feb, 2021
Reviewers invited by journal
18 Feb, 2021
Editor assigned by journal
15 Feb, 2021
Editor invited by journal
23 Dec, 2020
Submission checks completed at journal
23 Dec, 2020
First submitted to journal
09 Dec, 2020

You are reading this latest preprint version

The Force Effects of Two Types of Polyethylene Terephthalate Glyc-olmodified Clear Aligners Immersed in Artificial Saliva

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Introduction

Materials And Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusions

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Status:

Version 1