This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Original Article
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
A novel method for repeatability analysis of overconstrained kinematic coupling using a parallel-mechanism-equivalent-model is proposed. An overconstrained Kelvin-type coupling with one additional support is introduced and used for method illustration. Contact forces of the overconstrained coupling under preload are computed with Moore-Penrose inverse and the deformations are obtained using the Hertz theory. The couping is equivalently modeled as a 7-SPS parallel mechanism, spherical joints of which represent the centers of the supporting balls and the contact points, respectively, and prismatic joints are used to simulate the deformations. Therefore, pose error of the coupling arisen from preload is analyzed using the well-appraised incremental method for forward kinematics analysis of parallel mechanisms. The uncertainties of the preload are discussed and a boundary-sampling method is proposed for repeatability analysis. The main contribution of this study lies in that the proposed parallel-mechanism-equivalent-model and the boundary-sampling method greatly simplify the repeatability analysis of overconstrained kinematic couplings. Finally, the proposed methods are validated by case study.
Keywords
kinematic coupling, repeatability, overconstrained mechanism, parallel mechanism
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
This preprint is available for download as a PDF.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
View the published article here.
Version 1
Posted 15 Dec, 2020
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Mechanical Engineering
Learn more about our company.
This is a preprint. It has not completed peer review.
Original Article
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
View the published article here.
Version 1
Posted 15 Dec, 2020
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Mechanical Engineering
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
View the published article here.
A novel method for repeatability analysis of overconstrained kinematic coupling using a parallel-mechanism-equivalent-model is proposed. An overconstrained Kelvin-type coupling with one additional support is introduced and used for method illustration. Contact forces of the overconstrained coupling under preload are computed with Moore-Penrose inverse and the deformations are obtained using the Hertz theory. The couping is equivalently modeled as a 7-SPS parallel mechanism, spherical joints of which represent the centers of the supporting balls and the contact points, respectively, and prismatic joints are used to simulate the deformations. Therefore, pose error of the coupling arisen from preload is analyzed using the well-appraised incremental method for forward kinematics analysis of parallel mechanisms. The uncertainties of the preload are discussed and a boundary-sampling method is proposed for repeatability analysis. The main contribution of this study lies in that the proposed parallel-mechanism-equivalent-model and the boundary-sampling method greatly simplify the repeatability analysis of overconstrained kinematic couplings. Finally, the proposed methods are validated by case study.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
This preprint is available for download as a PDF.
Loading...