The Preparation of Multitype MSCs
First, 1T-MoS2/MXene hybrid thin films of variable thickness were prepared through vacuum filtration. We transferred thin films of differing thicknesses to the glass substrate. As shown in Figure 1a, a confocal spatial pulse shaping system for femtosecond lasers was constructed to achieve ultrafast, high-precision patterning. In this process, materials are subjected to laser ablation according to controllable energy. By designing any combination of light fields, various types of symmetric and asymmetric MSCs can be fabricated. Almost any material, including ultrahard, ultrastrong materials, can be subjected to such processing.[15] Phase-adjustable spatial light modulators (SLMs) were employed to focus the Gaussian femtosecond laser into a femtosecond laser with a varying spatial distribution. Through the design of distinct phases, arbitrary changes in the light field were realized within an extremely short period to produce multiple types of MSCs. SLMs can load computer-generated holograms (CGHs) to focus light in space. Before the Gaussian laser entered the SLM, it was focused using a Michelson interferometer. The Gaussian femtosecond pulse was integrated into an evenly divided double pulse sequence with a pulse delay of 10 ps. The subsequent subpulses focused the laser on the material in the preceding sequence. When the front sequence pulse contacted the material, numerous freely moving electrons were excited. The subsequent pulse sequence further interacted with the seed electrons generated by the front sequence pulse before the material was modified or ablated, leading to the avalanche ionization of more free electron eruptions. This occurrence is because the pulse delay between the two pulse sequences is in the picosecond order, which is substantially shorter than the time required for material phase transition.
For our initial beam (800 nm, 35 fs), we customized a special algorithm to calculate the original incident beam, adjusting it according to our target light field. The optimized GS algorithm ensured a more uniform light field distribution.[16] In previous experiments using SLM, each pattern corresponded to a CGH.[17, 18] However, considering the pattern processing of multiple types of MSCs, various patterns must be processed in the asymmetric MSCs in situ at the same time. Thus, the processing technology requires optimization. We overlaid the target pattern on multiple target images, and programming was applied to load various CGHs into SLMs to realize continuous changes in multiple light fields over a 0.001-s duration. Multiple spatially focused light fields were smoothly focused by the objective lens from the SLM outlet through the 4f relay system. As shown in Figure 1b, we irradiated the original material (1T-MoS2/MXene) with different shaped pulse lasers, and used shaped light field 1 to remove the 1T-MoS2/MXene, and shaped pulse lasers 2 and 3 to modify the material to obtain laser-induced MXene-derived TiO2/1T-MoS2-derived MoO3. The whole process realizes two processes of laser induced material synthesis and laser removal. As displayed in Figure 1c, when light field pattern 1 was individually focused and processed on the thin film sample, a high-precision symmetric MSC (1T-MoS2/MXene) with an adjustable size was fabricated. At this point, ablation was performed by the laser focused using light field pattern 1. By adjusting energy or controlling the number of subpulse repetitions, light field 1 could completely remove the material, whereas light field 2 required laser induction to modify the material. When light field patterns 1 and 2 were combined to focus on the thin film sample, we obtained the same precision size of the asymmetric MSC (1T-MoS2/MXene//laser-induced MXene-derived TiO2/1T-MoS2-derived MoO3). The simultaneous projection of light fields 1, 2, and 3 produced two symmetric MSCs (laser-induced MXene-derived TiO2 and 1T-MoS2-derived MoO3). As presented in Figure 2a, the patterns of the target light field obtained were different and could be arbitrarily combined to form multiple types of MSCs. The various types of MSCs fabricated had ultrahigh resolution (line width ≥200 nm), were extremely small (10 × 10 µm2), had extremely high processing consistency, and could be rapidly prepared in a very short time (150 groups/min) across a large area (Figures 2b and 2c). The MSCs clearly exhibited regularity, and the minimum line width was continuous. The interdigital MSCs with differing shapes and fingers could be completely prepared, such that the influence of fingers on electrochemical performance could be determined. MSCs of different shapes were prepared by controlling the shapes of the target light field (Supplementary Figure 1). This enabled the controllable and personalized preparation of microscale electronics, and the flexibility surpassed that achieved through conventional processing techniques. Moreover, we could control the laser frequency in the actual processing procedure; laser pulses could be shot out of the laser extremely rapidly. In the processing of MSCs with a size of 10 × 10 µm2, the translational was set to move at a rate of 2000 um/s under a laser frequency of 200. Therefore, 200 subpulses could be used to pattern 200 symmetric MSCs in 1 s. However, because multiple patterned light fields are required to realize the fabrication of an asymmetric MSC, the maximum number of MSCs processed per second is 100. Supplementary Figure 2 presents MSCs arrays (with varying sizes and line widths) prepared through this method. As indicated in Supplementary Figure 3, we designed patterned MSCs with differing line widths by adjusting the patterns and parameters of the light field with focused laser pulses. These line widths were adjustable from the micron scale (5 µm) to the nanometer scale (200 nm). Furthermore, we achieved ultrahigh-resolution machining by setting a delay in temporally and spatially shaped femtosecond laser to control pulse shaping near the ablation threshold of the material. We employed femtosecond laser pulses to realize one-step pattern processing of various electrode material systems because this technology can be used to process almost any material.
As shown in Figure 2d, regular pattern processing was conducted on various materials (a metal–organic framework, graphene, WS2, MoTe, MnO2, and RuO2). Raman characterization of the laser-patterned area confirmed the complete removal of the material through laser ablation. This demonstrates that our technology can not only be applied to the pattern processing of two-dimensional materials but also be employed for the high-precision processing of metal oxide materials. These results indicate that our technology is promising for the preparation of microelectronics and microscale energy storage devices. We conducted a review of technologies used in the processing of asymmetric supercapacitors. Supplementary Table 1 presents a comparison of our technology with other processes in terms of the size and the maximum resolution of the asymmetric supercapacitors fabricated. Our asymmetric MSCs are at the micron scale, which is dozens or even hundreds of times smaller than conventional asymmetric MSCs. Moreover, our technology greatly enhances the processing resolution of asymmetric MSCs.
Characterization and Analysis of Laser-Induced MXene/1T-MoS2 Materials
Figure 2e presents scanning electron micrographs of the surface morphology of the composite material before and after processing. The numerous metal oxide particles generated on the material surface after plastic laser processing indicate that oxidation occurred during processing. Supplementary Figure 4 depicts the characterization of the composed material ablated by the focused laser under various parameters. The scanning electron micrographs in Supplementary Figure 3 (a–f) demonstrate that as the laser energy increased, nanoparticles appeared on the surface of the laser-induced material, and the morphology and size of the nanoparticles underwent regular changes as the laser energy changed. These nanoparticles ranged from approximately 10 to 30 nm in size, considerably increasing the specific surface area of the material and providing a greater number of sites for the generation of laser-induced metal oxides. The transmission electron micrographs and selected area electron diffraction patterns of the laser-induced 1T-MoS2-derived MoO3 and MXene-derived TiO2 (MT) thin films ablated by the focused laser under various parameters. The transmission electron micrographs and high-resolution transmission electron micrographs of laser-induced materials (Figure 2f) confirm the presence of TiO2 and MoO3. We labeled the composed materials induced by the focused laser at 10 mW with no pulse delay as MT-10/0. Supplementary Figure 4 presents the transmission electron micrographs and selected area electron diffraction patterns of MXene/1T-MoS2, MT-10/0, MT-10/10, MT-20/0, MT-20/10, MT-30/0, and MT-30/10. Lattice fringes are observable in the high-resolution transmission electron micrographs in Supplementary Figure 5, where the d-space of 0.35 nm corresponds to the (101) plane of anatase TiO2.[19] In the high-resolution transmission electron micrographs of typical orthogonal MoO3 nanorods, lattice fringes are clearly visible. The distance between adjacent fringes is approximately 0.23 nm, indicating that the nanorods grew in the (200) direction.[20] MT was found among laser-induced materials, but the morphology differed due to the influence of laser power and pulse delay. The transmission electron micrographs revealed that the corresponding metal oxides were formed during the laser ablation of MXene/1T-MoS2. We speculate that the temporally and spatially shaped femtosecond laser first excited a large number of free electrons. After laser pulse bombardment, these free electrons increased in number. The extremely high instantaneous power of the femtosecond laser pulses generated defects in the Mo–S and Ti–C bonds. The numerous free electrons facilitated the combination of the femtosecond laser pulses with oxygen in the air. Moreover, the femtosecond laser pulses ionized to the oxygen to produce oxygen bonds. Thus, the original MXene material was easily transformed into metal oxide.
To further explore the effect of laser ablation on MXene/1T-MoS2, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was conducted. Studies have reported that the binding energy of 1T-MoS2 is almost 0.9 eV lower than that of 2H-MoS2 in non-laser–processed materials.[19, 21]
As presented in Figure 3a, the high-resolution XPS spectra of Mo 3d could be deconvoluted into peaks assigned to Mo 3d3/2 and Mo 3d5/2. The peaks at 231.6, 232.8, 234.6, and 235.8 eV in various MT thin films indicated that the Mo 3d5/2−3/2 doublets corresponded to MoO3 and MoS2 (with Mo5+ 3d5/2 peaks at 231.6 eV, Mo5+ 3d3/2 peaks at 234.6 eV, Mo6+ 3d5/2 peaks at 232.8 eV, and Mo5+ 3d5/2 peaks at 235.8 eV, respectively).[19, 24]. The content of Mo in distinct valence states could be summarized from XPS analysis. The Ti2p spectra confirmed the presence of TiO2. The peaks centered at 455.1 and 461.2 eV (Figure 3b) corresponded to Ti–C bonds. The peaks centered at 458.5 and 464.4 eV were assigned to Ti–O 2p3/2 and Ti–O 2p1/2, revealing that the oxygen in TiO2 resulted in the formation of C–Ti–O.[25, 26] As shown in Table 1, the proportion of Mo fluctuated with changes in laser power and pulse delay, confirming that the composition of mixed materials and the content of MoO3 can be adjusted by modifying laser parameters. Results regarding the unprocessed MXene hybrid materials and the TM materials laser processed under various parameters were also summarized. After laser ablation, the Ti–C bond in MXene was substantially reduced. By contrast, the Ti–O bond was considerably increased, indicating the production of titanium oxide. As displayed in Figure 3c, three oxygen components at binding energies of 530.3 eV (Ti–O–Ti), 532.1 eV (Ti–OH), and 531.2 eV (O–Mo) are observable in the O 1s spectra. A detailed summary of these results is provided in Supplementary Table 2. Specifically, information on the presence of molybdenum oxide and titanium oxide in the TM materials is presented.
Effects of Laser Parameters on Materials and Their Electrochemical Properties
When focused laser pulses are applied to MXene and 1T-MoS2 composite materials, they not only cause changes in the material properties but also produce new laser-induced metal oxide materials. Controlling these composite materials through laser parameters and determining the optimal parameters are of great research relevance. In this study, as shown in Figure 4a, we analyzed changes in the Mo content in the composite material by adjusting the laser power and pulse delay. As the laser power was increased, the proportion of Mo5+ and Mo6+ increased gradually, whereas the Mo4+ content initially decreased substantially and then remained stable. These results can be explained as follows: As the laser pulses acted on the material, Mo4+ was oxidized and modified, leading to an increase in the valence state. Taken together with the XPS data, these results suggest that the modified Mo formed a more stable bond with oxygen, generating molybdenum oxide. We also analyzed the mixed materials generated by laser-induced MXene targets. As presented in Figure 4b, the proportion of Ti–C bonds in MXene decreased as the laser power was increased. At the same time, the Ti–O bonds increased gradually. This is in line with the premise that the laser pulses acted on 1T-MoS. In sum, metal oxides were formed during laser processing. When the laser power remained unchanged but the pulse delay was adjusted, a slight change was noted in the composite material. This is mainly related to the ionization of electrons and materials under the pulse delay. An increase in the pulse delay resulted in increased valence states and a more uniform distribution of Mo and Ti in the composite material. This also confirms that the pulse delay excited more electrons, promoting complex chemical reactions such as the redox reactions of Mo and Ti.
The X-ray diffraction patterns of different MT and MXene/1T-MoS2 were analyzed (Figure 4c). The diffraction peaks of MXene/1T-MoS2 located at 7.78°, 14.38°, 18.28°, and 28.2° corresponded to the expected diffraction (002) peak of MXene, (002) peak of MoS2, (006) peak of MXene, and (004) peak of MoS2, respectively.[25, 27] When the focused laser pulses were applied to the material, the diffraction peaks changed considerably. The characteristic diffraction peaks of the original MXene/1T-MoS2 remained. Moreover, many new characteristic diffraction peaks were detected at 12.86°, 25.27°, 26.90°, 38.18°, 54.69°, and 62.47°. They corresponded to the diffraction peaks characteristic of the (020), (040), and (112) crystal planes of MoO3, as well as to those of the (101), (004), (204) crystal planes of anatase TiO2, confirming the effective oxidation of Ti and Mo layers in MXene/1T-MoS2 during laser ablation. The differing peak intensities of the characteristic peaks and the slightly stronger intensity of TM10 may be related to the extensive modification of the MXene material under laser pulsing.
To further examine the content of titanium oxide and molybdenum oxide in the composite materials, the Raman spectra of all samples were analyzed (Figure 4d). Obvious peaks at 50–900 cm−1 corresponding to the distinct vibration modes of the composite materials are observable. Regarding MXene/MoS2, the peaks located at 198 and 710 cm−1 were related to the A1g group vibrations of Ti and C atoms. Notably, the additional strong peaks at 167 (J1), 225 (J2), and 387 (J3) cm−1 were consistent with those of 1T-MoS2. Moreover, the other peaks of the Eg group vibrations of MXene are in line with those reported in other studies.[27, 28] Small peaks of molybdenum oxide near 263, 342 and 831 cm−1 were assigned to the orthorhombic MoO3 compound.[29] These characteristic peaks were located at 150, 198, 401, 515, and 641 cm−1, confirming the presence of anatase TiO2.[30] We conducted electrochemical tests on the MSCs processed under various laser parameters, and the cyclic voltammetry (CV) curves are shown in Figure 4e. The MSCs had excellent electrochemical performance, which may be due to the laser ablation–induced production of multivalent molybdenum oxide in the hybrid materials. The multivalent metal oxides affected the electrochemical performance of the materials. Because of the material modification threshold, the femtosecond laser pulses fully oxidized the material. Moreover, to maximize electrochemical performance, the electrode material on the surface was not removed. Figure 4f demonstrates the influence of laser parameters, including the laser pulse delay, on MSC performance.