Demographic characteristics of study participants
As shown in Table 1, a total of 103 (n= 65 male and n= 38 female) of street children (age 10-18 years) took part in the study, where 26 (n= 15 male and n=11 female) are interviewed and 77 (n= 50 male and n= 27 female) participated in (FGDs). Of the 103 participants, 38 never have been into schooling and 60 (58%) of participants dropped their education; whereas, 5 (5%) were into schooling by in and off style. About 40 (39%) of participants informally “married” to one another to cope with the challenges of street life. Thirty-three participants newly joined into the street society, while 16 participants lived for more than 5 years (refer Table 1).
Table: 1, Demographic characteristic of street children in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 2019.
Used research tools
FGDs
|
No of participants
|
Sex
|
Educational background
|
Years lived on-street
|
Schooling
Status
|
Marital status
|
Male
|
Female
|
never have been into school
|
Primary (1 to 6)
|
Junior 2ry education (7 & 8)
|
Newly joined
|
One year
|
2-5 yrs
|
5+ yrs
|
In
|
drop
|
Single
|
Informally married
|
Male FGDs
|
FGD1
|
9
|
9
|
-
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
5
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
9
|
5
|
4
|
FGD2
|
11
|
11
|
-
|
6
|
4
|
1
|
4
|
5
|
2
|
-
|
1
|
10
|
7
|
4
|
FGD3
|
8
|
8
|
-
|
3
|
5
|
-
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
-
|
-
|
8
|
6
|
2
|
FGD4
|
12
|
12
|
-
|
5
|
6
|
1
|
3
|
6
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
11
|
7
|
5
|
FGD5
|
10
|
10
|
-
|
4
|
5
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
2
|
1
|
-
|
10
|
6
|
4
|
Female FGDs
|
FGD6
|
8
|
-
|
8
|
5
|
-
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
-
|
8
|
5
|
3
|
FGD7
|
10
|
-
|
10
|
6
|
-
|
2
|
4
|
4
|
1
|
1
|
-
|
10
|
6
|
4
|
FGD8
|
9
|
-
|
9
|
6
|
-
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
1
|
8
|
6
|
3
|
Total
|
77
|
50
|
27
|
39
|
5
|
24
|
27
|
28
|
13
|
9
|
-
|
74
|
48
|
29
|
In-depth interviews
|
|
26
|
15
|
11
|
15
|
9
|
2
|
6
|
5
|
8
|
7
|
2
|
24
|
15
|
11
|
Total
|
103
|
65
|
38
|
54
|
14
|
26
|
33
|
33
|
21
|
16
|
5
|
98
|
63
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FGD n= 77 (n= 50 males and n=27 females), In-depth interviews n= 26 (n= 15 males and n= 11 females).
The framework analysis findings of both in-depth interviews and FGDs of street children are presented in the table below.
Table: 2, Major thematic areas, sub- themes and categories of in-depth interviews and FGDs of street children in Ethiopia, 2019.
Major thematic areas
|
Sub-themes and Categories
|
Theme 1: Initiation into street life
|
1.1. Pushing/pulling factors into the street
1.2. Challenges of living in the street
1.2.1 Lack of social ties and networks
1.2.2 Critical shortage of coverage of basic needs
1.2.3 Physical, sexual and verbal harassments
1.2.4 Child trafficking
|
Theme 2: Means of survival and coping mechanisms
|
2.1. Formation of group life versus collective security
2.1.1. Inter or intra group conflict of interest
2.2 Sharing available resources and vital information
2.2.1 Sex as a means of survival
|
Theme 3: Available government structures and street children perceived strategies to alleviate and prevent the occurrence of plights.
|
3.1. Governmental and non-governmental structure to regulate and protect street children
3.2. Street children proposed perceived strategies to alleviate and prevent the occurrence of plights.
3.2.1. Separate shelter to spend over the night
3.2.2. Regular health education, health services and life coaching
3.2.3. Effective implementation of child protection policy
3.2.4. Creation of income generating activities for self-help
3.2.5. Community strengthening as a preventive strategy
3.2.6. Reintegration with families or extended relatives
|
Theme 1: Initiation into street life
Initiation into the street is a rite of passage marking entrance and acceptance into a society of street and participating its culture and work to survive. It might be either joining alone or as group into the street society due to variety of push/pull factors. When one joins, he/she will be introduced to the hierarchy of sub-group structure, line of command, power, sex, loyalty, role and responsibilities of the group members, since it is the beginning of new life. Five of the 7, (71.5%) of discussants reported group joining has a great advantage than joining as single person into the street society. When you join by group, you do not have the problems of socialization with other street societies. You might not face the harassment of first day arrival by other groups or individuals. “Especially, if you have one or more experienced street child in the group, you will get the information how to live in the street, how to search for basic needs and security issues in the street. Such grouping is great that can survive and protect group members from any type of harassments” (FGD).
Participants reported “If you joined street society as a single person, your fate is on the hand of strangers that you met in the street. They have a power over your body and can do what they like. By the first day arrival, you don’t know with whom you are, with whom you have sleeping quarter. Most of the time, group sex is common for the new comers. If you reject their idea, you might be beaten up and chased away from that particular place. Thus, the first day initiation into the street is the most difficult as to our experiences” (FGD). Fourteen-year interviewee said that he arrived at Addis Ababa around bus station at 6:00 PM. He was looking for shelter and something to eat and the time came to 8:00PM. He said, one of street boy told to have sleeping quarter with him. When he heard this, he was very happy. He gave me bread and took him to the railway building –where, he has been sleeping. He shared nigh cloth and sleeping quarter with the new comers and have it together. “Just after an hour, he forced me to have anal sex. I swear to St. merry, he had anal sex with me and continued it over the night. Starting form that day, I lost confidence to my sexual identity” (interviewee 7). Concurrently, seven interviewees shared the same experiences.
A female interviewee pointed that her mother was late and she is the only child for the family. Since the death of her mother, her father drank alcohol by every day. Later on, her father forced her to have sex with. At night always he drank alcohol and back to home and forcing his daughter to have sex. “Hmmm…forcefully, he had sex with me for many times. This situation left me with its psychological pain. One day, I decided to escape from home to join street society. Then, I fled into the street. On her first day arrival of Addis Ababa street, she met one older street boy. He greeted and talked to her. He said, I think you seems new person to this area, she said yes. He requested for her to stay with, and she said, where? He told to her, “I am street boy and living here under railway building”. “I said alright. But, now I am very hungry, would you give me something to eat? He run away and brought me bread. Then, I decided to be with him. We shared his night cloth and sleeping quarter, where we enjoyed sex over the night. With him I have been two years in the street as my informal husband. Sometimes, I am practicing prostitution and have a paid sex, to survive. Know, I felt the ideal freedom. Even though, I am selling my flesh to survive and facing many derogatory and abusive words in the street. Despite to this, I am psychologically free compared to with the previous time that I faced at home. Imagine, having sex with your father. Hmm….in my life, I don’t forget its psychological pain forever” (interviewee 17). Similarly, two female interviewees reported the same tragedies (interviewees 19, 26).
Reportedly 5 of the 7, (71.5%) discussants said by first day arrival to particular street, getting friends in the street seems a great opportunity. But, it has its own penalties. When you newly joined the street, you meet with the group of street society and they treat you with available basic needs. They gave you bread, night cloth and sleeping quarter, which is a great opportunity for you. But later on, you might be facing many hurdles. Over the night, they force you to have sex whether anal or vaginal. You know, first you treated well and later face the hideous life that you couldn’t forget” (FGDs). Twenty-three of the 26, (88.5%) of interviewees pointed both male and female have the same sleeping quarters-which, promising for group sex. New arrivals used as sex object, by both older boys and shopkeepers’/ institution guardians. “Any sexual relations i.e., group sex, oral, anal and vaginal sex will happen to you-which, used as a defense for you. In the case of refusal for such sexual advances, you will be beaten up and chased away from that area” (interviewees). Male discussants (4 of the 7 FGDs) reported, to adapt with new society and survive, you should accept what your seniors said, whether it harmful or not. You should welcome whether sex, physical or verbal harassment. “The psychological trauma of post-anal penetration is the most painful that you cannot forget. You may think about it again and again. Even, you may face mental health problems like hopelessness, depressive symptoms, self-harm, and to the worst suicidal attempt. To be out of it, you may start drugs and get out of its pain. Gradually, adopt the pain of anal penetration and form harmonized relation with friends in the street. The situation is re-cycling. When you become senior, you may do the same thing to new comers and can’t be out of this circuit” (FGDs).
Sub-theme 1.1: Pushing/pulling factors into the street life
Participants revealed the complexity of push and pull factors pose a risk of flee into the street. Pushing factors are any kind of influencing factors that force children to leave/escape from home and flee into the street. Five of the 7, (71.5%) of discussants reported pushing factors such as poverty, separation of parents, family death, economic decline, single-parenthood, child abuse, neglect, school dropout, land grab and family eviction due to urban development and family size were the top causing factors of flee into the street (FGD). Following land grab, millions of local communities around capital city (Addis Ababa) have been forced to resettle without composition. In such essence, forced eviction of families fueled the number of street children in the country. Nineteen interviewees revealed that death of the family, destruction of extended relatives’ relationship and schooling problem are the most common reasons of flee from home (interviewees). Pulling factors are those that draw/enticement children to flee into the street. Four of the 7, (57%) of discussants reported that “enticements of apparent freedom, financial independence, peer influence and traditional values i.e. adventure and city glamour were factors that draw children into the street” (FGDs). Due to the above factors, millions of children were fleeing into the street and being victim of its difficulties.
Sub-theme 1.2: Challenges of living in the street
Street children are facing many challenges and difficulties of street life. Discussants reported that when you face any of the pushing and/or pulling factors discussed above, you can't expect good situation to live with your family. The only chance is escaping into the street and enjoy the ideal of freedom. Interviewees noted, living in the street has many struggles, coercions, and maltreatments. “You might be facing many challenges in your street life-span. The only chance you have is, living with the sorest condition it” (interviewees). Reportedly, absence of clear and contextualized strategies and policies as-well-as little attention of government to address our difficulties made us highly vulnerable to any kind of problems and exacerbating (FGDs). They listed many problems, which are presented here below.
Category 1.2.1: Lack of social ties and networks
Five of the 7, (71.5%) discussants reported starting from the day of flee into the street, they lost social ties and networks with their families and communities, where they live in. “We are considering ourselves as thrown-away children. We are living in ignored world by both our families and communities. We haven’t any social ties and networks. We are the most deprived people, with no access to family love, care and affection. Nobody looks after you. You don’t have anyone to share your idea with. For whom do you cry?” (FGDs).
Twenty- three of the 26, (88.5%) participants pointed street children are found instable-where they left family for abuse, community hate them for their dirty lifestyle and consider them as a crime person. Due to this, lack of proper social ties and networks with their family and community is common. “We are alone (no father or mother) who care for you. If you try to have healthy social networks with the community, the entire of the community hate you, due to our dirty living style, consider you as criminal and pin-pocket person”, (interviewees). Six of the 7, (85.7%) reported “Our social ties and networks are distorted. You feel hopelessness, your current and future life is shadowy. We cry out for help, but from where? There is no anyone in our side. At times we feel lonely; we suffer from lack of sleep, anxiety, isolation and mood depression. To hide yourself from such conditions, we use local alcohol, glue, hashish and Khat” (FGD).
Category 1.2.2: Critical shortage of coverage of basic needs
Three of the 7, (43%) of discussants reported street children are young people who are living in ignored tragedy with the critical shortage of coverage of basic needs. Like other human being, they need basic needs from their biological families to have healthy life, but in their case, they are responsible to look for it. “At this age, we are conciliating our schooling and forced to engage ourselves in begging, collecting materials from the garbage, selling small things, manual work, prostitution and etc. You are the only one who act as a father or mother and responsible for daily coverage of basic needs. While looking for coverage of daily basic needs, we face many struggles and coercion from the street society and/or community (FGD). Twenty-three of the 26, (88%) of participants agreed the most challenge of living in the street is lack of coverage of basic needs. “The experience of street life appeared harder than the what the community think of it (interviewees).
Sub- theme 1.2.3: Physical, sexual and verbal harassments
Five of the 7, (71.5%) of discussants reported street children are living in the world-where, they are forced for early sexual initiation, multiple sexual partners, group sex, either of homo or heterosexual. Most of them initiated early sexual intercourse before flee into the street-where, there is abusive families or extended families force them and be a main reason to be in the street. Others raped and forced to have sex either anal or vaginal in the street. These situation exposes them for health problems i.e. HIV/STIs, hepatitis, early pregnancy and its psychological trauma. “While living in the street, both male and female faces similar physical and sexual violence. Either of us have the fate of sexual harassment-which is the worst in the first day initiation into the street society-where you face the most intricacy of either anal or vaginal penetration. Anybody, either the street boy or shopkeepers/guardians do what they like. Both male and female will face this ugly life for advanced protection. You will stay in the same sleeping quarter (under railway building, veranda etc...), where you forced for unwilling practice. Such disinclined practices are rampant among us or outsiders. Unprotected sex with strangers is common, where condom use is vested under the interest of strangers you met in the street. Most of male participants have reported post-anal penetration, psychological trauma is always memorable pain- which, you might be victim of it by the first day of joining with street society. When you become experienced, you can do the same thing to the new comers, if you don’t afraid of your God” (FGDs).
Nineteen of the 26, (73%) reported “You cannot out of harassments-where, any strangers do it, while you live in the street. Anybody can beat/slap you if you resist any unwilling practice. Sexual, physical and verbal violence are common and daily practice among street society and outsiders. We are living in ignored world, where there is no any social protection grantee you-which, exacerbate any type of harassments i.e. beating, slapping, sexual violence and even murdering” (Interviewees).
Category 1.2.4: Child trafficking
Even though the root causes for child trafficking is too difficult to know, millions of street children have been experiencing it, at least once in their life time. They are vulnerable to child trafficking, due to helpless implementation of social protection policy by the government. Five of the 7, (71.5%), discussants reported child trafficking for cheap child labor and/or sexual intercourse. “We are highly vulnerable for trafficking. The trafficking encompasses within the city (Addis Ababa) or out of the city. People need you, for cheap uncompensated labor force and sexual activities - where you forced for cheap labor and/or sexual materialize (FGDs). Two of the 26 interviews reported street children have limited education and poor socio-economic factors that made them vulnerable to trafficking. A fifteen-year boy interviewee reported “Me and my friend came from Harargeh (east part of the country). One day, two females came and have taken us to their home. After we arrived their home, they immediately offer us to shower and clothes to change. Then, they forced us to have sex. I have been there for three days and run away from. But, my friend is still there” (interviewees). Similarly, interviewees (11/26) shared the same tragedies.
Theme 2: Means of survival and coping mechanisms
Street children as much as possible prefer and reside in areas with a special supportive environment and characteristics that do not conflict with their life-style, nor pose intimidations against their existence. They usually teach one another how to earn basic need coverage, where to go for living, and what to do in case they face problems, which is a clear exhibition of their sub-group culture. After flee into the street, they forced to have active role and participate in informal work sectors and survival sex to sustain their life. Discussants pointed “we survive through participating in transactional sex, scavenging garbage, labor-intensive work to change with bread, begging food from restaurant/hotels, take food from street food vendors, sometimes stealing, washing cars, selling small things like tissue paper and tooth brush, carrying luggage and heavy things (FGDs). Six of FGDs discussants reported their lives were full of struggles, coercions, and maltreatments, exploitation and violence among themselves and by shopkeepers, institution guardians, striders and hawkers in the street. Seventeen of the 26 interviewees reported living in the street environment places them at special struggles and coercions. To resist such actions, most of street children form small groups to counteract the negative influences and practices. They are extremely aware of the problematic and often dangerous environment in which they reside. They have obsessive concern about troubles and remind their group members to be lookout for situations that might lead to conflict. Hence, they tend to be strict in their practices, encouraging children to respect and participate in sub-group collective security. New comers are liable to have taken orientation and direction at the first time of joining the group. In such ways, they use different coping mechanisms to confront with the struggle of street life.
Sub-theme 2.1: Formation of group life and collective security
The journey of living in the street have full of struggles and coercions among themselves and outsiders. Many things are uncertain about how long they are living and die of violence. To cope up with such encounters, street children form a small group- where every member of the group has his/her role. The 6 of the 7 FGDs pointed to cope up with such a harsh lifestyle, they form a group-which, enable them mutual support and protection with a strong sense of companionship. They have their own group norm and culture with a code of street language.
Street children are governing interpersonal behavior and manage violence through, informal rules. The rules prescribe both a proper comportment and a proper way to respond if challenged. They regulate the use of violence and allow those who are inclined to aggression to precipitate violent encounters in an approved way. The rules have been established and are enforced mainly by well experienced street-oriented child. Everybody knows that if the rules are violated, there are penalties. “Street world is characterized by miserable deprivation, subjected to physical, verbal and sexual abuse, and victims of violence. We are forming a group and try to resist any violence in the form of group security. We have a group norm and culture, which leaded by one of brilliant street-oriented child. Through forming group security, we protect ourselves from any coercions. Within the group, there is sometimes intrapersonal violence, most likely by the older street children” (FGD).
Category 2.1.1: Inter or intra group conflict of interest
Discussants 5 of the 7 participants said most of the time, the group might be dysfunction and disperse its members. Many things are uncertain about how long we are living and we believe we may die due to violence among ourselves or by violent strangers at any time. They accept this fate and living in the border. Anybody can intimidate you; we try to counteract it. During this time, you don’t know what will happen on you. “We discourage the violence as a primary solution of resolving disputes and encourage the group members to accept nonviolent behavior. But, if the negotiation goes down, every group member runs for self-defense. Many of us, much more concerned about the threat of our group norms. If somebody break the norm and culture, fighting within the group is common practice. Even though the nonviolent orientation rarely overcomes the impulse to strike back in an encounter, it may lead to certain confusion and lead to a profound violence among the group. Hence, the member of the group strives to go for bad action against each other (FGDs). Additionally, two female discussants reported females are mimicking the male behavior and try to have their own version of manhood. “When you act as manhood, you get respect and will be recognized by the group members. We try to achieve this in the ways that established by the boys and doing what the male street child do i.e. using abusive language, to be recognized person to actively participate in resolving disputes within the group or between the groups” (FGDs).
Five of the 7, discussants pointed conflict among street female exists due to the assessment of beauty girl within the group i.e. which girl in a group is the most beauty and competition over boyfriends within the group or from other groups. “A main cause of conflict within the group is he says, she says rumor. Usually one girl might be said something negative about somebody in a group, behind that person. The negative saying will back to the person talked about. In such essence, this might be led to group gossiping-which, it can be the main reason for the group violence and disperse” (FGD). Almost all of FGD discussants reported factors that increase risk of group violence behavior are a complex interaction or combination of factors leads to an increased risk of violent behavior. Factors like previous aggressive behavior, being victim, competition for the cute girl, drug use behavior and he/she said rumor about somebody are the most leading factors of violence within or between the groups. Due to this, the group will split over impossibility to keep violence and animosity between members at bay and look for another group to join.
Sub-theme 2.2: Sharing available resources and vital information
There is a compassion and caring culture among the sub-group of street children. The sympathy kindness and devotion of sub-group members of street children is astounding and astonishing. All of the 7, (100%) discussants noted everybody within the group has his/her mandate to look and search for daily basic needs. Some of the individuals participate in manual work, scavenging through garbage, begging, selling small things- whereas, female might be taking the responsibility to have survival sex and bring the money for the group. “Sharing resources and information is our fundamental activity. We have our own sub-culture which gave us group identity. The group has its own rule to welcome newcomers to the group with the mandate of orienting survival skills and socializing with the group. New arrivals oriented about means of survival and as streets are full of drugs and violence” (FGDs). The 17 of 26, (65%) of interviewees pointed “to survive this harsh world, we are engaging ourselves in all kind of activities that bring money. At this age, we are engaging ourselves in shining of shoes, pushing trucks and gathering and carrying it to the dumpsite, sell rubber bags, tissue paper, tooth brush in the street, scavenging garbage and engaging in paid sex. To survive in the street, you engage yourself in any type of activities and ensure the group self-support.” (Interviewees).
Six of the 7, (85.7%) discussants pointed sharing vital information is the most important and imperative activity to survive. They move here and there to settle down in areas-where, they feel secure and gives them the possibility of earning for coverage of basic needs and able them to have fun with the group members. They prefer popular, market and commercial areas to be engaged in informal work sector-where, they earn living and enjoyment expense. Such areas are identified and informed via information sharing. “You know, there is interesting kind-heartedness and devotion among group members. You share important information to earn living and enjoyment expenses and bring it for the group members. You are responsible to bring money from any activities you get and share with your group members’ (FGDs).
Category 2.2.1 Sex as a means of survival
Many research evidences show that street children are shift to prostitution as a means of survival. All discussants pointed most of street children turn to prostitution in order to survive. Both male and female are highly at risk of participating unwilling sex. Where, unprotected sex with strangers is common practice and made them vulnerable to health problems and early unwanted pregnancies. “To survive, we engage ourselves in prostitution. Prostitution is the main income generating activity for our informal wife. Over the night, if you see the streets, it is congregated with many young women. Most of them are our informal wife acting as prostitution ladies and seeking for paid sex. When she back to act as a wife, we share the money and expense for our basic needs. If she has informal husband within the group, her husband is the one who share the money with her. If the group lack coverage of daily basic needs, her husband is responsible to buy food for that particular day (FGDs).
Eleven of the 26, (42%) of participants reported if expense for survival is very tense, boys forced to have paid sex. Sometimes, boys engage themselves both in homo and heterosexual intercourse, due to immediate need of basic needs. “With outsiders’ paid sex is common, if other means of survival are unsuccessful. Our intention is on the money rather than protected or unprotected sexual activities. But, if you have paid homosexual activity, its psychological pain was the most puzzling to categorize your sexual identity” (Interviewees).
Theme 3: Available government structures and street children perceived strategies to alleviate and prevent the occurrence of plights.
African governments are incapacitated and slow to address difficulties of the street children. Today, governments are increasingly taking ruthless and crooked steps to support and solve problems of street children. Such uncoordinated traditional response by most of African governments and elsewhere has been lagging to solve problems of street children. Even though there are policies and strategies targeting women and children, complete and representative data on the street children as-well-as strategies particular to street children are hardly available [3]. The Ethiopian government is not exceptional. The Ethiopian government, social protection minister developed social protection policy with the goals of protecting and promoting the wellbeing of its citizens under the country constitution and considering international and regional conventions. The policy stated that all Ethiopians have the right to social protection services including access to health care, education, shelter, good nutrition, protection, and reduce child labour. Also it stated vulnerable children have the right to access social protection services thru providing with school materials, food and shelter, IGAs. Moreover, the policy suggested strengthening community‐based social support for vulnerable children-where the community are expected to support through buying school material, providing food and shelter [18].
Sub-theme 3.1: Governmental and non-governmental structure for child protection policies
Despite to the above mentioned Ethiopian policy, the government failed to implement the policy due to several factors i.e. designing problem of policies, strategies and programmes, budget allocation, poor inter-sectoral integration and lack of comprehensive standards were bottle neck of policy implementation. Furthermore, fewer and/or no political value for such victimized of young people is exacerbating the problems [12]. Consequently, street children have been considered as felon, out laws and having a mentality of committing crime by both law keeping bodies and society. This in turn, affecting this young people to be accepted by their community and get legal protection under the law-which, aggravate the problem against street children in Ethiopia.
The 6 of the 7, (85.7%), discussants pointed, “We are human beings with no access to legal protection. We are forgotten groups by the government. The policemen always harass, beat and jail us without any evidence, because they don’t think of us as a normal person with legal rights. Among us, if someone goes to prison with small crime or just with suspicion, it will be difficult to get him/her to bell out. No one cares or trusts us. We stay in prison for weeks or months, whether we do crime or not. We are just people with no legal protection services” (FGDs). Most of interviewees (19 of the 26, 73%) reported “Government doesn’t know us. Sometimes, we hear things over media about street children, but none of the government body have the intention of doing practical and reliable activities to respond to our problems. They just talk what they felt, but they don’t know a bit about our challenges. They do not offer any viable alternative and failed to set down realistic and concrete solutions for our problems. On the other hand, policemen are our enemy. If something happens, we are their first option and victims of their ruthless beating. We are just bunch of criminals in their eyes; who happened to be out laws and just hate being legal. Hence, they beat us like dogs. How can we think that the government know us, while their people treat us like animals? It’s ridiculous! Even animals have the right, but we…. Sometimes, the society is better. At least, we hustle and make our daily living, because they let us. There are good people who help and provide us with different things” (Interviewees).
Most 5 of the 7, (71.5%) of discussants reported absence of clear and contextualized strategies and policies as-well-as little attention of government to address and prevent our problems, made them more vulnerable to inhumanity practices. All FGDs reported the problem of street children is depending on individual situations and life experiences. In fact, their problem is sometimes individualized, depending on personal history that made him/her flee into the street and personal status at home and living in the street. “The care of street children must be effective through addressing personal situation by categorizing sub-group life experiences and holistically address the categorized problems. To do this, studying child profile and categorizing similar profiles and then, strategically attempting to solve is imperative for us. Therefore, better understanding of children living and growing up in the streets is essential” (FGDs). In such essence, key institutions or individuals understand the structural causes of street children situations and easily mitigate their problems case by case is imperious.
Sub-theme 3.2: Street children proposed and perceived strategies to alleviate and prevent the occurrence of plights.
This qualitative inquiry addressed street children’s perceived strategies that support to develop clear, comprehensive and contextualized strategies to respond to difficulties of street life. This part of the study aimed to look at the street children’s proposed strategies to discourse the plights against this young marginalised group and in need to attention. Their perceived strategies will benefit in recommending the Ethiopian policy makers and urban planners for urgent interventions. The participants listed the following strategies to be considered by the governmental and non-government organizations, communities and other interested stakeholders.
Category 3.2.1: Separate shelter to spend over the night
The Ethiopian social protection policy states ever vulnerable child is liable to have shelter, with very little and/or no implementation. Hence, absence of shelter imposing both male and female to have the same sleeping quarters. They are forced to share veranda, railway cove and open space etc. by group all together. Six of the 7, (85.7%) discussants reported whatever the reason, being the street child is sleeping in insalubrious places, facing violence and becoming an expiatory victim of it. Street environment does not offer any social protection of shelter. Hence, they are victims of any type of harassments, cold and rain, since there is no safe sleeping quarter. The mainstreams of the street children are living in conditions of severe deprivation and unsafe environment-which place them at all kinds of risks. “We are living in harsh environment and with no shelter, where male and female share the same sleeping quarters. This situation amplifies sexual and physical violence among us and outsiders. If the government can hear us, we are loudly shouting out and looking for service of separate and safe night shelter” (FGDs).
Twenty-three of the 26, (88.5%) of interviewees pointed lack of night shelter in the street is providing an enabling environment for prostitutes-where, older street child, night guardians/watchmen forcibly engage them in unprotected sex. “We are begging for multi-cultural approach practices that might be amenable for the provision of night shelter. It benefits potentially to reduce the risk of harassments, cold and rain that we are suffering from” (interviewees).
Category 3.2.2: Access to regular health education, healthcare and life coaching services
Street children access to regular health education, healthcare and life coaching services are backbone to empower and address and prevent plights against them. Life coaching is a motivational and behavioural change approach that helps people to set and reach better goals, leading to enhanced well-being and personal ability of functioning [19]. Since, they are highly exposed to verbal, physical and sexual violence and psychosocial difficulties-which, may be mitigated through assistance of caregivers (assigning volunteer ambassador mothers/fathers)- who have an interest and capacity to parent and support this young people by life coaching. Evidence shows that life coaching is a promising behaviour change approach for empowerment, efficiency and well-being of domestic violence survivals [20].
Nineteen of the 26, (73%) of interviewees reported access to regular health, education, and life coaching services are essential to make street children healthy, educated and allow to a healthy and happy lifestyle. Due to absence of guidance and their lifestyle, the health of street children is strongly compromised form day to day. “We …. Street children do not have access to sanitary facilities that made us often dirty and infested with fleas. Due to lack of hygiene, we are exposed to different infectious diseases (Interviewees). Five of the 7, (71.5%) of discussants pointed poor living styles have negative impact, not only on their physical and psychological development, but also their socio-economic development and social networks. “We are looking for any organizations or individuals, who make our education reality and who can help us to access health services and able to coach our living styles. If we are aware of the ways of infection transmissions, we recognize them and protect ourselves in the street life span. Not only this, such services are essential in increasing our socio-economic productivity as-well-as important in determining our future life” (FGDs).
Category 3.2.3: Effective implementation of child protection policy
The Ethiopian social protection policy implementation is highly important for this young people and should get in need of attention. Failing to provide special legal protection and social services for street children exposed them to child labour, trafficking, violence and moral problems that contribute in social and psychological predicaments. Twenty-two of the 26, (84.6%) interviewees reported, since street children are marginalized group of young people, they are often victims of discrimination and facing inhumanity practices by day to day. “We do not have any human right protection services. implementation of such policy is vital for us. We don’t know, if government consider us as a human being, we are in need of such practices” (interviewees). Six of the 7, (85.7%) of discussants highlighted, community members have prejudices and stigmatizing by naming and calling them as “street child”. They pointed even the name “Godana tedadary” which means street child/children, is derogatory word that affect you morally. Not only this, the name itself support in community prejudices and spoil our social networking with the community-where, we are living. “Nobody stand behind us to look after or protect our rights. Anybody come and abuse you, whether physically or sexually. If it is possible, we are pleading for social protection that liable to ensure our safety and security. Generally, we are demanding government and/or non-government organization, for human right protection services. We are loudly shouting for basic human right protection. We are looking for any organizations or individuals who can ensure our right protection and possibly reduce our level of vulnerability that able us to live with a freedom” (FGDs).
Category 3.2.4: IGAs for financial self-help
Critical financial constraints forcing street children to participate in heavy manual activities, prostitution and child labor. Hence, financial burden is compromising their health, psychology and schooling. The Ethiopian social protection policy document stated that highly vulnerable children are liable to get IGAs training and provided with IGAs. However, street children responded and witnessed, as they never have seen such activities and practices [18]. All FGDs of study participants were highly interested to the IGAs for financial self-help. Discussants reported their working conditions are more hazardous and less likely to be protected by the employment legislation, since they are participating in informal sector activities. Twenty-four of the 26, (92%) of interviewees reported “We are looking for local authorities or international organizations support to establish micro-enterprise and able us for self-help, where the government ensure the safety of working environment with protected employment legislations. Every day, we are participating in informal sector activities-where the employer abuses you and even uncompensated payment. Sometimes, refuse to reimburse for the activities you have done”. Six of the seven discussants reported; to ensure financial self-help, creating small micro-enterprises need to be gain attention and access to capital finance operations and training on the specified activities. Such generous support may relief our financial constraints and basic needs problems.
Sub-theme 3.2.5: Community strengthening as preventative strategy
One pillar of Ethiopian social protection policy states encouraging community‐based social support for vulnerable children through buying school material, food and shelter. The community care coalitions, district level social protection committees allowed to collect voluntary contributions and allocate for vulnerable child social protection actions. Such informal mechanisms are important social support mechanisms that bedrock for child protection and empowerment. However, such practices are absent or rarely implemented in the community and contributing in the increment of street children in the cities and urbans. [18]
Almost all (24 of the 26, 92%) of interviewees preferred preventive strategies within the community in advance to prior flee. Preventive strategies within the community are a main concern and has importance to minimize the magnitude of street children in the street. They noted preventive strategies can address the main reason of flee from home before being a main reason. “For our most of street children, the main reasons of flee into the street are material and financial problems, abusive family like step mother or father, poverty and inability to schooling, land grab and family eviction are the factors lie behind the departure of us into the street (interviewees).
Six of the 7 FGDs said if the government body and community members detect their problems earlier and monitor through social welfare within the community, they might not be in the street today. Reported as they need social protection committee that funded and fully mainstreamed social welfare programmes in the community-where, they can early detect and take measurements against problems that lead into the street. “You know, if there are such services in the community for vulnerable children, it is possible to address the root cause and our complex challenges that made us the street boy or girl. Even, this can be addressed by the religious and community leaders-where they can do reality of our schooling materials, allow to enough food and advising our abusive families to not do” (FGD). Similarly, most (23 of the 26, 88%) of interviewees are perceived preventive strategy as a main solution.
Fourteen-year old female interviewee reported “My father was late. After a year, my mother married another person. My step father made me always farming and denied my schooling. With this hard work, nobody cares about me. That is why, I joined the street society. Thus, if the community members responsibly, advocate the right of vulnerable child and mobilize the community for our rights and schooling materials as-well-as encouraging us to speak out for our problems, definitely they can prevent the suffer I am facing here in the street (interviewee 25). Most (21 of the 26, 81%) of interviewees reported the same tragedy.
Category 3.6.1: Reintegration with families or extended relatives
Most research scholars support and recommend the value of reintegration into their families or extended relatives. However, most of study participants denied the value of reintegration strategy. Eighteen of 26, 69% interviewees and (4 of the 7 FGDs) of discussants are denied the value of reintegration. “Returning back to abusive families is not a good option. You fled into the street from where you have neglected, abused, denied schooling, farming, no enough food etc. and back to such families is unbearable. From such families you do not expect good things”. Among the total participants only (8 of 26, 31%) (Male n=5 and female n=3) interviewees and (2 of the 7) focus group participants agreed positively the value of reintegration. Even though they have agreed on the reintegration, they highlighted that it should be with the legal background and the families should agree to nonviolent behavior and promise to schooling with the presence of witness. “Ideally, reintegration is a good solution. However, if your families do the same thing as previous reasons to flee, it hasn’t sense. Due to this, during reintegration, our families should promise us nonviolence behavior and provision of schooling materials as well enough food”. Even though most of researchers recommend the value of reintegration strategy, only few participants have agreed to it with outstanding preconditions-where, they beholding for forcing legal background to nonviolent behaviors of families and promising to schooling. This shows that the street children reason to flee into the street and life challenges in the street varies-which, needs identifying and categorizing problems and address through sub-culture and reason of flee and life experiences of street children.