Identification of LINC01133 with CNVs involved in HCC recurrence and prognosis
We revealed a genome-wide heatmap of CNVs in lncRNAs determined by WGS data of 49 Chinese patients with HCC who underwent curative resection and subsequently experienced HCC recurrence (cohort 1; Fig. 1A; Supplementary Fig. 1A) [18]. LncRNAs that were frequently amplified were mainly located on chromosomes 1q, 8q, 17q, 20q, whereas those that were frequently deleted were mainly located on chromosomes 4q, 9q, 13q, and 16q (Fig. 1A). We selected seven lincRNAs (LINC00051, LINC00303, LINC00482, LINC00862, LINC01133, LINC01136, and LINC01300) that had average copy number > 3.0 and CNV gain in > 50% of the HCC samples for further investigation (Fig. 1B, Supplementary Table 2). To verify the CNVs of these lincRNAs, we analyzed an additional 238 pairs of human HCC tumors and adjacent non-tumor tissue samples (cohort 2) by TaqMan copy number assay. The results confirmed that the copy numbers of all seven candidate lincRNAs were higher in the tumors than in the matched non-tumor tissues (Fig. 1C and 1D). We also measured the expression levels of the seven lincRNAs in 70 pairs of tumor and non-tumor samples randomly selected from cohort 2 and found that the expression levels of LINC00482 (P < 0.001), LINC00862 (P = 0.0014) and LINC01133 (P = 0.0086) were significantly higher in the tumor samples than in the matched non-tumor samples (Fig. 1E; Supplementary Fig. 1B). We did not detect significant differences in the expression levels of the other four candidate lincRNAs between the tumor and non-tumor samples (Supplementary Fig. 1B).
We analyzed the association between CNVs in these seven lincRNAs and clinical outcomes in cohort 2. The 238 patients were categorized into two groups: CNVhigh and CNVlow according to each lincRNA CNVs (Supplementary Fig. 1C). Kaplan-Meyer analysis showed that CNVs gain in LINC01133 and LINC01300 were associated with reduced overall survival (OS; Fig. 1F, left panel; Supplementary Fig. 1D). Because both the genomic copy numbers and the RNA expression levels of LINC01133 were elevated in HCC tissues compared with those in matched non-tumor tissues, we selected LINC01133 for further investigation. Patients with high LINC01133 copy numbers in their tumors exhibited shorter tumor-free survival than those with low LINC01133 copy numbers in their tumors (Fig. 1F, right panel). Univariate and multivariate analyses suggested that LINC01133 CNV was an independent prognostic factor for patient survival (Tables 1 and 2). In addition, the LINC01133 CNV was positively correlated with the LINC01133 relative expression level in the tumors compared with non-tumor tissues (Fig. 1G). RNAscope assay confirmed that LINC01133 was overexpressed in HCC tumors compared with the adjacent non-tumor tissues and mainly existed in cytoplasm of the tumor cells (Fig. 1H). Collectively, our results demonstrated that LINC01133 was frequently amplified at the genomic-sequence and overexpressed at transcript levels in the tumors of patients that experienced HCC, implying that LINC01133 plays a role in HCC recurrence and prognosis.
Table 1
Correlation between the factors and clinicopathologic characteristics in HCC (Cohort 2, n = 238)
Clinicopathological Indexes | CNV in LINC01133 | P value* |
Lower(n = 138) | High(n = 100) |
Age(year) | ≤ 50 | 59 | 50 | 0.268 |
> 50 | 79 | 50 |
Sex | Female | 22 | 10 | 0.185 |
Male | 116 | 90 |
HBsAg | Negative | 20 | 13 | 0.742 |
Positive | 118 | 87 |
AFP (ng/ml) | ≤ 20 | 48 | 36 | 0.846 |
> 20 | 90 | 64 |
GGT(U/L) | ≤ 54 | 62 | 35 | 0.124 |
| > 54 | 76 | 65 | |
Liver cirrhosis | No | 35 | 19 | 0.247 |
yes | 103 | 81 |
Tumor size(cm) | ≤ 5 | 70 | 44 | 0.305 |
> 5 | 68 | 56 |
Tumor number | Single | 117 | 83 | 0.711 |
Multiple | 21 | 17 |
Microvascular invasion | Absence | 126 | 88 | 0.403 |
Present | 12 | 12 |
Tumor encapsulation | None | 55 | 40 | 0.982 |
Complete | 83 | 60 |
Tumor differentiation** | I + II | 95 | 59 | 0.117 |
III + IV | 43 | 41 |
* Chi-square tests for all analyses. ** Edmondson grade. Abbreviations: CNV, copy number variation; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase. |
Table 2
Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors in HCC (Cohort 2, n = 238)
Variable | OS | | TTR |
HR (95% CI) | P | | HR (95% CI) | P |
Univariate analysis* | | | | | |
Age, year (≤ 50 vs.>50) | 0.942(0.661–1.341) | 0.739 | | 1.053(0.770–1.439) | 0.746 |
Sex (female vs. male) | 1.375(0.788–2.399) | 0.262 | | 1.040(0.663–1.631) | 0.866 |
HBsAg (negative vs. positive) | 0.820(0.485–1.387) | 0.460 | | 0.551(0.333–0.912) | 0.020 |
AFP, ng/ml (≤ 20 vs.>20) | 1.284(0.880–1.875) | 0.195 | | 1.145(0.826–1.589) | 0.416 |
GGT, U/L (≤ 54 vs.>54) | 1.710(1.172–2.494) | 0.005 | | 1.187(0.863–1.631) | 0.292 |
Liver cirrhosis (no vs. yes) | 1.405(0.893–2.210) | 0.142 | | 1.349(0.907–2.007) | 0.139 |
Tumor size, cm (≤ 5 vs.>5) | 2.927(2.003–4.279) | 0.000 | | 2.090(1.518–2.879) | 0.000 |
Tumor number (single vs. multiple) | 1.178(0.742–1.868) | 0.487 | | 1.206(0.801–1.814) | 0.369 |
Microvascular invasion (no vs. yes) | 2.713(1.639–4.490) | 0.000 | | 2.000(1.235–2.241) | 0.005 |
Tumor encapsulation (complete vs. none) | 0.839(0.587–1.199) | 0.336 | | 0.752(0.550–1.029) | 0.075 |
Tumor differentiation** (I + II vs. III + IV) | 1.620(1.130–2.322) | 0.009 | | 1.201(0.868–1.661) | 0.269 |
CNV in LINC01133 (low vs. high) | 1.616(1.136–2.299) | 0.008 | | 1.399(1.024–1.910) | 0.035 |
Multivariate analysis* | | | | | |
HBsAg (negative vs. positive) | NA | NA | | 0.533(0.321–0.886) | 0.015 |
GGT, U/L (≤ 54 vs.>54) | 1.314(0.891–1.937) | 0.168 | | NA | NA |
Tumor size, cm (≤ 5 vs.>5) | 3.097(2.081–4.609) | 0.000 | | 2.138(1.549–2.949) | 0.000 |
Microvascular invasion (no vs. yes) | 2.581(1.530–4.355) | 0.000 | | 2.182(1.337–3.563) | 0.002 |
Tumor differentiation** (I + II vs. III + IV) | 1.634(1.130–2.363) | 0.009 | | NA | NA |
CNV in LINC01133 (low vs. high) | 1.522(1.065–2.176) | 0.021 | | 1.337(0.978–1.828) | 0.068 |
*Analyses were conducted using univariate analysis or multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression; **Edmondson grade. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Boldface type indicates significant values. Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; TTR, time to recurrence; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; GGT, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidential interval; CNV: copy number variation. |
Characteristics And Distribution Of Linc01133 In Hcc Cell Lines
LINC01133 is located in chromosome 1q23.2 (Supplementary Fig. 2A) without protein-encoding ability (https://lncipedia.org/; Supplementary Table 3). We detected copy numbers and expression level of LINC01133 in HCC cell lines with different metastatic potentials. We found that the LINC01133 copy numbers and expression levels were both greater in HCC cell lines with high metastatic potential (MHCC97H, MHCC97L, and HCCLM3) than in HCC cells lines with low metastatic potential (Hep3B, PLC/PRF/5, Huh7, and HepG2; Fig. 2A and 2B). RNAscope assays showed that LINC01133 was more highly expressed in MHCC97H cells than in HepG2 cells and mainly existed in the cytoplasm in both cell lines (Fig. 2C). Likewise, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) revealed that LINC01133 was localized to the cytoplasm and the nucleus of MHCC97H and HCCLM3 cells, both of which had high overall expression of LINC01133, but was relatively enriched in the cytoplasm in both cell lines (Fig. 2D).
LINC01133 promotes HCC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro and in vivo
We utilized short hairpin RNA (shRNA) to knock down LINC01133 expression in HCCLM3 and MHCC97H cells. In addition, we used lentivirus-based expression vectors to overexpress LINC01133 in HepG2 and PLC/PRF/5 cells. We confirmed the knockdown and overexpression of LINC01133 in the respective cell lines by qRT-PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis (Fig. 3A). Compared with corresponding control cells, cells overexpressing LINC01133 had increased rates of proliferation and colony formation, whereas cells with LINC01133 knockdown had reduced rates of proliferation and colony formation (Fig. 3B and 3C). Similarly, cell migration and invasion assays showed that cells overexpressing LINC01133 had increased cell numbers of migration and invasion compared with control cells, whereas those with LINC01133 knockdown had reduced cell numbers of migration and invasion compared with control cells (Figs. 3D and 3E).
The mouse xenograft model showed that PLC/PRF/5 cells overexpressing LINC01133 produced larger tumors and more metastatic lung nodules than PLC/PRF/5 cells expressing the empty vector. Conversely, MHCC97H cells with LINC01133 knockdown produced smaller tumors and fewer metastatic lung nodules than MHCC97H cells expressing a control shRNA (Fig. 3F). These data suggested that LINC01133 promotes HCC cells growth and metastasis in vitro and in vivo.
LINC01133 acts as a sponge of miR-199a-5p in HCC cells
LincRNAs in the cytoplasm can potentially act as sponges to inactivate miRNAs and thus regulate the post-transcriptional translation of target genes [14]. To determine if LINC01133 can sponge miRNAs to affect HCC development and progression, we performed miRNA sequencing (miR-seq) in HCC cells with LINC01133 overexpression and LINC01133 silencing. Among 1620 known miRNAs appearing in one or more of the HCC cell lines, we identified 94 miRNAs that were down-regulated (fold-change > 2) in PLC/PRF/5 cells overexpressing LINC01133 in comparison with control cells, 149 miRNAs that were up-regulated (fold-change > 2) in MHCC97H cells with LINC01133 silencing in comparison with control cells, and 422 miRNAs that were predicted by the miRanda miRNA Target Prediction Tool to bind to LINC01133 (Fig. 4A and 4B). Two miRNAs, miR-199a-5p and miR-501-5p, were included in all three groups (Fig. 4B). qRT-PCR showed that LINC01133 overexpression reduced miR-199a-5p levels, but not miR-501-5p levels, in PLC/PRF/5 cells (Fig. 4C). Conversely, LINC01133 knockdown enhanced miR-199a-5p expression, but not miR-501-5p expression, in MHCC97H cells compared to control cells (Fig. 4C). Analysis using the miRanda software revealed sequence complementary to miR-199-5p at nucleotide (nt) positions 961–983 of LINC01133 (Fig. 4D). In dual-luciferase reporter gene assays, miR-199a-5p inhibited the luciferase reporter activity of wild-type LINC01133 but not that of mutant LINC01133 (Fig. 4D). These data indicated that LINC01133 sponges miR-199a-5p in HCC cells.
LINC01133 triggers epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in HCC cells through miR-199a-5p/snail signaling
It has been reported that miR-199a-5p binds to the 3'-UTR (untranslated region) of SNAI1 to inhibit its expression [19, 20]. In agreement with previous study, the complementary sequence of miR-199a-5p was identified in the 3’-UTR of SNAI1 mRNA by TargetScan 7.0 (http://targetscan.org; Supplementary Fig. 2B). Luciferase reporter assays showed that miR-199a-5p overexpression suppressed the luciferase-reported activity of the wild-type SNAI1 3'-UTR, but not that of a mutant SNAI1 3'-UTR (Supplementary Fig. 2B). It was well known that snail is a key transcription factor linked to EMT. Therefore, we examined the expression of snail and markers related to EMT in HCC cells with LINC01133 overexpression or knockdown by qRT-PCR and western blot. We found that LINC01133 overexpression in PLC/PRF/5 cells up-regulated the mRNA and protein levels of snail, vimentin, and N-cadherin, whereas LINC01133 knockdown in MHCC97H cells attenuated the mRNA and proteins levels of those EMT markers (Figs. 4E and 4F). We observed the inverse results for E-cadherin expression (Figs. 4E and 4F).
For further investigation, we performed rescue experiments to investigate whether LINC01133 regulates EMT in an miR-199a-5p-dependent manner. We transfected LINC01133-overexpressing PLC/PRF/5 cells with a miR-199a-5p lentiviral vector. We then transfected LINC01133-silenced MHCC97H cells with an anti-miR-199a-5p lentiviral vector and measured the expression of miR-199a-5p in the cells by qRT-PCR (Fig. 4G). We found that overexpression of miR-199a-5p up-regulated E-cadherin expression and down-regulated snail, vimentin, and N-cadherin expression in the LINC01133-overexpressing PLC/PRF/5 cells (Fig. 4H and 4I). Conversely, in the LINC01133-silenced MHCC97H cells, anti-miR-199a-5p down-regulated E-cadherin expression and up-regulated snail, vimentin, and N-cadherin expression (Fig. 4H and 4I). Together, those results suggested that LINC01133 regulates EMT in HCC cells in a miR-199a-5p/snail dependent manner.
Linc01133 Activates Anxa2/stat3/cyclin D1 Signaling In Hcc Cells
In addition to interacting with other RNAs, lincRNAs also exert functions by interacting directly with proteins. We performed RNA pull-down assays to identify LINC01133-associated proteins. Mass spectrometry analysis of a ~ 35 KD protein band pulled down by LINC01133 (Fig. 5A) revealed nine potential LINC01133 binding proteins, excluding keratin, with peptide number > 5 and unique peptide number > 5 (Fig. 5B). Of the nine potential LINC01133 binding proteins, ANXA2 had the highest total score in protein identification analysis (Fig. 5B and 5C). We verified the presence of ANXA2 among the proteins isolated in the RNA pull-down assay by western blot (Fig. 5D). The RNAfold database (http://rna.tbi.univie.ac.at/cgi-bin/RNAWebSuite/RNAfold.cgi) and Cat-Rapid database (http://service.tartaglialab.com/page/catrapid_omics_group) consistently predicted that ANXA2 possibly binds to 126–177nt or 651-792nt of LINC01133 (Supplementary Fig. 2C and 2D). Moreover, RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) assays showed that LINC01133 was enriched in lysates of MHCC97H cells treated with anti-ANXA2 antibody in comparison with lysates of MHCC97H cells treated with IgG protein (Fig. 5E), further confirming the interaction between LINC01133 and ANXA2 in HCC cells.
To further investigate the possible role of the LINC01133/ANXA2 signaling axis in HCC, we measured the expression of ANXA2 by qRT-PCR and western blot. The results showed that the mRNA level of ANXA2 was not affected by LINC01133 overexpression in PLC/PRF/5 cells or by LINC01133 silencing in MHCC97H cells (Fig. 5F). By contrast, the protein level of ANXA2 was increased by LINC01133 overexpression in PLC/PRF/5 cells and reduced by LINC01133 silencing in MHCC97H cells (Fig. 5G). Furthermore, LINC01133 overexpression increased the phosphorylation levels of ANXA2 and STAT3 and the expression level of cyclinD1 in PLC/PRF/5 cells, whereas LINC01133 silencing reduced the phosphorylation levels of ANXA2 and STAT3 and the expression level of cyclinD1 in MHCC97H cells (Fig. 5G). Taken together, our results confirmed that LINC01133 interacts with ANXA2 to activate STAT3/cyclin D1 signaling, which may be involved in the proliferation of HCC induced by this lincRNA.