1. Ueckerdt, F. et al. Potential and risks of hydrogen-based e-fuels in climate change mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 384–393 (2021).
2. Bloomberg Finance L.P. Hydrogen Economy Outlook - Key messages. (2020).
3. IEA. Global Hydrogen Review 2021. (2021).
4. IRENA. Green Hydrogen Supply: A Guide to Policy Making. (2021).
5. Creutzig, F. et al. Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment. GCB Bioenergy 7, 916–944 (2015).
6. Luderer, G. et al. Environmental co-benefits and adverse side-effects of alternative power sector decarbonization strategies. Nat Commun 10, 5229 (2019).
7. van Renssen, S. The hydrogen solution? Nature Climate Change 10, 799–801 (2020).
8. European Commission. A hydrogen strategy for a climate-neutral Europe. COM(2020) 301 final (2020).
9. IEA. Net Zero by 2050. https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050 (2021).
10. IRENA. World Energy Transitions Outlook: 1.5°C Pathway. (2021).
11. Bauer, C. et al. On the climate impacts of blue hydrogen production. Sustainable Energy & Fuels 6, 66–75 (2022).
12. Ueckerdt, F. et al. On the cost competitiveness of blue and green hydrogen (submitted).
13. Liebreich, M. The Clean Hydrogen Ladder. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/clean-hydrogen-ladder-v40-michael-liebreich/ (2021).
14. UNFCCC. Adoption of the Paris Agreement. (2015).
15. European Commission. A Clean Planet for all - A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy. COM(2018) 773 (2018).
16. Davis, S. J. et al. Net-zero emissions energy systems. Science (2018) doi:10.1126/science.aas9793.
17. IRENA. Green hydrogen cost reduction. https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Dec/Green-hydrogen-cost-reduction (2020).
18. Marchetti, C. & Nakicenovic, N. The Dynamics of Energy Systems and the Logistic Substitution Model. http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/1024/ (1979).
19. Grübler, A., Nakićenović, N. & Victor, D. G. Dynamics of energy technologies and global change. Energy Policy 27, 247–280 (1999).
20. Wilson, C. Up-scaling, formative phases, and learning in the historical diffusion of energy technologies. Energy Policy 50, 81–94 (2012).
21. Sovacool, B. K. How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science 13, 202–215 (2016).
22. Grubler, A., Wilson, C. & Nemet, G. Apples, oranges, and consistent comparisons of the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science 22, 18–25 (2016).
23. Sovacool, B. K. & Geels, F. W. Further reflections on the temporality of energy transitions: A response to critics. Energy Research & Social Science 22, 232–237 (2016).
24. Kern, F. & Rogge, K. S. The pace of governed energy transitions: Agency, international dynamics and the global Paris agreement accelerating decarbonisation processes? Energy Research & Social Science 22, 13–17 (2016).
25. Jewell, J. & Cherp, A. On the political feasibility of climate change mitigation pathways: Is it too late to keep warming below 1.5°C? WIREs Climate Change 11, e621 (2020).
26. Bi, S., Bauer, N. & Jewell, J. Dynamic Evaluation of Policy Feasibility, Feedbacks and the Ambitions of COALitions. (2022) doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-827021/v1.
27. Cherp, A., Vinichenko, V., Jewell, J., Brutschin, E. & Sovacool, B. Integrating techno-economic, socio-technical and political perspectives on national energy transitions: A meta-theoretical framework. Energy Research & Social Science 37, 175–190 (2018).
28. Hansen, J. P., Narbel, P. A. & Aksnes, D. L. Limits to growth in the renewable energy sector. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 70, 769–774 (2017).
29. Madsen, D. N. & Hansen, J. P. Outlook of solar energy in Europe based on economic growth characteristics. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 114, 109306 (2019).
30. Grubb, M., Drummond, P. & Hughes, N. The shape and pace of change in the electricity transition: Sectoral dynamics and indicators of progress. https://www.wemeanbusinesscoalition.org/blog/shape-and-pace-of-change-in-the-electricity-transition/ (2020).
31. Lowe, R. J. & Drummond, P. Solar, wind and logistic substitution in global energy supply to 2050 – Barriers and implications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 153, 111720 (2022).
32. Cherp, A., Vinichenko, V., Tosun, J., Gordon, J. A. & Jewell, J. National growth dynamics of wind and solar power compared to the growth required for global climate targets. Nat Energy 6, 742–754 (2021).
33. Wilson, C., Grubler, A., Bauer, N., Krey, V. & Riahi, K. Future capacity growth of energy technologies: are scenarios consistent with historical evidence? Climatic Change 118, 381–395 (2013).
34. Nemet, G. F. et al. Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 063003 (2018).
35. Hanna, R., Abdulla, A., Xu, Y. & Victor, D. G. Emergency deployment of direct air capture as a response to the climate crisis. Nature Communications 12, 368 (2021).
36. van Sluisveld, M. A. E. et al. Comparing future patterns of energy system change in 2°C scenarios with historically observed rates of change. Global Environmental Change 35, 436–449 (2015).
37. Napp, T. et al. Exploring the Feasibility of Low-Carbon Scenarios Using Historical Energy Transitions Analysis. Energies 10, 116 (2017).
38. Iyer, G. et al. Diffusion of low-carbon technologies and the feasibility of long-term climate targets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 90, 103–118 (2015).
39. Jewell, J., Vinichenko, V., Nacke, L. & Cherp, A. Prospects for powering past coal. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 592–597 (2019).
40. Vinichenko, V., Cherp, A. & Jewell, J. Historical precedents and feasibility of rapid coal and gas decline required for the 1.5°C target. One Earth 4, 1477–1490 (2021).
41. Vartiainen, E. et al. True Cost of Solar Hydrogen. Solar RRL 2100487 (2021) doi:10.1002/solr.202100487.
42. IEA. Hydrogen Projects Database. (2021).
43. Luderer, G. et al. Impact of declining renewable energy costs on electrification in low-emission scenarios. Nat Energy 1–11 (2021) doi:10.1038/s41560-021-00937-z.
44. Creutzig, F. et al. The underestimated potential of solar energy to mitigate climate change. Nature Energy 2, 1–9 (2017).
45. Bogdanov, D. et al. Low-cost renewable electricity as the key driver of the global energy transition towards sustainability. Energy 227, 120467 (2021).
46. Luderer, G. et al. Assessment of wind and solar power in global low-carbon energy scenarios: An introduction. Energy Economics 64, 542–551 (2017).
47. Nemet, G. F. How Solar Energy Became Cheap: A Model for Low-Carbon Innovation. (Routledge, 2019). doi:10.4324/9780367136604.
48. Wiser, R. et al. Expert elicitation survey predicts 37% to 49% declines in wind energy costs by 2050. Nat Energy 6, 555–565 (2021).
49. Nemet, G. F., Zipperer, V. & Kraus, M. The valley of death, the technology pork barrel, and public support for large demonstration projects. Energy Policy 119, 154–167 (2018).
50. Bento, N., Wilson, C. & Anadon, L. D. Time to get ready: Conceptualizing the temporal and spatial dynamics of formative phases for energy technologies. Energy Policy 119, 282–293 (2018).
51. Arthur, W. B. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. (University of Michigan Press, 1994).
52. McDonald, A. & Schrattenholzer, L. Learning rates for energy technologies. Energy Policy 29, 255–261 (2001).
53. Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition. (Free Press, 2003).
54. Lambert, M. EU Hydrogen Strategy - A case for urgent action towards implementation. https://www.oxfordenergy.org/publications/eu-hydrogen-strategy-a-case-for-urgent-action-towards-implementation/ (2020).
55. Trancik, J. E. Renewable energy: Back the renewables boom. Nature 507, 300–302 (2014).
56. Chan, G., Goldstein, A. P., Bin-Nun, A., Diaz Anadon, L. & Narayanamurti, V. Six principles for energy innovation. Nature 552, 25–27 (2017).
57. Wilson, C. et al. Granular technologies to accelerate decarbonization. Science 368, 36–39 (2020).
58. Brändle, G., Schönfisch, M. & Schulte, S. Estimating long-term global supply costs for low-carbon hydrogen. Applied Energy 302, 117481 (2021).
59. Meng, J., Way, R., Verdolini, E. & Anadon, L. D. Comparing expert elicitation and model-based probabilistic technology cost forecasts for the energy transition. PNAS 118, (2021).
60. Trancik, J. E. Testing and improving technology forecasts for better climate policy. PNAS 118, (2021).
61. IEA. Renewables 2021. https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2021 (2021).
62. IEA. World Energy Outlook 2021. (2021).
63. Quarton, C. J. et al. The curious case of the conflicting roles of hydrogen in global energy scenarios. Sustainable Energy Fuels 4, 80–95 (2019).
64. Mowery, D. & Rosenberg, N. The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies. Research Policy 8, 102–153 (1979).
65. Nemet, G. F. Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change. Research Policy 38, 700–709 (2009).
66. BP. Statistical Review of World Energy 2021. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/energy-economics/statistical-review-of-world-energy.html (2021).
67. Rypdal, K. Empirical growth models for the renewable energy sector. in Advances in Geosciences vol. 45 35–44 (Copernicus GmbH, 2018).
68. Aguirre, M. & Ibikunle, G. Determinants of renewable energy growth: A global sample analysis. Energy Policy 69, 374–384 (2014).
69. Hosseini, S. E. An outlook on the global development of renewable and sustainable energy at the time of COVID-19. Energy Research & Social Science 68, 101633 (2020).
70. Unruh, G. C. Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy 28, 817–830 (2000).
71. Hydrogen Council & McKinsey & Company. Hydrogen Insights: A Perspective on Hydrogen Investment, Deployment and Cost Competitiveness. (2021).
72. Mercure, J.-F. et al. Macroeconomic impact of stranded fossil fuel assets. Nature Climate Change 8, 588–593 (2018).
73. Fasihi, M., Bogdanov, D. & Breyer, C. Long-Term Hydrocarbon Trade Options for the Maghreb Region and Europe—Renewable Energy Based Synthetic Fuels for a Net Zero Emissions World. Sustainability 9, 306 (2017).
74. Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M. & Bürer, M. J. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 35, 2683–2691 (2007).
75. Batel, S. Research on the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies: Past, present and future. Energy Research & Social Science 68, 101544 (2020).
76. Schlund, D., Schulte, S. & Sprenger, T. The who’s who of a hydrogen market ramp-up: A stakeholder analysis for Germany. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 154, 111810 (2022).
77. Biggins, F., Kataria, M., Roberts, D. & Brown, D. S. Green hydrogen investments: Investigating the option to wait. Energy 241, 122842 (2022).
78. Anadón, L. D., Baker, E. & Bosetti, V. Integrating uncertainty into public energy research and development decisions. Nat Energy 2, 1–14 (2017).
79. IEA. The Future of Hydrogen: Seizing today’s opportunities. (OECD, 2019). doi:10.1787/1e0514c4-en.
80. Fasihi, M., Bogdanov, D. & Breyer, C. Techno-Economic Assessment of Power-to-Liquids (PtL) Fuels Production and Global Trading Based on Hybrid PV-Wind Power Plants. Energy Procedia 99, 243–268 (2016).
81. Rodrigues, R. et al. Narrative-driven alternative roads to achieve mid-century CO2 net neutrality in Europe. Energy 239, 121908 (2022).
82. Everall, J. & Ueckerdt, F. Electrolyser CAPEX and efficiency data for: Potential and risks of hydrogen-based e-fuels in climate change mitigation. (2021) doi:10.5281/zenodo.4619892.
83. Modley, R. Aviation facts and figures. (McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1945).
84. Fischer, G. J. A Statistical Summary of Shipbuilding Under the US Maritime Commission During World War II. (US Government Printing Office, 1949).
85. Norris, R. S. & Kristensen, H. M. Global nuclear weapons inventories, 1945–2010. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 66, 77–83 (2010).
86. Internet Systems Consortium. Internet Domain Survey. https://www.isc.org/survey/ (2019).
87. International union of railways. High speed lines in the world. https://uic.org/passenger/highspeed/article/high-speed-database-maps (2021).
88. EIA. U.S. Shale Production. (2021).
89. statista. Global smartphone shipments from 2007 to 2020, by vendor. https://www.statista.com/statistics/271539/worldwide-shipments-of-leading-smartphone-vendors-since-2007/ (2021).
90. Kenney, M. & Pon, B. Structuring the Smartphone Industry: Is the Mobile Internet OS Platform the Key? J Ind Compet Trade 11, 239–261 (2011).
91. statista. Number of e-bikes sold in Europe from 2009 to 2019. (2021).
92. Zweirad-Industrie-Verband (ZIV). Zahlen, Daten, Fakten zum Fahrradmarkt in Deutschland 2020. (2021).
93. Mathieu, E. et al. A global database of COVID-19 vaccinations. Nat Hum Behav 5, 947–953 (2021).