Effect of plasma treatment
Plasma treatment can modify surface topography, increase surface energy and introduce functional groups on PA fibre.23 and thus promote better adhesion and accessibility of biological molecules from ink and substrate solution towards fibre. Effects of such modification are dependent on several parameters of plasma treatment, such as type and amount of gas used, electric power used to energize the gasses, distance between electrodes and fabric feed speed. Among these parameters, the used gas is the main factor determining which functional group would be introduced on the PA surface. Oxygen and nitrogen are common reactive gasses used for this purpose.24 Hence, the effects of these two gasses on PA fabric to influence adhesion and activity of printed tyrosinase were studied by keeping other plasma parameters constant. Treated fabrics were characterized qualitatively by SEM and quantitatively by XPS and WCA analyses.
SEM images (Figure 1) confirmed the change of morphology and increased roughness of PA surface, as expected after plasma treatment.24 Compared to the smoother surface on untreated samples, micro-etched areas were visible on all treated samples due to the bombardment of gaseous ions by the plasma process. However, it was not possible to conclusively differentiate such effects brought about by various gasses from SEM figures. Nevertheless, the achieved effects indicated improvement of fabric wettability for better ink absorption and increased surface area for higher sites available for enzyme adsorption.
Table 1: Surface elements of variously pretreated polyamide-6,6 fabrics
|
Untreated
|
Plasma treated with
|
|
|
oxygen
|
nitrogen
|
oxygen + nitrogen
|
C %
|
75.7
|
70.5
|
69.7
|
68.9
|
O %
|
15.4
|
20.8
|
17.8
|
21.4
|
N %
|
7.8
|
8.5
|
12.3
|
9.6
|
O/C ratio
|
0.203
|
0.295
|
0.255
|
0.311
|
N/C ratio
|
0.103
|
0.121
|
0.177
|
0.139
|
XPS was used to identify molecular elements (Table 1) and functional groups present on the PA surface. As expected, C, O, N was found as major constituents of untreated and plasma-treated fabric. For all plasma treated samples, atomic% of C reduced and atomic% of both O and N increased. Oxygen and combined gas treated fabrics had significantly higher O% (~5.5%) and nitrogen gas treated had higher N% (~4.5%). The ratio of O/C and N/C values reflected a similar trend. In term of binding energy, peaks for C-C chain and amido nitrogen [–C–NH(C=O)–] was observed at 284.8 eV and 287.6 eV, respectively, on untreated samples. The peak intensity of amido carbonyls (C=O) was increased for oxygen plasma (~6.5%) at 286.6 eV and nitrogen-containing plasmas (~12%) at 288 eV. Such an increase confirmed successful oxidation on the PA surface caused by plasma. Further, a newly formed C-OH functional group appeared on nitrogen-containing plasma samples with 14-17.5% higher peak intensity at 285.9 eV. Similar results were found in previous works15-17,25 and ensured the formation of carboxylic species in hydrocarbon or carbonyl groups of plasma-treated PA fabrics of this study.
Table 2: Water contact angle of variously pretreated polyamide fabrics
|
Untreated
|
Plasma-treated with
|
|
|
oxygen
|
nitrogen
|
oxygen + nitrogen
|
Water contact angle (°)
|
84 ±5
|
50 ±4
|
51 ±4
|
59 ±3
|
WCA of all plasma treated fabrics was reduced by about 30° compared to untreated fabric (Table 2) due to the introduction of micro-etched areas, increase of surface energy and introduction of functional groups 16,17. However, no significant difference in WCA was found between treatments with different gasses. To enhance the effects of each applied gas, other parameters of treatment (e.g. amount of feed gas, electric power) need to be optimized. Nominal reduction of tensile strength values (1-2%) was observed after plasma treatment as this process is known to be less detrimental for the bulk properties of the fibre.23,26,27
Ink formulation
Formulating an ink containing enzyme needs careful optimization of ionic and rheological properties, along with printhead parameters as demonstrated in our previous work.22 Ionic profiles help an enzyme to maintain an active state, viscosity and surface tension ensures proper drop formation and ink spreading on fabric and suitable printhead adjustment helps ink flow for drop ejection. Among other ink constituents, viscosity modifiers take a large part (30-50%) and can highly influence activity values compared to an enzyme in buffer solution only.22 Common viscosity modifiers for piezoelectric inkjet printing systems include glycerol, CMC, PEG and PVA. However, the effects of these on tyrosinase activity when used as ink formulations were not well explored. Therefore, four ink combinations were evaluated in this study to understand the effects of these modifies on tyrosinase activity (Table 3).
Table 3: Activity of tyrosinase (1 mg.ml-1) in buffer and ink solutions with various viscosity modifiers
|
Buffer
|
Glycerol
|
CMC
|
PEG
|
PVA
|
Activity (Units.ml-1)
|
958±38
|
103±16
|
654±20
|
178±35
|
745±36
|
Tyrosinase activity of inks made with PVA (78%) and CMC (68%) showed markedly higher values than inks containing PEG (19%) and glycerol (11%) when compared to activity in the buffer. In general, the addition of large polymers in an ink solution would increase viscosity and limit molecular redistribution ability. This often causes macromolecular overcrowding, thus leading to a limited diffusion rate and reduced enzyme activity.28 CMC and PVA can provide certain stability and protection to tyrosinase against such reduction. CMC has been found to ensure the structural stability of tyrosinase to heat and storage.3 PVA has been described to create a hydrophobic layer around the enzyme and thus, protection against invasive polymerization.8 Any such protection has not been observed to offer by glycerol and PEG.8,29
UV-visible spectroscopy of tyrosinase in buffer and prepared ink solution exhibited a broad band of absorbance around 300-320 nm (Figure 2). Tyrosinase absorbance peak around this wavelength range has been observed in previous studies due to the presence of tyrosine, phenylalanine, tryptophan and histidine residues.30-32 However, absorbance intensity was significantly different between prepared inks. Glycerol and PEG containing ink had lower intensity and indicated unwanted interaction between enzyme and solvent.8,29 Intensity of CMC and PVA containing inks were close to that of buffer, suggesting well preservation of protein structure residues of enzyme. Additionally, this ensured uniformity and well dispersion of ink composing materials to avoid printhead nozzle blocking.
Suitable ink viscosity to print through a piezoelectric printhead can vary between 5-20 mPa.s, depending on the system requirements.21 An enzyme would be expected to perform efficiently over such a viscosity range. However, there was a lack of studies regarding the effect of viscosity variation on tyrosinase activity concerning CMC and PVA modifiers during printing or similar mechanical processing. Therefore, four inks were printed in this study for each of the modifiers over a range of viscosity and keeping the protein concentration constant (Figure 3a). For both modifiers, a slight reduction of activity (maximum ~10%) was observed with increased viscosity. As already mentioned, this might have been caused by diffusion limitation of enzymes with increased modifier amount. Over the same viscosity value, these two groups of inks showed no significant difference in the activity. Unlike other enzymes22, no initial increase of activity was seen due to the addition of CMC or PVA. These results suggested that both of the modifiers could be used for printing tyrosinase over the general viscosity range of industrial printheads.
It was important to find a linear range of activity over enzyme concentration for these two modifiers. This would help to define the initial velocity and substrate saturation ability of prepared inks. Thus, two groups of inks with both modifiers were tested in this study covering a range of protein concentrations (0.1 – 2.0 mg.ml-1) with a negligible change of viscosity. Results showed (Figure 3b) that PVA containing inks were able to maintain linear activity until 1 mg.ml-1 of enzyme protein concentration. Although, CMC containing inks maintained a linear relationship until the highest used concentration (2 mg.ml-1). Such difference between the two modifiers might be related to their molecular weight and resulted in protein overcrowding.33 In general, it could be concluded that CMC based inks would ensure more reasonable activity readings at comparatively higher protein concentrations which might occur on fabric after drying of printed ink.
Printability and ink stability
Theoretical printability of both CMC and PVA based inks were evaluated through limiting values of a few dimensionless characteristics numbers i.e. Webers number (We) and inverse Ohnesorge number (Z). These numbers were calculated from density and surface tension of the ink, along with velocity and characteristics length of the printhead as explained in literature.34 Found numbers (Z = 2.8 - 3.7, We = 10.4 – 11.6) were well within the range for efficient inkjetting process (1< Z <10; We > 4).35 These theoretical values ensured that during the printing process inks would overcome the influence of the air-fluid interface that is necessary for drop formation. Furthermore, continuous ejection through printhead nozzles would take place without the formation of satellite drops.
Initially, CMC and PVA based inks were printed and collected on a glass plate to check the effects printhead actuation mechanism on tyrosinase activity. CMC based ink retained higher activity (69%) than PVA based ink (52%) when compared to respective activity before printing. As observed for piezoelectric printing of other proteins,27,36 such reduction of activity could be caused by shear stress generated inside printhead during drop ejection to influence tyrosinase protein structure. Activity difference between CMC and PVA based inks might be related to the solvent composition which can interfere with the electrostatic forces governing protein conformation.37 CMC has been suggested to provide a hydrophilic microenvironment to minimize such modification and ensure better protection to tyrosine active structure.33,38 Additionally, PVA based ink was more challenging to print with a lower amount collected on a glass plate and requiring frequent purging of the printhead. Therefore, CMC based ink was selected to further investigate and printed on plasma-treated fabrics.
The stability of ink should be ensured during the printing operation and storage period. Stability could be affected by variation of ionic profiles, rheology, temperature and interaction between ink constituents. As presented in Figure 4, prepared CMC based ink showed significantly stable viscosity of 7.5 - 9.2 mPa·s and 8.2 - 9.2 mPa·s over a range of probable printhead temperatures (20 - 40 °C) and shear rate (100 - 10 000 s-1), respectively. An ink with Newtonian behavior is expected to be suitable for most of the recent piezoelectric printheads.21 Local variation of viscosity due to inkjetting force and heat development inside the printhead would be less probable for such an ink. Therefore, even fluid flow and efficient drop ejection were likely to result from the prepared CMC based ink.
The prepared ink was stored for five days at 4° C and stability to several variables were tested (Figure 5). UV-visible absorbance at 320 nm ranged 2.16 - 2.25 (arbitrary unit) over the storage period, indicating good compatibility among ink materials and less likelihood of unwanted interference. Surface tension was maintained between 30 - 33 mN.m-1, confirming well dispersion of ink particles and avoidance of adsorption on the surface of the ink bottle, tubing or printhead inner surfaces. Rapid change of viscosity that could indicate particle aggregation was unlikely as it was stable around 7.5 - 8.5 mPa.s. Additionally, the pH value of ink during storage was stable and ensured proper maintenance of enzyme protein structure.
Tyrosinase activity
Activity found on printed fabrics were significantly lower (33 – 60%) than the activity of ink solution (Figure 6-i). Such a reduction might have been resulted by a change of enzyme-substrate interaction from a macro (ink) to microenvironment (fabric) and corresponding issues of diffusion. Additionally, activity reduction could be influenced by various immobilization phenomenon subjected to the enzyme e.g. change of protein structure and interaction with fiber matrix.3,4 After an activity assay, fabric samples were removed from the cuvette and subjected to a second assay cuvette to check reusability. A maximum of only 12% activity (nitrogen plasma treated) was observed among all samples during reuse. Further, freshly printed fabrics were dried and rinsed in buffer solution for several cycles to release any loosely adsorbed enzyme proteins. After the sixth rinsing cycle (Figure 6-ii), protein release became negligible and then the samples were subjected for activity assay. Surprisingly, fully rinsed fabrics showed higher activity (max. 34%) than reused ones. Few studies found similar or even higher activity after immobilization and reuse of tyrosinase.6,7,13,14 However, most of those studies used uncontrolled and lengthy dipping or incubation based methods of enzyme deposition, on contrary to the controlled and rapid approach of inkjet printing. Hence, it is difficult to compare the findings of this study with literature, nonetheless, it can be regarded as satisfactory for pioneering inkjet printing of tyrosinase on plasma-treated PA fabric.
Found tyrosinase activity among printed fabrics were dependent on received pretreatment (Figure 6-i). Untreated fabrics retained higher activity after printing but were lost almost entirely upon the reuse and rinsing process. Plasma treated fabrics retained similarly low activity (9-12%) upon reuse irrespective of the used gasses. After the rinsing process, nitrogen gas treated fabrics showed significantly higher activity (34%) than the other two treatments (20-26%). Though, before the rinsing process, nitrogen gas treated fabrics had lower activity (40%) than the other two groups (49-59%). Such activity variations were regulated by the nature and stability of enzyme adsorption on fabric surface which was further reflected through the release of printed enzymes upon rinsing (Figure 6-ii). After the first rinsing cycle, protein release was significantly lower for plasma treated fabrics (15-25 µg.ml-1) than untreated ones (~85 µg.ml-1). This meant that most enzymes from untreated fabrics were reacting at a homogeneous state with substrate solution and showed higher activity than plasma treated fabrics. It explained low activity values upon reuse as many proteins were already released. Additionally, product contamination from the first cuvette might have influenced the reuse assay. Although the released enzymes were in the same state of ink during catalysis, their activity could not reach the same level due to possible compromise of protein structure that occurred during adsorption-desorption processes.39
Enzyme released after fourth rinse cycle became negligible and enzymes remained on fabric surface after sixth rinse cycle could be considered as strongly adsorbed. Lower activity from this group of fabrics could simply attribute to less amount of available enzymes. Additionally, these enzymes were reacting solely in a heterogeneous state and could show reduced activity due to a changed orientation of active sites towards fiber rather than substrates.39 Plasma treated fabrics could facilitate better adsorption of enzymes due to increased surface roughness and specific area, alongside, probable hydrophilic and ionic interaction.40 SEM images showed the creation of micro-etched areas (Figure 1) and XPS results (Table 1) confirmed increment of oxygen and nitrogen species after respective plasma process, along with the introduction of hydroxyl and carboxyl groups. Nitrogen gas containing treatments showed relatively higher activity which might have been aided by better adsorption kinetics between plasma-enhanced amide groups on fabric24 and amino groups on enzyme protein molecules.41
Effect of pH and temperature
The effectiveness of tyrosinase printed fabric could be demonstrated by safeguarding an optimum pH and temperature. Enzyme adsorption on a solid surface, substrate affinity and activity are often regulated by surrounding pH and temperature. The value of pH can influence the net surface charge of these amphoteric protein molecules and active conformation. Higher temperature increases the reaction rate, however until a limit before starting to bring irreversible conformational changes i.e. denaturation. Therefore, the effect of these two variables was studied on nitrogen plasma treated PA fabric printed with tyrosinase and after rinsing the same for six cycles. Fabric samples had significantly low activity than ink samples for most pH and temperature ranges (Figure 7). This might have resulted simply due to reduced protein amount on fabrics after the rinsing process as already discussed.
Ink solution had optimum activity around pH 6 (Figure 7a) and significantly lower activity at other pH values as expected for tyrosinase 42. This result indicated that the response to solution ionic properties of the enzyme was not altered by ink formulation constituents. The activity of printed enzymes that remained on fabric was optimum around pH 7 (~42%) and change of activity among pH values was less drastic compared to ink solution. A shift of optimum pH level towards the neutral region has been reported in the literature3,9,43 and this could indicate immobilization of enzymes on fabric surface through strong adsorption. Such a shift could be caused by the partitioning of hydrogen ions due to a charged microenvironment at the fabric surface and resulting localized pH 44. Measured values by a pH meter would represent the pH of assay solution, however, the activity of printed enzymes was influenced by pH near protein active sites immobilized in fabric. Negative ions induced by nitrogen-based plasma on fabric could cause an apparent shift i.e. pH 6 near printed enzymes that was read as pH 7 from assay solution. Indeed, it demonstrated that printed enzymes could be protected at higher pH compared to ink solution3,43, along with less activity variation over several pH values for fabric samples.
The highest activity of tyrosinase in ink form was found at assay temperature of 30°C and then reduced significantly with increased temperature, reaching as low as 14% at 60°C (Figure 7b). Comparatively, variation of activity for printed enzymes was less drastic from the near room (~29%) to the respective optimum temperature of 40°C (~46%). At the highest assay temperature, printed enzymes held 21% activity, which was better than ink activity under same condition. Similar to the outcomes from pH-variation experiments, a shift of optimum temperature could indicate immobilization of printed enzymes and related changes in chemical and physical properties brought about by fabric microenvironment as observed in previous studies.3,9,45 Immobilization of an enzyme on a fibrous matrix can reduce its conformational mobility and preserve tertiary structure even at elevated temperatures.46 The structure of enzymes in ink form probably started to destabilize around 40°C, however, remained relatively stable in fabric. Thus, inkjet-printed tyrosinase would be less susceptible to pH and temperature conditions compared to its use in free solution form.
Kinetic studies
The kinetic constants (Vmax and Km) were calculated over a range of substrate concentrations for tyrosinase in ink solution and printed on nitrogen plasma treated PA fabric (rinsed). Both of the constants were reduced significantly for fabric samples (Table 4). In general, kinetic parameters change upon immobilization on porous fabric like support due to diffusional limitation of substrates, steric hindrance towards the active site and lack of protein conformation flexibility.39 Vmax was expected to reduce due to such immobilization effect, in addition to the fact that there was less amount of enzyme available on fabric after the rinsing process. A reduced Km meant higher affinity between enzyme and substrate and thus, another reason for lower Vmax resulted from fabric samples. Km could be apparently reduced due to partitioning of charged molecules at fabric microenvironment. Under the kinetics assay conditions, the concentration of a positively changed substrate at low ionic strength (50 mM) could appear to be higher near active site of printed enzyme than the same on bulk form i.e. ink solution. Therefore, a lower substrate concentration would be sufficient to half-saturate printed enzymes compared to enzymes present in ink solution and thus, apparently reducing the kinetic constants.44 Similar results have been reported by other studies on tyrosinase immobilization13,43,45, however none related to printing technology.
Table 4: Kinetic parameters of tyrosinase in free-form (ink) and after printing-rinsing process (fabric)
Enzyme in
|
Vmax (Units mg-1 protein)
|
Km (mM)
|
Ink solution
|
1546
|
1.444
|
Fabric
|
408
|
0.808
|
Storage Stability
Enzymes may undergo irreversible changes in protein structure depending on storage condition and duration. This would lead to compromised activity and challenge for practical applications. Generally, immobilizing enzymes in fabric like solid support could enhance the activity period.2 Stability of tyrosinase activity in ink solution and printed on nitrogen plasma treated PA fabric (rinsed) were evaluated during storage at 4°C for sixty days (Figure 8). All samples showed a gradual reduction of activity, however to different extents. The initial activity of ink samples was reduced to about half within five days of storage, while it took 26 days for fabric samples to reach the same level. After forty days, ink samples lost almost all activity, whereas fabrics retained 41% of initial activity. At the end of sixty days storage period, fabrics still retained almost one-third of activity. A less drastic reduction for fabric samples could be attributed to adsorption mediated stabilization of tyrosinase protein structure compared to its free form in ink solution.47 Other studies on tyrosinase immobilization have reported widely varied yield and duration of storage stability depending on the applied method and nature of attachment.3,4,13,33 In general comparison, the results of this study could be further improved to attain a similar level of stability.