1. Liu L, Oza S, Hogan D, et al. Global, regional, and national causes of under-5 mortality in 2000-15: an updated systematic analysis with implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lancet. Dec 17 2016;388(10063):3027-3035. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31593-8
2. Marlow N, Bennett C, Draper ES, Hennessy EM, Morgan AS, Costeloe KL. Perinatal outcomes for extremely preterm babies in relation to place of birth in England: the EPICure 2 study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. May 2014;99(3):F181-8. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2013-305555
3. NHS England. Saving Babies’ Lives Version Two. A care bundle for reducing perinatal mortality. Accessed 08/09/2019, 2019. https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/saving-babies-lives-care-bundle-version-two-v5.pdf
4. World Health Organisation. Born Too Soon. The Global Action Report on Preterm Birth. WHO. Accessed 10/11/19, 2019. https://www.who.int/pmnch/media/news/2012/201204_borntoosoon-report.pdf
5. Romero R, Espinoza J, Kusanovic JP, et al. The preterm parturition syndrome. BJOG. Dec 2006;113 Suppl 3:17-42. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01120.x
6. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Preterm Labour and Birth. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2015. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng25/resources/preterm-labour-and-birth-pdf-18373335766457.
7. Esplin MS, Elovitz MA, Iams JD, et al. Predictive Accuracy of Serial Transvaginal Cervical Lengths and Quantitative Vaginal Fetal Fibronectin Levels for Spontaneous Preterm Birth Among Nulliparous Women. JAMA. Mar 14 2017;317(10):1047-1056. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.1373
8. Jwala S, Tran TL, Terenna C, et al. Evaluation of additive effect of quantitative fetal fibronectin to cervical length for prediction of spontaneous preterm birth among asymptomatic low-risk women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. Aug 2016;95(8):948-55. doi:10.1111/aogs.12907
9. Brown BH, Tidy JA, Boston K, Blackett AD, Smallwood RH, Sharp F. Relation between tissue structure and imposed electrical current flow in cervical neoplasia. Lancet. 2000;355(9207):892-5.
10. Tidy JA, Brown BH, Healey TJ, et al. Accuracy of detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia using electrical impedance spectroscopy with colposcopy. BJOG. 2013;120(4):400-10; discussion 410-1. doi:10.1111/1471- 0528.12096
11. Murdoch C, Brown BH, Hearnden V, et al. Use of electrical impedance spectroscopy to detect malignant and potentially malignant oral lesions. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:4521-32. doi:10.2147/ijn.s64087
12. Braun RP, Mangana J, Goldinger S, French L, Dummer R, Marghoob AA. Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy in Skin Cancer Diagnosis. Dermatol Clin. Oct 2017;35(4):489-493. doi:10.1016/j.det.2017.06.009
13. Anumba DOC, Stern V, Healey JT, Dixon S, Brown BH. Value of cervical electrical impedance spectroscopy to predict spontaneous preterm delivery in asymptomatic women: the ECCLIPPx prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;58(2):293-302. doi: 10.1002/uog.22180.
14. Stern V, Anumba D. Potential incorporation of novel cervical impedance spectroscopy assessment into existing clinical algorithms for predicting preterm birth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;256:523-524. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.019
15. Cicero S, Skentou C, Souka A, To MS, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 22-24 weeks of gestation: comparison of transvaginal and transperineal-translabial ultrasonography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2001;17(4):335-40. doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.2001.00345.x
16. Heath VC, Southall TR, Souka AP, Novakov A, Nicolaides KH. Cervical length at 23 weeks of gestation: relation to demographic characteristics and previous obstetric history. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.1998;12(5):304-11. doi:10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.12050304.x
17. Clement S, Candy B, Heath V, To M, Nicolaides KH. Transvaginal ultrasound in pregnancy: its acceptability to women and maternal psychological morbidity. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22(5):508-14. doi:10.1002/uog.893
18. Carlisle N, Carter J, Radford S, Shennan A. Women's experiences of tests and procedures carried out at a preterm birth surveillance clinic. Br J Midwifery. Jan 2018;26(1):31-34. doi:10.12968/bjom.2018.26.1.31
19. Romero ST, Holmgren CC, Feltovich H, Porter TF, Esplin MS. Cervical length screening: a randomized trial assessing the impact on visit length and patient attitudes. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33(12):2159-63. doi:10.7863/ultra.33.12.2159
20. Shennan A, Jones G, Hawken J, et al. Fetal fibronectin test predicts delivery before 30 weeks of gestation in high risk women, but increases anxiety. BJOG. 2005;112(3):293-8. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00420.x
21. Carlisle N, Watson HA, Seed PT, et al. Impact of a medical mobile phone app (QUiPP) for predicting preterm birth on the anxiety and decisional conflicts faced by women in threatened preterm labour. Midwifery. 2021;92 doi:10.1016/j.midw.2020.10286422
22. O'Brien ET, Quenby S, Lavender T. Women's views of high risk pregnancy under threat of preterm birth. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2010;1(3):79-84. doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2010.05.001
23. Carter J, Tribe RM, Shennan AH, Sandall J. Threatened preterm labour: Women's experiences of risk and care management: A qualitative study. Midwifery. 2018;64:85-92. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2018.06.001
24. Peterson WE, Sprague AE, Reszel J, et al. Women's perspectives of the fetal fibronectin testing process: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:190. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-14-190
25. Carlisle N, Watson HA, Kuhrt K, et al. Ten women’s decision-making experiences in threatened preterm labour: Qualitative findings from the EQUIPTT trial. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2021/09/01/ 2021;29:100611. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100611
26. White H, Morton VH, Stock SJ, Lavender T. Preterm labour decision-making and experiences of care for women and clinicians (QUIDS Qualitative): A qualitative exploration. Sex Reprod Healthc. 2019 Oct;21:95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2019.06.005.
27. O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ. Sep 17 2010;341:c4587. doi:10.1136/bmj.c4587
28. Bryman A. Mixed methods research: combining quantitative and qualitative research. Social Research Methods. 5th ed. Oxford University Press; 2016.
29. Marteau TM, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol. Sep 1992;31 ( Pt 3):301-6.
30. Bayrampour H, McDonald S, Fung T, Tough S. Reliability and validity of three shortened versions of the State Anxiety Inventory scale during the perinatal period. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2014 Sep;35(3):101-7. doi: 10.3109/0167482X.2014.950218.
31. Lilliecreutz C, Larén J, Sydsjö G, Josefsson A. Effect of maternal stress during pregnancy on the risk for preterm birth. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jan 15;16:5. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0775-x.
32. Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain. Aug 1987;30(2):191-7. doi:10.1016/0304-3959(87)91074-8
33. Gallagher EJ, Bijur PE, Latimer C, Silver W. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2002 Jul;20(4):287-90. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2002.33778.
34. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543.
35. Luria RE. The validity and reliability of the visual analogue mood scale. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Apr;12(1):51-7. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90020-5.
36. Aitken RC. Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc R Soc Med. 1969;62(10):989-993.
37. Bijlenga D, Birnie E, Bonsel GJ. Feasibility, reliability, and validity of three health-state valuation methods using multiple-outcome vignettes on moderate-risk pregnancy at term. Value Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;12(5):821-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00503.x.
38. Morgan DL. Pragmatism as a Paradigm for Social Research. Qualitative Inquiry. 2014-02-03 2014;20:1045–53. doi:10.1177_1077800413513733
39. Kaushik V, Walsh CA. Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm and Its Implications for Social Work Research. Social Sciences. 2019-09-06 2019;8(9):255.doi:10.3390/socsci8090255
40. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77-101.
41. Farmer T, Robinson K, Elliott SJ, Eyles J. Developing and Implementing a Triangulation Protocol for Qualitative Health Research: Qual Health Res.2016;16(3):377-94. doi:10.1177_1049732305285708
42. Julian LJ. Measures of anxiety: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63 Suppl 11:S467-72. doi:10.1002/acr.20561