1. Bhuiyan MSA, Kim HJ, Lee DH, Lee SH, Cho SH, Yang BS, et al. Genetic parameters
of carcass and meat quality traits in different muscles (Longissimus dorsi and semimembranosus)
of Hanwoo (Korean cattle). J Anim Sci. 2017;95:3359–69.
2. Mateescu RG, Garrick DJ, Reecy JM. Network analysis reveals putative genes affecting
meat quality in Angus cattle. Front Genet. 2017;8.
3. Leal-Gutiérrez JD, Elzo M, Johnson D, Mateescu R. Genome-wide association and gene
enrichment analyses of meat tenderness in an Angus-Brahman cattle population. 11th
World Congr Genet Appl to Livest Prod. Auckland, New Zealand; 2018.
5. McClure MC, Ramey HR, Rolf MM, McKay SD, Decker JE, Chapple RH, et al. Genome-wide
association analysis for quantitative trait loci influencing Warner-Bratzler shear
force in five taurine cattle breeds. Anim Genet. 2012;43:662–73.
6. Chen Y, Lun ATL, Smyth GK. From reads to genes to pathways: differential expression
analysis of RNA-Seq experiments using Rsubread and the edgeR quasi-likelihood pipeline.
F1000Research [Internet]. 2016;5:1438. Available from: http://f1000research.com/articles/5-1438/v2
7. Simielli Fonseca LF, Jovino Gimenez DF, dos Santos Silva DB, Barthelson R, Baldi
F, Aparecido Ferro J, et al. Differences in global gene expression in muscle tissue
of Nellore cattle with divergent meat tenderness. BMC Genomics. BMC Genomics; 2017;18:1–12.
8. Seo M, Kim K, Yoon J, Jeong JY, Lee HJ, Cho S, et al. RNA-seq analysis for detecting
quantitative trait-associated genes. Sci Rep [Internet]. Nature Publishing Group;
2016;6:1–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep24375
9. Song J, Tan H, Perry AJ, Akutsu T, Webb GI, Whisstock JC, et al. PROSPER: An Integrated
Feature-Based Tool for Predicting Protease Substrate Cleavage Sites. PLoS One. 2012;7.
10. Bang ML, Li X, Littlefield R, Bremner S, Thor A, Knowlton KU, et al. Nebulin-deficient
mice exhibit shorter thin filament lengths and reduced contractile function in skeletal
muscle. J Cell Biol. 2006;173:905–16.
11. Ménétrey J, Perderiset M, Cicolari J, Dubois T, Elkhatib N, Khadali F El, et al.
Structural basis for ARF1-mediated recruitment of ARHGAP21 to Golgi membranes. EMBO
J. 2007;26:1953–62.
12. Azzato EM, Pharoah PDP, Harrington P, Easton DF, Greenberg D, Caporaso NE, et
al. A genome-wide association study of prognosis in breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol
Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:1140–3.
13. Sanchez Bassères D, Vedelago Tizzei E, Duarte AAS, Ferreira Costa F, Olalla Saad
ST. ARHGAP10, a novel human gene coding for a potentially cytoskeletal Rho-GTPase
activating protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;294:579–85.
14. Barcellos KSA, Bigarella CL, Wagner M V., Vieira KP, Lazarini M, Langford PR,
et al. ARHGAP21 protein, a new partner of α-tubulin involved in cell-cell adhesion
formation and essential for epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:2179–89.
15. Zhang S, Sui L, Zhuang J, He S, Song Y, Ye Y, et al. ARHGAP24 regulates cell ability
and apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells via the regulation of P53. Oncol Lett. 2018;16:3517–24.
16. Teng JP, Yang ZY, Zhu YM, Ni D, Zhu ZJ, Li XQ. The roles of ARHGAP10 in the proliferation,
migration and invasion of lung cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 2017;14:4613–8.
17. Batrakou DG, De Las Heras JI, Czapiewski R, Mouras R, Schirmer EC. TMEM120A and
B: Nuclear envelope transmembrane proteins important for adipocyte differentiation.
PLoS One [Internet]. 2015;10:1–21. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127712
18. Farnier C, Krief S, Blache M, Diot-Dupuy F, Mory G, Ferre P, et al. Adipocyte
functions are modulated by cell size change: Potential involvement of an integrin/ERK
signalling pathway. Int J Obes. 2003;27:1178–86.
21. Patwari P, Emilsson V, Schadt EE, Chutkow WA, Lee S, Marsili A, et al. The arrestin
domain-containing 3 protein regulates body mass and energy expenditure. Cell Metab
[Internet]. Elsevier Inc.; 2011;14:671–83. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2011.08.011
22. The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: The universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic
Acids Res. Oxford University Press; 2017;45:D158–69.
23. Xu L, Bickhart DM, Cole JB, Schroeder SG, Song J, Van Tassell CP, et al. Genomic
signatures reveal new evidences for selection of important traits in domestic cattle.
Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:711–25.
24. Ma J, Liu S, Zhang W, Zhang F, Wang S, Wu L, et al. High expression of NDRG3 associates
with positive lymph node metastasis and unfavourable overall survival in laryngeal
squamous cell carcinoma. Pathology. 2016;48:691–6.
25. Ren GF, Tang L, Yang AQ, Jiang WW, Huang YM. Prognostic impact of NDRG2 and NDRG3
in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Histol Histopathol.
2014;29:535–42.
26. Wang W, Li Y, Li Y, Hong A, Wang J, Lin B, et al. NDRG3 is an androgen regulated
and prostate enriched gene that promotes in vitro and in vivo prostate cancer cell
growth. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:521–30.
27. Kim A, Kim MJ, Yang Y, Kim JW, Yeom Y Il, Lim JS. Suppression of NF-κB activity
by NDRG2 expression attenuates the invasive potential of highly malignant tumor cells.
Carcinogenesis. 2009;30:927–36.
28. Colin E, Huynh Cong E, Mollet G, Guichet A, Gribouval O, Arrondel C, et al. Loss-of-function
mutations in WDR73 Are responsible for microcephaly and steroid-resistant nephrotic
syndrome: Galloway-mowat syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2014;95:637–48.
29. Gu Z, Zhang F, Wang ZQ, Ma W, Davis RE, Wang Z. The p44/wdr77-dependent cellular
proliferation process during lung development is reactivated in lung cancer. Oncogene.
2013;32:1888–900.
30. Miliara X, Garnett JA, Tatsuta T, Abid Ali F, Baldie H, Perez-Dorado I, et al.
Structural insight into the TRIAP1/PRELI-like domain family of mitochondrial phospholipid
transfer complexes. EMBO Rep [Internet]. 2015;16:824–35. Available from: http://embor.embopress.org/cgi/doi/10.15252/embr.201540229
33. Suzuki T, Kanai Y, Hara T, Sasaki J, Sasaki T, Kohara M, et al. Crucial Role of
the Small GTPase ARF6 in Hepatic Cord Formation during Liver Development. Mol Cell
Biol [Internet]. 2006;26:6149–56. Available from: http://mcb.asm.org/cgi/doi/10.1128/MCB.00298-06
34. Gomez T, Billadeau D. A FAM21-Containing WASH Complex Regulates Retromer- Dependent
Sorting. Dev Cell. 2009;17:699–711.
35. Jia D, Gomez TS, Metlagel Z, Umetani J, Otwinowski Z, Rosen MK, et al. WASH and
WAVE actin regulators of the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP) family are controlled
by analogous structurally related complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci [Internet]. 2010;107:10442–7.
Available from: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0913293107
36. Helfer E, Harbour ME, Henriot V, Lakisic G, Sousa-Blin C, Volceanov L, et al.
Endosomal recruitment of the WASH complex: Active sequences and mutations impairing
interaction with the retromer. Biol Cell. 2013;105:191–207.
37. Hu W-X, Ren W, He L-Q, Sheng R, Shi Y-W. Methylation of CpG islands was involved
in the down-regulation of DAZAP2 in multiple meyloma cells. Blood. 2007;110.
38. Hu W-X, Qu Q, Li J, Ren W. Hyper-Methylation DAZAP2 May Suppress Its Expression
in Specific Subtypes of Myeloma. Blood. 2009;114.
39. Krem MM, Salipante SJ, Wechsler JD, Horwitz MS. The role of KLHDC8B deficiency
in Hodgkin lymphoma pathogenesis. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28.
40. Krem MM, Salipante SJ, Horwitz MS. Mutations in a gene encoding a midbody protein
in binucleated Reed-Sternberg cells of Hodgkin lymphoma. Cell Cycle. 2010;9:670–5.
41. Braig S, Bosserhoff AK. Death inducer-obliterator 1 (Dido1) is a BMP target gene
and promotes BMP-induced melanoma progression. Oncogene [Internet]. Nature Publishing
Group; 2013;32:837–48. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2012.115
42. Liu Y, Kim H, Liang J, Lu W, Ouyang B, Liu D, et al. The death-inducer obliterator
1 (Dido1) gene regulates embryonic stem cell self-renewal. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:4778–86.
43. Buurman R, Sandbothe M, Schlegelberger B, Skawran B. HDAC inhibition activates
the apoptosome via Apaf1 upregulation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Med Res.
BioMed Central; 2016;21:1–6.
44. Long AB, Kaiser WJ, Mocarski ES, Caspary T. Apaf1 apoptotic function critically
limits Sonic hedgehog signaling during craniofacial development. Cell Death Differ
[Internet]. Nature Publishing Group; 2013;20:1510–20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2013.97
45. Long AB, Kaiser WJ, Mocarski ES, Caspary T. Apaf1 apoptotic function critically
limits Sonic hedgehog signaling during craniofacial development. Cell Death Differ.
Nature Publishing Group; 2013;20:1510–20.
46. Yong FL, Wang CW, Roslani AC, Law CW. The involvement of miR-23a/APAF1 regulation
axis in colorectal cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15:11713–29.
47. Ahn J, Oh SA, Suh Y, Moeller SJ, Lee K. Porcine G0/G1 switch gene 2 (G0S2) expression
is regulated during adipogenesis and short-term in-vivo nutritional interventions.
Lipids. 2013;48:209–18.
48. Zagani R, El-Assaad W, Gamache I, Teodoro JG. Inhibition of adipose triglyceride
lipase (ATGL) by the putative tumor suppressor G0S2 or a small molecule inhibitor
attenuates the growth of cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2015;6.
49. Ma T, Lopez-Aguiar AGN, Li A, Lu Y, Sekula D, Nattie EE, et al. Mice lacking G0S2
are lean and cold-tolerant. Cancer Biol Ther. 2014;15:643–50.
50. El-Assaad W, El-Kouhen K, Mohammad AH, Yang J, Morita M, Gamache I, et al. Deletion
of the gene encoding G0/G1 switch protein 2 (G0s2) alleviates high-fat-diet-induced
weight gain and insulin resistance, and promotes browning of white adipose tissue
in mice. Diabetologia. 2015;58:149–57.
51. Kusakabe M, Watanabe K, Emoto N, Aki N, Kage H, Nagase T, et al. Impact of DNA
demethylation of the G0S2 gene on the transcription of G0S2 in squamous lung cancer
cell lines with or without nuclear receptor agonists. Biochem Biophys Res Commun.
Elsevier Inc.; 2009;390:1283–7.
52. Micheli L, Leonardi L, Conti F, Maresca G, Colazingari S, Mattei E, et al. PC4/Tis7/IFRD1
Stimulates Skeletal Muscle Regeneration and Is Involved in Myoblast Differentiation
as a Regulator of MyoD and NF-κB. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:5691–707.
53. Iezaki T, Fukasawa K, Park G, Horie T, Kanayama T, Ozaki K, et al. Transcriptional
Modulator Ifrd1 Regulates Osteoclast Differentiation through Enhancing the NF-κB/NFATc1
Pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2016;36:2451–63.
54. Singh H, Cousin MA, Ashley RH. Functional reconstitution of mammalian “chloride
intracellular channels” CLIC1, CLIC4 and CLIC5 reveals differential regulation by
cytoskeletal actin. FEBS J. 2007;274:6306–16.
55. Wegner B, Al-Momany A, Kulak S, Kozlowski K, Obeidat M, Jahroudi N, et al. CLIC5A,
a component of the ezrin-podocalyxin complex in glomeruli, is a determinant of podocyte
integrity. Am J Physiol Physiol. 2010;298:F1492–503.
56. Berryman M, Bruno J, Price J, Edwards JC. CLIC-5A functions as a chloride channel
in vitro and associates with the cortical actin cytoskeleton in vitro and in vivo.
J Biol Chem. 2004;279:34794–801.
57. Kuga T, Sasaki M, Mikami T, Miake Y, Adachi Y, Shimizu M, et al. FAM83H and casein
kinase I regulate the organization of the keratin cytoskeleton and formation of desmosomes.
Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–15.
58. Kim KM, Park SH, Bae JS, Noh SJ, Tao GZ, Kim JR, et al. FAM83H is involved in
the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma and is regulated by MYC. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–13.
59. Haghighi K, Kolokathis F, Gramolini A, Waggoner J, Pater L, Lynch R, et al. A
mutation in the human phospholamban gene, deleting arginine 14, results in lethal,
hereditary cardiomyopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2006;103:1388–93.
60. Ceholski DK, Trieber CA, Young HS. Hydrophobic imbalance in the cytoplasmic domain
of phospholamban is a determinant for lethal dilated cardiomyopathy. J Biol Chem.
2012;287:16521–9.
61. Medin M, Hermida-Prieto M, Monserrat L, Laredo R, Rodriguez-Rey JC, Fernandez
X, et al. Mutational screening of phospholamban gene in hypertrophic and idiopathic
dilated cardiomyopathy and functional study of the PLN -42 C>G mutation. Eur J Heart
Fail. 2007;9:37–43.
62. Medin M, Hermida M, Monserrat L, Laredo R, Rodriguez J, Fernandez X, et al. Mutational
screening of phospholamban gene in hypertrophic and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
and functional study of the PLN-42 C>G mutation. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2007;9:37–43.
63. Ceholski DK, Trieber CA, Holmes CFB, Young HS. Lethal, hereditary mutants of phospholamban
elude phosphorylation by protein kinase A. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:26596–605.
64. Uniacke J, Perera JK, Lachance G, Francisco CB, Lee S. Cancer cells exploit eIF4E2-directed
synthesis of hypoxia response proteins to drive tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2014;74:1379–89.
65. Kelly NJ, Varga JFA, Specker EJ, Romeo CM, Coomber BL, Uniacke J. Hypoxia activates
cadherin-22 synthesis via eIF4E2 to drive cancer cell migration, invasion and adhesion.
Oncogene [Internet]. Nature Publishing Group; 2018;37:651–62. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2017.372
66. Weinstein LS, Liu J, Sakamoto A, Xie T, Chen M. Minireview: GNAS: Normal and abnormal
functions. Endocrinology. 2004;145:5459–64.
67. Furukawa T, Kuboki Y, Tanji E, Yoshida S, Hatori T, Yamamoto M, et al. Whole-exome
sequencing uncovers frequent GNAS mutations in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms
of the pancreas. Sci Rep. 2011;1.
69. Wu J, Matthaei H, Maitra A, Dal Molin M, Wood L, Eshleman J, et al. Recurrent
gnas mutations define an unexpected pathway for pancreatic cyst development. Sci Transl
Med. 2011;3.
70. Bandyopadhyay U, Kaushik S, Varticovski L, Cuervo AM. The Chaperone-Mediated Autophagy
Receptor Organizes in Dynamic Protein Complexes at the Lysosomal Membrane. Mol Cell
Biol [Internet]. 2008;28:5747–63. Available from: http://mcb.asm.org/cgi/doi/10.1128/MCB.02070-07
72. Hubert V, Peschel A, Langer B, Gröger M, Rees A, Kain R. LAMP-2 is required for
incorporating syntaxin-17 into autophagosomes and for their fusion with lysosomes.
Biol Open [Internet]. 2016;5:1516–29. Available from: http://bio.biologists.org/lookup/doi/10.1242/bio.018648
73. Bassi MT, Manzoni M, Monti E, Pizzo MT, Ballabio A, Borsani G. Cloning of the
gene encoding a novel integral membrane protein, mucolipidin - And identification
of the two major founder mutations causing mucolipidosis type IV. Am J Hum Genet.
2000;67:1110–20.
74. Schmiege P, Fine M, Blobel G, Li X. Human TRPML1 channel structures in open and
closed conformations. Nature. 2017;19:477–91.
75. Cuajungco MP, Basilio LC, Silva J, Hart T, Tringali J, Chen C, et al. Cellular
Zinc Levels are Modulated by Trpml1-Tmem163 Interaction. Traffic. 2014;15:1247–65.
76. Raychowdhury MK, González-Perrett S, Montalbetti N, Timpanaro GA, Chasan B, Goldmann
WH, et al. Molecular pathophysiology of mucolipidosis type IV: pH dysregulation of
the mucolipin-1 cation channel. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:617–27.
77. Rämö O, Kumar D, Gucciardo E, Joensuu M, Saarekas M, Vihinen H, et al. NOGO-A/RTN4A
and NOGO-B/RTN4B are simultaneously expressed in epithelial, fibroblast and neuronal
cells and maintain ER morphology. Sci Rep [Internet]. Nature Publishing Group; 2016;6:1–14.
Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35969
78. Wang S, Tukachinsky H, Romano FB, Rapoport TA. Cooperation of the ER-shaping proteins
atlastin, lunapark, and reticulons to generate a tubular membrane network. Elife.
2016;5:1–29.
79. Rämö O, Kumar D, Gucciardo E, Joensuu M, Saarekas M, Vihinen H, et al. NOGO-A/RTN4A
and NOGO-B/RTN4B are simultaneously expressed in epithelial, fibroblast and neuronal
cells and maintain ER morphology. Sci Rep. Nature Publishing Group; 2016;6:1–14.
80. Leal-Gutiérrez JD, Rezende FM, Elzo MA, Johnson D, Peñagaricano F, Mateescu RG.
Structural Equation Modeling and Whole-Genome Scans Uncover Chromosome Regions and
Enriched Pathways for Carcass and Meat Quality in Beef. Front Genet [Internet]. 2018;9:1–13.
Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2018.00532/full
82. Shin DH, Lee HJ, Cho S, Kim HJ, Hwang JY, Lee CK, et al. Deleted copy number variation
of Hanwoo and Holstein using next generation sequencing at the population level. BMC
Genomics [Internet]. BMC Genomics; 2014;15:1–16. Available from: BMC Genomics
83. Elzo MA, Thomas MG, Johnson DD, Martinez CA, Lamb GC, Rae DO, et al. Genomic-polygenic
evaluation of multibreed Angus-Brahman cattle for postweaning ultrasound and weight
traits with actual and imputed Illumina50k SNP genotypes. Livest Sci [Internet]. Elsevier;
2015;175:18–26. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.03.002
84. Elzo MA, Thomas MG, Johnson DD, Martinez CA, Lamb GC, Rae DO, et al. Genetic parameters
and predictions for direct and maternal growth traits in a multibreed Angus-Brahman
cattle population using genomic-polygenic and polygenic models. Livest Sci [Internet].
Elsevier; 2015;178:43–51. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.06.015
85. Elzo MA, Mateescu R, Thomas MG, Johnson DD, Martinez CA, Rae DO, et al. Growth
and reproduction genomic-polygenic and polygenic parameters and prediction trends
as Brahman fraction increases in an Angus-Brahman multibreed population. Livest Sci
[Internet]. Elsevier; 2016;190:104–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.06.011
87. Belk KE, Dikeman ME, Calkins CR, Andy King D, Shackelford SD, Hale D, et al. Research
Guidelines for Cookery, Sensory Evaluation, and Instrumental Tenderness Measurements
of Meat. 2015.
88. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. United States;
89. Schmieder R, Edwards R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets.
Bioinformatics. 2011;27:863–4.
92. Kim D, Pertea G, Trapnell C, Pimentel H, Kelley R, Salzberg S. TopHat2: accurate
alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions.
Genome Biol. 2013;14:0–9.
93. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods.
2012;9:357–9.
95. Anders S, Pyl P, Huber W. HTSeq-A Python framework to work with high-throughput
sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:166–9.
96. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, Van Baren MJ, et al. Transcript
assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform
switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol [Internet]. Nature Publishing
Group; 2010;28:511–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1621
97. Trapnell C, Hendrickson DG, Sauvageau M, Goff L, Rinn JL, Pachter L. Differential
analysis of gene regulation at transcript resolution with RNA-seq. Nat Biotechnol
[Internet]. Nature Publishing Group; 2013;31:46–53. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2450
99. Reyes A, Anders S, Weatheritt RJ, Gibson TJ, Steinmetz LM, Huber W. Drift and
conservation of differential exon usage across tissues in primate species. Proc Natl
Acad Sci [Internet]. 2013;110:15377–82. Available from: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1307202110
100. Wang L, Wang S, Li W. RSeQC: quality control of RNA-seq experiments. Bioinformatics.
2015;28:137–46.
101. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The Sequence
Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9.
102. McCarthy DJ, Chen Y, Smyth GK. Differential expression analysis of multifactor
RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:4288–97.
103. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation
for Statistical Computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria; 2018. Available from: http://www.r-project.org.
104. Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential
expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:139–40.
106. Venables WN, Ripley BD. Modern Applied Statistics with S. Fourth Edi. Springer,
New York; 2002.
107. JMP®, Version 13. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989-2007.
108. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion
for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:1–21.
109. Jia C, Guan W, Yang A, Xiao R, Tang WHW, Moravec CS, et al. MetaDiff: Differential
isoform expression analysis using random-effects meta-regression. BMC Bioinformatics.
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015;16:1–12.
110. Mi G, Di Y, Emerson S, Cumbie JS, Chang JH. Length Bias Correction in Gene Ontology
Enrichment Analysis Using Logistic Regression. PLoS One. 2012;7.
111. Young MD, Wakefield MJ, Smyth GK, Oshlack A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq:
accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol [Internet]. 2010;11. Available from: http://genomebiology.com/content/11/2/R14%5Cnfile:///Users/zzhou/Dropbox/Library.papers3/Files/E5/E57EB86C-6036-4CE4-B644-1E522EF11A09.pdf%5Cnpapers3://publication/uuid/F930FBCE-A1CC-45CD-8DD7-CB709BF223BE
112. Orchard S, Ammari M, Aranda B, Breuza L, Briganti L, Broackes-Carter F, et al.
The MIntAct project - IntAct as a common curation platform for 11 molecular interaction
databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:358–63.
113. Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. Cytoscape:
A Software Environment for Integrated Models of Biomolecular Interaction Networks.
Genome Res [Internet]. 2003;13:2498–504. Available from: http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110001910481/
114. Möller S, Croning MDR, Apweiler R. Evaluation of methods for the prediction of
membrane spanning regions. Bioinformatics. 2001;17:646–53.
115. Sigrist CJ, Cerutti L, Hulo N, Gattiker A, Falquet L, Pagni M, et al. PROSITE:
a documented database using patterns and profiles as motif descriptors (available
at http://www.expasy.ch/prosite). Br Bioinforma. 2002;3:265–74.
116. Arnold K, Bordoli L, Schwede T. Structural bioinformatics The SWISS-MODEL workspace :
a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. 2006;22:195–201.
117. Biasini M, Bienert S, Waterhouse A, Arnold K, Studer G, Schmidt T, et al. SWISS-MODEL:
Modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:252–8.
118. Kiefer F, Arnold K, Künzli M, Bordoli L, Schwede T. The SWISS-MODEL Repository
and associated resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:387–92.
119. Petersen TN, Brunak S, Von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: Discriminating signal
peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods [Internet]. Nature Publishing Group;
2011;8:785–6. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1701