Innovation | Indoor walking route accessibility●‡ | Scores < 3 were considered not accessible (never or rarely), scores ≥ 3 were considered accessible (sometimes, most of the time, or always) |
| Indoor walking route signage visibility●‡ | Scores < 3 were considered not visible (never or rarely), scores ≥ 3 were considered visible (sometimes, most of the time, or always) |
| Outdoor walking route accessibility●‡ | Scores < 3 were considered not accessible (never or rarely), scores ≥ 3 were considered accessible (sometimes, most of the time, or always) |
| Outdoor walking route signage visibility●‡ | Scores < 3 were considered not visible (never or rarely), scores ≥ 3 were considered visible (sometimes, most of the time, or always) |
| Communal signage visibility●‡ | Scores < 3 were considered not visible (never or rarely), scores ≥ 3 were considered visible (sometimes, most of the time, or always) |
| Individual signage visibility●‡ | Scores < 3 were considered not visible (never or rarely), scores ≥ 3 were considered visible (sometimes, most of the time, or always) |
| Stair signage visibility●‡ | Scores < 3 were considered not visible (never or rarely), scores ≥ 3 were considered visible (sometimes, most of the time, or always) |
| Optional cultural strategies chosen●‡ | Percents < 50 were considered limited optional strategies chosen, percents ≥ 50 were considered moderate-high optional strategies chosen |
| Optional environmental strategies chosen●‡ | Percents < 50 were considered limited optional strategies chosen, percents ≥ 50 were considered moderate-high optional strategies chosen |
| Optional social strategies chosen●‡ | Percents < 50 were considered limited optional strategies chosen, percents ≥ 50 were considered moderate-high optional strategies chosen |
| Sent e-newsletters□‡ | Percents < 80 were considered limited e-newsletters sent, percents ≥ 80 were considered most e-newsletters sent |
| Supported informal hourly breaks□‡ | Percents < 80 were considered limited support for hourly breaks, percents ≥ 80 were considered high support for hourly breaks |
| Completed quarterly meeting□‡ | Percents < 80 were considered limited completion of quarterly meetings, percents ≥ 80 were considered high completion of quarterly meetings |
| Completed advocate survey□‡ | Percents < 80 were considered limited completion of advocate survey, percents ≥ 80 were considered high completion of advocate survey |
| Supported email distribution□‡ | Percents < 80 were considered limited support for email distribution, percents ≥ 80 were considered high support for email distribution |
| Completed community readiness interview□‡ | Percents < 80 were considered limited completion of community readiness interview, percents ≥ 80 were considered high completion of community readiness interview |
Context | Worksite culture supported breaks◊‡ | Percents < 80 were considered limited support for breaks, percents ≥ 80 were considered high support for breaks |
| Worksite leadership supported breaks◊‡ | Percents < 80 were considered limited support for breaks, percents ≥ 80 were considered high support for breaks |
| Months used desk of total◊‡ | Scores < 3 were considered low use, scores ≥ 3 were considered high use |
| Perceived morale for the program◊ℓ | Scores < 4 were considered as low perceived morale, scores = 4 were considered neutral, and scores > 4 were considered as high perceived morale |
| Existing Efforts◊ | Scores < 5 were considered low existing community efforts, scores ≥ 5 were considered some existing community efforts |
| Knowledge of Efforts◊ | Scores < 5 were considered low knowledge of existing community efforts, scores ≥ 5 were considered high knowledge existing community efforts |
| Leadership◊ | Scores < 5 were considered low leadership recognition/efforts, scores ≥ 5 were considered high leadership recognition/efforts |
| Climate◊ | Scores < 5 were considered negative community climate, scores ≥ 5 were considered positive community climate |
| Knowledge About Issue◊ | Scores < 5 were considered low knowledge about the issue, scores ≥ 5 were considered high knowledge about the issue |
| Resources◊ | Scores < 5 were considered low resources available for the issue, scores ≥ 5 were considered high resources available for the issue |
| Overall community readiness score◊ | Scores < 5 were considered low community readiness, scores ≥ 5 were considered high community readiness |
Recipient | Advocate's interaction with employees●ℓ | Percents < 50 were considered limited advocate-employee interactions, scores ≥ 50 were considered moderate-high advocate-employee interactions |
| Knowledge of employees●ℓ | Percents < 50 were considered advocate having limited knowledge of employees, scores ≥ 50 were considered advocate having moderate-high knowledge of employees |
| Advocates self-efficacy in role●ℓ | Percents < 50 were considered low self-efficacy, scores ≥ 50 were considered high self-efficacy |
| Advocate's willingness to continue role●ℓ | Scores < 3 were considered low willingness of advocate to continue their role, scores ≥ 3 were considered high willingness of advocate to continue their role |
| Time spent in the last quarter●ℓ | Scores < 5 were considered less time spent in advocate role, scores ≥ 5 were considered more time spent in advocate role |
| Time willing to spend in role next quarter●ℓ | Scores < 5 were considered less time willing to spend in advocate role, scores ≥ 5 were considered more time willing to spend in advocate role |
| Employees aware of advocate◊ℓ | Percents < 50 were considered low awareness, percents ≥ 50 were considered moderate-high awareness |
| Removed wastebin◊ℓ | No = wastebin was not removed from office area, yes = wastebin was removed from office area |
| Removed printer◊ℓ | No = printer was not removed from office area, yes = printer was removed from office area |
| Stood in a meeting◊ℓ | No = did not stand in a meeting, yes = stood in a meeting |
| Walked in a meeting◊ℓ | No = did not walk in a meeting, yes = walked in a meeting |
| Used face-to-face interaction◊ℓ | No = did not use face-to-face interaction, yes = used face-to-face interaction |
| Used the stairs◊ℓ | No = did not use stairs, yes = used stairs |
| Attended at least one group advocate call□ℓ | No = did not attend any group advocate calls, yes = attended at least one group advocate call |
Note. ●indicates data obtained from advocate perspective; ◊indicates data obtained from employee perspective; □indicates data obtained from researcher observation; ‡indicates construct for adherence; ℓindicates construct for competence. |