Hsp90α had discrepant screening effectiveness in different cancers
Yongzhang Luo et al. found that Hsp90α had a high sensitivity and specificity for early liver cancer.[18] To confirm the clinical application value of Hsp90α protein, the Hsp90α expression of six types of cancer patients with prior treatment, including 124 lung cancer patients, 22 liver cancer patients, 58 breast cancer patients, 63 esophageal cancer patients, 74 gastric cancer patients, and 29 colorectal cancer patients, was researched (Table 1). By analyzing the mean expression of the Hsp90α protein in the T1, T2, T3 and T4 cancer phases of these six cancers, we found that the expression level in the T1 phase was lower in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, and gastric cancer and higher in the T4 phase in lung cancer, liver cancer, breast cancer, esophageal cancer and gastric cancer (Figure 1 A-F and Table 1).
Except for colorectal cancer, the expression of the Hsp90α protein increased following cancer progression. Meanwhile, Hsp90α expression in the T2 and T3 phases was obviously different (p<0.05) in lung cancer, liver cancer and esophageal cancer patients (Figure 1A, 1B and 1D), and there were no obvious differences between the T3 and T4 phases. For the reference range for the Hsp90α protein, normal values were 0-82.06 ng/mL (Hsp90α protein quantitative detection kit). According to this standard, the coincidence rates of Hsp90α expression on lung cancer, liver cancer, breast cancer, esophageal cancer, gastric cancer and colorectal cancer patients were 42.74% (53/124), 50% (11/22), 50% (29/58), 23.81% (15/63), 35.14% (26/74), and 37.93% (11/29), respectively, and esophageal cancer had the minimum coincidence rate.
As there were no T1 phase cancer patients in all six cancers, the mean expression of Hsp90α in the T2, T3 and T4 phases in these six cancers was analyzed, and there were no obvious differences in the T2 phase (Figure2A), while there were significant differences in the T3 phase between liver cancer, lung cancer, esophageal cancer and gastric cancer; esophageal cancer had the lowest Hsp90α expression (86.23 ± 50.59 ng/mL), while liver cancer had highest Hsp90α expression (228.67 ± 167.87 ng/mL) (Figure2B and Table 1). These results indicated that Hsp90α protein expression was mostly consistent with cancer progression, even though there were a few inconsistencies, such as in colorectal cancer. There were no obvious differences in the Hsp90α protein expression in the T2 and T4 phases, but in the T3 phase, the overall protein expression of Hsp90α was discrepant in multiple cancers (Figure2A-C).
Hsp90α was more suitable for cancer treatment monitoring
To explore the ability to use the Hsp90α protein to monitor the therapeutic effect, Hsp90α was detected before and after therapy, and retrospective data from 54 lung cancer patients (44 males and 10 females) were analyzed (Figure3A and 3B). Hsp90α was detected in twenty-nine lung cancer patients prior to treatment, and Hsp90α detected after treatment was accompanied with disease remission; a total of 79.31% (23/29) of patients had reduced Hsp90α expression after treatment. To observe the dynamic changes in Hsp90α expression, the trend change is shown in Figure3A, the total of 29 patients, except patient 3, patient 11, patient 18, patient 20, patient 28 and patient 29, showed a downward trend in Hsp90α expression when the disease was in remission after therapy.
Similarly, Hsp90α was detected in twenty-five lung cancer patients before treatment, and Hsp90α that was detected after treatment was accompanied by disease progression; meanwhile, 80% (20/25) of patients had increased Hsp90α expression, and the overall coincidence rate was 79.63% (43/54). As shown in Figure3B, the total of 20 lung cancer patients, apart from patient 4, patient 15, patient 23, patient 24 and patient 25, had elevated Hsp90α expression. These results demonstrated that dynamic changes in Hsp90 expression were highly consistent with the diagnostic efficacy.
Long-term monitoring effect analysis on typical samples
Next, the long-term monitoring effect of Hsp90α protein was analyzed. In the retrospective analysis of two patients, the Hsp90α protein was detected 10 times during their therapy. Patient A was a 63-year-old male with tumor stage T4 and had passed away. This patient originally had an Hsp90α protein level of 61.58 ng/mL, which was stable after treatment; eventually, the disease progressed until his death. The 10 Hsp90α protein tests in the whole process of progression reached 70% coincidence rate (7/10) (Figure3C). Patient B was a 58-year-old male with tumor stage T3 and had passed away. In patient B, the Hsp90α protein was 31.91 ng/mL initially, which was similar to that before treatment, and was stable after treatment; eventually, the disease progressed until his death. The coincidence rate in this patient was 80% (8/10) (Figure3C). Therefore, the retrospective study results also showed that the Hsp90α protein has an excellent ability to monitor the therapeutic effect and can be used in long-term monitoring during the course of cancer therapy.