Demographic Indices of the Study Participants
The study recruited 175 comprising 86 woodworkers and 89 non-exposed workers. Table 1 shows a t-test comparison of the demographic data of the woodworkers and the non-exposed workers. The mean age and height of the woodworkers were significantly different from the non-exposed workers. The woodworkers were much young and taller than the non-exposed workers. However, there was no significant difference in the mean weight of the two groups.
Table 1 Demographic Indices of The Wood Workers and Non-Exposed Workers
Variables
|
Non-exposed workers
|
woodworkers
|
|
n =89
(mean ± SD)
|
n = 86
(mean ± SD)
|
p-value
|
Age
|
42.74 ± 9.43
|
38.55 ± 11.12
|
(0.009) *
|
Height
|
168.36 ± 6.33
|
171.10 ± 6.68
|
(0.004) *
|
Weight
|
70.92 ± 12.24
|
68.35 ± 8.21
|
0.136
|
P-values in parentheses; *p<0.01 SD: Standard deviation.
Determination of ambient air wood dust
The concentrations of ambient air wood dust measured within eight working hours are shown in Table 2. The particulate matter (PM) measured was greater than 2.5µm. Levels of inhalable wood dust particles measured at the two sites ranged between 0.003 and 0.102 mg/m3 at an average ambient temperature of 33oC and relative humidity of 67%. Minimum exposure levels were recorded when the workers were engaged in minimal work within the workshop. The maximum exposure levels were recorded when the woodworkers were actively engaged in their work for a long time.
Table 2 Measurement of ambient air wood dust.
Machine
|
Mean Temp. oC
|
Mean %Relative Humidity
|
Range of Wood dust level (mg/m3)
Min – Max
|
1
|
33.2
|
67.9
|
0.005 - 1.02
|
2
|
33.1
|
66.7
|
0.003 - 0.882
|
Comparison of the Frequency of Respiratory Symptoms of the woodworkers at Workplace and Non-Exposed Workers.
The frequency of respiratory symptoms among the woodworkers compared with non-exposed workers is shown in Table 3. The frequency of all the respiratory symptoms at the workplace was significantly higher in the woodworkers than the non-exposed workers at (p<0.05). None of the 89 non-exposed workers studied reported or showed the presence of any of the listed respiratory symptoms. However, among the woodworkers 8% wheezed, 76% sneezed, 34% had dry cough 30% had cough with phlegm, 34% had frequent fever, 10% had shortness of breath at rest, 29% had shortness of breath after exercise, 24% had a loss of voice and 46.5% reported of catarrh/ rhinitis at the workplace. Most of the woodworkers reported discontinuous or no respiratory symptoms on vacation.
Table 3 Comparison of the Frequency of Respiratory Symptoms of the woodworkers at Workplace and Non-Exposed Workers.
Respiratory symptoms
|
Non-exposed workers N (%)
|
Woodworkers N (%)
|
p-value
|
Use mask
|
|
|
|
No
|
89(100)
|
77(89.53)
|
0.001**
|
Yes
|
0
|
9(10.45)
|
|
Wheeze
|
|
|
|
No
|
89(100.00)
|
79(91.86)
|
0.006**
|
Yes
|
0
|
7(8.14)
|
|
Sneeze
|
|
|
|
No
|
89(100.0)
|
20(23.26)
|
<0.001***
|
Yes
|
0
|
66(76.74)
|
|
Dry cough
|
|
|
|
No
|
89(100.0)
|
57(66.28)
|
<0.001***
|
Yes
|
0
|
29(33.72)
|
|
Cough phlegm
|
|
|
|
No
|
89(100.0)
|
60(69.77)
|
<0.001***
|
Yes
|
0
|
26(30.23)
|
|
Freq. fev.
|
|
|
|
No
|
89(100.0)
|
56(65.12)
|
<0.001***
|
Yes
|
0
|
30(34.88)
|
|
Short breath res.
|
|
|
|
No
|
89(100.0)
|
77(89.53)
|
0.001***
|
Yes
|
0
|
9(10.47)
|
|
Short breath ex.
|
|
|
|
No
|
89(100.0)
|
61(70.93)
|
<0.001***
|
Yes
|
0
|
25(29.07)
|
|
Loss voice
|
|
|
|
No
|
89(100.0)
|
65(75.58)
|
<0.001***
|
Yes
|
0
|
21(24.42)
|
|
Catarrh
|
|
|
|
No
|
89(100)
|
46(53.5)
|
<0.001***
|
Yes
|
0
|
40(46.5)
|
|
On Vacation
|
|
|
|
No
|
89 (100)
|
83(96.5)
|
0.03*
|
Yes
|
0
|
3(3.5)
|
|
P-values in parentheses; *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001; No = absence of symptoms; Yes = occurrence of symptoms
Comparison of Lung Function Indices among Woodworkers and Non-Exposed Workers.
Table 4 shows the student t-test was used to compare the lung function indices (spirometry values) among the woodworkers and non-exposed workers. Although most of the woodworkers had normal VC values, there was a significant change compared with the non-exposed workers. There were insignificant changes with the other lung function indices (FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and PEFR) of the woodworkers compared with the non-exposed workers.
Table 4 Compared Lung Function Indices between Woodworkers and Non-Exposed Workers
Spirometry values (%pred)
|
Woodworkers Mean (± SD)
|
Non-exposed workers Mean (± SD)
|
T
|
p-value
|
VC
|
90.14 ± 13.75
|
94.20 ± 11.48
|
2.12
|
0.036
|
|
|
|
|
|
FVC
|
94.56±15.01
|
97.13±13.45
|
1.19
|
0.234
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEV1
|
98.20±17.91
|
99.73±14.69
|
0.62
|
0.538
|
|
|
|
|
|
FEV1/FVC
|
103±0.10
|
104±0.13
|
-0.79
|
0.429
|
|
|
|
|
|
PEFR
|
79.55±18.56
|
80.11±10.17
|
-0.81
|
0.449
|
P-values; p<0.05, SD: Standard deviation.
Woodworkers with normal lung function indices.
Table 5 shows that more than 75% of the woodworkers had lung function (VC, FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC,) values above the normal except PEFR which was 54%.
Table 5 Wood Workers with normal lung function indices
Parameters
|
Woodworkers
Mean %predicted values
|
Number of Woodworkers with normal values (%) n=86
|
VC
|
90.14
|
68 (78)
|
FVC
|
94.56
|
74 (85)
|
FEV1
|
98.20
|
74 (82)
|
FEV/FVC
|
1.03
|
77 (89)
|
PEFR
|
79.55
|
47 (54)
|