1 Kress, W. J. et al. Green plant genomes: What we know in an era of rapidly expanding opportunities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (2022).
2 Chase, M. W. et al. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 181, 1-20 (2016).
3 Crane, P. R., Friis, E. M. & Pedersen, K. R. The origin and early diversification of angiosperms. Nature 374, 27-33, doi:10.1038/374027a0 (1995).
4 Qiu, Y.-L. et al. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature 402, 404-407, doi:10.1038/46536 (1999).
5 Williams, J. H. & Friedman, W. E. Identification of diploid endosperm in an early angiosperm lineage. Nature 415, 522-526, doi:10.1038/415522a (2002).
6 Friedman, W. E. Embryological evidence for developmental lability during early angiosperm evolution. Nature 441, 337-340, doi:10.1038/nature04690 (2006).
7 Friedman, W. E. Hydatellaceae are water lilies with gymnospermous tendencies. Nature 453, 94-97, doi:10.1038/nature06733 (2008).
8 Goremykin, V. V. et al. The Evolutionary Root of Flowering Plants. Syst. Biol. 62, 50-61, doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys070 (2012).
9 Albert, V. A. et al. The Amborella genome and the evolution of flowering plants. Science 342, 1241089 (2013).
10 Xi, Z., Liu, L., Rest, J. S. & Davis, C. C. Coalescent versus concatenation methods and the placement of Amborella as sister to water lilies. Syst. Biol. 63, 919-932 (2014).
11 Leebens-Mack, J. H. et al. One thousand plant transcriptomes and the phylogenomics of green plants. Nature 574, 679-685, doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1693-2 (2019).
12 Li, H.-T. et al. Origin of angiosperms and the puzzle of the Jurassic gap. Nat. Plants 5, 461-470, doi:10.1038/s41477-019-0421-0 (2019).
13 Yang, L. et al. Phylogenomic insights into deep phylogeny of angiosperms based on broad nuclear gene sampling. Plant communications 1, 100027 (2020).
14 Zhang, L. et al. The water lily genome and the early evolution of flowering plants. Nature 577, 79-84, doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1852-5 (2020).
15 Guo, X. et al. Chloranthus genome provides insights into the early diversification of angiosperms. Nature Communications 12, 6930, doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26922-4 (2021).
16 Ma, J. et al. The Chloranthus sessilifolius genome provides insight into early diversification of angiosperms. Nature Communications 12, 6929, doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26931-3 (2021).
17 Qin, L. et al. Insights into angiosperm evolution, floral development and chemical biosynthesis from the Aristolochia fimbriata genome. Nat. Plants, doi:10.1038/s41477-021-00990-2 (2021).
18 Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E. & Chase, M. W. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from multiple genes as a tool for comparative biology. Nature 402, 402-404, doi:10.1038/46528 (1999).
19 Yang, Y. et al. Prickly waterlily and rigid hornwort genomes shed light on early angiosperm evolution. Nat. Plants 6, 215-222 (2020).
20 Jiao, Y. et al. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 473, 97-100, doi:10.1038/nature09916 (2011).
21 Friedman, W. E. The meaning of Darwin's “abominable mystery”. American Journal of Botany 96, 5-21 (2009).
22 Carta, A., Bedini, G. & Peruzzi, L. A deep dive into the ancestral chromosome number and genome size of flowering plants. New Phytologist 228, 1097-1106, doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16668 (2020).
23 Yan, Z., Smith, M. L., Du, P., Hahn, M. W. & Nakhleh, L. Species Tree Inference Methods Intended to Deal with Incomplete Lineage Sorting Are Robust to the Presence of Paralogs. Syst. Biol., doi:10.1093/sysbio/syab056 (2021).
24 Rokas, A. & Holland, P. W. Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics. Trends in ecology & evolution 15, 454-459 (2000).
25 Hill, J. et al. Unprecedented reorganization of holocentric chromosomes provides insights into the enigma of lepidopteran chromosome evolution. Science Advances 5, eaau3648, doi:doi:10.1126/sciadv.aau3648 (2019).
26 Graphodatsky, A. S., Trifonov, V. A. & Stanyon, R. The genome diversity and karyotype evolution of mammals. Molecular Cytogenetics 4, 22, doi:10.1186/1755-8166-4-22 (2011).
27 Stebbins, G. L. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. (1971).
28 Grant, V. Plant speciation. Columbia university press, (1981).
29 Simakov, O. et al. Deeply conserved synteny resolves early events in vertebrate evolution. Nature Ecology & Evolution 4, 820-830, doi:10.1038/s41559-020-1156-z (2020).
30 Murat, F., Armero, A., Pont, C., Klopp, C. & Salse, J. Reconstructing the genome of the most recent common ancestor of flowering plants. Nat. Genet. 49, 490-496, doi:10.1038/ng.3813 (2017).
31 WANG, Z. & WANG, X. Evolutionary genomics model of chromosome number reduction and B chromosome production. SCIENTIA SINICA Vitae 50, 524-537 (2020).
32 D’Hont, A. et al. The banana (Musa acuminata) genome and the evolution of monocotyledonous plants. Nature 488, 213-217, doi:10.1038/nature11241 (2012).
33 Zhang, Y. et al. Chromosome-scale assembly of the Dendrobium chrysotoxum genome enhances the understanding of orchid evolution. Horticulture Research 8, 183, doi:10.1038/s41438-021-00621-z (2021).
34 Boore, J. L. The use of genome-level characters for phylogenetic reconstruction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21, 439-446 (2006).
35 Simakov, O. et al. Deeply conserved synteny and the evolution of metazoan chromosomes. Science Advances 8, eabi5884, doi:doi:10.1126/sciadv.abi5884 (2022).
36 Avise, J. C. Evolutionary pathways in nature: a phylogenetic approach. (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
37 Yin, Y. et al. Molecular mechanisms and topological consequences of drastic chromosomal rearrangements of muntjac deer. Nature Communications 12, 6858, doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27091-0 (2021).
38 Luo, J., Sun, X., Cormack, B. P. & Boeke, J. D. Karyotype engineering by chromosome fusion leads to reproductive isolation in yeast. Nature 560, 392-396, doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0374-x (2018).
39 Acorus americanus v1.1, DOE-JGI, http://phytozome-next.jgi.doe.gov/.