Demographic and clinical data
In total, 220 CAP patients and 110 healthily control subjects were recruited and analyzed in the present study. As shown in Table 1, there was no notable different of age, gender and BMI between CAP patients and control cases. Routine blood test was detected between two groups. We found that white blood cell (WBC) and neutrophil were increased, lymphocyte was decreased in CAP patients. The ratios of platelet-lymphocyte (PLR), monocyte-lymphocyte (MON) and neutrophil-lymphocyte (NLR) were increased in patients with CAP (Table 1). Moreover, liver function and renal function were detected among all cases. As shown in Table 1, except for uric acid, no obvious different of liver function and renal function was observed in two groups. Besides, inflammatory cytokines were measured and compared in two groups. The levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6 and CRP were elevated in CAP patients. Meanwhile, the severity of pneumonia was assessed with CAP severity scores. Among 220 patients with CAP, the median of PSI, CURB-65, CRB-65 and SMART-COP score was 2.0, 1.0, 94.0 and 2.0, respectively. Additionally, there was 92 (41.8%) severe patients in CAP group (CURXO score) (Table 1).
The levels of serum S100A9 in control subjects and CAP patients
Serum S100A9 was measured between CAP patients and control subjects. As shown in Figure 2A, serum S100A9 was dramatically increased in CAP patients compared with control subjects. Additionally, serum S100A9 was analyzed among different grades of CAP patients. As shown in Figure 2B, serum S100A9 was higher in ≥3 score grade than in other grades based on CRB-65 score. According to SMART-COP score, serum S100A9 was higher in 7~8 score than in other grades (Figure 2C). Besides, we found that serum S100A9 was higher in severe CAP patients than those in mild CAP patients (CURXO score) (Figure 2D). What’s more, serum S100A9 was lowest in 0~1 score and was highest in 3~5 score on the basis of CURB-65 score (Figure 2E). Furthermore, the level of serum S100A9 was increased in the grade of Ⅲ than those in the grade of Ⅱ and Ⅰ based on PSI score. Serum S100A9 in the grade of Ⅳ was highest (Figure 2F).
Correlations of S100A9 with disease severity, blood routine parameters and inflammatory cytokines among CAP patients
The correlations between S100A9 and CAP severity scores were analyzed among CAP patients. We found that serum S100A9 was positively correlated with CURB-65 (r=0.501, P=0.001), CRB-65 (r=0.488, P=0.001), PSI (r=0.567, P<0.001), CURXO (r=0.502, P=0.003) and SMART-COP (r=0.475, P<0.001) (Table 2). Additionally, the correlations between S100A9 and blood routine parameters were explored. As shown in Table 2, serum S100A9 was positively correlated with WBC (r=0.297, P=0.003), NLR (r=0.274, P=0.006) and MON (r=0.277, P=0.012). Meanwhile, we also observed the correlations between serum S100A9 and inflammatory cytokines. We found that there was a positive correlation between serum S100A9 with TNF-α (r=0.248, P=0.001), IL-1β (r=0.273, P<0.001) and CRP (r=0.345, P=0.002). Moreover, associations between serum S100A9 and CAP severity scores were further analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The univariate logistic regression indicated that serum S100A9 was positively correlated with CURB-65 (β=1.358; 95% CI: 1.121, 1.652), CRB-65 (β=1.223; 95% CI: 1.025, 1.562), PSI (β=1.325; 95% CI: 1.056, 1.762), SMART-COP (β=1.262; 95% CI: 1.050, 1.462) and CURXO (β=1.451; 95% CI: 1.215, 1.864) (Table 3). Confounding factors were controlled and adjusted, the multivariate logistic regression was further used to analyze the associations between serum S100A9 and CAP severity scores. These results indicated that serum S100A9 was positively associated with PSI (β=1.225; 95% CI: 1.035, 1.562), SMART-COP (β=1.212; 95% CI: 1.065, 1.615) and CURXO (β=1.116; 95% CI: 1.011, 1.365) (Table 3).
The association between serum S100A9 and the prognosis in CAP patients
The level of serum S100A9 were compared between alive patients and dead cases. As shown in Figure 3A, serum S100A9 was increased in dead patients than these in alive CAP patients. Moreover, the levels of serum S100A9 was higher in>14 days than these in <8 days and 8~14 days (Figure 3B). Besides, the associations between serum S100A9 and the prognosis of CAP patients were analyzed using logistical regression. The univariate logistic regression revealed that serum S100A9 was positively associated with hospital stay (β=1.159; 95% CI: 1.062, 1.321) and the risk of death (β=1.112; 95% CI: 1.010, 1.336) (Table 4). In order to control confounding factors, the multivariate logistic regression was continued to performing. The results found that serum S100A9 was positively associated with the risk of death (β=1.137; 95% CI: 1.023, 1.312).
The predictive capacity of serum S100A9 for CAP
The predictive capacity of serum S1009A was analyzed using receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC). As shown in Figure 4A, the AUC of S100A9 for CAP was 0.788 (95% CI: 0.699, 0.878). The sensitivity and specificity of S100A9 in the prediction of CAP were 73.5% and 82.5%. Furthermore, the predictive capacity of serum S1009A for severity was analyzed among CAP patients. We found that the AUCs for different biomarkers were as follows: CURB-65, 0.893 (95% CI: 0.832, 0.954); CRB-65, 0.886 (95% CI: 0.823, 0.950); PSI, 0.919 (95% CI: 0.891, 0.987); SMART-COP, 0.916 (95% CI: 0.932, 0.998); CURXO, 0.880 (0.810, 0.951); S100A9, 0.832 (95% CI: 0.715, 0.943) (Figure 4B). The optimal cut-off value of serum S100A9 level was 213.6 pg/mL with 76.0% sensitivity and 82.0% specificity.