Ajideh, P., Zohrabi, M., & Jahanbakhsh, A. A. (in press). Study quality in quantitative L2 studies: A path Analysis on the perceptions of Iranian published authors. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies. http://dx.doi.org/10.30479/jmrels.2020.14296.1760.
Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., & Rao, S. M. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 3-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000191.
Breckler, S. (2009). Dealing with data. American Psychological Association: Science Directions. http://www.apa.org/monitor/2009/02/sd.aspx
Chaudron, C. (2001). Progress in language classroom research: Evidence from the Modern Language Journal, 1916-2000. Modern Language Journal, 85, 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00097.
Cooper, H. & Hedges, L. V. (2009). Research synthesis as a scientific process. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (2nd ed., pp. 147–158). Russell Sage Foundation.
Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. Routledge.
DeKeyser, R., Alfi-Shabtay, I., & Ravid, D. (2010). Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(3), 413 - 438. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716410000056.
Derakhshan, A., Shakki, F. (2021). A meta-analytic study of instructed second language pragmatics: A case of the speech act of request. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2021.16722.
Gass, S. (2009). A survey of SLA research. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 3–28). Emerald.
Gass, S., Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L. (2020). Coming of age: The past, present, and future of quantitative SLA research. Language Teaching, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000430.
Hu, Y., & Plonsky, L. (2019). Statistical assumptions in L2 research: A systematic review. Second Language Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319877433.
Hudson, T., & Llosa, L. (2015). Design issues and inference in experimental L2 research. Language Learning, 65(Suppl. 1), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12113.
Khany, R., & Tazik, K. (2019). Levels of statistical use in applied linguistics research articles: From 1986-2015. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 26(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2017.1421498.
Larson-Hall, J. (2012). Our statistical intuitions may be misleading us: Why we need robust statistics. Language Teaching, 45(4), 460-474. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000127.
Larson–Hall, J. (2017), Moving Beyond the Bar Plot and the Line Graph to Create Informative and Attractive Graphics. The Modern Language Journal, 101, 244-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12386.
Larson-Hall, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). Reporting and interpreting quantitative research findings: What gets reported and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 65(Suppl. 1), 127–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12115.
Norouzian, R., & Plonsky, L. (2018). Eta- and partial eta-squared in L2 research: A cautionary review and guide to more appropriate usage. Second Language Research, 34(2), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658316684904.
Norris, J. M. (2015). Statistical Significance Testing in Second Language Research: Basic Problems and Suggestions for Reform. Language Learning, 65(Suppl. 1), 97-126. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12114.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning 50(3), 417–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136.
Norris, J. M., Plonsky, L., Ross, S. J., & Schoonen, R. (2015). Guidelines for reporting quantitative methods and results in primary research. Language Learning, 65(2), 470-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12104.
Ortega, L. (2005). Methodology, epistemology, and ethics in instructed SLA research: An introduction. Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 317 - 327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00307.x.
Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. London: Hodder Education.
Paquot, M., & Plonsky, L. (2017). Quantitative research methods and study quality in learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 3(1), 61–94. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr3103paq.
Plonsky, L. (2011). Study quality in SLA: A commulative and developmental assessment of designs, analyses, reporting practices and outcomes in quantitative L2 research. [Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University]. MSU Libraries. https://d.lib.msu.edu/etd/1417/datastream/OBJ/download/Study_quality_in_SLA___a_cumulative_and_developmental_assessment_of_designs__analyses__reporting_practices__and_outcomes_in_quantitative_L2_research.pdf.
Plonsky, L. (2013). Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(4), 655–687. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000399.
Plonsky, L. (2014a). Study quality in quantitative L2 research (1990-2010): A methodological synthesis and call for reform. Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 450–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12058.x.
Plonsky, L. (2014b, February). Sampling, power, and generalizability in L2 research (Or, why we might as well be flipping coins). Keynote presentation at the Second Language Studies Symposium, East Lansing, MI.
Plonsky, L. (2015). Statistical power, p values, descriptive statistics, and effect sizes: A “back-to-basics” approach to advancing quantitative methods in L2 research. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 23-45). Routledge.
Plonsky, L., & Gass, S. (2011). Quantitative research methods, study quality, and outcomes: The case of interaction research. Language Learning, 61(2), 325– 366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00640.x.
Plonsky, L., & Gonulal, T. (2015). Methodological synthesis in quantitative L2 research: A review of reviews and a case study of exploratory factor analysis. Language Learning, 65(Suppl. 1), 9-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12111.
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2015). Meta-analyzing second language research. In L. Plonsky (ed.), Advancing Quantitative Methods in Second Language Research (pp. 106-128). Routledge.
Plonsky, L., Egbert, J., & Laflair, G. T. (2015). Bootstrapping in applied linguistics: Assessing its potential using shared data. Applied Linguistics, 36(5), 591-610. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu001.
Rosenthal, R (1979). File drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull. 86, 638-41. https://doi.org/10.137/0033-2909.86.3.638.
Rosenthal, R. and DiMatteo, M.R. (2001) Meta-Analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.59
Wilcox, R. (2005). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing. Elsevier Academic.
Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594.
Yousefi, M., & Nassaji, H. (2019). A meta-analysis of the effect of instructions and corrective feedback on L2 pragmatics and the role of moderator variables: Face-to face vs. computer-mediated instruction. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 170(2), 277-308. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.19012.you.
Ziegler, N. (2013). Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University]. DigitalGeorgetown, https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/bitstream/handle/10822/559497/Ziegler_georgetown_0076D_12341.pdf;sequence=1.