Plant material collection and preparation
The authors procured permission from the Forest Department, Govt. of Kerala, India to visit and collect the plant sample from the forest areas for research purposes as per Order No. WL 10-47474/2014 dated 1/12/2015 and accordingly procured the sample for the study. Plant materials were collected from the Nilgiri Hills, India during the month of August, were dried under shade and powdered. Root and aerial parts were powdered separately. The material was identified and authenticated by Dr. Prabhukumar K. M., Scientist and Head, Plant Systematics and Genetics Division, Centre for Medicinal Plants Research, Kottakkal, India. Root and the aerial parts were extracted with hexane, methanol and water successively. All the fractions were concentrated and stored for further studies. All study related to plant were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
Selection of the extracts
Out of the different extracts studied, hexane extract of the plant root showed higher inhibitory activity on the enzymes selected for the study [3].
In vitro anti-inflammatory assays
Trypsin inhibition assay
A continuous rate spectrophotometric method, developed by Sigma Aldrich with slight modifications was used for the assay [3]. The substrate used was 0.25 mM Nα- benzoyl- L- arginine ethyl ester (BAEE) in phosphate buffer at pH 7.6. One BAEE binding unit of trypsin will show an absorbance of 0.001 per minute at pH 7.6. The enzyme (0.05 mM) was prepared in ice-cold 0.001 M hydrochloric acid and the inhibitor in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Inhibitory action was expressed as the number of BAEE units of trypsin inhibited by the inhibitor and it was expressed as a percentage of inhibition. The reaction mixture contained a total volume of 3.4 mL with a 3 mL substrate, 0.2 mL enzyme, and 0.2 mL inhibitor. Enzyme and the inhibitor were incubated for 10 minutes. Then, the substrate was added and the readings were taken at 253 nm by time scanning for 10 minutes. 0.1 mM concentration of phenylmethyl sulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) was used as the standard inhibitor.
Blank → 0.2 mL DMSO, 0.2 mL HCl and 3 mL substrate
The activity of the native enzyme (N) → 0.2 mL DMSO, 0.2 mL enzyme, and 3 mL substrate
Activity of the inhibitor (I) → 0.2 mL inhibitor, 0.2 mL enzyme, and 3 mL substrate
Percentage of inhibition =\(\left(\frac{\text{N}-\text{I}}{\text{N}}\right)\text{x} 100\)
LOX inhibition assay
LOX inhibition assay, developed by Anthon and Barrett with slight modifications was used [3]. LOX (EC 1.13.11.12) type I-B (soybean) was the enzyme used and linoleic acid was the substrate. 0.93 µM solution of enzyme and 0.32 mM substrate was prepared in 0.2 mM borate buffer at pH 9. The assay mixture contained 50 µL enzyme, 360 µL substrate, and 1.59 mL borate buffer to make the final volume of 2 mL. While adding inhibitor (50 µL) to the reaction mixture, buffer volume had to be reduced to 1.54 mL to maintain the total volume at 2 mL. The formation of hydroperoxyl-octadecadienoic acid was the indicator of LOX activity, which could be measured in a spectrophotometer at 234 nm. Vanillin of 1 mM was used as the standard inhibitor.
Blank → 50 µL DMSO, 1.59 mL buffer, and 360 µL substrate
Activity of the native enzyme (N) → 50 µL enzyme, 50 µL DMSO, 1.54 mL buffer, and 360 µL substrate
The activity of the enzyme in the presence of inhibitor (I) → 50 µL enzyme, 50 µL inhibitor, 1.54 µL buffer, and 360 µL substrate
Percentage of inhibition =\(\left(\frac{\text{N}-\text{I}}{\text{N}}\right)\text{x} 100\)
Activity guided isolation of the compounds
Hexane extract of the plant which showed a very high inhibition of trypsin and LOX were subjected to fractionation by column chromatography using silica gel of 100–200 mesh size. The sample was loaded and eluted with a hexane-acetone solvent system by gradient elution. 25 fractions of 25 mL each were collected and subjected to enzyme inhibition assay. Active fractions were pooled and further fractionated with a column of 230–400 mesh size. The same solvent system was used for elution. 25 fractions were collected and analyzed for enzyme inhibition. Active fractions were pooled and spotted on analytical thin-layer chromatographic plates to know the banding pattern. Similar ones were pooled and purified by preparative thin-layer chromatography.
GC-MS analysis of the purified band
Characterization of the active fraction was done by GC-MS. Analysis was performed using GCMS-QP2010 Shimadzu Gas Chromatograph and Mass Spectrometer. The phytochemical profile of the fraction was created by GC 2010 Gas chromatography. 99.9% helium gas was the carrier gas with a flow rate of 1 mL per minute and the sample was injected by splitless mode with an injection volume of 1 µL and injection temperature of 260°C. The column temperature was initially programmed at 80°C for 4 minutes and then allowed to increase linearly to 280°C with a hold time of 6 minutes. The GC-MS ion source temperature was 200°C and the interface temperature was 280°C. The compounds in the sample were identified by comparing the retention time, mass spectra, and fragmentation pattern. NIST library data were used for the reference.
In silico analysis of the enzyme-compound interaction: Preparation of the protein and ligands
Interaction of the compounds, identified by the GC-MS analysis, with the enzyme was studied by in silico molecular modelling and docking techniques. This was performed using Schrodinger Maestro 10.4 software package. The protein crystal structure coordinates for docking studies were downloaded from the PDB with the ID of trypsin, 4MTB. The initial step in the protein preparation protocol was to remove the water molecules from the crystal structure and addition of polar hydrogen groups. Then the structure was minimized at an RMSD (root mean square deviation) cut-off of 0.30 Å using protein preparation wizards. The force field assigned was OPLS 3e [18]. A grid of 20 Å dimensions was set with the centre of the crystallographic ligand as the centre of the grid. Ligand molecule's structures were downloaded from the PubChem Database and were prepared for docking studies using LigPrep module of the Schrodinger program, which produces the lowest energy conformations. All the possible conformations of the compounds were generated at pH 7. Docking studies were performed by the extra precision method and the binding energies were predicted with prime MM/GBSA.
Selection of compounds
The compounds with the highest glide score for trypsin inhibition were selected and purchased from Sigma Aldrich for further studies. As an initial step, the enzyme (trypsin and LOX) inhibitory potential of pure compounds (1 mM) was carried out by the same procedure described above.
Enzyme kinetics assay for trypsin and LOX
The enzyme-ligand reaction kinetics was found out by enzyme kinetics assay [19]. The same protocol for enzyme inhibitory assay was followed here with different substrate concentrations. The rates of the reaction at different substrate concentrations and the mode of inhibition were also identified by this assay. The different substrate concentrations used for trypsin were 0.03125, 0.0625, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5 mM, and for LOX 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 µM. The activity of the enzyme at different substrate concentrations was measured first and the same was repeated with 1 mM concentration of the compounds of study. Change in the specific enzyme activity against the respective substrate concentrations was plotted and a Lineweaver-Burk (LB) plot was drawn. From the plot Michaelis-Menten constant (Km) and the maximal velocity (Vmax) were determined. The inhibitor constant (Ki) was calculated with
$${\text{K}{\prime }}_{\text{m}}={\text{K}}_{\text{m}}\left(1+\frac{{\text{I}}_{\text{O}}}{{\text{K}}_{\text{i}}}\right)$$
Kʹm is the Michaelis-Menten constant for the enzyme-inhibitor complex.
The Cheng-Prusoff equation was used to calculate the IC50
$${\text{K}}_{\text{i}}=\frac{{\text{I}\text{C}}_{50}}{(1+\frac{\left[\text{S}\right]}{{\text{K}}_{\text{m}}})}$$
Anti-neuroinflammation assay
Cell culturing and inflammation induction
IMR 32 cells were procured from National Centre for Cell Sciences (NCCS), Pune, India. IMR 32 cells are continuous hyper-diploid cell lines from human neuroblastoma tissue [20]. These cell lines are used for the study of various neurological disorders like neuro-inflammatory diseases, Alzheimer's disease, etc. The cells were then maintained in Dulbecco's modified eagles' medium (DMEM) of Sigma Aldrich. Subculturing of the cells was done in a 25 cM2 tissue culture flask containing DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, L-glutamine, sodium bicarbonate (Merck, Germany), and antibiotic solutions, Penicillin (100 U/mL), Streptomycin (100 µg/mL), and Amphotericin B (2.5 µg/mL). Cultured cell lines were kept at 37 ºC in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator (NBS Eppendorf, Germany). The cells grown with 60% confluency were treated with 1 µL of 1 µg/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for inducing inflammatory reactions. LPS activated cells were then treated with different concentrations of the inhibitor (25, 50, 100 µg/mL) and incubated for 24 hours. After incubation, the anti-inflammatory assays were performed using the cell lysate.
COX activity
The COX inhibitory activity was determined by the method of Walker and Gierse [21]. 100 µL cell lysate was mixed with Tris-HCl buffer of pH 8, glutathione 5 mM/L, and haemoglobin 5 mM/L. The mixture was then incubated for 1 minute at 25°C. 200 mM/L of arachidonic acid was added to initiate the reaction and 200 µL 10% trichloroacetic acid in 1 N hydrochloric acid was added to terminate the reaction after 20 minutes of incubation at 37°C. The mixture was centrifuged, 200 µL of 1% thiobarbiturate was added, boiled for 20 minutes, and allowed to cool. This was again centrifuged for three minutes. COX activity was determined by reading absorbance at 632 nm.
Percentage of enzyme inhibition =\(\left(\frac{\text{N}-\text{I}}{\text{N}}\right)\text{x} 100\)
N - Activity of the native enzyme
I - Activity of the enzyme in the presence of inhibitor
LOX activity
LOX activity was determined by a method developed by Axelrod [22]. 2 mL reaction mixture contained 50 µL of the cell lysate, 200 µL sodium linoleate, and Tris HCl buffer at pH 7.4. The LOX activity was monitored by measuring absorbance at 234 nm, which reflected the presence of 5-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid.
Percentage of enzyme inhibition =\(\left(\frac{\text{N}-\text{I}}{\text{N}}\right)\text{x} 100\)
N - Activity of the native enzyme
I - Activity of the enzyme in the presence of inhibitor
Antiepileptic study on rat models
Ethics approval statement
Al the experiments were carried out according to the guidelines of the Committee for Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA), India and ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) after getting approval from the Internal Animal Ethical Committee of Kannur University, Kerala, India (KULS/IAEC/2017/19).
Toxicity study
The study was performed according to the guidelines of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The doses selected for the study were 500 mg/kg and 1000 mg/kg. Animals were divided into five groups with six members each. One group was kept as control and two groups for two doses of each compound. Animals were kept in a fasting condition overnight with access only to water before the experiment. After the administration of compounds animals were kept under 48 hours of observation for any toxic effects [23].
PILO induced convulsions - Animals
Sprague Dawley rats (200–250 g) of either sex were obtained from Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Mannuthy, Kerala, India. The randomly selected animals were maintained in the Animal House facility of the Department of Biotechnology and Microbiology, Kannur University in polypropylene cages at room temperature with free water and food access. After one week of acclimatization, experiments were carried out according to the guidelines of the Committee for Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA), India (KULS/IAEC/2017/19).
Drugs and Chemicals
Analytical grade methyl scopolamine (MS), pilocarpine (PILO), diazepam (DZ), docosane (DC), and methyl palmitate (MP) were bought from Sigma Aldrich.
Induction of Status Epilepticus
350 mg/kg of PILO was injected i.p. on the drug-treated animals to induce convulsions. Pretreatment with testing drugs (DC and MP) and standard drug (DZ-10 mg/kg) was done before 30 minutes of PILO injection. Dosages chosen for DC and MP were 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg. This was based on a minimum dose with maximum activity. Peripheral effects of the inducer were reduced by i.p. injection of MS (1–2 mg/kg). Animals were kept in observation cages for 2 hours to record latency, onset, and different stages of Status Epilepticus (SE) [24]. 7 groups of 6 animals each were chosen. The first group was kept as blank (normal rats), second-negative control (MS and PILO), third-positive control (MS, DZ, and PILO), and the other four groups were test groups. Groups 4 and 5 were DC test groups and groups 6 and 7 were MP test groups.
Behavioral stages of SE
Animals were observed for 2 hours closely after the injection of PILO for rating behavioral changes, measuring latent period and the onset of SE. The rating was done based on the Racine score [25]. Different stages of seizure according to the Racine score are stage 0 (baseline)-without any behavioral changes, stage 1-absence seizure-like immobility, stage 2-head nodding, facial movements with or without salivation, stage 3-clonuses in forelimbs, slight rearing with excess salivation, stage 4-rearing and falling and stage 5-generalized convulsions (tonic-clonic seizures). The first three stages were considered as non-convulsive seizure (NCS) stages and the other three as convulsive seizure (CS) stages [26].
Blood sampling and analyses
Animals were anesthetized with isoflurane and blood samples were collected from the right heart ventricle by cardiac puncturing during SE and after 24 hours of SE. The samples were collected in ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) tubes for cell count analysis and clot activating tubes for separating plasma. Plasma was separated by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 minutes at 4°C and was analyzed for inflammatory markers during epileptogenesis [27]. Considering the role of PILO in triggering inflammatory parameters and in turn seizure activities, three important factors from blood were considered for the study: WBC count with the percentage of lymphocytes, IL-1β, and CRP levels.
WBC total and differential count
Total and differential counts of WBC were estimated using the impedance method (Horiba Pentra ES 60). Total count was measured in number per cubic millimeter and differential counts were expressed in percentage.
IL-1β quantification
Plasma concentration of IL-1β was quantified by enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay (ELISA) (KB31165 IL-1β rat analyte kit, Krishgen biosystems, India) as instructed in the manual.
CRP quantification
Plasma concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP) was quantified by ELISA (88-7501 Rat CRP kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific) as per the instructions in the manual.
Brain tissue isolation, preparation, and analyses
Animals were killed by decapitation for isolating brain tissues during SE and after 24 hours of SE. The brain was removed and dissected within 4 minutes after decapitation at -18°C on a cold plate. The Hippocampus, the central region for the development of seizures in the PILO model [28], and the choroid plexus was isolated from the brain to measure the serum albumin content as an indicator of BBB permeability.
Dissection was started by removing the fur and attached skin above the cranium. The cranium was opened carefully from the foramen magnum and after removing calotte, the brain was taken out in toto. Before isolation, a cold plate was set at a temperature of -18°C. All the dissection tools were also maintained at the same temperature. The first part to be separated was olfactory bulbs. Further steps were followed as per the dissection lines by Zeman and Innes. A transverse incision was made at A22 to separate the brain into dorsally located and caudally located parts. Then incision was made at a position below A17 to get a tissue slice where the hippocampus was visible and can be easily separated [29]. The isolated hippocampus and the rest of the tissues were stored at -80°C till it was analyzed [30].
Before choroid plexus isolation, blood vessels from the dorsal and ventral regions of the brain were removed. The choroid plexus was isolated by placing the brain in the dorsal side up position and fixing it in place using large forceps. A smaller forceps was inserted through the midline at the central part till the top of the midline of the hippocampus, punctured through the cortex and corpus callosum, and pulled away to expose the region. It was identified by the wavy red line and separated by pulling the end using a small forceps or needle. The same procedure was repeated to remove the choroid plexus of the other hemisphere [31].
Determination of the serum albumin content in the choroid plexus
The choroid plexus isolated during SE was weighed and mixed with barbital buffer at pH 8.6 for homogenization. The homogenate was centrifuged for 20 minutes at 2000 rpm. The supernatant was used for determining the albumin content. The assay was carried out using an albumin ELISA kit (E111-125, Bethyl laboratories) [32].
Quantification of Glutamate and GABA in the hippocampus
Hippocampus tissue isolated during SE was washed with 0.9% saline to remove the attached blood clots and other tissues. After adding 0.1 N HCl in 80% ethanol to the tissues at a concentration of 1 mL solvent for 100 mg tissue, it was homogenized thoroughly and centrifuged at 4500 rpm for 20 minutes at 25°C. The supernatant was collected and stored for further analysis. Standards of glutamate and GABA were also prepared in 0.1 N 80% HCl. Working standards of 5 to 50 µg/mL were prepared from a stock solution of 1 mg/mL. 2 µL of the samples and standards were applied on pre-coated thin layer chromatography (TLC) plates (Silica gel F254, Merck) and dried at 60–65°C in a hot air oven. Plates were then developed using the mobile phase n-butanol: glacial acetic acid: water (22:3:5 v/v/v) and dried again at 60–65°C. 0.2% ninhydrin in acetone was sprayed and kept at 60–70°C for 5 minutes. The observation was done at 550 nm [33].
Statistical analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (Version 20) and the final data was presented as mean ± SEM. All data were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc comparison test and a value of P < 0.05 was taken as significant.