Given alarming concerns over the detrimental air pollution effects on human health are increasing, the issue has drawn a greater deal of academic research on a global scale, implying that air pollution, especially PM2.5, is among the most significant causes of cardiovascular diseases and death [23].
PM is of particular importance due to its specific characteristics such as composition and size distribution. This pollutant is characterized by a very high surface area and can adsorb many diverse organic materials such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, heavy metals, pathogens, and radioactive materials. It contains very fine particles that penetrate into the lower respiratory system and also the blood as well as migrate to other organs, even brain [24].
According to the WHO recommendation, long-term exposure to extreme levels of PM2.5, over 10–25 µg/m³, can potentially impair coagulation process, reduce inflammation, damage blood vessels, and eventually cause cardiovascular disease. Several pathways that could help justify the strong link between PM2.5 and cardiovascular diseases were identified [25, 26].
In Europe, PM2.5 concentration in the air of urban areas has been increasing, and some recent cohort studies have approved the relation between long-term PM2.5 exposure and increased mortality rate. Such studies have confirmed the strong correlation between PM concentration and the number of hospital admissions due to heart and respiratory problems [27]. Similar studies have been carried out worldwide (China, Italy, and Mexico) to determine the short-term effects of PM using the AirQ model [28, 29, 30].
According to the findings of Hoek et al., the pooled effect estimate expressed as excess risk per 10 µg/m3 increase in PM2·5 exposure was 6% (0.95 CI = 4–8%) for all-cause mortality and 11% (0.95 CI = 5–16%) for cardiovascular mortality [11].
Chen et al. (2008) conducted a systematic review of the relationship between long-term exposure to ambient pollution and chronic diseases and found that such PM2·5 exposure would increase the risk of cardiovascular mortality by nearly 12–14% per 10-µg/m3 increase in PM2·5, independent of age, gender, and geographic region [31].
The existence of vast deserts in the surrounding areas and so many large industries in the suburb of Isfahan city have made this city one of the most polluted cities in Iran [32].
High PM2.5 levels in Isfahan can be attributed to the growing emergence of deserts and mines, especially lead and zinc mines, as well as energy conversion sectors such as power plants and oil refineries around the city. In addition to the above, in Isfahan province, wind direction changes seasonally, meaning that the wind blows from west to east except in summer. Due to the adaptation of wind currents to the degraded areas caused by the activities of gypsum, clay, sand mines as well as related industries in more than 12,900 hectares (6800 hectares of gypsum and 6100 hectares of clay and sand), a significant impact on air quality, especially due to the concentration of suspended particles, in Isfahan was observed. Further to this, experts’ estimates and the study of the amount of dust and suspended particles in the main stations of Isfahan indicated that more than 30% of the increase in dust in summer resulted from the workings of local centers. These particles are produced in the east and through summer winds [33].
According to the results given in Table 1, 78.8% of the cohort population lived in the city; however, in the third tertile, this number was 60.3% and the difference between the two mentioned values was significant. Regional characteristics of Isfahan are the cause of the higher percentage of PM2.5 concentration in the nearby rural areas. Based on the information collected and the results of the project, Mazloumi et al. identified the eastern and northeastern regions of Isfahan as the most polluted areas with a large number of nearby rural areas. This phenomenon occurring in the suburbs can be attributed to the proximity of these areas to such areas as Sajzi, Nain, Gavkhoni swamps. Sajzi and Nain are desert areas that have remained subject to wind erosion and due to the prevailing wind direction in these areas blowing from east to west in summer, considerable suspended particles move towards the city and cause air pollution. Gavkhoni Wetland, an area to which excess water from the Zayandeh River has been flowing in recent years and a place for trapping suspended particles, has dried up due to reduced rainfall and improper farming and irrigation methods; thus, it has become a breeding ground for dust particles. Also, the existence of sand mines and brick kilns located in the east and northeast of the city (villages around Isfahan) is an important generating source of dust particles polluting the air of Isfahan [34].
In ICS comprising 3081 adults living in 37 clusters across Isfahan province, long-term outdoor PM2·5 exposure corresponded to increased major CVD events. Our findings reveal new information on the relationship between ambient PM2·5 exposure and CVD over a wide range of PM2.5 concentrations (20.01 to 69.80 µg/m3) and in diverse areas and urban/rural populations while adjusting an extensive set of individual, household, and community CVD risk factors.
A recent meta-analysis has pinpointed 53 studies on long-term PM2·5 and mortality, among which only six were conducted outside of North America and Europe and the mean PM2·5 concentration was 15·7 µg/m3 in all these studies. The weighted mean PM2·5 concentration for world’s population in 2017 was 46 µg/m3 with over 54% of them living in areas above 35 µg/m3, i.e., the WHO Interim Target-1 [10]. To date, only three CVD studies have been conducted at high PM2·5 concentrations, all in China, and the mortality rate estimated per 10% increase in PM2·5 at a mean exposure of 10 µg/m3 was a 14·6% (0.95 CI = 12·5–16·7%) increase in CVD mortality. They also identified low risk at higher PM2·5 concentrations [35]. In our study, we observed the mean (SD) 3-year PM2·5 concentration of 45.28 µg/m3 (11.63) and the HR value of 1.026 (0.95 CI = 1.016, 1.036) per 10 µg/m3 increase in PM2·5 for all CVD events (Table 2). These estimates were considerably smaller than those cited above from the meta-regression analyses and might be justified by the constraints in our study and the level of covariate adjustment compared to the previous studies.
In the study of Abdolahnejad et al., Relative Risk (RR) demonstrated the increased risk resulting from exposure to pollutants, as obtained through time-series experiments. They evaluated the daily connection of air pollution and health effects, such as mortality due to cardiovascular and respiratory diseases. In Isfahan, after each 10 µg/m3 increase in the pollutant amount, the value of RR per increase in the total mortality induced by PM2.5 was 0.5% [36]. In our study, per 10 µg/m3 increase in PM2.5, HR was 0.997 ((0.95 CI = 0.978, 1.016); therefore, we did not observe any evidence of a risk association between the mentioned PM2.5 increase and CVD death.
Tertile models (Table 4) demonstrated a strong, steadily increasing exposure-response relationship for CVD deaths, CVD events, MI, and stroke in the model and then, PM2.5, age, sex, smoking status, physical activity, healthy eating index, obesity, hypertension status, diabetes, cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-to-HDL ratio, history of heart disease in the family, cluster random effect, and urban/rural status random effect were adjusted. In the fully adjusted model, only CVD events and stroke demonstrated a significant strong dose-response relationship: HRs related to the 3rd tertile of PM2·5: 1.652 (0.95 CI = 1.269, 2.150) for all CVD events and 1.791 (0.95 CI = 1.036, 3.097) for stroke events. Taken together, our study results reinforce the evidence of increased CVD risk, especially for stroke, at high PM2·5 concentrations; however, this relationship is not significant.
Table 4
Sub-group analyses by individual and clinical variables for the associations of tertiles of PM2·5 versus CVD events and separately for AMI and Stroke.
| CVD Death | CVD Events | AMI Events | Stroke Events |
Tertiles of PM2·5 | | | | |
1st Tertile | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
2nd Tertile | 0.796(0.472,1.345) | 0.982(0.748,1.289) | 0.941(0.470,1.884) | 1.005(0.567,1.784) |
3rd Tertile | 1.239(0.729,2.106) | 1.652 *(1.269,2.150) | 1.583(0.806,3.111) | 1.791 *(1.036,3.097) |
Sex | | | | |
Female | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Male | 1.795 *(1.068,3.018) | 1.394 *(1.084,1.793) | 2.242 *(1.185,4.242) | 1.208(0.709,2.058) |
Age | | | | |
≤ 60 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
> 60 | 6.995 *(4.218,11.601) | 2.497 *(1.984,3.142) | 1.871 *(1.027,3.409) | 4.624 *(2.844,7.518) |
Smoking Status | | | | |
Never smoker | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Ever smoker | 1.299(0.780,2.162) | 1.401*(1.089,1.802) | 1.407(0.753,2.629) | 1.536(0.902,2.615) |
Physical Activity | | | | |
Low | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Moderate | 0.847(0.533,1.344) | 0.859(0.677,1.090) | 1.138(0.609,2.127) | 0.890(0.550,1.439) |
High | 0.387 *(0.186,0.808) | 0.612 *(0.446,0.840) | 0.389 *(0.151,0.999) | 0.421 *(0.199,0.892) |
Healthy Eating Index | | | | |
Poor diet | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Healthy diet | 1.101(0.549,2.207) | 1.091(0.780,1.525) | 0.697(0.327,1.489) | 1.063(0.528,2.138) |
Hypertension Status | | | | |
No | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Yes | 1.832 *(1.177,2.853) | 1.754*(1.407,2.185) | 1.376(0.773,2.448) | 1.914 *(1.206,3.039) |
Diabetes | | | | |
No | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Yes | 4.179 *(2.555,6.833) | 2.278 *(1.705,3.045) | 3.688 *(1.897,7.169) | 3.375 *(1.952,5.838) |
Cholesterol | 1.003(0.998,1.009) | 1.003 *(1.000,1.005) | 1.010 *(1.005,1.015) | 0.997(0.992,1.002) |
Triglycerides | 0.997(0. 994,1.000) | 1.000(0.999,1.002) | 0.998(0.994,1.001) | 1.000(0.997,1.003) |
LDL to HDL ratio | | | | |
Unnormal | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Borderline | 0.440(0.041,4.682) | 1.512(0.192,11.141) | - | - |
Normal | 0.184(0.020,1.708) | 1.190(0.161,8.778) | - | - |
Obesity | | | | |
No | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Yes | 0.904(0.498,1.638) | 1.141(0.889,1.465) | 1.027(0.531,1.988) | 10541(0.921,2.580) |
History of heart disease in the family | | | | |
No | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. |
Yes | 1.066(0.507,2.242) | 1.100(0.748,1.618) | 1.044(0.371,2.942) | 0.965(0.415,2.247) |
Model 6: PM2.5, age, sex, smoking status, physical activity, healthy eating index, obesity, hypertension status, diabetes, cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL to HDL ratio, History of heart disease in the family, cluster random effect and urban/rural status random effect. * Statistically significant (0.05). |
In addition to the diverse geographical population and large PM2·5 concentration range, the ICS is unique in its depth of individual variables available to adjust the potential confounding factors. Besides the long-term follow-up (15 years), ICS considered a range of sociodemographic, behavioral, metabolic, and clinical variables that affect CVD, an issue that most large cohort studies examining air pollution did not measure [34].
In the analysis controlling for center urban and rural random effects (Model 5, Table 2), we observed a substantial change in the estimated HR for AMI and IHD, implying the existence of unmeasured important factors at the center level for the two above events.
From the results, one can conclude that long-term outdoor PM2·5 is a significant contributing factor in CVD in Iran. This research enjoys a number of advantages including a longitudinal study with the 15-year follow-up, enough number of samples and comprehensive outcomes, and sufficient urban and rural population exposed to high PM2·5 concentrations for the whole study period, uniform assessment of long-term PM2·5 exposure using estimation methods, objective measurement of a comprehensive suite of individual CVD risk factors, and standardized collection of data on household and community characteristics, and prospective recording of fatal and non-fatal events that were evaluated through standard definitions. Further to the above, our research was subject to potential limitations. We could not control the acute (i.e., daily) variations in PM2·5 exposures and their impacts. Further, we assigned PM2·5 to study communities, representing neighborhoods in urban areas and small villages in rural areas. While it is unlikely that outdoor PM2·5 concentrations would vary substantially over such small areas, some exposure misclassifications exist that could bias estimates towards the null.
Models were sensitive to geographical adjustments as we compared PM2·5 concentrations and CVD events across different areas. While residual confounding cannot be ruled out, we adjusted more individual CVD risk factors than previous studies; the analyses controlling for unmeasured factors between centers using random effects demonstrated larger estimates of the effect. We could not examine specific causes of non-CVD deaths due to the smaller number of events, but these analyses can be done in the future with additional follow-up and more events.