Genotyping with HRM and sequencing
We used amplicon melting analysis in the presence of the saturated HRM dye by the Rotor-Gene 6000 System to detect SNP. HRM analysis can clearly distinguish between the homozygous (A/A, C/C) and heterozygous (A/C) genomic DNA samples according to the different melting curve shapes. The different melting curve shapes were caused by the lower thermal stability of A/A base pairs compared with A/C base pairs and C/C base pairs. Heterozygous (A/C) genomic DNA samples can be easily distinguished by their unique biphasic melting patterns(Fig 1). However, sometimes the A/A genotype and C/C genotype may produce the similar curve shape. To avoid misclarification of genotypes between A/A and C/C, the foreign DNA sample of A/A genotype confirmed by directly sequencing was added to every homozygous samples (in a 1:1 ratio). If the unknown samples are A/A genotype, the melting curve shapes will not be changed after adding the foreign A/A genotype DNA sample. If the unknown samples are C/C genotype, the melting curve shapes were the heteroduplexes curve shapes, and then, the samples can be correctly identified. The genotyping results of all selected samples by HRM was 100% identical with those obtained by direct sequencing.
Distribution of IKZF4 genotypes
Among the 459 patients, the A/A genotype had 253 cases ,the frequency was 55.1%, the C/C genotype had 34 cases ,the frequency was 7.4%, and the A/Cgenotype had 172 cases, the frequency was 37.5%. The frequency of allele A and C was 73.9% and 26.1% respectively. In both AA patient group and healthy control group, the genotype distributions of SNP rs1701704 were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The distribution of polymorphism was assessed in the patient and control groups. The frequencies of SNP were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (p>0.05). Differences in the distribution of both genotype (p<0.0001) and alleles (p<0.0001) between AA patient group and healthy control group were statistically significant (Table 1).
Table 1 Genotype and allele distribution of the rs1701704 in patients with AA
Group
|
Genotype frequencies (%)
|
p
|
Allele frequencies(%)
|
p
|
C/C
|
A/C
|
A/A
|
C
|
A
|
Male
|
18(7.9)
|
81(35.4)
|
130(56.7)
|
0.641
|
117(25.5)
|
341(74.5)
|
0.681
|
Female
|
16(6.9)
|
91(39.6)
|
123(53.5)
|
123(26.7)
|
337(73.3)
|
Age ≤38 years
|
22(9.5)
|
88(38.1)
|
121(52.4)
|
0.174
|
132(28.6)
|
330(71.4)
|
0.092
|
Age >38 years
|
12(5.3)
|
84(36.8)
|
132(57.9)
|
108(23.7)
|
348(76.3)
|
AA
|
34(7.4)
|
172(37.5)
|
253(55.1)
|
<0.0001
|
240(26.1)
|
678(73.9)
|
<0.0001
|
Healthy control
|
9(2.1)
|
148(34.1)
|
277(63.8)
|
166(19.1)
|
702(80.9)
|
Severe AA
|
4(4.2)
|
36(37.5)
|
56(58.3)
|
0.377
|
44(22.9)
|
148(77.1)
|
0.252
|
Mild AA
|
30(8.3)
|
136(37.4)
|
197(54.3)
|
196(27.0)
|
530(73.0)
|
With family history
|
8(12.1)
|
35(53.0)
|
23(34.9)
|
0.001
|
51(38.6)
|
81(61.4)
|
<0.0001
|
Without family history
|
26(6.6)
|
137(34.9)
|
230(58.5)
|
189(24.0)
|
597(76.0)
|
IKZF4 genotype and severity or family history
In our study, we divided the patients into two groups according to their gender: a male group and a female group. There was no significant difference in the distribution of genotype (p=0.641) and alleles (p=0.681) (Table 1) between the two groups.
We divided the patients into two groups according to the onset ages,: Age ≤38 years group and Age >38 years group. There was notable differences between the two groups in the distribution of genotype (p=0.174) and alleles (p=0.092). But there was a little different between the two groups.
The assessment of severity was based on the patient’s most severe condition since the onset of alopecia areata. According to the AA investigational assessment guidelines, patients were classified into four subgroups: patients having patchy AA,patients having alopecia totalis (AT), patients having alopecia totalis/universalis (AT/AU), and patients having alopecia universalis (AU)[24]. In this study, patients with patchy AA were classified as mild AA (n=363), while patients with AT, AT/AU, AU were classified as severe AA (n=96). According to the severity of alopecia areata, those patients were divided into two groups: a severe AA group (AT, AU and AT/AU) and a mild AA group (patchy AA). There was no significant difference in the distribution of both genotype (p=0.377) and alleles (p=0.252) between severe AA group and mild AA group (Table 1).
In our study, the family history was defined as at least one firee-degree or second-degree relative having alopecia areata. There were 66 patients having the family history of AA. According to the family history, those patients were also divided into two different groups: patients with family history group and patients without family history group. Differences in the distribution of both genotype(p=0.001) and alleles (p<0.0001) between these two groups reached the statistical siginificance (Table 1) . The frequency of C allele in the group with family history was higher than that in the group without family history.