Metformin reverse minocycline to inhibit minocycline-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii by destroy the outer membrane and enhance membrane potential in vitro

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1426299/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Metformin reverse minocycline to inhibit minocycline-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii by destroy the outer membrane and enhance membrane potential in vitro

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1426299/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) is an opportunistic pathogen and has emerged as one of the most troublesome pathogens. Drug resistance in A. baumannii has been reported on a global scale. Minocycline was found to be active against multi-drug resistant A. baumannii and was approved by the FDA for the infections caused by sensitive strains of A. baumannii. However, the emergence of minocycline resistance and its toxic effects still need to be addressed. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the synergistic effects of metformin combined with minocycline on minocycline-resistant A. baumannii.

Results: The effect of metformin on the antibacterial activity of minocycline was determined by checkerboard and time-kill assays. Further, it was observed by biofilm formation assay that metformin combination with minocycline can inhibit the formation of biofilm. Outer membrane integrity, membrane permeability, membrane potential and reactive oxygen species (ROS) were monitored to explore the underlying synergistic mechanisms of metformin on minocycline. And the results shown that metformin can destroy the outer membrane of A. baumannii, enhance its membrane potential, but does not affect the membrane permeability and ROS.

Conclusion: These findings suggested that the combination of metformin and minocycline has the potential for rejuvenating the activity of minocycline against minocycline-resistant A. baumannii.

Acinetobacter baumannii

Metformin

Minocycline

Potentiator

Mechanisms

Bacterial infections have been a serious global threat owing to the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria[1]. Although A. baumannii is an opportunistic nosocomial pathogen causing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), blood infections, and urinary tract infections [2], it is now resistant to antimicrobials agents, including carbapenems, leading to the evolution of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains like Carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CR-Ab) that has become a major public health concern. Because of limited antibiotic choices, minocycline has been used for the treatment of drug-resistant A. baumannii [3] and is often used in combination with other antibiotics [4]. As minocycline is a second-generation semisynthetic tetracycline analog [5], its primary mechanism involves attachment to the bacterial 30S ribosomal subunit, thereby affecting the protein synthesis and inhibiting the bacterial peptide formation and further bacterial growth [6]. Since approximately 20% of A. baumannii isolates are resistant to minocycline [7], antibiotic adjuvant could be a promising approach [8]. Combining antibiotics with non-antibiotic adjuvants has been seen to be successful in overcoming resistance against β-lactam resistant Gram-negative pathogens [9]. Besides this, cationic antimicrobial polymers can also enhance the antibacterial activity of polypeptide antibiotics [10].

Metformin is the most popular orally administered drug used for lowering blood glucose worldwide that is widely considered to be the preferred initial treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [11]. Previous research has shown that metformin has several innate properties like anti-cancer, immunoregulatory, and anti-aging effects, which is now attracting the attention of researchers in varied fields other than endocrinology [12]. It was reported that diabetic patients treated with metformin were less likely to have bacterial infections, revealing a potential antimicrobial function of metformin [13, 14] which was also substantiated by the findings of Singhal A et al. that metformin was capable of reducing the intracellular growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis depending on the AMPK (adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase) energy sensor [15]. Liu Y et al. stated that metformin effectively potentiates doxycycline against tet(A)-positive E. coli B2 strains and could moderately activate innate immune response [16]. Whereas in vitro results of another study depicted that metformin efficiently down-regulated the quorum sensing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, thus, inhibiting the bacterial motility and biofilm formation [17].

In this study, as we explored the synergistic activity of metformin in combination with antibiotics against A. baumannii, our findings indicated that metformin synergistically in combination with minocycline inhibits biofilm formation, destroys the outer membrane integrity, and increases the membrane potential.

2.1. Bacterial Strains

The employed strains, A. Baumannii strains A1 (minocycline-sensitive strain), A163 (minocycline-mediated strain), and A156 (minocycline-resistant strain), were clinically isolated from Zhangjiagang people’s hospital, Xuyi hospital, and Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, respectively and preserved in the pathogenic microbiology laboratory of Yangzhou University while the strains were grown in Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth or on MH agar.

2.2. Susceptibility Testing

According to the Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2020 guidelines [18], antibiotic MICs were measured using the standard broth microdilution method in which antibiotics were two-fold diluted in MHB and mixed with the same volume bacterial suspension (≈ 10⁵CFU/mL) in a 96-well microtiter plate while the MIC values were defined as the minimum antibiotic concentrations at which bacterial growth is completely inhibited after 18 h incubation at 37°C.

2.3. Checkerboard Assays

The synergistic activities of antibiotics in conjunction with metformin were evaluated by checkerboard assays which included dispensing of 100 µL MHB into each well of a 96-well plate titer along with the dilution of antibiotics along the ordinate while the metformin was diluted along the abscissa. After 18 h of co-incubation with 100 µL of A. baumannii culture (5 × 10⁶ CFUs/well), the optical density (OD) of bacterial culture at 600 nm was measured using a microplate reader. The FIC indices (FICIs) were calculated according to the formula as follows:

FIC index = MIC _ab ∕ MIC _a + MIC _ba ∕ MIC _{b =}FIC _a + FIC _b

The synergy is defined as FICI ≤ 0.5; irrelevance is defined as 0.5 < FICI ≤ 4; the antagonism is defined as FICI > 4.

2.4. Time-dependent Killing Curve

Time-kill kinetic assays were carried out with A. baumannii strains A1, A163, and A156 for further confirmation of the metformin synergism with minocycline in which overnight dilution of A. baumannii in 1/1000 in Mueller Hinton Broth (MHB) was carried out, and then incubation was performed for four hours (exponential phase) at 37°C, followed by addition of metformin, minocycline, or a combination of both drugs were added into the bacterial culture which was then treated with Phosphate buffered saline (PBS), minocycline (MIN, 4,8,16, 32, µg/mL) or metformin (MET, 5, 20 mg/mL) alone or in combination (MIN + MET, 4 µg/mL + 5 mg/mL, 8 µg/mL + 5 mg/mL or 32 µg/mL + 20 mg/mL). The minocycline concentration in this experiment corresponded to the MIC of each strain, while the metformin concentration used was 0.25 MIC of each strain. After the removal of 100 µL bacteria culture aliquots every two hours, succeeded by centrifugation, PBS resuspension, and ten-fold serial dilution, the dilutions were placed on MHA plates, and colony counts were determined after incubation for 12 h at 37°C; performed experiments were conducted in triplicate, and the mean ± SD was revealed accordingly.

2.5. Biofilm Inhibition Assay

The biofilm formation assay was conducted in a 96-well plate as previously described [19] in which A. baumannii A156 isolates were cultured in MH (5 mL) at 37°C with a shaking rate of 200 rpm for 12 h followed by adding 100 µL of a mixture containing different concentration of only metformin (metformin,0–40 mg/mL) as well as a combination of both drugs (metformin 20 mg/mL; minocycline 4 µg/mL) to each well. Furthermore, as 100 µL of the prepared bacterial culture containing 1 × 10⁶ CFU/mL was added to each well and incubated at 37°C for 24 h, planktonic cells were removed, and the wells were washed with PBS and air-dried followed by the staining of the adhered biofilm cells with 1% crystal violet for 30 min and repeated PBS rinse thrice. Thenceforth, as the wells were dissolved in ethanol (95%), the experiment was repeated thrice, followed by measurement of absorbance at 590 nm using Bio-Tek SYNERGY2 (Bio-Tek, USA).

2.6. Outer Membrane Integrity and Membrane Permeability

In order to confirm the outer membrane damage due to the combination of minocycline with metformin, the bacterial outer membrane integrity was investigated by the usage of 1-N-phenylnaphthylamine (NPN) and propidium iodide (PI) [20] in which the bacteria were collected, washed with PBS and suspended to 1 × 10⁷ CFU/mL in PBS followed by treatment with metformin (final concentrations 0–80 mg/mL) for testing the singular effect of the metformin on the outer membrane. Furthermore, in another group, the bacterial suspensions were treated with minocycline (MIN,0–64 µg/mL) or metformin (MET, 20 mg/mL) alone or in a combination for one hour at 37°C 180rpm using untreated bacteria as the control. The fluorescence intensity of the bacterial suspension (200 µL) as well as 10 µM NPN in 96-well black microtiter plate was immediately measured at the excitation and emission wavelengths of 350 and 420 nm, respectively along with the measurement of fluorescence intensity of 10 nM propidium iodide (PI)-labeled 200 µL of the bacterial cells treated with drugs with the excitation and emission wavelength of 535 and 615 nm, respectively.

2.7. Membrane Depolarization

Bacteria were collected, washed, and suspended in 5 mM HEPES [pH 7.0, with 5 mM glucose] with an optical density (OD600) of 0.5 reading succeeded by a pre-treatment with metformin (0–80 mg/mL) and minocycline (0–64 µg/mL) alone or combined with 20 mg/mL metformin for one hour at 37°C while using untreated bacteria as the control. As the membrane potential was measured by 3, 3-dipropylthiadicarbocyanine iodide (DiSC₃(5), 0.5 µM) (Yuanye, Shanghai, China), the membrane potential level of bacterial cells was measured with the excitation and emission wavelength of 622 and 670 nm, respectively.

2.8. ROS Level

In order to measure the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), a fluorescent probe, carboxy-H₂DCFDA (carboxy-2’,7’-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate; Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. USA), was used. Bacteria were collected, washed with PBS and suspended to 1 × 10⁷ CFU/mL in PBS followed by the treatment of bacterial cells with different concentrations of metformin (0–80 mg/mL) or minocycline (0–64 µg/mL) or its combination with 20 mg/mL metformin followed by addition of 5 µM of Carboxy-DCFDA to the bacterial suspension and incubation at 37°C for 30 min in the dark while the fluorescence intensity was measured with a fluorescence microplate reader using excitation and fluorescence detection at 488 and 530 nm wavelengths, respectively.

2.9 Resistance Development Studies

Due to the sensitivity of A. baumannii isolate, ATCC19606 to minocycline, it was employed further in the resistance development studies. ATCC 19606, after culture at 37°C for 24 h was diluted in 1:100 MHB media supplement with 0.5 × MIC of minocycline or minocycline plus 0.5 × MIC of metformin (10 mg/mL) which was then cultured again at 37°C for 24 hours, diluted in 1:100 MHB, and cultured to an OD600 of 0.5 while determining the MIC by two-fold serial dilutions in 96-well microtiter plates. Furthermore, this culture was again diluted in 1:100 MHB media containing 0.5 × MIC of drugs for a total of 40 passages containing ATCC19606 inducing minocycline-resistant strains along with the calculation of the fold increase in subsequent minocycline MIC relative to initial MIC [21].

2.10 Safety Assessment

The hemolytic activity of metformin in combination with minocycline was evaluated based on previously reported studies [22] in which 8% sheep blood cells prepared from fresh sterile defibrinated sheep blood, was treated with a combination of minocycline (16–128 µg/mL) and metformin (0–80 mg/mL) in equal volumes, using 0.2% Triton X-100 as a positive control and (PBS 0.01 mol/L, pH = 7.4) as a negative control at 37°C for one hour followed by the measurement of the released hemoglobin absorption at 576 nm by Bio-Tek Synergy2 Multi-mode Microplate Reader. The percentage of hemolysis percentage was calculated by:

Hemolysis (%) = [(OD576 _sample−OD576 _blank) ∕ (OD576 _{0.2%Triton X−100}−OD576 _blank)] ×100%

3.1. Synergistic activity of metformin with antibiotics

In order to determine the efficacy of metformin in combination with antibiotics inhibits multidrug-resistant A. baumannii, the synergistic antimicrobial activity of metformin combined with several antibiotics was investigated by chequerboard broth microdilution assays. The activities of nine antibiotics (kanamycin; tetracycline; tigecycline; vancomycin; ampicillin; minocycline; erythromycin; ciprofloxacin; imipenem) with metformin against A. baumannii isolate A1 is shown in Fig. 1. Metformin showed a synergistic effect with minocycline against A. baumannii A1 through primary screening, the results displayed that the metformin was a potential adjuvant to minocycline with Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index (FICI) = 0.28125, Fig. 1F). The metformin activity in conjunction with different antibiotic classes against A. baumannii A1 was enumerated as follows; the FICI (kanamycin with metformin) ≥ 2; FICI (tetracycline with metformin) = 1; FICI (tigecycline with metformin) = 0.75; FICI (vancomycin with metformin) = 2; FICI (ampicillin with metformin) ≥ 2; FICI (minocycline with metformin) = 0.28125; FICI (erythromycin with metformin) ≥ 2; FICI (ciprofloxacin with metformin) ≥ 2; FICI (imipenem with metformin) ≥ 2, thereby implying that FIC indices of metformin with tigecycline, tetracycline, ampicillin, kanamycin, imipenem, vancomycin, erythromycin, and ciprofloxacin were above > 0.5, suggesting irrelevance or antagonism as shown in Fig. 1.

As it was reported that A. baumannii A1 strain was sensitive to minocycline, the evaluation of metformin’s synergistic effect with minocycline on A163 (minocycline-mediated strain) and A156 (minocycline-resistant strain) depicted that metformin also had a synergistic effect on A. baumannii A163 and A156 strains (Fig. 2). Since metformin FICI with minocycline for A163 and A156 was 0.375 and 0.1825, respectively, it indicated that the synergistic effect of metformin with minocycline existed in A. baumannii strains no matter it is minocycline resistant or not.

Time-dependent killing curves were determined using strains with different sensitivity to minocycline for studying the synergistic bactericidal activity of metformin with minocycline as the combination of minocycline with metformin displayed obvious bactericidal activities against A. baumannii (Fig. 3).

3.2. Metformin inhibited the formation of biofilms

After confirming that metformin potentiates minocycline killing against A. baumannii, we sought to conduct the potential mechanism studies on minocycline resistant A. Baumannii A156 strain. Biofilm can protect microorganisms and enhance their resistance against stressed environments and antibiotics [23, 24]. Biofilm formation assay was performed to determine the efficacy of metformin combination with minocycline for inhibiting the biofilm formation, confirming that metformin can inhibit the formation of biofilms. However, minocycline itself has no effect on biofilm formation (Fig. 4A, B).

3.3. Metformin destroyed outer membrane of A. baumannii

The minocycline’s antibacterial activity depends on the inhibition of protein synthesis; thus, suggesting that intracellular minocycline accumulation might be enhanced by metformin. Both NPN and PI were used to detect the outer membrane permeability and membrane integrity for studying whether the intracellular minocycline accumulation induced by metformin is due to the change of membrane permeability in A. baumannii; the results are shown in Fig. 5. It is reported that metformin increased outer membrane permeability in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 5A) while the addition of different minocycline concentrations did not influence the outer membrane permeability of A. baumannii; however, the outer membrane permeability of A. baumannii increased significantly when metformin was added (Fig. 5B) whereas the addition of different metformin concentrations does not affect the membrane permeability of A. baumannii (Fig. 5C). Hence, these results indicated that metformin in conjunction with minocycline might only lead to outer membrane damage.

3.4. Metformin can enhance the membrane depolarization of A. baumannii

The damaged outer-membrane by metformin might cause dysfunctions in cytoplasmic membrane; thus, DiSC₃(5) was used to detect the bacterial membrane depolarization. The A. baumannii treatment with 20 mg/mL,40 mg/mL and 80 mg/mL metformin showed an increase (p < 0.05) in fluorescence, whereas using 10 mg/mL metformin showed no change (Fig. 6A). Hence, it was stated that the addition of different concentrations of minocycline combined with 20 mg/mL metformin influences the membrane depolarization of A. baumannii (Fig. 6B) and further indicated that metformin increased the damage of the outer membrane and dissipated the cytoplasmic membrane potential while no change was observed in whole membrane permeability thereby, implying that the structural integrity of the inner membrane might be largely maintained, although the functionality was affected by the usage of these drugs.

3.5. Effect of metformin on the production of ROS

As depicted in previous studies, antibiotics affected many cellular targets by causing a disturbance in metabolism and respiration by generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) [25]. Hence, metformin, minocycline, and a combination of both the drugs were examined for inducing ROS production; the ROS levels of A. baumannii were detected and shown in Fig. 6C and D. It was also observed that the minocycline monotherapy group did not display any change of fluorescent intensity when compared with the control and metformin monotherapy groups that showed an increased ROS production only with higher concentrations (40 mg/mL and 80 mg/mL), respectively. While the combination group showed little changes with increasing minocycline concentration combined with 20 mg/mL metformin, only 64 µg/mL minocycline with metformin showed a significant difference (Fig. 6D); thus, proving that the synergistic effect of metformin and minocycline is not associated with ROS production.

3.6. Resistance Development Studies

In order to further understand the ability of metformin to inhibit the development of antibiotic resistance, several resistance development studies were conducted. Due to the multiple targets of metformin action (membrane damage, membrane depolarization, and ROS formation), the speed of minocycline resistance development against A. baumannii might be decreased, 40 passages of ATCC19606 (the standard strain of A. baumannii) with minocycline sub-MIC (0.5×MIC) in metformin’s presence and absence (10 mg/mL, corresponding to half of MIC) was performed. As it was observed that the speed of minocycline resistance development of the minocycline alone group was faster than the combination group (Fig. 7), the metformin’s addition inhibited the evolution of minocycline resistance to A. baumannii ATCC 19606 in vitro and indicated that the combination of minocycline and metformin could delay the emergence of minocycline resistance.

3.7. Safety evaluation of minocycline and metformin combination

The hemolysis of minocycline in the presence of metformin was examined to observe the influence of metformin in the minocycline toxicity, which was not observed when there was an increase in the combination treatment as compared to the singular effect (Fig. 8), along with another finding that the combination of minocycline and metformin is safe and stable for further usage in relevant conditions.

The increase of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria has become a severe problem worldwide due to persistent over usage of antibiotics [26]. A. baumannii, an opportunistic Gram-negative pathogen, is frequently involved in nosocomial infection outbreaks [27]. In the last two decades, A. baumannii infection has been seen to increase in both the incidence and severity in critically ill patients [28]. Thus, it is important to find compounds that increase the effectiveness of antimicrobial agents on drug-resistant bacteria. Several studies have reported that some compounds could enhance the antibacterial activity of antibiotics via a number of different mechanisms [29, 30]. Metformin is the first-line treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Although multiple biofunctions of metformin in treatment of diseases such as cardiovascular disease, neurodegenerative disease, cancer, and aging have been demonstrated [31–33], its potential antibacterial activity in bacterial infections has not been fully explored.

Our results revealed that metformin effectively potentiates minocycline against A. baumannii due to the implementation of several evaluation assays like the checkerboard test assay, whose primary screening identified that metformin had a synergistic activity with minocycline against A. baumannii along with the utilization of time-kill kinetics assay that provided significant evidence regarding the synergistic effect of the metformin combination with minocycline, inhibiting the formation of biofilm; thus, reducing the ability of A. baumannii to antibiotic resistance. It was also confirmed that metformin in combination with minocycline inhibited A. baumannii by destroying the outer membrane, hence enhancing its membrane potential.

Compared to free-swimming (planktonic) bacterial cells, biofilms depicted a higher resistance to killing by a great majority of antimicrobial agents [34] as well as in the realization of biofilm-specific therapy that promoted the dispersal of biofilm cells and might be used later to treat such challenging infections [35]. This study exhibited that metformin inhibited the formation of biofilm, thereby reducing the ability of A. baumannii to resist minocycline. Liu Y et al. revealed that metformin could destroy gram-negative bacterial outer membrane and dissipated membrane potential of the cytoplasmic membrane [16], which was similar to the inhibitory effect of metformin on the mitochondrial complex –I, the largest multi-subunit complex of the respiratory chain [36]. Metformin might also inhibit bacterial NADH dehydrogenase-like complex type-1 (NDH-1) complex due to a similarity between its structure and function with mitochondrial complex –I [15, 37, 38].

This is the first study that has employed the co-application of metformin and minocycline against A. baumannii and provided the evidence of antibacterial potential for using the above-mentioned compounds as antibiotic adjuvants in the treatment of A. baumannii as these metformin antibacterial mechanism findings supply a basis for allowing the screening for other antibiotic adjuvants. Nevertheless, more research work on metformin’s synergistic pathway is the need of the hour to provide a better understanding of its potential synergistic mechanism in combating bacterial resistance.

In conclusion, our research shown that there is a synergistic effects of non-antibiotic drug(metformin) with minocycline on A. baumannii that resist minocycline. Mechanism studies proved that metformin can destroy the outer membrane of A. baumannii, enhance its membrane potential, but does not affect the membrane permeability and ROS. Therefore, the use of metformin together with minocycline may be a good strategy in clinical treatments and provides a theoretical basis for screening more non-antibiotic drugs in minocycline-based combination.

A. baumannii : Acinetobacter baumannii ; MET: Metformin; MIN: Minocycline; ROS：reactive oxygen species; MH：Mueller-Hinton; NPN：1-N-phenylnaphthylamine; PI：Propidium iodide

Ethics approval and consent to participate:Not Applicable.

Consent for publication:Not Applicable.

Availability of data and material: The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests : The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding：This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82073611 and 82002186), the Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province (Grant number: 19KJB310002).

Author Contribtions: GCL and TTG contributed to the design of the study. TTG, XLS, MYL, and LYY contributed to the acquisition of the data. GCL , TTG and XLS contributed to the analysis of the data. All authors contributed to data interpretation, drafting the manuscript, critically revising the manuscript for important intellectual content, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements:Not Applicable.

Brown ED, Wright GD. Antibacterial drug discovery in the resistance era. Nature. 2016;529(7586):336–43.
Tyumentseva M, Mikhaylova Y, Prelovskaya A, Tyumentsev A, Petrova L, Fomina V, Zamyatin M, Shelenkov A, Akimkin V. Genomic and Phenotypic Analysis of Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates Carrying Different Types of CRISPR/Cas Systems. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) 2021, 10(2).
Goff DA, Bauer KA, Mangino JE. Bad bugs need old drugs: a stewardship program's evaluation of minocycline for multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Clin Infect diseases: official publication Infect Dis Soc Am. 2014;59(Suppl 6):381–7.
Bowers DR, Cao H, Zhou J, Ledesma KR, Sun D, Lomovskaya O, Tam VH. Assessment of minocycline and polymyxin B combination against Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(5):2720–5.
Asadi A, Abdi M, Kouhsari E, Panahi P, Sholeh M, Sadeghifard N, Amiriani T, Ahmadi A, Maleki A, Gholami M. Minocycline, focus on mechanisms of resistance, antibacterial activity, and clinical effectiveness: Back to the future. J global Antimicrob Resist. 2020;22:161–74.
Sapadin AN, Fleischmajer R. Tetracyclines: nonantibiotic properties and their clinical implications. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54(2):258–65.
Kuo SC, Chang SC, Wang HY, Lai JF, Chen PC, Shiau YR, Huang IW, Lauderdale TL. Emergence of extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii complex over 10 years: nationwide data from the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) program. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:200.
Wright GD. Antibiotic Adjuvants: Rescuing Antibiotics from Resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24(11):862–71.
King AM, Reid-Yu SA, Wang W, King DT, De Pascale G, Strynadka NC, Walsh TR, Coombes BK, Wright GD. Aspergillomarasmine A overcomes metallo-β-lactamase antibiotic resistance. Nature. 2014;510(7506):503–6.
Tian J, Zhang J, Yang J, Du L, Geng H, Cheng Y. Conjugated Polymers Act Synergistically with Antibiotics to Combat Bacterial Drug Resistance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(22):18512–20.
Sanchez-Rangel E, Inzucchi SE. Metformin: clinical use in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2017;60(9):1586–93.
Podhorecka M, Ibanez B, Dmoszyńska A. Metformin - its potential anti-cancer and anti-aging effects. Postepy Hig Med Dosw(Online). 2017;71(0):170–5.
Shih CJ, Wu YL, Chao PW, Kuo SC, Yang CY, Li SY, Ou SM, Chen YT. Association between Use of Oral Anti-Diabetic Drugs and the Risk of Sepsis: A Nested Case-Control Study. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15260.
Mor A, Petersen I, Sørensen HT, Thomsen RW. Metformin and other glucose-lowering drug initiation and rates of community-based antibiotic use and hospital-treated infections in patients with type 2 diabetes: a Danish nationwide population-based cohort study. BMJ open. 2016;6(8):e011523.
Singhal A, Jie L, Kumar P, Hong GS, Leow MK, Paleja B, Tsenova L, Kurepina N, Chen J, Zolezzi F, et al. Metformin as adjunct antituberculosis therapy. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(263):263ra159.
Liu Y, Jia Y, Yang K, Li R, Xiao X, Zhu K, Wang Z. Metformin Restores Tetracyclines Susceptibility against Multidrug Resistant Bacteria. Advanced science (Weinheim. Baden-Wurttemberg Germany). 2020;7(12):1902227.
Hegazy WAH, Khayat MT, Ibrahim TS, Nassar MS, Bakhrebah MA, Abdulaal WH, Alhakamy NA, Bendary MM. Repurposing Anti-diabetic Drugs to Cripple Quorum Sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microorganisms 2020, 8(9).
Guo T, Li M, Sun X, Wang Y, Yang L, Jiao H, Li G. Synergistic Activity of Capsaicin and Colistin Against Colistin-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: In Vitro/Vivo Efficacy and Mode of Action. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:744494.
O'Toole GA. Microtiter dish biofilm formation assay. Journal of visualized experiments: JoVE 2011(47).
Kaur A, Sharma P, Capalash N. Curcumin alleviates persistence of Acinetobacter baumannii against colistin. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):11029.
Maisuria VB, Okshevsky M, Déziel E, Tufenkji N: Proanthocyanidin Interferes with Intrinsic Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms of Gram-Negative Bacteria. Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) 2019, 6(15):1802333.
Liu Y, Jia Y, Yang K, Tong Z, Shi J, Li R, Xiao X, Ren W, Hardeland R, Reiter RJ, et al. Melatonin overcomes MCR-mediated colistin resistance in Gram-negative pathogens. Theranostics. 2020;10(23):10697–711.
Wang YC, Huang TW, Yang YS, Kuo SC, Chen CT, Liu CP, Liu YM, Chen TL, Chang FY, Wu SH, et al. Biofilm formation is not associated with worse outcome in Acinetobacter baumannii bacteraemic pneumonia. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):7289.
Bardbari AM, Arabestani MR, Karami M, Keramat F, Aghazadeh H, Alikhani MY, Bagheri KP. Highly synergistic activity of melittin with imipenem and colistin in biofilm inhibition against multidrug-resistant strong biofilm producer strains of Acinetobacter baumannii. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect diseases: official publication Eur Soc Clin Microbiol. 2018;37(3):443–54.
Dwyer DJ, Belenky PA, Yang JH, MacDonald IC, Martell JD, Takahashi N, Chan CT, Lobritz MA, Braff D, Schwarz EG, et al. Antibiotics induce redox-related physiological alterations as part of their lethality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(20):E2100–9.
Dijkshoorn L, Nemec A, Seifert H. An increasing threat in hospitals: multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5(12):939–51.
Opazo A, Domínguez M, Bello H, Amyes SG, González-Rocha G. OXA-type carbapenemases in Acinetobacter baumannii in South America. J Infect developing Ctries. 2012;6(4):311–6.
Gootz TD, Marra A. Acinetobacter baumannii: an emerging multidrug-resistant threat. Expert Rev anti-infective therapy. 2008;6(3):309–25.
Gaurav A, Gupta V, Shrivastava SK, Pathania R. Mechanistic insights into synergy between nalidixic acid and tetracycline against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Escherichia coli. Commun biology. 2021;4(1):542.
Shin B, Park W. Synergistic Effect of Oleanolic Acid on Aminoglycoside Antibiotics against Acinetobacter baumannii. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(9):e0137751.
Lv Z, Guo Y. Metformin and Its Benefits for Various Diseases. Front Endocrinol. 2020;11:191.
Vancura A, Bu P, Bhagwat M, Zeng J, Vancurova I. Metformin as an Anticancer Agent. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2018;39(10):867–78.
Jenkins AJ, Welsh P, Petrie JR. Metformin, lipids and atherosclerosis prevention. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2018;29(4):346–53.
Hoyle BD, Costerton JW. Bacterial resistance to antibiotics: the role of biofilms. Progress in drug research Fortschritte der Arzneimittelforschung Progres des recherches pharmaceutiques. 1991;37:91–105.
Taylor PK, Yeung AT, Hancock RE. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms: towards the development of novel anti-biofilm therapies. J Biotechnol. 2014;191:121–30.
Wheaton WW, Weinberg SE, Hamanaka RB, Soberanes S, Sullivan LB, Anso E, Glasauer A, Dufour E, Mutlu GM, Budigner GS, et al. Metformin inhibits mitochondrial complex I of cancer cells to reduce tumorigenesis. eLife. 2014;3:e02242.
Yagi T, Yano T, Di Bernardo S, Matsuno-Yagi A. Procaryotic complex I (NDH-1), an overview. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1998;1364(2):125–33.
Vashisht R, Brahmachari SK. Metformin as a potential combination therapy with existing front-line antibiotics for Tuberculosis. J translational Med. 2015;13:83.

Download PDF

Editorial decision: Major revision
02 May, 2022
Reviews received at journal
30 Mar, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
29 Mar, 2022
Editor invited by journal
15 Mar, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
14 Mar, 2022
First submitted to journal
06 Mar, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Metformin reverse minocycline to inhibit minocycline-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii by destroy the outer membrane and enhance membrane potential in vitro

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

1. Background

2. Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains

2.2. Susceptibility Testing

2.3. Checkerboard Assays

2.4. Time-dependent Killing Curve

2.5. Biofilm Inhibition Assay

2.6. Outer Membrane Integrity and Membrane Permeability

2.7. Membrane Depolarization

2.8. ROS Level

2.9 Resistance Development Studies

2.10 Safety Assessment

3. Results

3.1. Synergistic activity of metformin with antibiotics

3.2. Metformin inhibited the formation of biofilms

3.3. Metformin destroyed outer membrane of A. baumannii

3.4. Metformin can enhance the membrane depolarization of A. baumannii

3.5. Effect of metformin on the production of ROS

3.6. Resistance Development Studies

3.7. Safety evaluation of minocycline and metformin combination

4. Discussion

5. Conclusion

Abbreviations

Declarations

References

Status:

Version 1