Amarcus41. (2012). 193 papers could be retracted: Journal consortium issues ultimatum in Fujii case. Retrieved March 31, 2018 from http://retractionwatch.com/2012/04/10/193-papers-could-be-retracted-journal-consortium-issues-ultimatum-in-fujii-case/#more–7238.
Amarcus41. (2013). Retraction record broken, again: University report should up Fujii total to 183. Retrieved March 31, 2018 from http://retractionwatch.com/2013/01/15/retraction-record-broken-again-university-report-should-up-fujii-total-to–183/#more–11761
Björk B. (2015). Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits to growth?. Peerj, 3(4), e981.
Casadevall A, Fang F C. (2012). Winner takes all. Scientific American, 307(2): 13–17.
Chawla D S. (2018). The secrets of Switzerland’s surprisingly high citations success. Small countries have an outsized presence among the scientific elite. Retrieved March 31, 2018 from https://www.natureindex.com/news-blog/the-secrets-of-switzerlands-surprisingly-high-citations-success.
Chen, C., Hu, Z., Milbank, J., & Schultz, T. (2013). A visual analytic study of retracted articles in scientific literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 64(2), 234–253.
Chen, S., Pan, Y., Yao, Q., Yao, L., Liu, Z., & Xiang, L. (2014). Publication pressure on chinese doctors—another view. Lancet, 384(9947), 956–956.
Chen, W., Xing, Q. R., Wang, H., & Wang, T. (2017). Retracted publications in the biomedical literature with authors from mainland china. Scientometrics(5), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192–017–2565-x
Cheng, W. H., & Ren, S. L. (2016). Investigation on article processing charge for OA papers from the world’s major countries. Chinese Science Bulletin, 61(26), 2861–2868.
Cohen, D. (2018). Ema calls for hydroxyethyl starch solutions to be taken off market. BMJ, 360.
Dadkhah, M., Kahani, M., & Borchardt, G. (2017). A method for improving the integrity of peer review. Science & Engineering Ethics(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948–017–9960–9
Fang, F. C., Steen, R. G., & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(42), 17028.
Ferguson C. (2015). Leading diabetes researcher corrects paper as more than a dozen studies are questioned on PubPeer. Retrieved March 31, 2018 from http://retractionwatch.com/2015/01/12/leading-diabetes-researcher-corrects-paper-dozen-studies-questioned-pubpeer/
Goldman, B. (2017). The American Society for Microbiology and Publons—Teaming Up to Bring Recognition to Peer Reviewers. Retrieved March 31, 2018 from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/576fcda2e4fcb5ab5152b4d8/t/59c9174ed2b85751f5125639/1506350935812/ASM_Publons_Case_Study.pdf.
Hilten, L G. (2018). At Harvard, developing software to spot misused images in science. Retrieved March 31, 2018 from https://www.elsevier.com/connect/at-harvard-developing-software-to-spot-misused-images-in-science
Hindawi Publishing. (2015). Hindawi concludes an in-depth investigation into peer review fraud. Retrieved March 31, 2018 from http://www.hindawi.com/statement/.
Hua, H. E., & Xia, H. X. (2014). Science citation index papers and research performance assessment:an overview of editing companies. Medicine & Philosophy, 35(10A): 4–7.
Hvistendahl M. (2015). China pursues fraudsters in science publishing. Science, 350(6264), 1015.
Jiang, J., Li, J., & Zhou, B. (2016). Analysis on the attitude of title bundled with paper in professional medical staffs. Chinese Hospitals, 20(11), 35–37.
Karen E. W, Carol R, Beethika K, & Christina F. (2017). Science and Engineering Publication Output Trends: 2014 Shows Rise of Developing Country Output while Developed Countries Dominate Highly Cited Publications. Retrieved March 31, 2018 from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsf18300/
Liao, Q. J., Zhang, Y. Y., Fan, Y. C., Zheng, M. H., Bai, Y., & Eslick, G. D., et al. (2017). Perceptions of chinese biomedical researchers towards academic misconduct: a comparison between 2015 and 2010. Science & Engineering Ethics (7418), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948–017–9913–3
McCook, A. (2016a). 2001 Fujii papers retracted—finally. What took so long? Retrieved March 31, 2018 from http://retractionwatch.com/2016/02/03/2001-fujii-papers-retracted-finally-what-took-so-long/#more–36166
McCook, A. (2016b). Ever heard of China’s '‘ﬁve don’ts of academic publishing?’‘. Retrieved March 31, 2018 from http://retractionwatch.com/2016/10/20/ever-heard-of-chinas-ﬁve-donts-of-academic-publishing/#more45364.
McCook, A. (2017a). A new record: Major publisher retracting more than 100 studies from cancer journal over fake peer reviews. Retrieved March 31, 2018 from https://retractionwatch.com/2017/04/20/new-record-major-publisher-retracting–100-studies-cancer-journal-fake-peer-reviews/
McCook, A. (2017b). Can a tracking system for peer reviewers help stop fakes? Retrieved March 31, 2018 from https://retractionwatch.com/2017/06/23/can-tracking-system-peer-reviewers-help-stop-fakes/
McCook, A. (2017c). When a journal retracts 107 papers for fake reviews, it pays a price. Retrieved March 31, 2018 from http://retractionwatch.com/2017/08/16/journal-retracts–107-papers-fake-reviews-pays-price/#more–51443
McCook, A. (2018). Why one journal will no longer accept author-suggested reviewers. Retrieved March 31, 2018 from https://retractionwatch.com/2018/03/15/why-one-journal-will-no-longer-accept-author-suggested-reviewers/
Oransky, I. (2013). Why write a blog about retractions? Retrieved March 31, 2018 from https://retractionwatch.com/2010/08/03/why-write-a-blog-about-retractions/
Oransky, I. (2012a). Giving thanks for plagiarism detection software: Catching up on retractions for the sincerest form of flattery. Retrieved March 31, 2018 from http://retractionwatch.com/2012/11/22/giving-thanks-for-plagiarism-detection-software-catching-up-on-retractions-for-the-sincerest-form-of-flattery/
Oransky, I. (2012b). Retraction count grows to 35 for scientist who faked emails to do his own peer review. Retrieved March 31, 2018 from https://retractionwatch.com/2012/09/17/retraction-count-for-scientist-who-faked-emails-to-do-his-own-peer-review-grows-to–35/#more–9761
Oransky, I. (2015). What should an ideal retraction notice look like? Retrieved March 31, 2018 from https://retractionwatch.com/2015/05/21/what-should-an-ideal-retraction-notice-look-like/
Palus, S. (2015). Boldt’s retraction count upped to 94, co-author takes legal action to prevent 95th. Retrieved March 31, 2018 from https://retractionwatch.com/2015/10/12/boldts-retraction-count-upped-to–94-co-author-takes-legal-action-to-prevent–95th
Qi, X., Han, D., & Guo, X. (2017). Characteristics of retractions related to faked peer reviews: an overview. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 93(1102), 499.
Rees, M. (2015). Cope statement on inappropriate manipulation of peer review processes. Maturitas, 80(4), 339–339.
Ribeiro, M. D., & Vasconcelos, S. M. R. (2018). Retractions covered by retraction watch in the 2013–2015 period: prevalence for the most productive countries. Scientometrics, 114(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192–018–2653–6
Schmidt, M. (2018). An analysis of the validity of retraction annotation in PubMed and the web of science. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 69. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23913
Singh, H. P., Mahendra, A., Yadav, B., Singh, H., Arora, N., & Arora, M. (2014). A comprehensive analysis of articles retracted between 2004 and 2013 from biomedical literature—a call for reforms. Journal of traditional and complementary medicine, 4(3): 136–139.
Stretton, S., Bramich, N. J., Keys, J. R., Monk, J. A., Ely, J. A., & Haley, C., et al. (2012). Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: a systematic, retrospective study. Current Medical Research & Opinion, 28(10), 1575–83.
Tollefson J. (2018). China declared world’s largest producer of scientific articles[J]. Nature, 553(7689): 390–390.
Wager, E., & Williams, P. (2011). Why and how do journals retract articles? an analysis of medline retractions 1988–2008. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(9), 567.
Wager, E., Barbour, V., Yentis, S., & Kleinert, S. (2009). Wager E, Barbour V, Yentis S, et al. Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Maturitas,, 64(4): 201–203.
Wang, T., Xing, Q. R., Wang, H., & Chen, W. (2018). Retracted publications in the biomedical literature from open access journals. Science & Engineering Ethics(5), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948–018–0040–6
Wellington. (2018). Let’s End Reviewer Fraud. 2018. Retrieved March 31, 2018 from https://publons.com/blog/lets-end-reviewer-fraud/.
Zarychanski, R., Abousetta, A.M., Turgeon, A. F., Houston, B. L., Mcintyre, L., & Marshall, J. C., et al. (2013). Association of hydroxyethyl starch administration with mortality and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients requiring volume resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jama, 309(7), 678–688.