1.Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Costello A, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Shariat SF, Stolzenburg JU et al: Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012, 62(3):431–452.
2.Khoury W, Jakowlev K, Fein A, Orenstein H, Nakache R, Weinbroum AA: Renal apoptosis following carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum in a rat model. J Urol 2008, 180(4):1554–1558.
3.Wiesenthal JD, Fazio LM, Perks AE, Blew BD, Mazer D, Hare G, Honey RJ, Pace KT: Effect of pneumoperitoneum on renal tissue oxygenation and blood flow in a rat model. Urology 2011, 77(6):1508 e1509–1515.
4.Bergman S, Nutting A, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Andrew CG, Demyttenaere S, Woo D, Carli F, Jutras L, Buthieu J et al: Elucidating the relationship between cardiac preload and renal perfusion under pneumoperitoneum. Surgical endoscopy 2006, 20(5):794–800.
5.Demyttenaere SV, Taqi A, Polyhronopoulos GN, Bergman S, Stanbridge DD, Unikowsky B, Carli F, Fried GM, Feldman LS: Targeting individual hemodynamics to maintain renal perfusion during pneumoperitoneum in a porcine model. Surgery 2007, 142(3):350–356.
6.Sharma KC, Brandstetter RD, Brensilver JM, Jung LD: Cardiopulmonary physiology and pathophysiology as a consequence of laparoscopic surgery. Chest 1996, 110(3):810–815.
7.Lestar M, Gunnarsson L, Lagerstrand L, Wiklund P, Odeberg-Wernerman S: Hemodynamic perturbations during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in 45 degrees Trendelenburg position. Anesth Analg 2011, 113(5):1069–1075.
8.Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A: Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009, 37(9):2642–2647.
9.Hong JQ, He HF, Chen ZY, Du ZS, Liu WF, Weng PQ, Huang HB: Comparison of stroke volume variation with pulse pressure variation as a diagnostic indicator of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Saudi Med J 2014, 35(3):261–268.
10.Yang X, Du B: Does pulse pressure variation predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2014, 18(6):650.
11.Bliacheriene F, Machado SB, Fonseca EB, Otsuke D, Auler JO, Jr., Michard F: Pulse pressure variation as a tool to detect hypovolaemia during pneumoperitoneum. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2007, 51(9):1268–1272.
12.Renner J, Gruenewald M, Quaden R, Hanss R, Meybohm P, Steinfath M, Scholz J, Bein B: Influence of increased intra-abdominal pressure on fluid responsiveness predicted by pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in a porcine model. Crit Care Med 2009, 37(2):650–658.
13.Jacques D, Bendjelid K, Duperret S, Colling J, Piriou V, Viale JP: Pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation during increased intra-abdominal pressure: an experimental study. Crit Care 2011, 15(1):R33.
14.Hoiseth LO, Hoff IE, Myre K, Landsverk SA, Kirkeboen KA: Dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness during pneumoperitoneum and laparoscopic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012, 56(6):777–786.
15.Guinot PG, de Broca B, Bernard E, Abou Arab O, Lorne E, Dupont H: Respiratory stroke volume variation assessed by oesophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness during laparoscopy. Br J Anaesth 2014, 112(4):660–664.
16.Futier E, Constantin JM, Paugam-Burtz C, Pascal J, Eurin M, Neuschwander A, Marret E, Beaussier M, Gutton C, Lefrant JY et al: A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med 2013, 369(5):428–437.
17.Neto AS, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS, Beiderlinden M, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Futier E, Gajic O, El-Tahan MR, Ghamdi AA, Gunay E et al: Association between driving pressure and development of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation for general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Respir Med 2016, 4(4):272–280.
18.Park SJ, Kim BG, Oh AH, Han SH, Han HS, Ryu JH: Effects of intraoperative protective lung ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with laparoscopic surgery: prospective, randomized and controlled trial. Surgical endoscopy 2016, 30(10):4598–4606.
19.Myatra SN, Prabu NR, Divatia JV, Monnet X, Kulkarni AP, Teboul JL: The Changes in Pulse Pressure Variation or Stroke Volume Variation After a “Tidal Volume Challenge” Reliably Predict Fluid Responsiveness During Low Tidal Volume Ventilation. Crit Care Med 2017, 45(3):415–421.
20.Messina A, Montagnini C, Cammarota G, De Rosa S, Giuliani F, Muratore L, Della Corte F, Navalesi P, Cecconi M: Tidal volume challenge to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room: An observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2019, 36(8):583–591.
21.Linares-Perdomo O, East TD, Brower R, Morris AH: Standardizing Predicted Body Weight Equations for Mechanical Ventilation Tidal Volume Settings. Chest 2015, 148(1):73–78.
22.Deflandre E, Bonhomme V, Hans P: Delta down compared with delta pulse pressure as an indicator of volaemia during intracranial surgery. Br J Anaesth 2008, 100(2):245–250.
23.Zhang J, Critchley LA, Huang L: Five algorithms that calculate cardiac output from the arterial waveform: a comparison with Doppler ultrasound. Br J Anaesth 2015, 115(3):392–402.
24.Guinot PG, de Broca B, Abou Arab O, Diouf M, Badoux L, Bernard E, Lorne E, Dupont H: Ability of stroke volume variation measured by oesophageal Doppler monitoring to predict fluid responsiveness during surgery. Br J Anaesth 2013, 110(1):28–33.
25.Lahner D, Kabon B, Marschalek C, Chiari A, Pestel G, Kaider A, Fleischmann E, Hetz H: Evaluation of stroke volume variation obtained by arterial pulse contour analysis to predict fluid responsiveness intraoperatively. Br J Anaesth 2009, 103(3):346–351.
26.Gouvea G, Diaz R, Auler L, Toledo R, Martinho JM: Evaluation of the pulse pressure variation index as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during orthotopic liver transplantation. Br J Anaesth 2009, 103(2):238–243.
27.Wilkman E, Kuitunen A, Pettila V, Varpula M: Fluid responsiveness predicted by elevation of PEEP in patients with septic shock. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2014, 58(1):27–35.
28.Yang SY, Shim JK, Song Y, Seo SJ, Kwak YL: Validation of pulse pressure variation and corrected flow time as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients in the prone position. Br J Anaesth 2013, 110(5):713–720.
29.Cecconi M, Parsons AK, Rhodes A: What is a fluid challenge? Current opinion in critical care 2011, 17(3):290–295.
30.Hong DM, Lee JM, Seo JH, Min JJ, Jeon Y, Bahk JH: Pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients: tidal vs. forced inspiratory breathing. Anaesthesia 2014, 69(7):717–722.
31.Shrout PE, Fleiss JL: Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979, 86(2):420–428.
32.Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Goarin JP, Lehot JJ, Vallet B, Tavernier B: Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a “gray zone” approach. Anesthesiology 2011, 115(2):231–241.
33.Chiumello D, Carlesso E, Cadringher P, Caironi P, Valenza F, Polli F, Tallarini F, Cozzi P, Cressoni M, Colombo A et al: Lung stress and strain during mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008, 178(4):346–355.
34.Liu Y, Wei LQ, Li GQ, Yu X, Li GF, Li YM: Pulse Pressure Variation Adjusted by Respiratory Changes in Pleural Pressure, Rather Than by Tidal Volume, Reliably Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Crit Care Med 2016, 44(2):342–351.
35.Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Carlesso E, Valenza F: Bench-to-bedside review: chest wall elastance in acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. Crit Care 2004, 8(5):350–355.
36.Henny CP, Hofland J: Laparoscopic surgery: pitfalls due to anesthesia, positioning, and pneumoperitoneum. Surgical endoscopy 2005, 19(9):1163–1171.
37.Cinnella G, Grasso S, Spadaro S, Rauseo M, Mirabella L, Salatto P, De Capraris A, Nappi L, Greco P, Dambrosio M: Effects of recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure on respiratory mechanics and transpulmonary pressure during laparoscopic surgery. Anesthesiology 2013, 118(1):114–122.
38.Joris JL, Noirot DP, Legrand MJ, Jacquet NJ, Lamy ML: Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 1993, 76(5):1067–1071.
39.Suehiro K, Tanaka K, Funao T, Matsuura T, Mori T, Nishikawa K: Systemic vascular resistance has an impact on the reliability of the Vigileo-FloTrac system in measuring cardiac output and tracking cardiac output changes. Br J Anaesth 2013, 111(2):170–177.
40.Kubitz JC, Annecke T, Forkl S, Kemming GI, Kronas N, Goetz AE, Reuter DA: Validation of pulse contour derived stroke volume variation during modifications of cardiac afterload. Br J Anaesth 2007, 98(5):591–597.
41.Duperret S, Lhuillier F, Piriou V, Vivier E, Metton O, Branche P, Annat G, Bendjelid K, Viale JP: Increased intra-abdominal pressure affects respiratory variations in arterial pressure in normovolaemic and hypovolaemic mechanically ventilated healthy pigs. Intensive Care Med 2007, 33(1):163–171.
42.Jardin F, Genevray B, Brun-Ney D, Bourdarias JP: Influence of lung and chest wall compliances on transmission of airway pressure to the pleural space in critically ill patients. Chest 1985, 88(5):653–658.
43.Hedenstierna G, Larsson A: Influence of abdominal pressure on respiratory and abdominal organ function. Current opinion in critical care 2012, 18(1):80–85.
44.De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL: Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005, 31(4):517–523.
45.Pinsky MR: Targets for resuscitation from shock. Minerva Anestesiol 2003, 69(4):237–244.
46.Correa TD, Vuda M, Takala J, Djafarzadeh S, Silva E, Jakob SM: Increasing mean arterial blood pressure in sepsis: effects on fluid balance, vasopressor load and renal function. Crit Care 2013, 17(1):R21.
47.Monge Garcia MI, Gil Cano A, Gracia Romero M: Dynamic arterial elastance to predict arterial pressure response to volume loading in preload-dependent patients. Crit Care 2011, 15(1):R15.
48.Lee HC, Jung CW: Vital Recorder-a free research tool for automatic recording of high-resolution time-synchronised physiological data from multiple anaesthesia devices. Sci Rep 2018, 8(1):1527.