1. Bakhsheshian J, Mehta VA, Liu JC: Current Diagnosis and Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Global spine journal 2017, 7(6):572–586.
2. Lau D, Winkler EA, Than KD, Chou D, Mummaneni PV: Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with posterior spinal fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: influence of cervical alignment on outcomes. Journal of neurosurgery Spine 2017, 27(5):508–517.
3. Mastronardi L, Elsawaf A, Roperto R, Bozzao A, Caroli M, Ferrante M, Ferrante L: Prognostic relevance of the postoperative evolution of intramedullary spinal cord changes in signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging after anterior decompression for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 2007, 7(6):615–622.
4. Cao JM, Zhang JT, Yang DL, Yang YP, Xia HH, Yang L: Imaging Factors that Distinguish Between Patients with Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy with Mild to Moderate Cervical Spinal Cord Compression. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research 2017, 23:4901–4908.
5. Suri A, Chabbra RP, Mehta VS, Gaikwad S, Pandey RM: Effect of intramedullary signal changes on the surgical outcome of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. The spine journal 2003, 3(1):33–45.
6. Pepke W, Almansour H, Richter M, Akbar M: Spondylotic cervical myelopathy : Indication of surgical treatment. Der Orthopade 2018, 47(6):474–482.
7. Matsumoto M, Chiba K, Toyama Y: Surgical treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and its outcomes: posterior surgery by laminoplasty. Spine 2012, 37(5):E303-308.
8. Phan K, Scherman DB, Xu J, Leung V, Virk S, Mobbs RJ: Laminectomy and fusion vs laminoplasty for multi-level cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 2017, 26(1):94–103.
9. Montano N, Ricciardi L, Olivi A: Comparison of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion versus Laminoplasty in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes. World Neurosurg 2019, 130:530–536.e532.
10. Fujiyoshi T, Yamazaki M, Kawabe J, Endo T, Furuya T, Koda M, Okawa A, Takahashi K, Konishi H: A new concept for making decisions regarding the surgical approach for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: the K-line. Spine 2008, 33(26):E990-993.
11. Scheer JK, Tang JA, Smith JS, Acosta FL, Jr., Protopsaltis TS, Blondel B, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Deviren V, Lafage V et al: Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review. J Neurosurg Spine 2013, 19(2):141–159.
12. Wang T, Wang H, Liu S, Ding W-Y: Incidence of C5 nerve root palsy after cervical surgery: A meta-analysis for last decade. Medicine 2017, 96(45):e8560-e8560.
13. Wang T, Tian X-M, Liu S-K, Wang H, Zhang Y-Z, Ding W-Y: Prevalence of complications after surgery in treatment for cervical compressive myelopathy: A meta-analysis for last decade. Medicine 2017, 96(12):e6421-e6421.
14. Blizzard DJ, Caputo AM, Sheets CZ, Klement MR, Michael KW, Isaacs RE, Brown CR: Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for the treatment of spondylotic cervical myelopathy: short-term follow-up. Eur Spine J 2017, 26(1):85–93.
15. Takahashi M, Sakamoto Y, Miyawaki M, Bussaka H: Increased MR signal intensity secondary to chronic cervical cord compression. Neuroradiology 1987, 29(6):550–556.
16. Matsumoto M, Toyama Y, Ishikawa M, Chiba K, Suzuki N, Fujimura Y: Increased signal intensity of the spinal cord on magnetic resonance images in cervical compressive myelopathy. Does it predict the outcome of conservative treatment? Spine 2000, 25(6):677–682.
17. Okada Y, Ikata T, Yamada H, Sakamoto R, Katoh S: Magnetic resonance imaging study on the results of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine 1993, 18(14):2024–2029.
18. Ramanauskas WL, Wilner HI, Metes JJ, Lazo A, Kelly JK: MR imaging of compressive myelomalacia. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1989, 13(3):399–404.
19. Ohshio I, Hatayama A, Kaneda K, Takahara M, Nagashima K: Correlation between histopathologic features and magnetic resonance images of spinal cord lesions. Spine 1993, 18(9):1140–1149.
20. Lin X, Cai J, Qin C, Yang Q, Xiao Z: Comparison of clinical outcomes and safety between laminectomy with instrumented fusion versus laminoplasty for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Medicine 2019, 98(8):e14651-e14651.
21. Bartels RH, van Tulder MW, Moojen WA, Arts MP, Peul WC: Laminoplasty and laminectomy for cervical sponydylotic myelopathy: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 2015, 24 Suppl 2:160–167.
22. Tetreault LA, Karpova A, Fehlings MG: Predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: results of a systematic review. Eur Spine J 2015, 24 Suppl 2:236–251.
23. Tetreault L, Kopjar B, Cote P, Arnold P, Fehlings MG: A Clinical Prediction Rule for Functional Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Analysis of an International Prospective Multicenter Data Set of 757 Subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015, 97(24):2038–2046.
24. Fargen KM, Cox JB, Hoh DJ: Does ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament progress after laminoplasty? Radiographic and clinical evidence of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament lesion growth and the risk factors for late neurologic deterioration. J Neurosurg Spine 2012, 17(6):512–524.
25. Iwasaki M, Kawaguchi Y, Kimura T, Yonenobu K: Long-term results of expansive laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: more than 10 years follow up. J Neurosurg 2002, 96(2 Suppl):180–189.
26. Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Ishii K, Takaishi H, Nakamura M, Maruiwa H, Matsumoto M, Toyama Y: Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy–average 14-year follow-up study. Spine 2006, 31(26):2998–3005.
27. Lao L, Zhong G, Li X, Qian L, Liu Z: Laminoplasty versus laminectomy for multi-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review of the literature. J Orthop Surg Res 2013, 8:45.
28. Fehlings MG, Santaguida C, Tetreault L, Arnold P, Barbagallo G, Defino H, Kale S, Zhou Q, Yoon TS, Kopjar B: Laminectomy and fusion versus laminoplasty for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: results from the AOSpine North America and International prospective multicenter studies. The spine journal 2017, 17(1):102–108.
29. Henderson FC, Geddes JF, Vaccaro AR, Woodard E, Berry KJ, Benzel EC: Stretch-associated injury in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: new concept and review. Neurosurgery 2005, 56(5):1101–1113; discussion 1101–1113.
30. Yagi M, Ninomiya K, Kihara M, Horiuchi Y: Long-term surgical outcome and risk factors in patients with cervical myelopathy and a change in signal intensity of intramedullary spinal cord on Magnetic Resonance imaging. J Neurosurg Spine 2010, 12(1):59–65.
31. Rhee JM, Register B, Hamasaki T, Franklin B: Plate-only open door laminoplasty maintains stable spinal canal expansion with high rates of hinge union and no plate failures. Spine 2011, 36(1):9–14.
32. Tani S, Suetsua F, Mizuno J, Uchikado H, Nagashima H, Akiyama M, Isoshima A, Ohashi H, Hirano Y, Abe T: New titanium spacer for cervical laminoplasty: initial clinical experience. Technical note. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2010, 50(12):1132–1136.
33. Edwards CC, 2nd, Heller JG, Murakami H: Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis. Spine 2002, 27(11):1168–1175.
34. Park AE, Heller JG: Cervical laminoplasty: use of a novel titanium plate to maintain canal expansion–surgical technique. Journal of spinal disorders & techniques 2004, 17(4):265–271.
35. Pan F-M, Wang S-J, Ma B, Wu D-S: C5 nerve root palsy after posterior cervical spine surgery. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2017, 25(1):2309499016684502–2309499016684502.
36. Li FH, Qiao HH, Yang YC, Du JP, Jin XS, Wang B: Incidence and Outcomes of C5 Palsy and Axial Pain After Open-Door Laminoplasty or Laminectomy and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 2019, 128:e1002-e1009.