Agriculture, a pivotal development in our prehistoric biocultural trajectory, spread from the Near East and north-western Anatolia, reaching the Carpathian Basin around the end of the 7th millennium BCE1. Located centrally and comprising the majority of this large basin, the Great Hungarian Plain (GHP) forms a lowland confluence connecting the Balkans, Pontic Steppe, and Central Europe2,3. The GHP acted as a geographic funnel for population movement whereby new people and their ideas and ways of life, including subsistence strategies, entered Europe from the east and south; as such, it functioned as a region of major cultural and technological transition throughout prehistory4,5. It is thus a crucial region for identifying and investigating dietary trends between prehistoric time periods and cultures. Here we report on stable carbon and nitrogen isotope values from 75 individuals from twenty sites in the GHP (Fig. 1) dating to a ~ 3000-year transect between the Early Bronze and Early Iron Ages (Table 1) to ascertain dietary associations with cultural transitions, not only between the Bronze and Iron Ages, but also within these periods and their cultures.
Stable Isotopes
The application of isotopes to prehistoric dietary analyses is complex as many factors affect the values obtained from samples6,7,8,9,10. In brief, organisms incorporate carbon and nitrogen from diet material. For carbon, most plants fall under one of two categories (C3 and C4) based on their photosynthetic pathway, which makes it possible to distinguish general plant groups. C3 plants, which include temperate grasses and domesticated cereals from terrestrial ecosystems, exhibit carbon isotope values (13C/12C ratio or δ13C) from − 38 parts per mil (‰) to -22‰, with a mean of -26.5‰11,12,13. C4 plants, such as maize, sorghum, and millet, exhibit higher δ13C values, ranging between − 21‰ and − 9‰, with a mean of -12.5‰11, 14, 15. Dietary nitrogen (15N/14N ratio or δ15N) is incorporated via protein at a stepwise factor of about + 3‰ to 5‰16,17,18. Plants in some terrestrial ecosystems can range between − 15‰ to -10‰19; however, aquatic resources—including freshwater—can exhibit comparatively 15N-enriched values due to the relative complexity of the foodweb20,21. Moreover, both nitrogen and carbon isotope values are affected by climate22,23,24, soil conditions25,26, elevation27, water stress28,29, health of the individual30,31,32, and breastfeeding9. Lastly, milk consumption, not unlike breastfeeding, augments δ15N values much like that seen in other dietary trophic level increases33.
Cultural and dietary context
Animal husbandry, primarily of cattle, was the predominant subsistence practice during the Middle Copper Age of people migrating to the Carpathian Basin from the Eastern Steppe34,35,36. The contemporaneous cultures of the Late Copper Age, including the Baden, Vučedol, and Coţofeni, continued the tradition of animal husbandry and land cultivation36,37,38. A transformation from the ‘monolithic’ Baden culture to more varied and smaller regional Bronze Age communities was shaped either by internal developments or foreign influences, including population movement, of, for example, the Yamnaya, who arrived from the east during the Transitional Period (~ 2800-2,600 BCE)39,40,41. This was followed by the expansion of the Bell Beaker who migrated from the west (~ 2,500 BCE)37,42, and was accompanied by several independent cultures (e.g., Makó-Kosihy-Caka, Nagyrév, Somogyvár-Vinkovici), all practicing intensive cereal cultivation and animal husbandry43. However, only small groups settled along Danube River routes39,40,41.
The transition from the Early Bronze to Middle Bronze Age is marked by the development of the more sedentary Hatvan, Otomani/Ottomány, and Füzesabony cultures, all of whom occupied tells37,40,42,44,45,46. These groups and others coexisted for centuries, although not necessarily peacefully, until the end of the Middle Bronze Age38,47. The Füzesabony were partly contemporaneous with and subsequent to the Hatvan, with no indications that upon their arrival they usurped the former culture46. The Otomani-Füzesabony is associated with increased socio-political and metallurgical complexity in the Carpathian Basin, as evidenced by tell sites, communal cemeteries, and advanced trade networks48. By this point the plow had been introduced49, with communities cultivating cereals like wheat and barley, vegetables and fruits, and likely fodder crops to feed cattle, pig, goat, sheep, and horses37,50.
Although there was profound cultural diversification during the Early Bronze and Middle Bronze Ages, by the Late Bronze Age cultures appear to homogenize over large geographic regions, much like that which occurred between the Late Neolithic and Early Copper Age, as manifested in the reduction of local cultural expression. The emergence of several cultures, including the Piliny/Kyjatice in the northern mountain range, and Gáva east of the Tisza, likely resulted from interregional contacts between groups occupying different ecological zones, resulting in increased trade and information flow51. This is further supported by the spread and increased cultivation of millet52,53.
Late Bronze Age villages were seemingly abandoned, and new traditions and material culture appeared in the eastern parts of the Carpathian Basin at the beginning of the Iron Age (~ 900/800 BCE), namely on the central and southern part of the GHP, in the Northern Mountain Range, and in Transylvania. The Early Iron Age of the GHP is largely underrepresented in the archaeological record, perhaps because the cultures of this period, in particular the pre-Scythian (Mezőcsát), who mainly occupied the central and northern parts of the GHP54,55, were nomadic stockbreeders of gregarious animals (e.g., cattle, sheep, horse) unlike their more sedentary predecessors54,56. The Scythian (Vekerzug in the GHP) culture subsequently emerged and continued into the Middle Iron Age. Excavations of Vekerzug settlements indicate that agriculture and animal husbandry were practised along with highly developed iron metallurgy and ceramic manufacture54,57. Various other Middle Iron Age cultures occupied this region until the end of the 5th century BCE, when the Celts began their conquests and interrupted development of local cultures, not just in the Tisza region, but throughout the Carpathian Basin54,58.
Table 1
Summary of the prehistoric time periods and their associated cultures and subsistence practices in the GHP.
Adapted from Gamarra et al. (2018).
Time Period | Date Range | Associated Sampled Cultures | Subsistence Practices |
Early Bronze Age | 2,600 to 2,000/1,900 BCE | Nyírség, Proto-Nagyrév, Bell Beaker, Hatvan | Intensive crop cultivation (barley, wheat, legumes) and animal husbandry |
Middle Bronze Age | 2,000/1,900 to 1,450/1,400 BCE | Füzesabony, Otomani/Ottomány | Intensive crop cultivation (barley, einkorn, emmer, legumes, rye, legumes) and animal husbandry |
Late Bronze Age | 1,450/1,400 to 800/ 900 BCE | Piliny/Kyjatice, pre-Gáva, Gáva | Intensive crop cultivation (einkorn, emmer, barley, legumes); common millet as staple crop |
Early Iron Age | 800/900 to 650 BCE | Pre-Scythian (Mezőcsát), Scythian (Vekerzug) | Pastoral/semi- nomadism/transhuman pastoralism; stockbreeding; crop cultivation |
Middle Iron Age | 650 to 450 BCE | Scythian (Vekerzug) | Pastoral/semi-nomadism/transhuman pastoralism; stockbreeding; crop cultivation |
Previous archaeochemistry of the Great Hungarian Plain
To assess links between diet and cultural shifts on the GHP, stable isotope and ancient DNA (aDNA) research has been conducted on samples from the Neolithic through Iron Age43,59,60,61,62. Previous carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analyses of human and faunal osteological samples from this region have focused primarily on Neolithic and Copper Age populations, reporting a shift in subsistence strategies during the Late Neolithic and Copper Age towards increased consumption of animal protein compared to the previous subperiods59,63,64,65,66. Gamba et al.60 analysed the genomes of thirteen GHP individuals dating to between the Early Neolithic and Early Iron Age; the Bronze and Iron Age samples provided evidence for genomic turnover that contrasted the genetic continuity observed during the Neolithic and Copper Age. Allentoft et al.’s43 study of Eurasian genomes reported dynamic migrations during the Bronze Age, as well as the rise of the allele that confers the lactase gene, while de Barros Damgaard et al.67 found that Scythian groups were genetically comprised of Late Bronze Age herders, farmers, and hunter-gatherers. Comparing carbon and nitrogen isotopic values with aDNA results from GHP samples, Gamarra et al.59 found no associations between dietary, cultural, and genetic shifts from the Early Neolithic to Iron Age; however, Bronze and Iron Age individuals exhibited a diet higher in C4 plants typical of agriculture compared to those from the Neolithic and Copper Age.
Genetic turnover and technological shifts between the Copper and Iron Ages were thus non-linear, influencing the dietary strategies of numerous distinct cultures that intermixed and overlapped through time. Owing to the complexities of these prehistoric cultural and demographic processes, the present study thus aims to improve our understanding of diachronic and culture-specific dietary signatures as revealed by the archaeology and stable isotopes, both between and within chronological periods and cultures. To accomplish this aim we analyze stable carbon and nitrogen isotope values from 75 individuals dating to between the Early Bronze and Early Iron Ages (Fig. 1). Specifically, we ask the following questions: 1) Can nuanced diet changes across millennia be detected? 2) If changes are detected, what do they imply regarding prehistoric trans-Carpathian communication and trade?